|
H is? .
The present Florida State Turnpike Authaxlty cemeisting ct:
John M. Hammer Che.rmaa :anpa. Plorida
Raymond 8. Barnes vice Chairman Orlando, Florida
3anes T. nceill Secretary-Treasurer Port St. Joe, Plcrida
Rugh R. Bowling Member Jacksonville, florida
John H. lanai-ax: umber :. La'lderdale. Floric
was established in Jarzery 1961. Their first function was the re-study of
the Port Pierce to Jacksonville Extensicn of Prcject No. 1.
Early in the investigation it was apparent that the entire section
would not be feasible. It was then determine! :~ extend :h? present facil'}
as far as feasible. After much study and invwrtigasian i: was determined 9=
interchange with Interstate 75. near Wildwood. and there terminate Progett
HO. 2.
Fornsl contracts for the detailed preparezia: of plans and super-
vision of censtructian were signed in late April end early May. 196;, with
the following engineering 11:3. for .c Design Sections indicated:
Design Section 7 ~ 20.7 miles Radar and Assccietes
Design Section E c 18.8 miles W. K. Dasgrerty 2rd Associates
Design Section 9 22.2 miles Marion Brgineering Assac;stes, Inc.
and Fl50d. Wilscn and Assaczates
Design Section 10-32.2 miles at-on 1:5 Campeny
Design Beetle: ll-22.3 JiLes Bayrelds. Smith and Hills
These Design Sections extend between the Scrtherr Teraizus cf the Hie-i to
Port Pierce Section to s paint Vest of Crlsda. Formal cataracts were sigred
for the remaining Design Seetions an October 16, 1961. with the following
engineering firms for the Design Sections indicated:
Design Section 12-16.? miles Weilmsn-Lcrd nngLneering. Inc.
Design Sectien 13-14.! miles John A. Grant, :r., Inc.
Design Section l4-l4.0 miles Hellman-Lord Engineering. Inc.
lane of the previously prepared pleas were usable. due to changes in road-
way design features. nev development along the previously established
alignment, and policy determinations, dictated by problems of right of way
resulting in relocaticns of the Parkway. '
Actual design of the project under the present Authority was starred
in March. 1961. In the interest of time, the Bectian xngineers agreed to
begin field surveys and design prior to :he sale cf bonds. This early start
on the final design permitted the award cf ccastrsctLOt contracts immediatel}
after the bonds were sold and made Posaiblt -uneideration of a program
contemplating opening of the Turnpike prim; t the January 1, l964 target
date. The amount by which this date can ue advanced will be sn05ect to more
accurate determination as actua construction work progresses.
The Turnpike Authority continued the firm of Howard. Needles, Tammen
and Bergendoif, Orlando. 33 General Consultant; on the project.
On October 16, 1961. the Turnpike Authority 3c.ected the ArchiteccuraJ
firm of mailman-Lord Engineering, Inc. for the design and field supervision of
Toll Stations. Service Areas and Maintenance Areas. with Sewerage and Water
Facilities design and field supervla-on to br ocne urder subcontract by the
angineerinq firm of A. z. O'Neall and ASBOCLatea. Inc.
To promote close cans¢ruc::cn control std to provide for improved
coordination, Design Sections were umvideo .nuo Construczion Contracts. Thus?
Contracts were awarded in complete packages incl;diaq grading. drainage.
bridges and paving. The design of successive contracts was scheduled to per
mit a smooth flow of design plans by the Section Engineers and to provide the
award and prosecution of the construction abstracts in a logical order.
A testing laboratory and Administration Office was estatlished in
Orlando near the Turnpike alignoeat. 1 field testirg is handled by the
Turnpike Authority Engineering Staff under the direction of Mr. H. E. Lewis.
Chief Engineer for the Authority. This work has progressed smoothly and
efficiently and handling of such teatinq by Acthority Forces has resulted in
close coordination of construction activities.
