<%BANNER%>
Tomato variety trial results
ALL VOLUMES CITATION SEARCH THUMBNAILS PAGE IMAGE ZOOMABLE
Full Citation
STANDARD VIEW MARC VIEW
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00054241/00005
 Material Information
Title: Tomato variety trial results
Series Title: Bradenton GCREC research report
Physical Description: 4 v. : ; 28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: Gulf Coast Research and Education Center (Bradenton, Fla.)
University of Florida -- Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Publisher: Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida
Place of Publication: Bradenton Fla
Creation Date: 1988
Publication Date: 1986-
Frequency: semiannual
regular
 Subjects
Subjects / Keywords: Tomatoes -- Varieties -- Periodicals -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Tomatoes -- Field experiments -- Periodicals -- Florida   ( lcsh )
Genre: government publication (state, provincial, terriorial, dependent)   ( marcgt )
periodical   ( marcgt )
serial   ( sobekcm )
 Notes
Dates or Sequential Designation: Spring 1986-
Dates or Sequential Designation: Ceased in spring or fall of 1989.
General Note: Title from caption.
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 62705168
lccn - 2005229409
System ID: UF00054241:00005
 Related Items

Full Text
100

GCS

Central Science
GULF COAST RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER Library
IFAS, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
5007 60TH STREET EAST JUN 2 1989
BRADENTON, FL 34203
University of Florida
Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1989-6 March 1989


TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS FOR FALL 1988

T. K. Howe, J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters1

Sixteen fresh market tomato cultivars or breeding lines were evaluated in
a replicated trial in the fall of 1988 at the Gulf Coast Research and
Education Center in Bradenton, FL. In addition, sixty-six breeding lines
and cultivars were evaluated- subjectively (no harvest) in observational
plots.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bed Preparation: Raised beds of EauGallie fine sand were formed on August
11, 1988. The 33-inch wide, 8-inch high beds were spaced on 5 ft centers
with seepage irrigation ditches spaced every 6 beds. Fertilizer included
15-0-30-2 (N-P205-K20-MgO) at 240 lb/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB)
distributed into 2 narrow bands in shallow grooves on the bed surface 10
inches to each side of the bed center; and a full bed-width, incorporated
application of superphosphate (0-20-0 with 80 Ibs per ton minor elements
as F503) at 75 lb/1000 LFB. This fertilizer regime provided a 1:2 ratio
of N:K20 with approximately 36 Ib N per 1000 LFB. Beds were fumigated
with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (67%:33%) at 36 lb/1000 LFB and mulched
with white polyethylene film.

Transplant Production: Seed were sown on July 11, 1988 into wooden flats
containing Black Beauty& (Mineral Aggregates, Inc.), an inert processed
product of spent coal, and lightly covered with coarse vermiculite.
Seedlings were transferred 9 days later into ToddP planter flats
(Speedling, Inc., 1.5 x 1.5 x 2.5-inch cells, model 150) containing
vermiculite and Canadian peat (1:1, v:v) amended with superphosphate,
dolomite and micronutrients.

Crop Production: Transplants were set in the field August 22 spaced
thirty inches apart in single rows in the center of each bed, and drenched
with 20-20-20 liquid fertilizer at 5 lb/100 gal water. Four replications
of 10 plants per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design
for the harvested trial, and single 10-plant plots were used for the
observational trial. Paraquat was applied to row middles for weed
control. Plants were later staked and tied without pruning. Weather
information for the season compared to 33-yr averages is in Table 1.


1Biological Administrator I, Associate Professor (Vegetable Breeder) and
Center Director, respectively.








-2 -


Plots were scouted for insect control throughout the season. Leafminer,
sweet potato whitefly and armyworm were the primary insects found.
Methamidophos, methomyl, permethrin, oxamyl, endosulfan, fenvalerate,
esfenvalerate and Bacillus thuringiensis were applied on an "as needed"
basis following label instructions.

A regular spray program utilizing maneb-ZnSO4 and chlorothalonil was
followed to control fungal diseases. Tribasic copper sulfate was added to
maneb-ZnSO4 sprays to control bacterial spot.

Fruit of the replicated trial entries (Table 2) were harvested at the
mature-green stage (or beyond) on November 17 and 28 and December 7, 1988.
Tomatoes were graded as cull or marketable in quality, and marketable
fruit were sized by machine as: 6x7 (medium), 6x6 (large) and 5x6 (extra
large) according to commercial standards (see Table 3 or 4 for
specifications). Both cull and marketable fruit were counted and weighed.

