![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100
GCS Central Science GULF COAST RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER Library IFAS, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 5007 60TH STREET EAST JUN 2 1989 BRADENTON, FL 34203 University of Florida Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1989-6 March 1989 TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS FOR FALL 1988 T. K. Howe, J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters1 Sixteen fresh market tomato cultivars or breeding lines were evaluated in a replicated trial in the fall of 1988 at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Bradenton, FL. In addition, sixty-six breeding lines and cultivars were evaluated- subjectively (no harvest) in observational plots. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bed Preparation: Raised beds of EauGallie fine sand were formed on August 11, 1988. The 33-inch wide, 8-inch high beds were spaced on 5 ft centers with seepage irrigation ditches spaced every 6 beds. Fertilizer included 15-0-30-2 (N-P205-K20-MgO) at 240 lb/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB) distributed into 2 narrow bands in shallow grooves on the bed surface 10 inches to each side of the bed center; and a full bed-width, incorporated application of superphosphate (0-20-0 with 80 Ibs per ton minor elements as F503) at 75 lb/1000 LFB. This fertilizer regime provided a 1:2 ratio of N:K20 with approximately 36 Ib N per 1000 LFB. Beds were fumigated with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (67%:33%) at 36 lb/1000 LFB and mulched with white polyethylene film. Transplant Production: Seed were sown on July 11, 1988 into wooden flats containing Black Beauty& (Mineral Aggregates, Inc.), an inert processed product of spent coal, and lightly covered with coarse vermiculite. Seedlings were transferred 9 days later into ToddP planter flats (Speedling, Inc., 1.5 x 1.5 x 2.5-inch cells, model 150) containing vermiculite and Canadian peat (1:1, v:v) amended with superphosphate, dolomite and micronutrients. Crop Production: Transplants were set in the field August 22 spaced thirty inches apart in single rows in the center of each bed, and drenched with 20-20-20 liquid fertilizer at 5 lb/100 gal water. Four replications of 10 plants per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design for the harvested trial, and single 10-plant plots were used for the observational trial. Paraquat was applied to row middles for weed control. Plants were later staked and tied without pruning. Weather information for the season compared to 33-yr averages is in Table 1. 1Biological Administrator I, Associate Professor (Vegetable Breeder) and Center Director, respectively. -2 - Plots were scouted for insect control throughout the season. Leafminer, sweet potato whitefly and armyworm were the primary insects found. Methamidophos, methomyl, permethrin, oxamyl, endosulfan, fenvalerate, esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis were applied on an "as needed" basis following label instructions. A regular spray program utilizing maneb-ZnSO4 and chlorothalonil