The preparation of right of way maps and deed descriptions for pro-
perties required for the construction of the Parkway was started in April,
1961. Appraisals of property were started immediately upo: sale of the bends
and right of entry has been obtained for most of the Parkway at this time.
Condemnation suits have been filed and are awaiting appropriate action by the
courts for award of right of entry in the few locations remaining.
Prosecution of the preparation of the right of way maps and deed
descriptions. appraisals and purchase schedule complemented the proposed
construction schedule. All right of way appraisals and acquisitions are
handled by the Right of Way Department of the Florida State Turnpike Authority
under the direction of Mr. T. M. Ervln. Director of Right of Way.
The early start of design on the project permitted the award of the
first construction contracts 19 days following the sale of bonds. A formal
ground breaking ceremony was held at Orlando on Deoeber 28. 1961.
The sale of Parkway bond: for the project was completed on December
20. 1961. The proceeds of the Bond Issue were $157,000,000. of this alount.
$67,142,621 was used to retire the bonds for Project No. l. The balance was
deposit-d in tho ConstrucLic: ?.r¢ i7Rg w..n u.n~r available funda.
During l96l uonsidorablc oozivity and interest was gunursted by the
present Authority in attempting to validate and 56;; the bonds for Project
No. 2.
In tho,£ina1 stages of plannirg the Bond Issue. several adviaurs
attempted to convince the Authority that $2 Million to $4 uiLlicn would he
neodad in addition to the ostinatcd $L57,C00,0?0 issue, Dazed upon their
conviction that additional accruals would be forthcoming, from various fund
sources. tho Authority agreed to hold the line. This position has been
prove: as noted below: .
1. Transfer of reserve funds frco Project 3). ;:
Batimouod $7.3L..33w: Actual: 36.QL.140 which
represent c not qoir of $702,340.
2. neinvootmont oi Roxatxo:tian ard Inuecoat Reserve
roads eatinatod: 52280,033: Actua; as of March 1,
1963: $2,778,884, which represents a no: gain of
$498,884. Additional gains arm anticipatod through
tho remaining 10 months anonotiag on approximataly
$520,000. which in considered conservativa. Tho
anticipated no: gain, than, aacunta to approximately
$1,020,000.
3. lltinotod Set Rovanuoo from Project No. 1 through
' 1962 and 1963: Butinlod by tCltfiC engineers:
$7,907,000: Eran-fora an of Moron l, 1963: $4.925.5l?.85.
iranltoru through 1962 (final 10 months} equaled $3,571,771.89.
At tho moat conservativc estimato. this ancunt should be
oqyalod through 1963 (final 10 uoncha). The indicatod Net
Rovenuol from Project so. 1 should equal not lOII than
$8,500,000, which roprosocts a no: gain of $593,000.
Tho total not gain of tho three item: noted above amountl to
approximately $2,315,000. Thin amount will be available for tho
Construction Fund. .
The decision to stand by Lho proposed $157.000.000 Bond Issue saved
the Authority conlidorable monies. lioco every $1 Million left at and of
construction would cost tho Authority approximately $125,000. The Authority'a
decision than, reflects a saving of from 8250.000 to $500,000 dependent upon
the amount suggested by the advisers.
Although tho band maxkat was not :hu moo: favorable at tho tin. the
Authority acted in loaning the bonds, are decision to go ahead was based
upon the best opinions of bankers and financial advisers. Hindsight indicates
more favorable rates could have been obtairad and the issue been delayed A
few months. A: the time tn: iua4u was ms, 'nucvor, tun mazkst van uncoxtiln
and the financial adv190:a were unobln to (0 cm!" nnw _-rg :nh existing
conditions would he in exioct.
Litigation had some etfuct on the ra' issue. in re: dulays occa~
aioned by haressing tactics caused a gnx+ra1 2:32 in rates to be in effect
when the issue was made. Although this tine vx! no: of tho significance of
the general lowerirg trend noted afLur :ne issrn. it ras teen estimated aunt
tactics cost the Authority apprcximdimly Li Ln:¢:::a.
