![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loo ....
GBG Central Science GC Library OCT 25 1989 GULF COAST RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER IFAS. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA University of Florida 5007 60TH STREET EAST BRADENTON, FL 34203 Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1989-17 August 1989 TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS FOR SPRING 1989 T. K. Howe, J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters1 Eighteen fresh market tomato cultivars or breeding lines were evaluated in a replicated, harvested trial in the fall of 1988 at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Bradenton, FL. In addition, fifty-one breeding lines and cultivars were evaluated qualitatively (no harvest) in observational plots. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bed Preparation: Raised beds of EauGallie fine sand were formed on February 7, 1989. The 32-inch wide, 8-inch high beds were spaced on 5-ft centers with 6 beds between seepage irrigation ditches. Fertilizer included 15-0-30-2 (N-P205-K20-Mg0) at 240 lb/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB) distributed into 2 narrow bands in shallow grooves on the bed surface 10 inches to each side of the bed center and a full bed-width, incorporated application of superphosphate (0-20-0 with 80 Ibs per ton minor elements as F503) at 75 lb/1000 LFB. This fertilizer regime provided a 1:2 ratio of N:K20 with approximately 36 lb N per 1000 LFB. Beds were fumigated with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (67%:33%) at 36 lb/1000 LFB and mulched with white polyethylene film. One acre was equivalent to 8712 LFB. Transplant Production: Seed were sown on January 4, 1989 into wooden flats containing an inert processed product of spent coal, and lightly covered with coarse vermiculite. Seedlings were transferred 13 days later into planter flats (1.5 x 1.5 x 2.5-inch cells) containing vermiculite and Canadian peat (1:1, v:v) amended with superphosphate, dolomite and micronutrients. Crop Production: Transplants were set in the field February 27, 1989, spaced 28.5 inches apart in single rows in the center of each bed, and drenched with 20-20-20 liquid fertilizer at 5 lb/100 gal water. Four replications of 10 plants per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design for the harvested trial, and single 10-plant plots were used for the observational trial. Paraquat was applied to row middles for weed IBiological Administrator I, Associate Professor (Vegetable Breeder) and Center Director, respectively. control. Plants were later staked and tied without pruning. Weather information for the season which was compared to 33-yr averages is presented in Table 1. Plots were scouted for insect control throughout the season. Leafminer, sweet potato whitefly, armyworm and mites were the primary insects found. Methomyl, permethrin, oxamyl, endosulfan, avermectin, dicofol, esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis were applied on an "as needed" basis following label instructions. A regular spray program utilizing mancozeb and chlorothalonil was followed to control fungal diseases. Tribasic copper sulfate was added