|
Citation |
- Permanent Link:
- https://original-ufdc.uflib.ufl.edu/UF00083588/00017
Material Information
- Title:
- Letter to Farris Bryant from Manning J. Dauer. ( 1959-09-22 )
- Series Title:
- Legislative Papers, 1950-1960. Reapportionment 1955-1959. (Farris Bryant Papers)
- Creator:
- Dauer, Manning J.
- Publication Date:
- 9/22/1959
- Language:
- English
Subjects
- Subjects / Keywords:
- Bryant, Farris, 1914- ( LCSH )
United States. Office of Emergency Planning. ( LCSH ) Florida. Board of Control. ( LCSH ) Florida Turnpike Authority. ( LCSH ) Florida. State Road Dept. ( LCSH ) Marjorie Harris Carr Cross Florida Greenway (Fla.) ( LCSH ) Politics and government -- 1951- -- Florida ( LCSH ) Bryant, Farris, 1914- -- Correspondence ( LCSH ) United States. Congress. Senate -- Elections, 1970 ( LCSH ) Segregation -- Florida -- St. Augustine ( LCSH ) Political campaigns -- Florida ( LCSH ) Elections -- Florida ( LCSH ) Governors -- Florida -- 20th century ( LCSH ) Counties ( JSTOR ) Political campaigns ( JSTOR ) Censuses ( JSTOR ) United States Senate ( JSTOR ) Political elections ( JSTOR ) Hum ( JSTOR ) Canes ( JSTOR ) Voting ( JSTOR ) Omens ( JSTOR ) Population control ( JSTOR ) Governors ( JSTOR )
- Spatial Coverage:
- North America -- United States of America -- Florida
Notes
- General Note:
- BOX: 14
Record Information
- Source Institution:
- University of Florida
- Holding Location:
- University of Florida
- Rights Management:
- All rights reserved by the copyright holder.
- Resource Identifier:
- UF80000325_0014_015_0002
|
Downloads |
This item has the following downloads:
|
Full Text |
UNIvznsrrv or FLORIDA
Como: or Am mo Season
Guuuvaux
Sept 22 1959
Duo-now or Hum I:va
Peabody m1
Dear Farris:
I noted in this nordng'e Fla Times-Mon that Doyle
Carlton has cane out for amt-oval of uergemy landmnt on
reopportiommt to be voted on statewide on Novanbor 3rd.
Frankly, I no for the amendment on basis at more remecntntiva
in House for big counties. But after reading pogee 11-15 in the
enclosed panplet I on going to vote tamer Adoption of the
moment. I nowbolieve pork-ch anon: owed to this mend-
nent for 2 rouone: (1) to get something down before results of
1960 Federal Omens show about 753 of F1: population in 10
largest counties (2) to mono into Constitution the provisions to:-
Senatorial Districts as outlined on pp. 11-15 of enclosed pamptact,
so small counties on FOREIE! control Saute apportiomant regardless
of population inmasee in populous counties.
I do not like the changes in tending of recent Constitutia:
regaining future apportionnent in Senate.
If you should agree with mom can make strong stand now to
oppose the walnut NOT on 6 new members for Senate and 8 new
nanbera for House BUT on changes in wording re: xture Senate
opportioment. I feel that you can get more support in populous counties
by oppooing onenmerrt that in being for some. Amman, I think not is time
vou should 'oosh-in" one m or the etha- beforo election on Nov. 3rd.
PAGE 1
n comt! out for r=7:roval of m:er -tirar.ent to be vo",rri on state-rdele -, 2. was ser the r.elmi-:gro. on "om::1 e ror hi.7 cotir.ties. But after relad d pa!!ptli.t I ac .gin: +.o vote A"AI -ot. ~~ ram belive oork-chop crord
|
|