![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
UFDC Home |
myUFDC Home | Help | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Citation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cenuiai Science Library GULF COAST RESEARCH & EDUCATION ENTER NOV 1 IFAS, UNIVERSITY OF FLORID University of Florida 5007 60TH STREET EAST __" uNversy 1 Foria BRADENTON, FL 34203 Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1988-20 September 1988 TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS FOR SPRING 1988 T. K. Howe, J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters1 Twenty fresh market tomato cultivars or breeding lines were evaluated in a replica-td trial in the spring of 1988 at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Bradenton, Fl. In addition, ninety-three breeding lines and cultivars were evaluated subjectively (no harvest) in observational plots. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bed Preparation: Prior to the bedding operation, dolomite was applied at 1 ton/acre (June, 1987) and superphosphate (0-20-0) with minor elements (F503 at 80 lb/ton 0-20-0) was applied at 600 Ib/acre (Aug. 1988). Raised beds of EauGallie fine sand were formed on February 9, 1988. The 30-inch wide beds were spaced on 4.5 ft centers with seepage irrigation ditches spaced every 7 beds. Fertilizer included 15-0-30-2 (N-P205-K20-MgO) at 240 lb/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB) which was distributed into 2 narrow bands in shallow grooves on the bed surface 8 inches to each side of the bed center. This fertilizer regime provided a 1:2 ratio of N:K20 with approximately 36 lb N per 1000 LFB. The beds were fumigated with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (67%:33%) at 36 lb/1000 LFB and mulched with black polyethylene film. Transplant Production: All replicated entries (Table 1) and observational entries (Table 7) were sown on January 7, 1988 into wooden flats containing Black BeautyR (Mineral Aggregates, Inc.), an inert processed product of spent coal, and lightly covered with coarse vermiculite. Seedlings were transferred 12 days later into ToddR planter flats (Speedling, Inc., 1.5 x 1.5 x 2.5-inch cells, model 150) containing vermiculite and Canadian peat (1:1, v:v) amended with superphosphate, dolomite and micronutrients. Crop Production: Transplants were set in the field on February 25, 1988 29 inches apart in single rows in the center of each bed, and drenched with 20-20- 20 liquid fertilizer at 5 lb/100 gal water. Four replications of 10 plants per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design for the replicated (harvested) trial, and single 10-plant plots were used for the observational trial. Heavy resetting was done on February 29, March 4, 7 and 10, 1988. This 1Biological Administrator I, Associate Professor (Vegetable Breeder) and Center Director, respectively. 2 was subsequent to high winds and low temperatures on February 27 and 28 which caused dessication injury to the transplants, Shielded sprays of paraquat were applied to the row middles for weed control. Plants were later staked and tied without pruning. Weather information for the season compared to 33-yr averages is in Table 2, Crops were scouted for insect control throughout the season. Leafminer and armyworm populations were the primary insects. Methamidophos, methomyl, permethrin and Bacillus thuringiensis were applied on an "as needed" basis following label instructions. Leafminer was a severe problem and was a factor in scheduling only two harvests. A regular spray program utilizing maneb-ZnSO4 and chlorothalonil was followed to prevent or control fungal diseases. Tribasic