was followed to control fungal diseases. Tribasic copper sulfate was added to maneb-ZnSO4 sprays to control bacterial spot. Fruit of the replicated trial entries (Table 2) were harvested at the mature-green stage (or beyond) on November 17 and 28 and December 7, 1988. Tomatoes were graded as cull or marketable in quality, and marketable fruit were sized by machine as: 6x7 (medium), 6x6 (large) and 5x6 (extra large) according to commercial standards (see Table 3 or 4 for specifications). Both cull and marketable fruit were counted and weighed. Subjective ratings by the senior author were given to all tomato entries in the replicated and observational trials at the first harvest of the replicated trial and at the end of the season when red ripe fruit were on the vine (Table 5). Since replicated entries were harvested, additional unharvested plots of replicated entries were planted specifically for late season appraisal. Ratings were given in various categories defining plant features, fruit quality and horticultural characteristics. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Harvest Summary: Total marketable yields (Table 3) for the entire season ranged from 89.3 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Summer Flavor 6000' to 274.1 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Bingo'. 'Bingo' produced the greatest total yield, extra large (and greater) fruit yield and large fruit yield. All of the "hot set" tomato hybrids (see Table 2) exceeded 'Pacific', 'Bonita', 'Olympic', 'Duke', 'FTE 12', and 'Summer Flavor 6000' in total seasonal yield. Fall 1988 yields were reduced for the industry standards 'Sunny', 'Duke', and 'FTE 12' as compared to previous fall seasons of 1987, 1985, 1984, 1983 and 1982 (1-4,6), but yields were greater than 1986 (5). Cull production ranged from 18.6% for 'Bingo' to 33.8% for 'Duke'. Eight other entries were similar to 'Bingo' in low cull production. Average fruit weight was greatest for 'Bingo' (5 oz), which was not significantly different than 'Olympic' (4.8 oz), 'Gator' (4.6 oz) and 'Duke' (4.6 oz). Earliness as judged by the marketable yields obtained at the first harvest was greatest for 'Bingo' with a total yield of 97.2 cartons/1000 LFB (Table 4). 'IFAS 7211' was significantly greater in total first harvest yield than twelve other entries and 'IFAS 7209' was significantly greater than eleven other entries. The greatest extra-large and large fruit yield was produced by 'Bingo'. The second greatest extra-large fruit yield was produced by 'IFAS 7209'. As a percentage of total respective yield, 'NVH 4459' and 'Bingo' produced more than 30% of the seasonal yield at the first harvest. Cull production ranged from 12.1% for 'Pacific' to 30.6% for 'Gator'. Seven entries produced over 25% culls at the first harvest. Average fruit weight ranged from 4.2 oz for 'FTE 12' to 5.8 oz for 'Bingo'. All but four entries exceeded 5 oz average fruit size. Only -3- 'Olympic' had significantly less than a perfect plant stand at the first harvest. The outstanding performance of 'Bingo' was unanticipated since the hot set hybrids would have been expected to surpass all non-hot