Subjective ratings by the senior author were given to all tomato entries
in the replicated and observational trials at the first harvest of the
replicated trial and at the end of the season when red ripe fruit were on
the vine (Table 5). Since replicated entries were harvested, additional
unharvested plots of replicated entries were planted specifically for late
season appraisal. Ratings were given in various categories defining plant
features, fruit quality and horticultural characteristics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Harvest Summary: Total marketable yields (Table 3) for the entire season
ranged from 89.3 cartons/1000 LFB for 'Summer Flavor 6000' to 274.1
cartons/1000 LFB for 'Bingo'. 'Bingo' produced the greatest total yield,
extra large (and greater) fruit yield and large fruit yield. All of the
"hot set" tomato hybrids (see Table 2) exceeded 'Pacific', 'Bonita',
'Olympic', 'Duke', 'FTE 12', and 'Summer Flavor 6000' in total seasonal
yield. Fall 1988 yields were reduced for the industry standards 'Sunny',
'Duke', and 'FTE 12' as compared to previous fall seasons of 1987, 1985,
1984, 1983 and 1982 (1-4,6), but yields were greater than 1986 (5). Cull
production ranged from 18.6% for 'Bingo' to 33.8% for 'Duke'. Eight other
entries were similar to 'Bingo' in low cull production. Average fruit
weight was greatest for 'Bingo' (5 oz), which was not significantly
different than 'Olympic' (4.8 oz), 'Gator' (4.6 oz) and 'Duke' (4.6 oz).

Earliness as judged by the marketable yields obtained at the first harvest
was greatest for 'Bingo' with a total yield of 97.2 cartons/1000 LFB
(Table 4). 'IFAS 7211' was significantly greater in total first harvest
yield than twelve other entries and 'IFAS 7209' was significantly greater
than eleven other entries. The greatest extra-large and large fruit yield
was produced by 'Bingo'. The second greatest extra-large fruit yield was
produced by 'IFAS 7209'. As a percentage of total respective yield, 'NVH
4459' and 'Bingo' produced more than 30% of the seasonal yield at the
first harvest. Cull production ranged from 12.1% for 'Pacific' to 30.6%
for 'Gator'. Seven entries produced over 25% culls at the first harvest.
Average fruit weight ranged from 4.2 oz for 'FTE 12' to 5.8 oz for
'Bingo'. All but four entries exceeded 5 oz average fruit size. Only








-3-


'Olympic' had significantly less than a perfect plant stand at the first
harvest.

The outstanding performance of 'Bingo' was unanticipated since the hot set
hybrids would have been expected to surpass all non-hot set types in the
trial. However, 'Bingo' did show good yielding potential in the spring of
1988 (7) and may be worth considering on a limited scale by growers to
further examine its performance. All the hot set hybrids also produced
yields as great as or greater than the industry's standard for this area,
'Sunny'. Especially, noteworthy were the yields of 'IFAS 7211' and 'IFAS
7209'.

Subjective Evaluations: All of the replicated and observational entries
were given ratings for horticultural characteristics (Table 5). These
ratings were from plots of 10 plants each. They are intended only to
provide general indications of the crop at a given location and time.
Evaluations were conducted twice, once when the first mature-green fruit
should have been picked and then with ripened fruit on the plants.

Note: The information contained in this report is a summary of
experimental results, and should not be used as recommendations
for crop production. No discrimination is intended nor
endorsement implied where trade names are used.







-4-


LITERATURE CITED

1. Ibid. 1983. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall
1982. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1983-13.

2. Ibid. 1984. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall
1983. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1984-3.

3. Ibid. 1985. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for fall 1984.
Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1985-15.

4. Ibid. 1986. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1985 at
Bradenton, FL. Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1986-11.

5. Ibid. 1987. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1986. Bradenton
GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1987-10.

6. Ibid. 1988. Tomato variety trial results for fall 1987. Bradenton
GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-10.

7. Ibid. 1988. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1988.
Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-20.

8. Stanley, C.D. 1988. Temperature and rainfall report for 1987.
Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1988-11.




Acknowledgement: The authors wish to express their appreciation to the
following companies for their financial aid in support
of vegetable variety trials during 1988:

Asgrow Florida Co., Plant City, FL;
Campbell's Soup Co., Camden, NJ.












Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at the GCREC during the fall of 1988z
and the 33-year averages (8).