to mancozeb sprays to control bacterial spot when necessary. Fruit of the replicated trial entries (Table 2) were harvested at the mature-green stage (or beyond) on May 22, June 1 and June 7, 1989. Tomatoes were graded as cull or marketable in quality, and marketable fruit were sized by machine as: 6x7 (medium), 6x6 (large) and 5x6 (extra large) according to commercial standards (see Tables 3-6 for specifications). Both cull and marketable fruit were counted and weighed. Subjective ratings by the senior author were given to all tomato entries in the replicated and observational trials at the end of the season when red ripe fruit were on the vine (Table 5). Since replicated entries were harvested, additional non-harvested plots of replicated entries were planted specifically for late season appraisal. Ratings were given in various categories defining plant features, fruit quality and horticultural characteristics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Seasonal. Total marketable yields for the season ranged from 314.4 cartons/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB) for 'HMX 6596' to 397.2 cartons/1000 LFB for 'FTE 24' (Table 3). Only 'Bingo', 'Whirlaway', 'Olympic' and 'HMX 6596' were significantly lower in yield than 'FTE 24'. This yield range is comparable to the 1985 and 1986 spring variety trials at this location (4-5), and greater than for 1982-1984 and 1987-1988 (1-3, 6-7). Yield of extra large fruit for the season ranged from 126.8 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Whirlaway' to 244.4 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Bingo'. Six other entries were not significantly different than 'Bingo' in extra large fruit yield: 'PSR 9586', 'NVH 4459', 'Pacific', 'Solar Set', 'Olympic' and 'Duke'. Average fruit weight was greatest for 'Bingo' (7.3 oz) which was similar to only 'Olympic' (6.8 oz). Cull production ranged from 17.3% for 'IFAS 7209' to 28.5% for 'Duke'. Eleven entries had greater than 19% cull production. First Harvest (May 22, 1989): Earliness, as judged by total marketable yields obtained at the first harvest, were similar for ten entries (Table 4): 'Duke' (212.4 cartons/1000 LFB), 'Bingo' (202.2), 'Regency (192.9), 'NVH 4459' (183.6), 'Pacific' (181.8), 'FTE 24' (174.5), 'Solar Set' (172.7), 'Bonita' (163.4), 'IFAS 7209' (163.3) and 'Shamrock 600' (150.7). Total marketable early yields ranged from 102.2 cartons/1000 LFB to 212.4 cartons/1000 LFB. When earliness was considered for each entry as a percentage of seasonal marketable yield harvested on May 22, 'Duke' and 'Bingo' had more than 60% of their respective yields harvested at the first pick. 'Summer Flavor 6000', 'Centenario', 'HMX 6596', 'Sunny' and 'Sunre 984' produced less than 40% of their total yield at the first harvest. Extra large fruit yield ranged from 55.4 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Centenario' to 177.0 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Bingo'. Only 'Duke' and 'NVH 4459' were similar to 'Bingo' in extra large fruit yield at initial harvest. Average fruit weight was greatest for 'Bingo' (8.2 oz) which was similar to 'PSR 9586' (7.8 oz) and 'Olympic' (7.6 oz). Plant stands were only significantly lower than 100% for 