set types in the trial. However, 'Bingo' did show good yielding potential in the spring of 1988 (7) and may be worth considering on a limited scale by growers to further examine its performance. All the hot set hybrids also produced yields as great as or greater than the industry's standard for this area, 'Sunny'. Especially, noteworthy were the yields of 'IFAS 7211' and 'IFAS 7209'. Subjective Evaluations: All of the replicated and observational entries were given ratings for horticultural characteristics (Table 5). These ratings were from plots of 10 plants each. They are intended only to provide general indications of the crop at a given location and time. Evaluations were conducted twice, once when the first mature-green fruit should have been picked and then with ripened fruit on the plants. Note: The information contained in this report is a summary of experimental results, and should not be used as recommendations for crop production. No discrimination is intended nor endorsement implied where trade names are used. -4- LITERATURE CITED 1. Ibid. 1983. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall 1982. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1983-13. 2. Ibid. 1984. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall 1983. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1984-3. 3. Ibid. 1985. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall 1984. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1985-15. 4. Ibid. 1986. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1985 at Bradenton, FL. Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1986-11. 5. Ibid. 1987. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1986. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1987-10. 6. Ibid. 1988. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1987. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-10. 7. Ibid. 1988. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1988. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-20. 8. Stanley, C.D. 1988. Temperature and rainfall report for 1987. Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1988-11. Acknowledgement: The authors wish to express their appreciation to the following companies for their financial aid in support of vegetable variety trials during 1988: Asgrow Florida Co., Plant City, FL; Campbell's Soup Co., Camden, NJ. Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at the GCREC during the fall of 1988z and the 33-year averages (8). Average Daily Temperature (OF) 1988 33-yr. avg Rainfall (in.) Month Max Min Max Min 1988 33-yr. avg. Aug. 92 74 91 72 13.63 9.90 Sept.Y 90 73 89 71 15.57 8.22 Oct. 85 62 85 64 0.58 2.83 Nov. 81 61 78 57 5.15 2.00 Dec. 73 50 73 52 0.92 2.37 ZTrial in field Aug. 22 to Dec. 7, 1988. Y12.69 inches accumulation between Sept. 6 and 11, 1988. Table 2. Sources of tomato hybrids included in the fall 1988 replicated (harvested) trial. Entry Typez SourceY Agriset Agrisales Bingo Ferry-Morse Bonita Northrup King Duke Petoseed FTE 12 Petoseed Gator Asgrow IFAS 7206 hot set GCREC IFAS 7209 hot set GCREC IFAS 7211 hot set GCREC NVH 4459 Northrup King Olympic Petoseed Pacific