Average Daily Temperature (OF)
1988 33-yr. avg Rainfall (in.)
Month Max Min Max Min 1988 33-yr. avg.

Aug. 92 74 91 72 13.63 9.90
Sept.Y 90 73 89 71 15.57 8.22
Oct. 85 62 85 64 0.58 2.83
Nov. 81 61 78 57 5.15 2.00
Dec. 73 50 73 52 0.92 2.37


ZTrial in field Aug. 22 to Dec. 7, 1988.
Y12.69 inches accumulation between Sept. 6 and 11, 1988.







Table 2. Sources of tomato hybrids included in the fall 1988 replicated
(harvested) trial.



Entry Typez SourceY

Agriset Agrisales
Bingo Ferry-Morse
Bonita Northrup King
Duke Petoseed
FTE 12 Petoseed
Gator Asgrow
IFAS 7206 hot set GCREC
IFAS 7209 hot set GCREC
IFAS 7211 hot set GCREC
NVH 4459 Northrup King
Olympic Petoseed
Pacific Asgrow
Solar Set hot set GCREC
Summer Flavor 6000 Abbott & Cobb
Sunny Asgrow
X 3883 Campbell Soup


zhot set = ability to set fruit under heat stress.
YGCREC = Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, Bradenton,










Table 3. Yields and fruit size of tomato entries in the fall of 1988 (three
harvests).


Marketable Yields (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average
Extra Large Large Medium Culls Fruit
Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) Wt (oz)

Bingo 274.1 aY 77.9 a 108.5 a 87.6 b 18.6 e 5.0 a
IFAS 7211 203.2 b 25.7 c-e 67.0 b 110.5 a 25.1 b-e 4.3 cd
IFAS 7209 182.1 bc 32.7 b-d 60.8 bc 88.6 b 29.9 a-c 4.5 b-d
X3883 172.2 b-d 25.5 c-e 57.7 b-d 89.1 b 24.8 b-e 4.4 b-d
Solar Set 170.7 cd 31.5 b-d 59.2 bc 80.0 bc 20.8 de 4.5 b-d
Agriset 164.4 c-e 25.6 c-e 54.9 b-e 84.0 bc 19.4 de 4.3 cd
IFAS 7206 159.7 c-e 20.8 d-f 49.2 c-f 89.8 b 26.2 a-e 4.3 cd
NVH 4459 151.4 c-f 22.8 d-f 50.1 c-f 78.5 b-d 22.9 c-e 4.5 b-d
Sunny 142.1 d-g 19.7 d-f 42.9 d-g 79.5 bc 27.5 a-d 4.2 d
Gator 132.9 e-h 40.2 b 40.2 e-g 52.5 ef 32.6 ab 4.6 a-c
Pacific 124.6 f-h 20.1 d-f 37.9 fg 66.6 c-e 23.0 c-e 4.3 cd
Bonita 123.6 f-h 19.4 d-f 38.0 fg 66.2 c-e 29.5 a-c 4.3 cd
Olympic 118.4 f-i 37.0 bc 37.5 fg 43.9 f 24.2 c-e 4.8 ab
Duke 117.1 g-i 19.3 d-f 38.9 e-g 58.9 d-f 33.8 a 4.6 a-c
FTE 12 103.5 hi 12.9 de 32.1 g 58.5 d-f 29.1 a-c 4.1 d
Summer Flavor
6000 89.3 i 9.8 e 29.2 g 50.4 ef 32.5 ab 4.2 d


ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = Linear feet of bed.


Acre = 8712 LFB.


adjusted to 100% plant stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra
= (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) =
diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = 2 8/32
diameter.


All yields
large (5x6)
2 26/32
inches


YMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level.









Table 4. Yields, fruit size and plant stand of tomato entries for the first harvest, fall 1988.