During negotiaciaus for sale cf toads. it became quite evident that
substantial blocks woula not be purchased by the Large investors. Tho
Chairman and members of the Anthorzty personally pzrticipztod in the saligi-
tetion of buyers and wore Lufllential i! placing sevara; large blocks of tn:
bonds.
ITIROANIZA 2.301 .
The ovgenicatlcn {or constructiun a: bz~3ucz mm- 2 Lu: operation 0i
Project so. 1 is generally the uamo 49 that 5r: try: other (avenue band pr:
jec The following listing Lrirmtnu gernswl rcsgnrnlhilltics of each
funetiosory:
FLORIDA en's: mum AYnVECRSI'Y: Policy making gcvnr: 1.19 body. consisting
of 3 Chairman. Vice-Chairmen, Secretoryblreasurer, ard tut Hunters. one u:
which to e mother of the Stats Road Board. The Euaczlaue of Lhe Anchczlty are
primarily :houe of deteua ting pclicy, operating existing faciltiee. arper
Vining. in a broad lenpe. the design, planning lad construction, end issuing
the neceeeexy documents required :: obtain and dlebtrsu Elude.
GENERAL CONGULEENT: Required by tho quat Aggsenant to be a nationally
recognized firm of Consulting Engineers, exptriqnned in planning, consttuatlc
and.ednin1etration of toll facilities. The General Consultant repreeente the
Bond Holders as well as acting as Consultant for the Authority. A: a repre-
sentative of the Bond Solder, the General Consultant is expected to overeae
cunetruction, plane, administration and expenditure 0! all funds other than
discretionary funds. reocnuend to the Authority and Bond Rchezs as to in-
surance requirements. fund requirements, maintenance of existing facilities
and to report at certain specified period: so the Bond Holders concerning
progress of construction. fund ~xpenditurea, status of maintenance and recon-
mendeticne for improvements and/or maintenance controls. The Authority and
General Consultant, by the nature of their relationship, work closely to-
gether as a teen. Although primarily caneidezed as a representitive of the
Bond Holders, the General Consultant acts in an advisory capacity to tho
Authority. causidering the purpose: and eventual nine of the Authority and
the Bond Holders to be identical. The furn:lon of the General Consultant is
than, twofold. First, to represent the Band Bolders: second. to enniot and
advise the Turnpike Authori: .
TIAF'ZC 8'01828181 Bngw-xvd -y c;# ltdSl ~g 2.x.r: 1 Lb h hnLeduzlll cho-
gained (it! of Cont~lttnq Trerfi: ang;neers: .xpazzt;tcd an dvtexainetion cf
trelttc nave-ente. Qetlmnch it tacility usu:e. :atexmtnzttan at zevenuee
bee-d on experience 1n tha traffic field and able to eat In en edvieory
cepeclty to the Bend Scldor' ate Traffic Enginetee teletiun to the Band
Boldete end Authority 1- idettics; with the: of the Genetel Coueultent.
IICTIOI elozleles. Coneuetinq Htginaers expexxenced in :oedvey deetgn end
conetructtan euperviezon. genexelly cheetn frza lace: Caneclttnq VitII.
Theee Inqineere ere required to report to the Genexel Caaezltent concerning
progreee end expendituxce Vi:?1: the d:e£ COVnzed by thetr eervicee. 0.019:
eecttane very in length eccnrdan to latriiso local ccndittane. etc. late
of the Section Inqtnenre Ln dae:;1 and constraction eupervleicn 1- inepected
by ARIA lltlllll eoployod by the Gnitil Ccaeultent. Iheee Axoe lngtneeze
ere experienced in design ':1 ornatr-c:imc superuieiat end ere quallfied 31d
euthorltod to lake duCLliIE2 thms trtn palic; ascieiyne. on the ab.