Asgrow Solar Set hot set GCREC Summer Flavor 6000 Abbott & Cobb Sunny Asgrow X 3883 Campbell Soup zhot set = ability to set fruit under heat stress. YGCREC = Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, Bradenton, Table 3. Yields and fruit size of tomato entries in the fall of 1988 (three harvests). Marketable Yields (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Extra Large Large Medium Culls Fruit Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) Wt (oz) Bingo 274.1 aY 77.9 a 108.5 a 87.6 b 18.6 e 5.0 a IFAS 7211 203.2 b 25.7 c-e 67.0 b 110.5 a 25.1 b-e 4.3 cd IFAS 7209 182.1 bc 32.7 b-d 60.8 bc 88.6 b 29.9 a-c 4.5 b-d X3883 172.2 b-d 25.5 c-e 57.7 b-d 89.1 b 24.8 b-e 4.4 b-d Solar Set 170.7 cd 31.5 b-d 59.2 bc 80.0 bc 20.8 de 4.5 b-d Agriset 164.4 c-e 25.6 c-e 54.9 b-e 84.0 bc 19.4 de 4.3 cd IFAS 7206 159.7 c-e 20.8 d-f 49.2 c-f 89.8 b 26.2 a-e 4.3 cd NVH 4459 151.4 c-f 22.8 d-f 50.1 c-f 78.5 b-d 22.9 c-e 4.5 b-d Sunny 142.1 d-g 19.7 d-f 42.9 d-g 79.5 bc 27.5 a-d 4.2 d Gator 132.9 e-h 40.2 b 40.2 e-g 52.5 ef 32.6 ab 4.6 a-c Pacific 124.6 f-h 20.1 d-f 37.9 fg 66.6 c-e 23.0 c-e 4.3 cd Bonita 123.6 f-h 19.4 d-f 38.0 fg 66.2 c-e 29.5 a-c 4.3 cd Olympic 118.4 f-i 37.0 bc 37.5 fg 43.9 f 24.2 c-e 4.8 ab Duke 117.1 g-i 19.3 d-f 38.9 e-g 58.9 d-f 33.8 a 4.6 a-c FTE 12 103.5 hi 12.9 de 32.1 g 58.5 d-f 29.1 a-c 4.1 d Summer Flavor 6000 89.3 i 9.8 e 29.2 g 50.4 ef 32.5 ab 4.2 d ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = Linear feet of bed. Acre = 8712 LFB. adjusted to 100% plant stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = 2 8/32 diameter. All yields large (5x6) 2 26/32 inches YMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 4. Yields, fruit size and plant stand of tomato entries for the first harvest, fall 1988. Marketable Yields (Cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Plant Seasonal Extra Large Large Medium Culls Fruit Stand Yield Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) Wt (oz) (%) (%) Bingo 97.2 aY 44.0 a 38.9 a 14.3 ab 17.2 a-c 5.8 a 95.0 ab 35.5 IFAS 7211 60.0 b 16.1 cd 27.9 b 15.9 a 27.6 a 5.1 a-c 100.0 a 29.5 IFAS 7209 54.5 bc 24.5 b 21.4 bc 8.5 a-c 26.9 a 5.5 ab 95.0 ab 29.9 Solar Set 46.0 b-d 15.5 cd 20.2 cd 10.4 a-c 16.4 a-c 5.2 a-c 100.0 a 19.2 Gator 40.0 c-e 18.9 c 14.0 d-g 7.1 bc 30.6 a 5.4 ab 100.0 a 26.9 IFAS 7206 36.5 d-f 10.4 d-g 14.3 c-f 11.8 a-c 25.9 ab 5.4 ab 97.5 ab 21.5 Agriset 35.3 d-f 8.5 e-g 15.8 c-e 11.1 a-c 16.4 a-c 5.0 b-d 90.0 ab 22.9 X3883 33.1 d-g 11.4 d-f 14.7 c-f 7.0 bc 25.4 ab 5.3 a-c 100.0 a 19.8 Olympic 30.4 d-g 14.5 c-e 11.7 e-g 4.2 c 13.1 a-c 5.5 ab 87.5 b 15.7 NVH 4459 30.0 d-g 8.3 e-g 12.7 e-g 9.2 a-c 16.7 a-c 5.2 a-c 97.5 ab 30.1 FTE 12 25.2 e-g 5.6 fg 8.7 e-g 11.0 a-c 21.0 a-c 4.2 d 100.0 a 19.3 Pacific 24.0 e-g 5.3 fg 11.4 e-g 7.3 bc 12.1 c 4.9 b-d 95.0 ab 13.2 Duke 23.4 e-g 5.7 fg 11.0 e-g 6.7 bc 30.0 a 5.0 bc 100.0 a 25.7 Sunny 22.3 fg 8.5 e-g 9.0 e-g 4.9 c 17.2 a-c 5.2 a-c 97.5 ab 20.0 Summer Flavor 6000 20.2 fg 4.0 g 7.4 fg 8.9 a-c 26.8 ab 4.5 cd 100.0 a 24.3 Bonita 16.3 g 4.0 g 6.5 g 5.9 c 23.2 a-c 4.9 b-d 100.0 a 22.6 ZCarton = 25 lbs. LFB = Linear feet of bed. Acre = 8712 LFB. All yields adjusted