Marketable Yields (Cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Plant Seasonal
Extra Large Large Medium Culls Fruit Stand Yield
Entry Total (5 X 6) (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) Wt (oz) (%) (%)

Bingo 97.2 aY 44.0 a 38.9 a 14.3 ab 17.2 a-c 5.8 a 95.0 ab 35.5
IFAS 7211 60.0 b 16.1 cd 27.9 b 15.9 a 27.6 a 5.1 a-c 100.0 a 29.5
IFAS 7209 54.5 bc 24.5 b 21.4 bc 8.5 a-c 26.9 a 5.5 ab 95.0 ab 29.9
Solar Set 46.0 b-d 15.5 cd 20.2 cd 10.4 a-c 16.4 a-c 5.2 a-c 100.0 a 19.2
Gator 40.0 c-e 18.9 c 14.0 d-g 7.1 bc 30.6 a 5.4 ab 100.0 a 26.9
IFAS 7206 36.5 d-f 10.4 d-g 14.3 c-f 11.8 a-c 25.9 ab 5.4 ab 97.5 ab 21.5
Agriset 35.3 d-f 8.5 e-g 15.8 c-e 11.1 a-c 16.4 a-c 5.0 b-d 90.0 ab 22.9
X3883 33.1 d-g 11.4 d-f 14.7 c-f 7.0 bc 25.4 ab 5.3 a-c 100.0 a 19.8
Olympic 30.4 d-g 14.5 c-e 11.7 e-g 4.2 c 13.1 a-c 5.5 ab 87.5 b 15.7
NVH 4459 30.0 d-g 8.3 e-g 12.7 e-g 9.2 a-c 16.7 a-c 5.2 a-c 97.5 ab 30.1
FTE 12 25.2 e-g 5.6 fg 8.7 e-g 11.0 a-c 21.0 a-c 4.2 d 100.0 a 19.3
Pacific 24.0 e-g 5.3 fg 11.4 e-g 7.3 bc 12.1 c 4.9 b-d 95.0 ab 13.2
Duke 23.4 e-g 5.7 fg 11.0 e-g 6.7 bc 30.0 a 5.0 bc 100.0 a 25.7
Sunny 22.3 fg 8.5 e-g 9.0 e-g 4.9 c 17.2 a-c 5.2 a-c 97.5 ab 20.0
Summer Flavor
6000 20.2 fg 4.0 g 7.4 fg 8.9 a-c 26.8 ab 4.5 cd 100.0 a 24.3
Bonita 16.3 g 4.0 g 6.5 g 5.9 c 23.2 a-c 4.9 b-d 100.0 a 22.6


ZCarton = 25 lbs. LFB = Linear feet of bed. Acre = 8712 LFB. All yields adjusted to 100% plant
stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches
diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 inches diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = less
than 2 8/32 inches diameter.


YMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level.



















Table 5. Fruit and plant characteristics for entries in the fall 1988 trial.


t- O h
14 14
4 (a 1 1

a)1 m ,h
-H :3 W4 U : 1
N '0 M 0 W d 10 0
cc W.. U 1.
C ia y a 1 u l I 4 (
*H .c @1 D3 -H 44 W 14 a. 6W 3 0 i
a 3 0 0 0 W 0 5
r4 w o4 .0l V 0 q

Source/Entry41 W 1 W: 14 ou
P4 P4 P4. C Q N U m Commentsq


Abbott & Cobb
ACX 871304
ACX 87SU70
Hybrid 661
Hybrid 662
Summer Flavor 2000
Summer Flavor 3000
Summer Flavor 4000
Summer Flavor 4200
Summer Flavor 5000
Summer Flavor 6000

Agway
PSX 7784

Red Express
Valerie
Agrisales
Agriset (PSX 76184)
Asgrow
Gator


Pacific


3.0gb jo 3 3 3
3.5gb jo 3 3 2
3.0gb jo 2.5 4 3
3.0ug jo 3.5 4 3
4.0gb j2 3 2 3
4.5gb jo 3 3 2
4.0gb j2 2 3 3
3.0gb j2 2.5 2.5 3
2.0gb jo 3.5 4 3
3.0gb j2 3 3 3


m 3.0ug jo 3

s 3.0gb jo 3
m 3.5ug jo 3

t 3.0gb jo 2

m 3.0gb j2 3


m 4.0gb j2 3


Sunny m 3.0gb jo 2


3.5 c 4.5 3.5 4 4.5 4 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5
3 c 3.5 1 3 4.5 5 5 4 4.5 5 4.5 heavy vine, lg be
4 s 4 2.5 4 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.9 5 deep cracks
4 c 4.5p 3 4 5 5 5 3.5 5 4.5 5 deep fruit shape
3 c 51 3 3 4 3 5 4 5 3 5
4 c 51 2 4 5 4.5 4.5 4 5 4.5 5 dark shoulders
3.5 a 4.51 2 3 4.5 3.5 5 3 5 4 5
4 s 3o 2.5 3 4.5 4.5 5 3 5 4.5 5 folds, striping
4.5 a 4.5 2.5 2.5 4 5 4.5 4 5 5 5 fiberous internal
3 s 41 2 3 5 5 3 2 5 4.9 5 puffy; deep cracks in
green fruit