Section Inqineere apply 24v gan': Supt£*-b.br ii the pznject t: eteuxe ta'-
etruction pxoc00db et a Z¢Pid take. ccaaiezcnt vltt (QJAIEDOCLI )2 the 51!
and epocilicaticne. The Section Enq;:uer is espetted tr renlo detailed
inepcctxcn end to certify as :c the wrthinee- ct tne prcjcct upct C0m9;06193.
".7138" ;!r:- NC: DISBURSBMZS:S
Expendituree are clearly defined LL the Trust Agreeaenz, Mbniee ere
budgeted eetly tor all major {tenet and every attempt in nede to live within
theee budgeted emanate. Recognizing the hazezds cf eetixeting expenditure
eevetel loathe eheea o! the actae; diabtraenente. the General Ceteeltent
added e eutticlent enoutt to the Casstructic: ?z:d Requireaente tc cover
contingent ttene. Such C:mtquent Funds are the usual practice in :11 pro-
jecte, uhethe: ee etstcd a: tit ttd cave: anch ttsme as zieee 1: c:net:tctian
coete. with correepandlrg rises 5: azterdanz (teas, 11Cteelod CCU: of 219%:
of way enqutettion. coat 9: living :Lscn which e:tect. Ln pert. e11 itene of
diebureelmt. In effect. ewerel item listed in the eocelled Caeetructiec
fund Require-ent- eze inzanible end subject to change due to fluctuations
1n conetructton eeete. Constructinn :oeze are dependent. to e large extent
upon the e-ount or vcrk availabla, degree of relateeeee a: the project.
conetructlon tile e:lcved, end ueny other uncertain tse-e.
In eccordence wtth the Trust agreeaent. the Authority rue: :equieiti,
Inch {nude en axe requzren to: cperatzcne; a: coaetIuetion dietereeleate fro
the fruet Otlicer. the-o requisitiose etipulete end etteet the monies ze-
queeted eze neceeeery tor cperetion cf the Aathctity'e bueizeee. One 0! the
functione o! the Generel Caneultant is to sign etch teqtleltxone prior to
diebureelent. the Trent Office: is unable to dzeburee tunde vtthout e reqtl
ettion eiqned by both the huthcrity end the General Ccneultent. Corettuctior
tequteittoue eze becked-up' by a Ecru letter, signed by the Rneident Attorney
for the Turnpike Authority. attesting to the legality, necee-lty and fornelity
of tho potuculo: puzchua {potltm taperst an Fuc'. tron c Raw-Wing
NM. which to (airbusood fro. the Construc'.:a rum! each mt}. Roquioltlono
for tho Involving rum! telmtlm: are "backed-up' by a Lu: :1 dubutooo
unto Iodo through tho carton: "oriad frat the (And. no ohm mock-up.
oto (or purpoooo cf mating out to assist. the executan put." to
dounlno 01o moat of tho :oqsaioitioc.
m goon-u pracodnro u the sane to tha'. followed 1:: tho algority 6.!
rovouuo progocco ond to blood ac salad Instr. av! {ma-acid princzploo
Ooaottny opooklcg tho fella-ulna ital. liocod 1.1 tho Cat-Junction
land loqulro-au, no can or loss beyond tho ntborlty'o control. 11-..qu
no coo:- un cancomod:
l. Ccutructian Conn
20 at m
3. moer (Booed 3x: emu-1c: Coca:
4. Gold. 01:40. Burch-Ange
l'o o loo-or tout. OIL-mucosa and Offlco hplpnont canto no not
undo: tho Authority'o anodloto cancml, duo L0 tho basic snot uctu-
otlono. moo who: {meta-tier.- alas affect it... . through 4 liotod
Ihcvo.