to 100% plant stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 inches diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = less than 2 8/32 inches diameter. YMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 5. Fruit and plant characteristics for entries in the fall 1988 trial. t- O h 14 14 4 (a 1 1 a)1 m ,h -H :3 W4 U : 1 N '0 M 0 W d 10 0 cc W.. U 1. C ia y a 1 u l I 4 ( *H .c @1 D3 -H 44 W 14 a. 6W 3 0 i a 3 0 0 0 W 0 5 r4 w o4 .0l V 0 q Source/Entry41 W 1 W: 14 ou P4 P4 P4. C Q N U m Commentsq Abbott & Cobb ACX 871304 ACX 87SU70 Hybrid 661 Hybrid 662 Summer Flavor 2000 Summer Flavor 3000 Summer Flavor 4000 Summer Flavor 4200 Summer Flavor 5000 Summer Flavor 6000 Agway PSX 7784 Red Express Valerie Agrisales Agriset (PSX 76184) Asgrow Gator Pacific 3.0gb jo 3 3 3 3.5gb jo 3 3 2 3.0gb jo 2.5 4 3 3.0ug jo 3.5 4 3 4.0gb j2 3 2 3 4.5gb jo 3 3 2 4.0gb j2 2 3 3 3.0gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 2.0gb jo 3.5 4 3 3.0gb j2 3 3 3 m 3.0ug jo 3 s 3.0gb jo 3 m 3.5ug jo 3 t 3.0gb jo 2 m 3.0gb j2 3 m 4.0gb j2 3 Sunny m 3.0gb jo 2 3.5 c 4.5 3.5 4 4.5 4 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 3 c 3.5 1 3 4.5 5 5 4 4.5 5 4.5 heavy vine, lg be 4 s 4 2.5 4 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.9 5 deep cracks 4 c 4.5p 3 4 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.5 5 deep fruit shape 3 c 51 3 3 4 3 5 4 5 3 5 4 c 51 2 4 5 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 5 dark shoulders 3.5 a 4.51 2 3 4.5 3.5 5 3 5 4 5 4 s 3o 2.5 3 4.5 4.5 5 3 5 4.5 5 folds, striping 4.5 a 4.5 2.5 2.5 4 5 4.5 4 5 5 5 fiberous internal 3 s 41 2 3 5 5 3 2 5 4.9 5 puffy; deep cracks in green fruit 3.5 3 4 vc 5p 2 3.5 4 2 5 4 4.5 3.5 3 3 3 3.5 4 a 3 3 3 4 2.5 4.9 4 5 c 4.5p 3.5 3.5 4 2.5 5 4.5 5 5 5 cracks shallow; deep fruit shape 4.5 5 striping, gold fleck 4 5 puffy; nice red color 2 4 3 s 5 3 3 4 5 4.9 4 5 4.5 5 3.5 3 3 s 5 1 3 5 5 5 2 4 4 5 erratic set & size; deep cracks in greens; dark shoulder 3.5 3 4 s 4p 3 3 4.5 5 5 2 5 4.5 5 sv deep cracks; deep fruit shape 2 3 3 s 4 1.5 3 4.5 5 5 3 3 4.5 5 Table 5 (continued 2). $4 54 9 O c 9 0 0 a 0. i a - 45 0 4) N 54 41 0 I 48 U4 1 0 0 .4 0 3 0 1 V '0 Source/Entry _____44 _n PW Pk P. _FQ' P. N a 9 Comment.q. N Campbell Soup X3855 X3861 X3883 Ferry-Morse Bingo Harris Moran HMX 2807 HMX 6796 IFAS-Unlv. of Florida Flora-Dade Hayslip Horizon IFAS 7182 IFAS 7193 IFAS 7206 m 4.0gb jo 3 m 4.0gb j2 3 vs 3.0gb jo 3 m 4.0gb jo 3.5 2.5 2 4 a 4.71 1 3.5 5 4.5 4.5 3 3 3 2 2 c 5p 3 3 4.5 4.5 5 4.5 5 3 3 4 s 51 1.5 4 4 3 3 c 4.5p 3 4 m 2.5ug jo 2 3.5 3 3.5 a 4 2 3 m 3.5gb jo 3 4 2.5 4 s 4.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5 4.5 4 4 4.5 5 3 5 early fruit small; It green shoulder 5 5 shallow cracks; deep fruit shape 5 5 5 4.5 2 4.5 5 It green shoulder 4.7 5 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.8 radial scars 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.5 5 small be, some fruit v lg t 3.0ug j2 2 2 4 3.5 s 3 3 3 4.5 5 5 2 5 5 5 folds, v It first hand t 3.0gb j2 2.5 3 3 3 a 3.