copper sulfate was added to maneb-ZnSO4 sprays early in the season to control foliar bacterial disease. Fruit of the replicated trial entries were harvested at the mature green stage (or beyond) on May 23 and June 2. Tomatoes were graded as cull or marketable in quality, and marketable fruit were sized by machine as: 6x7 (medium), 6x6 (large) and 5x6 (extra large) according to commercial standards (soe Table 3, 4, or 6 for specifications). Both cull and marketable fruit were counted and weighed. Subjective ratings were given to all tomato entries in the replicated and observational trials at the end of the season when red ripe fruit were on the vine. Since replicated entries were harvested, additional unharvested plots of replicated entries were planted specifically for late season appraisal. Ratings were given in various categories defining plant features, fruit quality and horticultural characteristics. The ratings and the explanation of the rating scales are contained in the footnotes of Table 7 and Table 8. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Seasonal. Total marketable yields for the spring ranged from 163.7 cartons/1000 linear feet of bed (LFB) for 'Summer Flavor 6000' to 277.5 cartons/1000 LFB for 'NVH 4459' (Table 3). Four entries were similar to 'NVH 4459' in high yield, 'Regency' (245.2 cartons/1000 LFB), 'Bingo' (241.9), 'Bonita' (225.4) and 'FTE 12' (223.9). The range of total seasonal yields is lower than in past spring trials, since only two harvests were conducted as compared to three in previous years (1-6). Highest extra large (and larger) fruit yield was produced by 'Bingo' (136.4 cartons/1000 LFB), 'NVH 4459' (131.4), 'PSR 76184' (112.9) and 'IFAS 7193' (110.2). Average fruit weight ranged from 4.8 oz for 'FMX 86' to 6.2 oz for 'IFAS 7193'. Only 'IFAS 7193' and 'Bingo' produced fruit of 6 oz or greater for a seasonal average. Cull production ranged from 13.0% for 'IFAS 7193' to 31.4% for 'Duke'. 'IFAS 7193' was the only entry with cull production less than 20%. First harvest (May 23, 1988). Earliness as judged by the marketable yields obtained at the first harvest were highest for 'NVH 4459' with 170.9 cartons/1000 LFB which was similar to only 'Bingo' with 136.3 cartons/1000 LFB (Table 4). These two entries also produced the highest extra large (and larger) yield, 'NVH 4459' with 94.8 cartons/1000 LFB and 'Bingo' with 97.1 cartons/1000 LF8. These results are similar to spring 1985 and 1986 trials and higher than spring 1987 (4-6). When earliness of a variety was considered as the percentage of fruit harvested at each date, more than 50% of their total seasonal yield at the first harvest was produced by (Table 5): 'NVH 4459' (61.6%), 'Bingo' (56.3%), 'Summer Flavor 6000' (54.5%), 'Sun 984' (55.4%), 'Duke' (53.3%) and 'IFAS 7182' (52.7%). Average fruit weight at the first harvest ranged from 5.2 oz ('Summer Flavor 4200' and 'Summer Flavor 6000') to 6.6 oz ('IFAS 7193'). Cull production ranged from 16.7% for 'IFAS 7193' to 35.9% for 'Regency'. Plant stands wore similar for all entries with the exception of 'Horizon' which had an average plant stand of 80%, significantly lower than the other entries. Second harvest (June 2, 1988). 