3.5 3 4 vc 5p 2 3.5 4 2 5 4 4.5


3.5 3 3
3 3.5 4


a 3 3 3 4 2.5 4.9 4 5
c 4.5p 3.5 3.5 4 2.5 5 4.5 5


5 5 cracks shallow; deep
fruit shape
4.5 5 striping, gold fleck
4 5 puffy; nice red color


2 4 3 s 5 3 3 4 5 4.9 4 5 4.5 5

3.5 3 3 s 5 1 3 5 5 5 2 4 4 5 erratic set & size;
deep cracks in greens;
dark shoulder
3.5 3 4 s 4p 3 3 4.5 5 5 2 5 4.5 5 sv deep cracks; deep
fruit shape
2 3 3 s 4 1.5 3 4.5 5 5 3 3 4.5 5















Table 5 (continued 2).

$4 54

9 O c 9 0
0 a 0. i a -

45 0 4) N 54 41 0 I 48
U4 1 0 0 .4 0 3 0 1 V '0
Source/Entry _____44 _n PW Pk P. _FQ' P. N a 9 Comment.q. N


Campbell Soup
X3855
X3861


X3883


Ferry-Morse
Bingo
Harris Moran
HMX 2807
HMX 6796

IFAS-Unlv. of Florida
Flora-Dade
Hayslip
Horizon
IFAS 7182
IFAS 7193
IFAS 7206


m 4.0gb jo 3
m 4.0gb j2 3

vs 3.0gb jo 3


m 4.0gb jo 3.5


2.5 2 4 a 4.71 1 3.5 5 4.5 4.5 3 3
3 2 2 c 5p 3 3 4.5 4.5 5 4.5 5


3 3 4 s 51 1.5 4


4 3 3 c 4.5p 3 4


m 2.5ug jo 2 3.5 3 3.5 a 4 2 3
m 3.5gb jo 3 4 2.5 4 s 4.5 2.5 3.5


4.5 5 4.5 4 4


4.5 5
3 5 early fruit small; It
green shoulder
5 5 shallow cracks; deep
fruit shape


5 5 5 4.5 2 4.5 5 It green shoulder

4.7 5 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.8 radial scars
5 5 5 3.5 5 4.5 5 small be, some fruit
v lg


t 3.0ug j2 2 2 4 3.5 s 3 3 3 4.5 5 5 2 5 5 5 folds, v It first hand
t 3.0gb j2 2.5 3 3 3 a 3.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5 5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 green stripes
m 3.5gb j2 2 2.5 4 3 s 1.5o 2 3.5 4.5 5 5 3.5 5 4 4 Ig, open be, puffy
t 4.5 gb j2 4 3 3 3.5 s 3 3 3 4 5 4 3 5 1 5 It green shoulder
s 4.5ug jo 4 4 3 3.5 s 4 4 4 4.5 5 4.9 4.9 5 3 5
m 3.5gb jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 3i,o 4.5 3 4.5 5 5 5 5 4.9 5 It green shoulder; Ig
fruit; open be


IFAS 7209 m 3.0ug jo 3.5 3.5 2 4
IFAS 7211 m 2.5ug jo 3 3 1 3
Solar Set (IFAS 7164) m 4.5gb jo 3 3.5 3 4
Suncoast m 4.0ug jo 4 4.5 3 4


s 5 1.5 3
s 5 2.5 4
s 4i 3.5 4
s 3.51g 3 4


4 5 4.9 3.5 5
4.5 5 5 3 4
4.5 5 4.7 4.9 5
5 5 5 5 5


5 5
4 5
5 5 green striping
4.5 5 deep fruit shape

















Table 5 (continued 3).