'Olympic' (87.5%), 'Bingo' (82.5%) and 'Summer Flavor 6000' (80.0%). Cull production ranged from 11.9% for 'Sunre 984' to 23.6% for 'Duke'. Second Harvest (June 1, 1989): At the second harvest twelve entries were similar with respect to highest marketable yield for all fruit sizes (Table 5). Total yield ranged from 97.5 to 198.8 cartons/1000 LFB. There were no differences among any of the entries with respect to extra large fruit yield. Average fruit weight was greatest for 'PSR 9586' (6.9 oz) and 'Olympic' (6.9 oz) with 'Bingo' (6.4 oz), 'HMX 6596' (6.3 oz) and 'NVH 4459' (6.2 oz) not significantly different. With a few more plants lost between harvests, only 'Bingo' (82.5%) and 'Summer Flavor 6000' (80%) had significantly less than 100% plant stand. Third Harvest (June 2, 1989): No entry produced more than 26.8% of its yield at the third harvest (Table 6). Total yield ranged from 27.6 to 99.8 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Bingo' and 'Sunre 984', respectively. Three entries were not significantly different in greatest total yields: 'Sunre 984', 'HMX 6596' and 'PSR 9586'. 'HMX 6596' and 'Sunre 984'- were indicated as late cultivars at the first harvest (Table 4). Greatest extra large fruit yield was produced by 'PSR 9586', which was not significantly different from 'Sunre 984' or 'Sunny'. Average fruit size ranged from 4.5 oz for 'Centenario' to 5.5 oz for 'Sunny'. Only 'Centenario' was significantly smaller than 'Sunny' or 'PSR 9586'. By the last harvest only the 80% plant stand of 'Summer Flavor 6000' was significantly less than 100%. Horticultural Evaluations: All of the replicated and observational entries were given ratings for several horticultural characteristics (Table 7). These ratings were from plots of 10 plants each. They are intended only to provide general indications of the crop at a given location and time. Note: The information contained in this report is a summary of experimental results, and should not be used as recommendations for crop production. No discrimination is intended nor endorsement implied where trade names are used. 4 LITERATURE CITED 1. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1982. Hand harvest tomato variety trial results for spring 1982. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1982-15. 2. Ibid. 1983. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1983. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1983-20. 3. Ibid. 1984. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1984. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1984-10. 4. Ibid. 1985. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1985 at Bradenton, FL. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1985-21. 5. Ibid. 1986. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1986. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1986-16. 6. Ibid. 1987. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1987. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1987-20. 7. Ibid. 1988. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1988. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-20. 8. Stanley, C. D. 1988. Temperature and rainfall report for 1987. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-11. Acknowledgement: The authors wish to express their appreciation to the following companies for their financial aid in support of vegetable variety trials during 1988 and 1989: Asgrow Florida Co., Plant City, FL; Campbell Soup Co., Camden, NJ. Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at the GCREC during the spring of 1989z and the 33-year averagesY. Average Daily Temperature (OF) 1989 33-yr. avg Rainfall (in.) Month Max Min Max Min 1989 33-yr. avg. Feb 77 54 73 51 0.13 3.25 Mar 81 59 77 55 2.97 3.39 Apr 84 60 82 60 1.38 1.59 May 87 65 87 64 2.44 3.14 Jun 92 72 91 70 9.06 7.75 ZTrial transplanted Feb. 27, last harvest Jun. YRefer to Literature Cited, Stanley, C.D. 7, 1989. Table 2. Sources of tomato entries included in the spring 1989 replicated (harvested) trial. Entry Source Bingo Bonita Centenario Duke FTE 24 HMX 6596 IFAS 7209 NVH 4459 Olympic Pacific PSR 9586 Regency Shamrock 600 Solar Set Summer Flavor 6000 Sunny Sunre 984 Whirlaway Ferry-Morse Northrup King Neuman Petoseed Petoseed Harris Moran GCREC Northrup King Petoseed Asgrow Petoseed Harris Moran Shamrock GCREC/Asgrow Abbott & Cobb Asgrow Sunseeds Ferry-Morse ZGCREC = Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, Entrv--- - Bradenton, FL. Table 3. Seasonal yields and average fruit size of tomato spring of 1989 (three harvests). entries in the Marketable Yields (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Extra Large Large Medium Fruit Culls Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) Wt (oz) (%) FTE 24 397.2 aY 191.7 b-e 143.1 ab 62.5 b-d 5.9 d-f 19.3 d-g Pacific 385.8 ab 226.1 a-c 114.1 c-e 45.6 d-g 6.4 bc 24.2 a-d Solar Set 385.2 ab 225.5 a-c 113.8 c-e 45.9 d-g 6.4 bc 20.0 c-g IFAS 7209 385.1 ab 151.8 e-g 151.2 a 82.0 ab 5.6 ef 17.3 g NVH 4459 374.5 a-c 227.8 ab 107.2 c-e 39.5 e-h 6.5 bc 23.3 b-e Sunny 374.2 a-c 179.8 c-f 124.0 a-d 70.4 a-c 6.0 c-e 21.5 b-g Sunre 984 372.7 a-c 174.2 d-f 125.9 a-d 72.6 a-c 5.9 d-f 17.7 fg Regency 371.5 a-c 194.4 b-e 121.8 b-d 55.3 c-e 6.1 c-e 22.5 b-f Centenario 371.2 a-c 136.5 fg 146.0 ab 88.7 a 5.5 f 19.3 d-g Shamrock 600 367.5 a-c 156.6 e-f 132.7 a-c 78.2 ab 5.7 d-f 22.1 b-g Bonita 364.6 a-c 171.4 d-g 127.5 a-c 65.8 b-d 5.7 d-f 22.7 b-f Duke 344.7 a-c 212.0 a-d 98.6 d-f 33.5 f-h 6.2 cd 28.5 a Summer Flavor 600 335.7 a-c 161.3 e-g 120.5 b-e 53.9 c-f 5.8 d-f 19.7 c-g PSR 9586 332.0 a-c 231.7 ab 72.0 gh 28.3 gh 6.8 b 19.7 c-g Bingo 327.4 bc 244.4 a 60.8 h 22.2 h 7.3 a 23.0 b-e Whirlaway 323.8 bc 126.8 g 126.4 a-d 70.5 a-c 5.8 d-f 26.8 ab Olympic 318.4 c 217.7 a-d 74.4 f-h 26.3 gh 6.8 ab 18.7 e-g HMX 6596 314.4 c 175.6 d-f 93.8 e-g 45.0 d-g 6.1 c-e 24.8 a-c ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = linear feet 8712 LFB. Grading belt hole si; 2 26/32 inches diameter; large 18/32 inches diameter; cull = 2 zes: 6x6) 8/32 of bed with extra large = 2 26/32 d beds on (5x6) = diameter; inches diameter. 