'Regency' had the highest total marketable yield at the second harvest (180.8 cartons/1000 LFB) (Table 6). All other yields were lower and none of the remaining entries were sl gnirIafrtaly different. The range of yield, 74,5 to 180.8 cartons/1000 LFB, was similar to previous spring trials (3-6). Greatest extra large (and larger) yields were produced by 'PSR 76184' (61.8 cartons/1000 IFB), 'Rcgency' (51.3), 'IFAS 7193' (50.0), 'Bingo' (39.3) and 'NVH 4459' (36.5). Average fruit weight ranged from 4.4 oz for 'FMX 86' and 'NVH 4459' to 5.9 oz for 'IFAS 7193'. Cull production ranged from 9.6% for 'IFAS 7193' to 29.5% for 'FMX 86'. Plant stand was only significantly low for 'Horizon' at 75%. Subjective Evaluations: All of the replicated entries were given ratings for horticultural characteristics at the end of the season (Tables 7 and 8). These ratings are from plots of 10 plants each. They are intended only to provide general indications of the crop at a given location and time. Observational Entries. Ninety-three entries wore given subjective ratings (Tables 7 and 8) for plant types, fruit type and general horticultural characteristics. These entries were not harvested and evaluations were conducted with ripened fruit on the plants. Most favorable ratings for overall fruit and plant characteristics were given to 'FTE 12', 'Suncoast', 'Sunre 7E- 660' and two cherry tomatoes 'Chello' and 'HMX 4817' (Table 7). Ratings which indicated a lack of fruit defects were given to: 'IFAS 7209', 'IFAS 7212', 'NC 87194', 'NC 87408', 'NC 8642B' (cherry), and PSX 77684. Note: The information contained in this report is a summary of experimental results, and should not be used as recommendations for crop production. Where trade names are used, no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is implied. 4 LITERATURE CITED 1. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1982. Hand harvest tomato variety trial results for spring 1982. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1982- 15. 2. Ibid. 1983. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1983. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1983-20. 3. Ibid. 1984. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1984. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1984-10. 4. Ibid. 1985. Fresh market tomato variety trial results for spring 1985 at Bradenton, FL. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1935-21. 5. Ibid. 1986. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1986. Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1986-16. 6. Ibid. 1987. Tomato variety trial results for spring 1987. Bradenton GCREC Res, Rept. BRA1987-20. 7. Stanley, C.D. 1988. Temperature and rainfall report for 1987. Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1988-11. Acknowledgement: The authors wish to express their appreciation to the following companies for their financial aid in support of vegetable variety trials during 1988: Asgrow Florida Co., Plant City, FL; Campbell's Soup Co., Camden, NJ. Table 1. Sources and types of tomato entries included in the spring 1988 replicated (harvested) trial. Entry Type Sourcez Dingo Hybrid Ferry-,iorse Bonita Hybrid Northrup King Duke Hybrid Petoseed Floratom II Hybrid Petoseed FMX 86 Hybrid Ferry-Morse FTE 12 Hybrid Petoseed Horizon Open pollinated GCREC IFAS 7132 Open pollinated GCREC IFAS 7193 Open pollinated GCREC IFAS 7211 Open pollinated GCREC NVH 4459 Hybrid Northrup King Pacific Hybrid Asgrow PSR 76184 Hybrid Petoseed Regency Hybrid Harris Moran Solar Set Hybrid GCREC Summer Flavor 4200 Hybrid Abbott & Cobb Summer Flavor 6000 Hybrid Abbott & Cobb Sun 984 Hybrid Sunseeds Sunny Hybrid Asgrow XP,-l 5129 Hybrid Asgrow ZGCREC = Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Bradenton, FL. Table 2. Temperature and rainfall at the GCREC during spring 1988z and the 33- year average (7). Average Daily Temperature (OF) 1988 33-yr. avg Rainfall (in.) Month iMax Mlin Max iaiin 1988 33-yr, avg. Feb. 74 49 73 51 2.34 3.25 Mar. 78 55 77 55 5.27 3.39 Apr. 84 50 82 60 0.77 1.59 ay 86 53 87 64 2.55 3.14 Jun. 90 70 91 70 2.80 7.75 Feb. 25 June 2. 