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 green stripes m 3.5gb j2 2 2.5 4 3 s 1.5o 2 3.5 4.5 5 5 3.5 5 4 4 Ig, open be, puffy t 4.5 gb j2 4 3 3 3.5 s 3 3 3 4 5 4 3 5 1 5 It green shoulder s 4.5ug jo 4 4 3 3.5 s 4 4 4 4.5 5 4.9 4.9 5 3 5 m 3.5gb jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 3i,o 4.5 3 4.5 5 5 5 5 4.9 5 It green shoulder; Ig fruit; open be IFAS 7209 m 3.0ug jo 3.5 3.5 2 4 IFAS 7211 m 2.5ug jo 3 3 1 3 Solar Set (IFAS 7164) m 4.5gb jo 3 3.5 3 4 Suncoast m 4.0ug jo 4 4.5 3 4 s 5 1.5 3 s 5 2.5 4 s 4i 3.5 4 s 3.51g 3 4 4 5 4.9 3.5 5 4.5 5 5 3 4 4.5 5 4.7 4.9 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 green striping 4.5 5 deep fruit shape Table 5 (continued 3). 41 >4 54 : 94) 0a. a 54 41 4) : 0 4 14 49 0 0 P 3 3 En W. R A a a 1 s CO a) .0 4) 3. M '' 0. 54 < n a U0 0 44 4J 44 34 4 34 5 S 4r 4l 8) ". 14 4 :3 14 44 544 -A Su e n_ d 0 4 E 4~~45 4 i W 4 Source/Fntry N. M~ NO P.. 6Q. a 9 .U N 0 8 Consentsq Neuman Centenario (NS 264) NS 268 Summer Set (NS 215) North Carolina State Univ. Mountain Delight NC 8288 (hot set) NC 87346 (hot set) NC 87355 (hot set) NC 87370 (hot set) NC 87380 (hot set) NC 87386 (hot set) NC 87390 (hot set) NC 88283 (hot set) NC 88286 (hot set) NC 88387 (hot set) NC 88394 (hot set) NC 88396 (hot set) NC 88397 (hot set) NC 88398 (hot set) vt 4.0gb j2 3 3 3 4 s 4 2 3 4.5 4.5 5 4.7 5 4.5 5 m 3.0gb j2 2.5 3 3 3.5 a 31g 4 3 4.5 4 5 4 5 4.5 5 lg frt high on vine vt 3.0gb j2 2.5 2.5 4 4 s 3.51g 3.5 4 4.9 5 4.7 3.5 5 4.7 5 dk shoulder; Ig frt high on vine m 3.5 ug jo 2.5 3.5 3.5 3 s 4 2 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.9 5 4.7 5 m 4.0 ug jo 4 4 3 3.5 c 3.5vp 3 2 4 4 5 4.5 4.5 2.5 5 m 3.5 ug jo 5 3.5 1.5 4 s 4 4.5 4 4.7 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 deep fruit shape; gold fleck m 4.0 ug jo 5 4 1.5 4 a 3.51g 2.5 3 4.7 4.7 4.9 5 4.5 5 5 erratic side splits m 4.0 gb jo 5 4 2 3 s 4 2.5 3 4.5 4.7 5 5 4.7 5 5 deep fruit shape; It green shoulder m 3.0 ug jo 4.5 3.5 2 4 s 4.5 2.5 4 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 m 4.0 ug jo 3.5 2.5 2 3 a 4 2 4 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 many small fruit; some xlg fruit m 2.5 ug jo 4 2.5 2.5 3.5 s 41g 2 3.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 lg be, but closed m 4.0 ug jo 3 3 1.5 3.5 s 4 1.5 3.5 4.5 5 4 4.7 5 5 5 catfacing; shallow radial cracks vs 3.0 ug jo 4 3.5 1.5 4 s 4.5 3 3 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 short zippers m 4.0 ug jo 4 3 2 3.5 a 3.5 4 3.5 4.5 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 5 m 2.5 gb jo 4 3 2 3 s 4 2.5 3 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder m 3.5 gb jo 4.5 3.5 2 3.5 s 4.5 3 3 4.5 4 5 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder m 3.0 gb jo 5 4 1.5 3 s 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder m 4.0 ug jo 4.5 4 1.5 4 a 4 3 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.7 5 5 5 2 off-type plants Table 5 (continued 4). > k.11 r4 A 3 u 14 14 :3 :3 14 IA 14U 14 A 14 4 $ 4 01 0 "1 1r0 4 V 0 -I) a S / 3 N A a H N 0 a 4 A4 .3 0 44j 14 o1 H 14 .- 0 14 ,*l .0i a n 01 CO 44 1'. 