Tho gonorll procoduro, insofar as Administrotlvo. Logs; and Ilnnncili
Coot. Ito canootnod, hon boon to establish a working hudqoc, booed upon pout
oxpotlonco. Ibi- budgoc to proporod by the Authority Ind. on port ct 1:.
dutioo. opptovod by tho Gonocol Conoultanc. rho luthrcity :- allauod to
conduct lto buolnooo along tho lino. boot oul:od for its oporotlon, no long
no tho hudgocod olaunc to not Intozizlly excoodod.
ovum: I018
mung tho {loan you 1962, net rum (to. nojoct lo. 1 u.-
crooooa 14.10% on: tho u- potiod in 1961. During tho oo- poxlod optoth
oooto m 0.60! bola cooks in 1961. 'Iho following ccqotloono cloozly
doltno tho am in oponclono and monuu to: tho two you":
n 1961 1962
m m 1 5.7u.238 6.377.230
mun W 1.521.991 1.512.219
(cacti-nod)
Adnlantrattca a 14::er 181.84. {-2. 63142.335'
Accountzrq. Toll Audit 138.394 ( -J l'l:1.863
Adverttalng 84.672 (-24 9:3 65.764.
T311 Collection 385.l02 {f O.9%J388.9OO
Iogineering 5 Maintenaact 21.15: a/ l.91b¢29.566
Public Safety & Patrol 257 I70 {l18.8%J305.llO
Commuricatianl 48411 [/ 0.5%) 48.679
Purchaae Discount! 1752) (6983
1961 191:!
ll? RIVINUIE 4.262.247 3 4.865.0l9 I
XOGACICOI aarxed decrease frca Prevlcue Year
It should he acted that only 'Puhlir Safety and Patrol increaaed
appreciably during 1962. while a mtxked 59C:L9£ Le obvious Lr tVa (ram.
Adllniatratlcn and Legal" and Adveut15.nq
1 Does not inclgde interest on lovertnxtte
2 frenetara to reaerve fund: are not chew:
PROJICT BC. 2 CPNIAIISCI wzra ,RnIIC? KC. 1
Total construction coat; on Pttjcrt 8c. 1 were 540 £50,170 exclua1Ve
of marginal and feeder roade. This coete oncnrta to app:;ximetely $370,000
per mile of Parkway. Pro390t he. 2 c:netrac:.oc ccata are presently eethatea
at $58.72!.000 or approxlnately 8377 COO per mile, 1: anxeaet of none ;.9%
over Project lo. 1 coeta. Right of way toete fcr Project x.. 1 were
$7,850,746. or apprcateately $72.10C per el; fut :iqtt at wey apprtxinatety
300 feet wide. Right of way coats fer Pr'jec: Sn. 2 are preeently eetaazed
at 38,300.000 or a coat or $53,3cc per m;1e fr; z.qht of way 40C fee: wide [or
2/3 of the Project and 300 feet wide fer the reaairdez. Adalrlltretive and
Legal coate for Preject No. l totaled $414,529 ae of :uly l. 1956. the date of
the final lnginaerlng Report. fhia aum repreeeate the amount diahuraed during
construction and la chargeable to the Conettuctlon Fund. The current aeti-
nate of Adainiatrative and Legal coata {or Prcject So. 2 la $377,400, in aplte
of the fact theee coete cover a project nearly 44% longer than Preject So. I
and coating 46S not. than Project to. 1. me eatimted 3377.400. is ap
prouiletely 81.5% of the $41£.5:9 apent an the ease ltaa on Project lo. 1.