41 >4 54
: 94) 0a. a 54 41 4) :
0 4 14 49 0 0
P 3 3 En W. R A a a 1 s CO
a) .0 4) 3. M '' 0. 54 < n a
U0 0 44
4J 44 34 4 34 5 S 4r 4l 8) ".
14 4 :3 14 44 544 -A
Su e n_ d 0 4 E
4~~45 4 i W 4
Source/Fntry N. M~ NO P.. 6Q. a 9 .U N 0 8 Consentsq


Neuman
Centenario (NS 264)
NS 268
Summer Set (NS 215)

North Carolina State Univ.
Mountain Delight
NC 8288 (hot set)
NC 87346 (hot set)

NC 87355 (hot set)
NC 87370 (hot set)

NC 87380 (hot set)
NC 87386 (hot set)

NC 87390 (hot set)
NC 88283 (hot set)

NC 88286 (hot set)
NC 88387 (hot set)
NC 88394 (hot set)
NC 88396 (hot set)
NC 88397 (hot set)
NC 88398 (hot set)


vt 4.0gb j2 3 3 3 4 s 4 2 3 4.5 4.5 5 4.7 5 4.5 5
m 3.0gb j2 2.5 3 3 3.5 a 31g 4 3 4.5 4 5 4 5 4.5 5 lg frt high on vine
vt 3.0gb j2 2.5 2.5 4 4 s 3.51g 3.5 4 4.9 5 4.7 3.5 5 4.7 5 dk shoulder; Ig frt
high on vine

m 3.5 ug jo 2.5 3.5 3.5 3 s 4 2 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.9 5 4.7 5
m 4.0 ug jo 4 4 3 3.5 c 3.5vp 3 2 4 4 5 4.5 4.5 2.5 5
m 3.5 ug jo 5 3.5 1.5 4 s 4 4.5 4 4.7 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 deep fruit shape; gold
fleck
m 4.0 ug jo 5 4 1.5 4 a 3.51g 2.5 3 4.7 4.7 4.9 5 4.5 5 5 erratic side splits
m 4.0 gb jo 5 4 2 3 s 4 2.5 3 4.5 4.7 5 5 4.7 5 5 deep fruit shape; It
green shoulder
m 3.0 ug jo 4.5 3.5 2 4 s 4.5 2.5 4 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5
m 4.0 ug jo 3.5 2.5 2 3 a 4 2 4 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 many small fruit; some
xlg fruit
m 2.5 ug jo 4 2.5 2.5 3.5 s 41g 2 3.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 lg be, but closed
m 4.0 ug jo 3 3 1.5 3.5 s 4 1.5 3.5 4.5 5 4 4.7 5 5 5 catfacing; shallow
radial cracks
vs 3.0 ug jo 4 3.5 1.5 4 s 4.5 3 3 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 short zippers
m 4.0 ug jo 4 3 2 3.5 a 3.5 4 3.5 4.5 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 5
m 2.5 gb jo 4 3 2 3 s 4 2.5 3 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder
m 3.5 gb jo 4.5 3.5 2 3.5 s 4.5 3 3 4.5 4 5 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder
m 3.0 gb jo 5 4 1.5 3 s 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 It green shoulder
m 4.0 ug jo 4.5 4 1.5 4 a 4 3 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.7 5 5 5 2 off-type plants















Table 5 (continued 4).


> k.11 r4
A 3 u 14 14 :3 :3
14 IA 14U 14 A 14
4 $ 4 01 0 "1 1r0 4 V 0 -I) a
S / 3 N A a H N 0 a 4 A4
.3 0 44j 14 o1 H 14 .- 0 14 ,*l .0i
a n 01 CO 44 1'. 4) 0i 44( (0h A
14~~ 441 1
S ur 0e/E "r "r P B Colmllentaq
u ~ ~ ~ ~ r 4j M ur olr li nl "1 ( jCJ' 1 dloP 4
,..... a 1@ i ^ e i -M n *H *H y &> Se a a a


NC 88400 (hot set)
NC 88401 (hot set)
NC 88411 (hot set)
Piedmont
Summit
Northrup King
Bonita


NVH 4459


4.0 gb jo 4 3.5 1.5 4 s 4 2
3.0 gb jo 4 3.5 2 4 s 4.5 3
3.0 gb jo 4.5 4 1.5 4 a 3.50 3
3.5 ug j2 2 3.5 3 4 a 4 3
3.0 gb j2 2 3 4 3.5 s 41 2


m 4.0 gb j2 2

m 4.5 gb jo 2


3.5 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.5 5
3.5 4.5 4 4.9 5 5
3 4.5 4.9 5 5 5
2 4.5 5 4.5 4 5
2 4 5 5 4.5 5


4.7 5
5 5
5 5
3.5 5
4.5 5


bac. spot around calyx


2.5 4.5 3.5 s 41 4 3.5 4.5 5 5 4 5 5 5 deep cracks on green
fruit
2 3 4 s 3.51g 4 3 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 deep fruit shape