5 ft centers. Acre = (no belt) greater than medium (6x7) = 2 YMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level. ( > Table 4. Yields, fruit size and plant stand of tomato entries for the first harvest, May 22, 1989. Pro- portionY of Marketable Yield (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Plant Seasonal Extra Large Large Medium Fruit Culls Stand Yield Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) Wt (oz) (%) (%) (%) Duke 212.4 ax 152.8 ab 48.0 ab 11.6 a-c 6.6 e-i 23.6 a 97.5 ab 61.6 Bingo 202.2 ab 177.0 a 21.9 c-e 3.4 bc 8.2 a 15.4 bc 82.5 b 61.8 Regency 192.9 a-c 126.9 b-e 55.3 ab 10.7 a-c 6.7 d-i 17.7 a-c 92.5 ab 51.9 NVH 4459 183.6 a-d 144.4 a-c 35.2 b-e 3.9 bc 7.3 b-e 20.2 ab 92.5 ab 49.0 Pacific 181.8 a-d 134.2 b-d 39.3 a-e 8.3 a-c 7.1 b-g 19.6 ab 100.0 a 47.1 FTE 24 174.5 a-e 116.9 b-g 49.7 ab 7.9 a-c 6.5 e-i 13.6 bc 95.0 ab 43.9 Solar Set 172.7 a-e 122.6 b-f 34.7 b-e 15.3 a-c 7.5 b-d 17.6 a-c 92.5 ab 44.8 Bonita 163.4 a-f 104.3 c-h 47.4 ab 11.7 a-c 6.4 g-i 12.0 c 97.5 ab 44.8 IFAS 7209 163.3 a-f 84.0 e-i 60.1 a 19.1 a 6.0 i 15.2 bc 92.5 ab 42.4 Shamrock 600 150.7 a-f 84.8 e-i 48.8 ab 17.1 a-c 6.2 hi 17.1 a-c 95.0 ab 41.0 Sunny 143.6 b-f 91.4 d-i 34.3 b-e 18.0 ab 6.9 c-h 19.3 ab 90.0 ab 38.4 PSR 9586 143.3 b-f 123.9 b-e 15.8 e 3.6 bc 7.8 ab 16.6 a-c 92.5 ab 43.2 Olympic 139.9 b-f 119.0 b-g 18.0 de 3.0 c 7.6 a-c 14.7 bc 87.5 b 43.9 Whirlaway 135.4 c-f 70.0 hi 45.2 a-c 20.2 a 6.1 i 19.6 ab 92.5 ab 41.8 Summer Flavor 6000 121.3 d-f 78.8 f-i 33.2 b-e 9.3 a-c 6.5 f-i 14.0 bc 80.0 b 36.1 Centenario 111.3 ef 55.4 i 41.4 a-d 14.5 a-c 6.0 i 18.0 a-c 95.0 ab 30.0 HMX 6596 106.7 f 86.6 e-i 17.1 e 3.0 c 7.2 b-f 20.2 ab 92.5 ab 33.9- Sunre 984 102.2 f 76.3 g-i 22.3 c-e 3.6 bc 7.0 b-h 11.9 c 95.0 ab 27.4 zCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = Linear feet of bed with beds on 5 ft. centers. Acre = 8712 LFB. Grading Belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = 2 8/32 inches diameter. YBy weight. XMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 5. Yields, fruit size and plant stand of tomato entries for the second harvest, June 1, 1989. Pro- portionY of Marketable Yield (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Plant Seasonal Extra Large Large Medium Fruit Culls Stand Yield Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) Wt (oz) (%) (%) (%) Centenario 198.8 ax 75.9 a 78.6 a 44.3 a 5.6 cd 16.5 e 95.0 ab 53.6 FTE 24 176.6 ab 66.2 a 72.5 ab 37.9 a-c 5.6 cd 16.5 e 95.0 ab 44.5 Sunre 984 170.7 ab 75.7 a 60.2 a-c 34.8 a-c 5.8 b-d 19.7 c-e 95.0 ab 45.8 Sunny 166.5 a-c 73.4 a 61.7 a-c 31.3 a-d 5.7 cd 16.2 e 90.0 ab 44.5 Shamrock 600 163.0 a-d 62.4 a 61.6 a-c 39.1 ab 5.6 cd 19.6 c-e 92.5 ab 44.4 Solar Set 158.8 a-d 90.5 a 54.7 b-d 13.7 ef 6.0 b-d 18.3 de 92.5 ab 41.2 Bonita 158.0 a-d 60.4 a 60.8 a-c 36.8 a-c 5.3 d 25.3 a-d 97.5 ab 43.3 Summer Flavor 6000 157.3 a-d 71.1 a 60.4 a-c 25.8 cd 5.8 b-d 19.7 c-e 80.0 b 46.9 IFAS 7209 153.7 a-d 53.9 a 59.9 a-c 39.9 ab 5.6 cd 16.0 e 92.5 ab 39.9 Pacific 150.9 a-d 80.4 a 50.9 b-d 19.6 d-f 6.3 a-c 23.5 a-e 100.0 a 39.1 Whirlaway 145.4 a-d 51.8 a 61.2 a-c 32.4 a-c 5.9 b-d 29.1 a 92.5 ab 44.9 Regency 144.1 a-d 63.2 a 50.7 b-d 30.2 b-d 5.8 b-d 20.4 c-e 92.5 ab 38.8' NVH 4459 132.9 b-d 69.9 a 47.2 cd 15.8 ef 6.2 a-c 18.5 de 95.0 ab 35.5 Olympic 131.0 b-d 86.0 a 35.9 de 9.1 f 6.9 a 16.2 e 87.5 ab 41.1 HMX 6596 127.6 b-d 76.2 a 38.8 de 12.6 f 6.3 a-c 25.1 a-d 92.5 ab 40.6 PSR 9586 112.4 b-d 81.4 a 23.4 e 7.5 f 6.9 a 20.9 b-e 92.5 ab 33.9 Duke 100.9 cd 53.1 a 34.0 de 13.8 ef 5.9 b-d 28.4 ab 97.5 ab 29.3 Bingo 97.5 d 61.0 a 25.5 e 11.0 f 6.4 ab 27.1 a-c 82.5 