One of the prL-ary tea-one for the apparect ovar-rcna Ln varioue items
on Project lo. 2 1a the cloae ccuputatlcn of coat. by the Authority and 1t-
Ganaral Conaultant. 0n Project lo. 1 a total aurplua of nearly $11 Killian
waa noted. Uelng the rule of thumb eetabllehed at 3125.000 extra coet to the
Authority for each 31 Million aurplue. the coat to the Authority for euch a
eurplua on Progect Po. 2 would be $1.37S.000. tor thin raaaon all projected
ooeta were cloeely analyzed by the Anthorzty and General Consultant. and
ldniaa in aafficiant aaounta to cover all itene were provided for. Project
O
mgr
lo. 1 out. var. used as a guide and eh. manw I'd lmly pared. .11
an. it cp-tatinq wants.
also {moving tabla norr manly uptequ the counting: of cost
TOTAL COST!
nu "033C? KO. 1 "07301! In. 2
(rim; c'r-M (Latest 38%.. Cost)
m was! 106.8 141. 55.9 .u.
Construction 40,250.30 1 39,723,003
light of I17 7,850,746 6,300,000
ministration & Inga; 611,539 31.7 400 3
humanOffice Equip. 32, -th 279,000
1 nduive of marginal a fouhr roads
3 Lucinda. ran financing muu
POSTS 98% am
construction 371 000/ 5.7 7 ,. not}
light 0! Way 7:; LOCK 5.3 300/
Administration a houn 3.805% 3.165%
hintuauco-O'ico Iqutp. 5 640% 1 780/
PAGE 1
The presen-: F...:ri d.1 E -. :,:s 7..i rp-.k a ..! -3 -: ., e.:." -. a s. a.: c can M, Herret G.: -,--.: ~,=u'pa 31, car-i Rayniorad F .Mr-v:2. '~ic,: Chairm-Orlarde .F1 ,Eida amra n'. McNe i il Escre-t 1;y --la:a:: a:c P 'rt 5t .Far iria Hugh R.. Dculir.g ?WrJ-e eackscavala .F krida Jon E. M-mtar 4.-r:ta I"', .L-iadrsrd...1-.flerawas es-.0b'. ish+'d i-1 J-rary 2,%1. "heir !i ro. i~ur.ct 3:-er. was Ltcrm s e.xdy M the Fort Pierce to Jacksors-.. --JM-rales ->f la''jee-. h-3, i EMly ir. the irvest.Neix :.t was appa.:t:r.L tar. tae: '..ire ecctier nild not. bei feas i.ha. b. w.x r.is... dal:ez.-i! r e-: -. -ex'.r-c! E, -7-.2. --. i-m: -..! :Is fa" y fraIble .After' .,Tach d'.a 3:0 --:, r-, -gel -.-. :.ra .i -. We -lekwar.-d 2 :rttercherje with --,arsta-e: M ts-r Wil:rn:.d .:wl C:..m 1.crm[ m P-.c et u b, 2. FMT!ai CCr."2Elf.tS f-X C-se d"--i''iit E.rapace.-.I.-.5c-f 5 ; ene drid super-visier: of co:ger--.cti--r. we e s -.9vra a J --> Apr ..1 .r.d r =.r]; m. 1962. wita '.he foli;iwirig engi::ecrirg M:: n E.. -. ".te ms -.93 si:ct i .M i-d-..c-tid Dea tg:: Secti-ri ? -2'.: ."I ni s ies -10'10 y = -.., Am c m La Design sectin 6 18.R nille -W N. m.: ..1ty ed Ma e-ina Desigr Ser;tal 9 -22. 2 01:19 -MM.-::. E 311.-9:: Ir.g AEECI.LM ry. ard ?! M. W[a:e anci Mies -Fg -.is. 501'-5 ord Siin! Utese l'IE-E ..9.-1 Sec-..iars! exte:id F estw.e e t'--a y : ---. r i : : ::-i -13 -.5 -E t rio Mia[[-~t 4.