Petoseed
Duke
Floratom II
FTE 12


FTE 24


FTE 25


Olympic (PSX 77684)

PSR 9586


Sakata
SA 87-24
SA 87-29


3.5gb j2 2 2 3
4.0gb j2 2.5 3.5 4
4.0gb j2 2 2 4


m 4.0gb j2 3


m 4.5gb jo 3


4.5 s 41 2 4 4.5 5
4 s 41g 4.5 3 4 5
4 s 31,o 1.5 4.5 5 5


4.9 2 5 4.5 5
5 3 5 4.7 5
5 1.5 5 3 5


4 4 3 a 2 3 2 4.5 4.7 4.7 2


3 3 4.5 s 4.5 3 4


4.5 4.7 5


4.5 5 5 4.7 5 4


m 3.0gb jo 3 4 3 3 s 3 2 3 4.5 5 5 3 5 4.5 5

m 3.0ug jo 2.5 3.5 4.5 4 s 4 4 3.5 4.5 4.7 5 4.5 5 4.5 5


t 4.0 gb jo 3
vt 3.5 gb j2 2


2.5 2.5 4 s 3.5 3.5 3 4
2.5 3 3.5 s 4 2.5 3.5 4


v deep cracks
be ig, but closed
dark shoulder,gold
fleck
lt green shoulder;sv
puffy; sv deep cracks
in greens
deep fruit shape; sl
puffy
deep cracks in pinks &
ripes


5 4.9 4.5 5 5
5 5 4 5 4
















Table 5 (continued 5).



SSource/Entr Comments



SA 88-11 2.5 gb j2 3 3 3 3 a 4 2 3.5 4 4 4.7 3.5 5 5 5 deep cracks; deep fruit

SA 88-19 3.5 gb j2 3 3.5 3 3.5 e 4.5 3 4 5 5 4.9 3 5 4.5 5 stem rips fruit
SA 88-23 3.5 gb j2 3 2.5 3 3.5 c 4.5 2.5 5 4.5 4.9 5 4 5 5 4 stem rips fruit;dark
SA 8-11 2.50 gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 3 s 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4.7 3.5 5 5 5 deep cracks; deep fruit shapes,
green str puf


SA 88-1930 t 3.0 gb j2 3 3.5 2 4.5 2.5 s 4.5gp 2 3 4.5 5 4.9 3 5 4.5 5 stem rips fruit
SA 88-231 3.5 gb j2 32 3 4 3.5 c 4.5 25 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 dk shders
Sunre 6563 4.0 gb jo 2 3 s 4p 2 2 4 4 5 4 4.5 4.5 v puffy; dk shoulders;iping
SA 88- 6 m .0 gb j2 3 3.5 3 3 a 4.5 2 3.5 4.5 4.7 3. 5 4 5 deep fruit shape it



greenSunre 6572 m 4.0 gb jo 2.5 3 3 4 s 4.5 3 2 4.5 4.9 5 3 5 4 5 v puffy; deep fruit
shape
SA 88-9u t 3.0 gb j2 1.5 3 4 3.5 a 4 2 3 4 5 5 5. 3 5 4. 5 s leaes
SA 88-23 t 3.5 gb j2 23 2.5 s 4.5 2 2.5 4.5 5 4.9 3.5 5 4. 5 5 4 stem rips fruit;drk
Sunre 6563 4.0 gb jo 2 2 4 3 4p 2 2 4 4 5 4 4.5 4.5 5 shoulder green striping;
SA 88-24 s 3.0 gb j2 2.5 2.5 3 3 a 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 4 5 4.9 5 4. 7 44 5 deep fruit shapes,
Sunre 6572 green 4.0 gb jo 2.5 3 3 4 s 4.5 3 2 4.5 4.9 5 3 5 4 5 sv striping, puffy; deep fruit
Sunre 6574 m 3.0 ugb j2 1.5 1.5 4.5 2.5 a 41g 2 3 4 5 5 3 4.55 4 5 lg leaves




54-1103 t 4.5 gb j2 3.5 2 3 4 s 4 3 3 4 4.9 5 4 5 4 4.5
Vaughan's
Mamm ia (plum) m 5.0 ug jo 4 3 2 45 a 5 vp 4 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 3 nch long fruit
Hamma ~ia (plum) a 5.O ug jo 4 3 2 5 a S vp 4 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.7 5 3 inch long fruit