ARCHEOLOGICAL STRATEGY IN THE
INVESTIGATION OF AN UNKNOWN ERA:
SIXTEENTH CENTURY ST. AUGUSTINE
Kathleen Deagan
Florida State University
January, 1978
Project report submitted to the St. Augustine
Restoration Foundation, Inc. St. Augustine, Florida
1978
2504
INTRODUCTION
Over the past decade, the state of knowledge about the
Spanish colonial system in the Southeast has grown from an
incomplete descriptive base of historical facts and random
artifact categories, to an emerging picture of the cultural,
social and ecological adaptations of the Spaniards in Florida.
This depiction, however, has been largely synchronic, and is
restricted to town life in St. Augustine during the 18th
century, and to a lesser extent, the Florida mission system
of the 17th century (see bibliography). No diachronic study
of this Spanish colonial adaptive system has been possible,
due to the fact that no archeological studies of the earliest
period of Spanish occupation have taken place. In addition
to this, no descriptive base for the material culture of the
period has been available, which could provide a starting
point for processual studies. Although certain artifact
categories are known, largely through research in the Carib-
bean (Goggin 1968:1970; Council 1975; Willis 1976; Lister and
Lister 1976; Fairbanks 1972), no material culture complex or
adaptive system has been defined for 16th century Florida.
St. Augustine Florida *
FIGURE I
Location of Test Area
M TEST AREA
* After Puente (.764)
FLORIDA
2
For these reasons, and prompted by the public in-
terpretation programs of the St. Augustine Restoration
Foundation, Inc., a long-term research project concentrat-
ing on 16th century archeological data was initiated in
1976. This work is being carried out jointly by the Flo-
rida State University Anthropology Department, and the St.
Augustine Restoration Foundation, Inc., with consultation
by the Historic St. Augustine Preservation Board. The
overall research project, coordinated by the Foundation,
is the.joint effort of historians Paul Hoffman (Louisiana
State University); Eugene Lyon. (St. Augustine Restoration
Foundation, Inc.); Albert Manucy (National Park Service,
ret.); architect Herschel Shephard (Fisher and Shephard,
Inc., Jacksonville, Fla.); cultural anthropologist Frank
Aguilera (Boston University) and archeologist Kathleen
Deagan (Florida State University). The purpose of this
report is to document the 1977 archeological research re-
sults, and will contain only that historical, architec-
tural and anthropological data directly relevant to the
archeological research.
Since virtually nothing was known of the 16th
century St. Augustine at the outset of the project, the
first (1976) season was oriented toward locating and de-
lineating the site of the 16th century settlement. Work
3
by project historians indicated that the settlement was
within a 9-block area to the south of the present Plaza
(see Fig. 1). To test this hypothesis, a sub-surface
survey of the south half of the town was conducted, using
a mechanical soil auger to drill holes at set intervals
throughout the survey area. The results of this work,
reported in Deagan, Bostwick and Benton (1976) indicated
a strong clustering of 16th century material within an
area bounded by present day Artillery Lane, St. George
Street, Bridge Street and Marine Street in St. Augustine
(Fig. 2). This work supported the historians' hypothesis,
and provided a good indication.of the actual 16th century
town's location.
The 1977 season, discussed in this report, was
designed to further refine the settlement information,
and to test certain key sites within the survey area.
The project was carried out between April 1, 1977, and
September 1, 1977, under the direction of the author.
Field work and analysis were conducted by a two-person
team, under the supervision of Dale Benton (Florida State
University).
The primary goals of the project were:
1. To further confirm and/or refine the 16th century
settlement location.
SA 34 1
I SA 34 3 /
I -Aviles St. I...
SA 19 2
Block 23
Figure 2
Location of Tests o 25
N -
2. To test the area for features and other depositions
dating to the 16th century in order to gauge the
extent of actual occupation rather than simple
deposition.
3. To recover material from 16th century contexts
so that a preliminary definition of a 16th century
(archeological) material complex might be deve-
loped. "Archeological" is specified here since
project historians have produced a very extensive
list of material items, both perishable and pre-
servable, from personal property inventories of
colony officials, probate lists, ship registries,
royal supply lists and royal inventories. Since
many of these items are listed in general terms,
it was hoped that the project would specify these
items, and also to compare these known items (which
are admittedly skewed toward the upper economic
element in the colony) to material surviving in the
ground.
4. To locate one or more 16th century structures for
evidence of architectural design and materials,
as well as lot element information.
It should be noted that these project goals are
wholly descriptive in nature rather than attempting to
6
be explanatory. Processual investigation of the 16th
century cultural system through hypothesis testing cannot
properly be carried out until the nature and distribution
of 16th century features and material culture is under-
stood. This stage of the project is intended to begin
providing such a data base.
Historical and Cultural Setting
(Partially taken from Deagan, Bostwick and Benton 1976:5-6)
St. Augustine was founded in 1565 as a Spanish
military outpost, functioning as a buffer to other Euro-
pean powers in North America, as well as a defense and
relief station for the Spanish treasure fleet and its
frequent wreck victims.