b 29.8 ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = linear feet of bed with beds on 5 ft centers. hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter; cull = 2 8/32 inches Acre = 8712 LFB. Grading belt diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 diameter. YBy weight. XMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level. Table 6. Yields, fruit size and plant stand of tomato entries for the third harvest, June 7, 1989. Pro- portiopY of Marketable Yield (cartons/1000 LFB)Z Average Plant Seasonal Extra Large Large Medium Fruit Culls Stand Yield Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) Wt (oz) (%) (%) (%) Sunre 984 99.8 ax 22.2 ab 43.3 a 34.3 a 5.1 ab 19.3 g 95.0 ab 26.8 HMX 6596 80.1 ab 12.8 bc 37.9 ab 29.3 a-c 4.9 ab 30.2 d-f 92.5 ab 25.5 PSR 9586 76.4 a-c 26.4 a 32.8 a-c 17.2 de 5.4 a 24.9 fg 92.5 ab 23.0 IFAS 7209 68.1 b-d 13.9 bc 31.2 a-d 23.0 b-d 4.9 ab 25.6 fg .92.5 ab 17.7 Sunny 64.1 b-e 15.0 a-c 28.0 b-e 21.1 b-d 5.5 a 36.4 c-e 90.0 ab 17.1 Centenario 61.1 b-f 5.1 c 26.0 b-e 29.9 ab 4.5 b 31.0 d-f 95.0 ab 16.5 NVH 4459 58.0 b-g 13.5 bc 24.8 b-e 19.7 b-d 5.0 ab 38.9 b-e 92.5 ab 15.5 Summer Flavor 6000 57.1 b-g 11.4 bc 27.0 b-e 18.7 c-e 4.9 ab 29.6 ef 80.0 b 17.0 Shamrock 600 53.8 b-g 9.4 bc 22.3 c-e 22.1 b-d 4.8 ab 39.3 b-e 92.5 ab 14.6 Solar Set 53.7 b-g 12.5 bc 24.4 b-e 16.9 de 5.0 ab 30.2 ef 92.5 ab 13.9 Pacific 53.1 b-g 11.6 bc 23.9 b-e 17.6 de 5.1 ab 39.9 b-e 100.0 a 13.8 Olympic 47.4 c-g 12.7 bc 20.5 c-e 14.2 de 5.1 ab 34.3 d-f 87.5 ab 14.9 FTE 24 46.2 c-g 8.5 c 20.9 c-e 16.8 de 5.1 ab 41.6 b-d 95.0 ab 11.6 Bonita 43.3 d-g 6.7 c 19.3 c-e 17.3 de 4.8 ab 41.5 b-d 97.5 ab 11.9 Whirlaway 43.1 d-g 5.0 c 20.1 c-e 17.9 de 4.7 ab 37.0 c-e 92.5 ab 13.3 Regency 34.6 e-g 4.3 c 15.8 e 14.5 de 4.8 ab 47.5 a-c 90.0 ab 9.3 Duke 31.3 fg 6.6 c 16.6 de 8.1 e 4.9 ab 52.6 a 97.5 ab 9.1 Bingo 27.6 g 6.3 c 13.4 e 7.8 e 5.2 ab 49.2 ab 82.5 ab 8.4 ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = linear feet of bed with beds on 5 ft centers. Acre = 8712 LFB. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter; cull = 2 8/32 inches diameter. YBy weight. XMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level. [able 7. Horticultural ratings of fruit and plant characteristics for entries in the spring of 1989. NU) .- -- N 4-- ,- E S. 0 -. " 4. 4J C U4 4 C 4 ( -)4 - C) -3) CO .9 S4 U U ) aU 3C L l L-4 L/).. rE LA.. L-O,::3 O. S.. 0a 4--0 4- ..) 4) 0- M- 4j O S.. -ra U . C S- jE *- *- 3 )- M *2 a 4-) >! C. =- 0 00 M)fl Source/Entry0. LL-L. U- 2 L. -A co ,c ,co_ CD L) 0-Comments q/ m 3.5 gb jo 2.5 2.5 2 3 Summer Flavor 5000 m-t 2 gb jo 3 Summer Flavor 6000 Asgrow Pacific Sunny Campbell Soup CxD 126 CxD 127 CxD 128 CxD 130 CxD 132 CxD 133 Ferry-Morse Bingo Whirlaway Harris Moran HMX 6596 HMX 7803 Market Pride Regency m 4 gb j2 4 m 3.5 gb jo 3 m 3 gb jo 3 m 4 ug/gb jo/j2 3 s 4.5 gb jo 3 3.5 3 3 s 4.5 3 s 4.5 4 3.5 4.5 5 1.5 4.5 5 3.5 3 3.5 s 5 2 2.5 4 4.9 3.5 4.9 4.7 4 5 4 5 4.5 4 mod be rot; sl pointed be be rot;sm frt w/pointed be 5 5 4 4.5 4 3.5 sv be rot; ws 3.5 3 s 4 4 2 4 5 5 4 3 4 4 2.5 3 s 3 2 3 4.5 5 5 4.6 4.4 4.6 3.3 ws;misshaped frt;sm frt c w/pointed be 2 3 3.5 s. 3 2.5 3 3 2 2.5 c 4.5 2.5 2 m 3.5 jo 2.5 2.5 2 3.5 s 3.5 2.5 1.5 Itgb s-m 3.5 jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 3.5 1.5 3 Itgb m 4 gb jo 2.5 3 2 3 c 4.5 3 2 s 4.5 jo/j2 3 3.5 2 3 c 4.5 2 1.5 Itgb m 4 Itgb jo 3 4.5 3 4 m 3.5 gb j2 3.5 2.5 2 3 c 5 3.5 3 4.5 5 s 3 3 2 4.5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4.5 4.5 ws;poor foliage cover 5 5 5 3 4.7 3 4.5 ws;be rot;radial split; pointed be 4.7 5 5 4 4 4.5 4.5 radial & irregular split 5 5 5 3.5 4.5 4.5 5 irregular split;poor foliage cover 4.7 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 4 be rot; pointed be 4.7 5 4 4.5 4.5 4 4 catfacing 4 4 2 4.5 4 catfacing;be rot 5 4.5 5 4.7 4.7 mod be rot vt 3.5 ug jo 2.5 2.5 4 4 s 4.5 2 3 4.5 4.9 4.7 4.7 5 4.5 5 ws m 2.5 gb jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 3 3.5 3.5 4 5 4.7 3.5 5 4.7 4 ws m 2.5 ug jo 2.5 3.5 4 4 s 4.5 3 3 4.7 5 4.7 4.9 5 4.9 5 m 3.5 gb j2 4 3.5 2 3.5 s 3 3 2.5 4.7 5 5 4.7 5 4.7 4.5 sv be rot Abbott & Cobb Summer Flavor 3000 Table 7 (continued 2). S... N a, 06 I- g- I 7 V) C 0 j : 4 J N 4 j- L U 0 CO S U .C >s 'U -d S. L L ^ JCS xr= U, 4- 4J S L (0 4) 4J (I 04J CO C a) (fl C &I L. M r- S- (D 00 (nO) Source/Entry I I, I I ,, g ./ N U a. 0 Commentsq IFAS-University of Florida Hayslip Horizon IFAS 7209 Solar Set Suncoast North Carolina State Univ. NC 8884 NC 8895 NC 87127 NC 87175 NC 87345 NC 88107 NC 88111 NC 88121 NC 88135 NC 88289 NC 88338 m NC 88352 Piedmont Summit Neuman Centenario NS 268 Northrup King Bdnita NVH 4459 NVH 4461 m 4 gb j2 2.5 2.5 4 3.5 s 3 3 1.5 4.5 5 m 3.5 gb j2 2.5 3.5 2 3 s 3 3.5 2 4.7 5 m 3.5 ug jo 4 3 2 4 s 4 2 2 4.5 5 m 4 gb jo 4 4 2 4 s 4 3 2 4 5 m 4 ug jo 3 3.5 3 4 s 2.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5 m 3 ug jo 3 3.5 3 4 s 3.5 4.5 1.5 4.7 5 m 3 ug jo 2.5 4 3 3 s 3.5 4 4 5 5 m 3 ug jo 3.5 4 3 3 s 3 3 3.5 5 5 m 4 ug jo 3 3 3 3 s 3 4 2.5 4.5 5 m 3 ug jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 c 4.5 3 3 4.7 5 m 4 ug jo 3 4.5 3 3.5 c 5 4.5 4.5 5 5 m 3 ug jo 2.5 4.5 2 4 c 5 4.5 3.5 5 5 -t 4 ug jo 2.5 4 4 4.5 s 4.5 4 4 5 5 m 3.5 ug jo 2.5 3 3.5 4 s 4.5 3.5 3 4.7 5 t 4 ug jo 2.5 2.5 4 4 s 4 3 3.5 4 5 -t 4 ug jo 3 2.5 3 4 s 5 4 4 5 5 m 3.5 gb jo 3 2.5 3.5 3.5 s 4.5 4 3.5 5 5 vt 4 ug jo 2 2.5 4 4 s 4 3 3 4.7 5 m 4 gb j2 2.5 3 4 3 s 4 3 3 5 5 t 4.5 gb j2 2 2.5 3 m 3 gb j2 3.5 3 4 m 4.5 gb j2 3 2.5 3 m 4 gb jo 2 3.5 3 -m 4 ug jo 3.5 4 2 4 s 4.5 4.5 3 4.5 5 2.5 s 3 3.5 3.5 4.5 5 3 s 4.5 3 1.5 4.5 5 3 s 2.5 4 1 5 5 4 s 3 2.5 3.5 4.7 5 4.9 5 5 4.5 4 ws 5 3.5 4 4.7 4.5 4.9 4.5 5 5 5 sv be rot 4.9 4 5 5 3 4.7 5 5 5 5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 5 4.7 5 5 5 4.9 pointed be 4.7 4.7 5 4.5 5 4.5 5 5 5 5 be rot 4.9 4 4.5 5 5 pointed be 4.9 5 5 5 5 be rot 5 4.9 5 4.7 5 pointed be 4.9 5 5 4.7 5 be rot 4.9 5 5 5 5 pointed be 5 5 .5 5 5 be rot;pointed be 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 pointed be 5 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 4.5 4 ws;sv be rot;sm frt w/ pointed be 4 4.5 5 4.5 3.5 misshapen frt;cat- facing 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 3 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 sm frt w/pointed be 4.7 4 5 4.7 5 be rot lable 7 (continued 3). > 3C L N W f S .- C 0 N 0 C-,4 -. 