<. fr-t""' Pier."L"r: ijin"'"gi.pn t C. i-: p. ~ ett. we'. ::-E~ |-+ i ---| F -r-all ::-a'..artill w+.;re g gl-e 1-M the renlair ig Dea-gl See-,im:s ->n Oct-la 20 .961 .wish thisfc thM-.rej engrieering firis fcr rlEl DeFig. NOCK lem ird .cJted, Des igu sec-.iz 12-M .7 :ni..-a -we iso-L<.:: d Drag mar:.rig .Irte Des:..pi sec-.-_r 13 -14.3 -ailes -.-ch-. It marit, "-r ., Inc Desi ign Sectir>r. 14-14 .3 ''illem -Wel lMr,-L :'rd E.gmeert ng .Inc NOr!e of the previat:S'iy prepated pill'ai were wahR dt.4 '.C charge 2.1-. Cadway design [6.51;29:5 c.uw deve Op:ta.:.rte along the pr e 3.;sily as -; -dj 2d =1ignmer.t .st! policy deory.nations, d-_ctateel by pr. elene of right cf way resultina in relocation of -20 Parkway. Act-.ial desigr of the prci:cet r.der the pi eser.t Auther ity was star-ma :r. Mirreb, 131. In t~:s intern t ef~ t:1,is t:M Rii.e.tier. agiran aged to begin finLd myeye -r.-si desagri pr t .4 t.--_he sa i e :-f I-andi.. This ear'.y etur. o the firal desur-i per:r.tte
PAGE 2
..... ... .A~ atL iEg:u-r .1:1M a giadfec tpeit
PAGE 3
3 $ Es: iriated 31:3.. Eave .962 ar.d 1%3.. Est. 47 907. 00'.: ; "r-1-la -. Tra-tuit ce! -.l.co:rfli i AC. the c'::t --:".serDJC]stait-.d L-tcott-jh 196 Re:syceuas fj;cio Prag SS. 50-],00'~:, mien i Tava Le '. -a '. I.e-. rpa ni apprclxis ti:j y 32, ~f.. 5 E CC-r.'Itr.11Cules' ~/.ij:II The da.isio to St.sri by I t.he Au--.hority orsid-rable miea cortstructim would cet die Anthoj decinian them riarlect'i a 5.s-----ng i the auloer.t suggested 1-y ef.e advis Althetgh i.he be>:nl inar.wt s Authority acced i.'i iseri:lg tM: Me uparthe best -;'pi:n -ar. -. -;-t to:1~h:n:3 menfavccable ra-_a.e siorje! 1 va Li
PAGE 4
Project Sc. I geT'r.c-;.ily 9-107.E.Tl141-0 A'ill) -:--f -u:Imir.:rgy: 7LCRIDA STAIB 'KOKPD:Ei A:"-l' r.i e Chaigary .vie e--Q -.Lei which is a niewher of La S paim ily thm of detet:;ni visi ng in a bred ae.p: the ra:cess ary acem:1erty to GI:grmAL COK51.-LTANT. Pegi:2 re:. sq-hized firm of Cr-re'.T and Mr:inistrati-nn of tc.~.1 MM He-ade cas wel1 as ac: y-riustive of the send :roid c..astr'.ictice., pla:ha.. -'driin discretionary bmas, n:--. isi orace gewirenersts. Air.d ar.d tra repm-i. at Mrlais: s progress of costrw:tiere :llendations for apownt Ganeras co.nlant, by tam gather as -:t twa Althc.ug BonrJ Heridece -;.he a:,A-i
PAGE 5
TRAFFIC NGINEARGr ... .. ...: -... 2 '. s, a u .,, m -taw Zim fc. l= J ratnn n sp a-gej -1-mk1ti traffic movempr ~ ~ .+rire: 1t di s:s....... ofreene
PAGE 6
... ......irpem;rrig6=.~esoyne.. 1.$ ""n, Mhc ,rAElre -'mtec s m --. a aea:m : uyt for~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~, 2h eovrgF-drlibrea.ar-T adp ~ s fdage-
PAGE 7
A. .""Z 3T 'l-I. .........4 6 : -a W.i l GATRIFT spit
PAGE 8
a~~~ ~~~~ 1.*U* 5i4 4t* fl nAI. '-T
|