The earliest site of European occupation in St.
Augustine was the Timucuan Indian village of the chief
Seloy, who offered the village's communal structure to
Pedro Menendez as a fortification and headquarters (Manucy
1962:14). The site of Seloy's village is believed to lie
approximately 3/4 mile north of the present site of the
Castillo de San Marcos (Merritt 1977) in the vicinity of
the Fountain of Youth Park. For eight months the infant
colony was sustained at Seloy's village, until it was re-
located to an island at the entrance to the harbor (or
possibly to Anastasia Island), where the second and third
forts were constructed (Arnade 1959:16; Chatelaine 1941:43).
Due to erosion and to the need for a stronger defensive
position, the town and the fort were again relocated in
1572 to their approximate present locations.
The new settlement was plagued by Indian attack,
and in 1586 by the sacking and burning of the English
pirate, Sir Francis Drake. A map accompanying the account
of Drake's expedition shows nine formally laid out blocks
near the bay, some distance to the south of the fort.
These blocks are believed to have been within the area
tested in this project, and was apparently the primary
area of town settlement until sometime near the middle
of the 17th century (see Deagan, Bostwick and Benton 1976).
Following Drake's raid, the town was rebuilt,
largely of board and thatch (Manucy 1962:14-18), only to
be devastated throughout the remainder of the 16th cen-
tury by hurricanes, fire and flood. By 1600 there were
more than 120 houses and 625 people in St. Augustine, in-
cluding Spaniards, Indians and Negroes (Arnade 1959:8-9).
This figure remained fairly stable until late in the 17th
century, for in 1683, there were only 100 families in the
town, with about 600 people (Dunkle 1958:6). It seems
reasonable to assume that the town area itself did not
expand greatly, and probably not much outside of the original
9
area during this time, particularly since the number of
families (and therefore dwelling places) did not increase.
Population composition and socio-economic condi-
tions in 16th century St. Augustine are poorly known.
Although Menendez left Spain with some 2,000 people (in-
cluding soldiers and colonists) more than 1,000 died or
deserted before the establishment of the colony. This de-
sertion, in addition to the military expeditions against
the French, resulted in a male population of only about
70 men in the 1560's in St. Augustine (Dunkle 1958:4).
In 1569, 80 men and 14 women were brought to the colony,
and probably included, in addition to soldiers; farmers,
tanners, tailors, carpenters, shoemakers, locksmiths,
blacksmiths, silversmiths, tavern keepers, fishermen and
priests ibidd; Manucy 1977 ms). By 1578 it was reported
that of the 186 men in the colony, 157 were soldiers,
27 were seamen and two were "Frenchmen" (Dunkle 1958:4).
It seems likely that intermarriage between Indian women
and Spanish men was fairly frequent (see Deagan 1974b),
which would have done much toward establishing exchange
and mutual incorporation of Spanish and Indian elements
into the life of the town.
By the turn of the 17th century there were 650
colonists, including 250 men in the garrison. Fifty-seven
9
of these were married, with a total of 103 children
(Dunkle 1958:4). More than 120 houses were present, made
of wood and thatch. The streets were of mud, in which
animals frequently roamed, and each family was reported
to have had four to 10 cows. A palmetto thatch church
was present during the 16th century, as well as a hospital
during the latter years of the century. Prior to 1597,
no mill was present in the colony, and the inhabitants
(presumably female) were reported to have suffered much
in grinding corn by hand (Arnade 1959:9).
Anthropological and historical research has sug-
gested certain .factors with which the inhabitants of early
St. Augustine probably identified, and which may have
formed the structure of social organization in the com-
munity (Manucy 1977 ms). These include affiliation with
military life and service; the role of the Catholic Church
and the statuses and obligations of church membership;
loyalties to one's place of origin in Spain as noted in
early conflicts between people from different provinces;
and the identification with local civil and legal insti-
tutions, which seem to have provided a balance to the
Royal governing structure. These aspects of community
life, along with the continuing need for adaptation to the
Florida environment and its native inhabitants; provides
a beginning from which hypotheses about the colonial sys-
tem might ultimately be derived, and which may eventually
be tested using the data base developed in this stage of
the project.
The Excavation Project
During the course of fieldwork, six sites within
the suspected area of 16th century occupation were tested
(Fig. 2). The sites were selected according to the fol-
lowing factors, listed by priority:
1. Distribution in the center and along the periphery
of the suspected town location.
2. Presence of 16th century material, as indicated
by the 1976 season tests.
3. Availability of open ground to excavate.
4. Cooperation and permission of landowners.
Since the test area is a commercial and residen-
tial urban area, severe limitations were placed on site
selection by the existence of paving and standing struc-
tures, as well as by the reluctance of commercial land-
owners to allow parking lot and sidewalk removal on their
business properties.
The present status and a brief background of
each site is given below. The earliest historical docu-
mentation of site ownership is the 1763 Puente map and
|