4-) +3 4" 0 U -U M- - S, 30, Q,. C E I. 10 3 a 3 oC -e ) -Q 0 4- N 4 ) 0. W M- UU 0*- CO 41) 0 C4J Mr M to s- U S Etr L I L J 4 S- M $ W o3 V t3 0 W C nt Source/Entry 0- Cn U- U- --_X_ u z -u- -j ;; >- Cx Ca o -2 U Q Cm cSCommentsq Petoseed All Star Duke Empire (PSX 77384) FTE 24 FTE 25 Mountain Pride Olympic (PSX 77684) PSR 9586 Sakata SA 87-27 SA 87-29 SA 88-11 SA 88-16 SA 88-19 SA 88-28 SA 88-29 SA 88-291 SA 88-315 SA 88-316 Shamrock EXP 445 EXP 1007 EXP 1008 Shamrock 10 Shamrock 600 m-t 4 gb jo 3 m 4 gb jo 3 t 2 gb jo 3 3 3 4.5 2 3.5 3 4 s 3 2.5 3.5 4.7 5 4.7 4.5 5 4 s 2.5 3 2 4.5 5 4 4 5 3.5 s 3 2 3.5 4 5 5 3.5 4.9 4 gb j2 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 s 3.5 3 3.5 4.5 5 5 4 5 4 gb jo 2.5 3 3 4 s 3 3.5 3.5 4.7 5 4.7 4.9 5 3.5 ug jo 2 2.5 3 4.5 s 4 3 3 5 5 5 4.5 5 3.5 gb jo 3 4.5 2 4 s 4.5 4 4 4.5 5 5 5 5. 3 ug jo 3 4.5 3.5 4 s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.7 5 5 5 5 2.5 gb j2 2.5 3 3 3.5 s 2 3 3.5 4.5 5 5 .5 5 3 gb j2 2 3 3 3 s 2 4 1.5 4.5 5 5 2.5 5 3 gb j2 3 4 2.5 3 s 2 2.5 2 4.7 5 4.9 4 5 3 ug jo 2.5 2.5 3 3 s 3 3 3.5 5 5 4.9 4.7 5 3 gb j2 3 3 2.5 2 s 2 3 2 4.7 5 4.5 4.5 5 3 gb j2 3 3 2 3.5 s 3 2.5 4 4.5 5 5 4.9 5 3.5 gb j2 3.5 2.5 3 3 s 3.5 1.5 4 4.7 5 4.7 4.5 5 3 gb j2 3 3 3 4 s 3.5 2.5 4 4.7 5 5 4.5 5 3.5 ug jo 3 2 2 4 s 4 1.5 3 5 5 5 4.7 4.7 4 gb j2 3.5 3.5 2 3 s 3 4 2.6 4.7 5 4.5 4 5 3 gb jo 2.5 3.5 3 3 s 2.5 3 3.5 4.5 5 5 4.9 4 3 gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 3.5 s 3 3 3.5 4.5 5 5 4.5 5 3 gb j2 3 3 3 4 s 3.5 1.5 1.5 5 5 4.9 3 5 3 ug jo 3 3 2.5 3 s 3 2.5 2.5 5 5 4.5 3.5 5 3.5 gb jo 4 3.5 2 3 s 4.5 2 3 4 5 5 4.5 4 4.5 3 4 3 4.5 4.5 sv be rot;ws;squat frt;catfacing 4.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 frt set low on plant 5 5 4.7 4.7 be rot 4.5 5 ws 5 4.7 sl pointed be 4.5 4.5 be rot 4.5 4.7 be rot;ws;j2 rips 4.9 5 be rot;pointed be 5 4 ws 4.9 4.5 be rot 4.7 4 mod be rot; ws 4.7 4.7 be rot; pointed be 5 5 4.5 4.5 be rot;ws 4.5 3 5 4 pointed be;be rot 5 4.5 pointed be;be rot 5 5 be rot 4.5 4.5 Table 7 (continued 4). 4) L 1. U)) 5- ai =! N -0 4- 3 C ii 0- sO o- * 4 u u C UE 0 C S CW) 0) U- s- C 1 U 0 U 4 LJ 41 0 4. N 3 0 L4 J 4-O Ua 40 CO r 0/ -) o c4- -C a' .- U- Ci U) C o- E .r 4- U *- 4-> > *- O U o UU V oJ 'a a U 3 fl3 0 + .0 0 'a 0- 0 C 'a-.- I-Ci Source/Entry I .. .- i 5 u L. -Eo Y Ca C U CO -- CD Coinmmentsq m 3.5 gb t 2.5 gb n-t 3.5 gb 3.5 ug 3 gb 4 ug 2.5 2.5 2 3 3 3 2.5 3.5 3 2.5 3 4 3 1.5 2 2.5 2.5 4 3.5 c 2 s 3.5 s 3.5 s 4 s 3.5 s 4.5 3 4 4.5 5 3 2.5 3 4.5 5 4.5 2.5 3.5 4.7 5 3 4 3.5 3 3 5 5 4.7 5 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.9 4 5 4.9 4.5 4.7 5 4.7 4.5 4.7 4 5 4 be rot 4.7 4 pointed be all frt sizes 5 5 be rot;pointed be 4.5 4.5 be rot 4.5 4.5 be rot;heart shaped frt - Ca s = short, m = medium, t = tall, v = very. 1 = rough; 5 = smooth; ug = uniform green; gb = green base; Itgb = light green base. jo = jointed; j2 = jointless. 1 = poor; 5 excellent. 1 = small; 5 = extra large. 1 = early; 5 = late. 1 = inconsistent; 3 = average amount of variability; 5 = shape very consistent. s = smooth; c = curled. 1 = severe; 5 = absence of defect. be = blossom end; frt = fruit; mod = moderate; sl = slightly; sm = small; sv = severe; w/ = with; ws = white streaks radial from stem; j2 = jointless stem. Sunseeds Sun 984 Sunre 6563 Sunre 6572 Sunre 6574 Sunre 6579 Sunre 6583 |