4) 0i 44( (0h A 14~~ 441 1 S ur 0e/E "r "r P B Colmllentaq u ~ ~ ~ ~ r 4j M ur olr li nl "1 ( jCJ' 1 dloP 4 ,..... a 1@ i ^ e i -M n *H *H y &> Se a a a NC 88400 (hot set) NC 88401 (hot set) NC 88411 (hot set) Piedmont Summit Northrup King Bonita NVH 4459 4.0 gb jo 4 3.5 1.5 4 s 4 2 3.0 gb jo 4 3.5 2 4 s 4.5 3 3.0 gb jo 4.5 4 1.5 4 a 3.50 3 3.5 ug j2 2 3.5 3 4 a 4 3 3.0 gb j2 2 3 4 3.5 s 41 2 m 4.0 gb j2 2 m 4.5 gb jo 2 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.5 5 3.5 4.5 4 4.9 5 5 3 4.5 4.9 5 5 5 2 4.5 5 4.5 4 5 2 4 5 5 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.5 5 bac. spot around calyx 2.5 4.5 3.5 s 41 4 3.5 4.5 5 5 4 5 5 5 deep cracks on green fruit 2 3 4 s 3.51g 4 3 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 deep fruit shape Petoseed Duke Floratom II FTE 12 FTE 24 FTE 25 Olympic (PSX 77684) PSR 9586 Sakata SA 87-24 SA 87-29 3.5gb j2 2 2 3 4.0gb j2 2.5 3.5 4 4.0gb j2 2 2 4 m 4.0gb j2 3 m 4.5gb jo 3 4.5 s 41 2 4 4.5 5 4 s 41g 4.5 3 4 5 4 s 31,o 1.5 4.5 5 5 4.9 2 5 4.5 5 5 3 5 4.7 5 5 1.5 5 3 5 4 4 3 a 2 3 2 4.5 4.7 4.7 2 3 3 4.5 s 4.5 3 4 4.5 4.7 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 4 m 3.0gb jo 3 4 3 3 s 3 2 3 4.5 5 5 3 5 4.5 5 m 3.0ug jo 2.5 3.5 4.5 4 s 4 4 3.5 4.5 4.7 5 4.5 5 4.5 5 t 4.0 gb jo 3 vt 3.5 gb j2 2 2.5 2.5 4 s 3.5 3.5 3 4 2.5 3 3.5 s 4 2.5 3.5 4 v deep cracks be ig, but closed dark shoulder,gold fleck lt green shoulder;sv puffy; sv deep cracks in greens deep fruit shape; sl puffy deep cracks in pinks & ripes 5 4.9 4.5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 Table 5 (continued 5). SSource/Entr Comments SA 88-11 2.5 gb j2 3 3 3 3 a 4 2 3.5 4 4 4.7 3.5 5 5 5 deep cracks; deep fruit SA 88-19 3.5 gb j2 3 3.5 3 3.5 e 4.5 3 4 5 5 4.9 3 5 4.5 5 stem rips fruit SA 88-23 3.5 gb j2 3 2.5 3 3.5 c 4.5 2.5 5 4.5 4.9 5 4 5 5 4 stem rips fruit;dark SA 8-11 2.50 gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 3 s 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4.7 3.5 5 5 5 deep cracks; deep fruit shapes, green str puf SA 88-1930 t 3.0 gb j2 3 3.5 2 4.5 2.5 s 4.5gp 2 3 4.5 5 4.9 3 5 4.5 5 stem rips fruit SA 88-231 3.5 gb j2 32 3 4 3.5 c 4.5 25 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 dk shders Sunre 6563 4.0 gb jo 2 3 s 4p 2 2 4 4 5 4 4.5 4.5 v puffy; dk shoulders;iping SA 88- 6 m .0 gb j2 3 3.5 3 3 a 4.5 2 3.5 4.5 4.7 3. 5 4 5 deep fruit shape it greenSunre 6572 m 4.0 gb jo 2.5 3 3 4 s 4.5 3 2 4.5 4.9 5 3 5 4 5 v puffy; deep fruit shape SA 88-9u t 3.0 gb j2 1.5 3 4 3.5 a 4 2 3 4 5 5 5. 3 5 4. 5 s leaes SA 88-23 t 3.5 gb j2 23 2.5 s 4.5 2 2.5 4.5 5 4.9 3.5 5 4. 5 5 4 stem rips fruit;drk Sunre 6563 4.0 gb jo 2 2 4 3 4p 2 2 4 4 5 4 4.5 4.5 5 shoulder green striping; SA 88-24 s 3.0 gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 3 a 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.9 5 4. 7 44 5 deep fruit shapes, Sunre 6572 green 4.0 gb jo 2.5 3 3 4 s 4.5 3 2 4.5 4.9 5 3 5 4 5 sv striping, puffy; deep fruit Sunre 6574 m 3.0 ugb j2 1.5 1.5 4.5 2.5 a 41g 2 3 4 5 5 3 4.55 4 5 lg leaves 54-1103 t 4.5 gb j2 3.5 2 3 4 s 4 3 3 4 4.9 5 4 5 4 4.5 Vaughan's Mamm ia (plum) m 5.0 ug jo 4 3 2 45 a 5 vp 4 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 3 nch long fruit Hamma ~ia (plum) a 5.O ug jo 4 3 2 5 a S vp 4 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 3 inch long fruit |