1988. ZTomato trial: Table 3. Yields and fruit size of tomato entries in the spring of 1988 trial for the entire season (Two harvests: May 23 and June 2, 1988). Marketable Yields (cartons/1000 LFB)z Average Seasonal Extra Large+ Large Medium Fruit Entry Total (5 X 6)+ (6 X 6) (6 X 7) Culls (%) Wt (oz) NVH 4459 277.5 aY 131.4 a 90.2 a-c 55.9 a-e 27.0 a-c 5.2 c-f Regency 245.2 ab 93.6 bc 98.0 a 53.6 a-f 29.5 ab 5.4 c-f Bingo 241.9 a-c 136.4 a 77.3 a-c 28.3 fg 24.6 b-d 6.0 ab Bonita 225.4 a-d 70.7 c-e 93.6 ab 61.1 a-c 24.6 b-d 5.4 c-f FTE 12 223.9 a-d 59.2 c-f 86.5 a-c 78.2 a 28.3 ab 5.0 d-f Duke 219.0 b-d 76.2 c-e 90.5 a-c 52.2 a-f 31.4 a 5.6 b-d Floratom II 218.5 b-d 65.5 c-e 86.8 a-c 66.2 ab 29.0 ab 5.0 c-f PSR 76184 216.1 b-d 112.9 ab 69.8 b-d 33.4 c-g 25.0 b-d 5.6 b-d Pacific 203.5 b-d 72.9 c-e 82.5 a-c 48.1 b-g 22.1 cd 5.1 c-f Sun 984 199.2 b-d 91.6 b-d 72.6 a-d 35.0 c-g 24.8 b-d 5.6 bc XPH 5129 199.1 b-d 65.9 c-e 79.9 a-c 53.3 a-f 25.1 b-d 5.2 c-f IFAS 7182 197.0 b-d 60.6 c-f 76.0 a-c 60.4 a-c 20.3 d 5.0-d-f IFAS 7211 194.8 b-d 53.1 ef 80.8 a-c 61.0 a-c 27.9 a-c 5.0 d-f IFAS 7193 183.8 b-d 110.2 ab 49.8 d 23.7 g 13.0 e 6.2 a Sunny 180.9 cd 55.6 d-f 77.8 a-c 47.5 b-g 26.6 a-c 5.1 c-f FMX 86 173.8 d 39.9 ef 69.9 b-d 64.0 ab 29.4 ab 4.8 f Horizon 172.8 d 43.2 ef 67.4 cd 62.2 ab 29.2 ab 4.9 ef Solar Set 168.6 d 72.2 c-e 65.9 cd 30.5 e-g 23.4 cd 5.5 c-e Summer Flavor 4200 163.8 d 26.3 f 65.1 cd 72.4 ab 29.6 ab 4.9 ef Summer Flavor 6000 163.7 d 39.5 ef 66.5 cd 57.7 a-d 24.0 b-d 4.9 ef ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB adjusted to 100% plant (no belt) greater than diameter; medium (6x7) diameter. = Linear feet of bed. Acre = 9680 LFB. All yields stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = 2 10/32 inches YMean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 4. Yields and fruit size of tomato entries for the first harvest, May 23, 1988. Marketable Yields (Carton/1000 LFB)Z Average Plant Total Extra Large+ Large Medium Culls Fruit Stand Entry First Pick (5 X 6)+ (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) It (oz) (%) NVH 4459 170.9 aY 94.8 a 54.0 a 22.1 a-d 26.9 b-f 5.9 b-f 100.0 a Bingo 136.3 ab 97.1 a 30.2 b-d 9.0 c-e 26.2 b-f 6.6 ab 100.0 a Duke 116.7 bc 50.7 bc 48.7 ab 17.4 a-e 34.6 ab 6.2 a-d 95.0 a Bonita 111.9 b-d 47.2 bc 40.8 a-c 23.9 a-d 20.5 fg 5.8 c-f 100.0 a Sun 984 110.3 b-d 60.9 b 35.4 a-d 14.0 a-e 23.4 c-g 6.0 a-e 100.0 a IFAS 7182 103.8 b-d 40.6 b-d 38.1 a-c 25.1 ab 22.5 d-g 5.4 ef 100.0 a FTE 12 101.9 b-d 38.4 b-d 38.7 a-c 24.8 a-c 30.7 a-d 5.3 ef 97.5 a Pacific 96.5 b-d 46.9 bc 32.9 b-d 16.8 a-e 24.6 c-f 5.8 c-f 97.5 a XPH 5129 96.3 b-d 40.5 b-d 33.4 b-d 22.4 a-d 22.4 d-g 5.7 c-f 92.5 ab Floratom II 91.5 b-d 36.3 b-d 35.5 a-d 19.8 a-e 29.9 a-d 5.6 d-f 97.5 a Summer Flavor 6000 89.2 b-d 31.9 cd 34.6 a-d 22.7 a-d 21.6 e-g 5.2 f 95.0 a PSR 76184 86.4 b-d 51.2 bc 24.8 cd 10.5 b-e 29.0 a-e 5.8 c-f 100.0 a Sunny 85.7 cd 34.9 b-d 34.2 a-d 16.5 a-e 29.3 a-e 5.4 ef 100.0 a IFAS 7193 85.3 cd 60.2 b 16.4 d 8.7 de 16.9 g 6.6 a 97.5 a Horizon 84.7 cd 29.3 cd 31.4 b-d 24.0 a-d 30.2 a-d 5.3 ef 80.0 b IFAS 7211 82.9 cd 30.5 cd 34.0 a-d 18.4 a-e 26.4 b-f 5.3 f 100.0 a Solar Set 77.7 cd 42.8 b-d 24.6 cd 10.3 b-e 26.3 b-f 6.0 a-e 97.5 a FMX 86 76.9 cd 24.9 cd 32.8 b-d 19.2 a-e 31.1 a-c 5.5 d-f 100.0 a Summer Flavor 4200 74.2 cd 17.9 d 26.8 cd 29.5 a 31.4 a-c 5.2 f 100.0 a Regency 64.4 d 42.3 b-d 16.8 d 5.4 e 35.9 a 6.4 a-c 92.5 ab ZCarton = 25 Ibs. LFB = Linear feet of bed. Acre = 9680 LFB. All yields adjusted to 100% plant stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 inches diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = less than 2 10/32 inches diameter. Yiean separation within columns by Duncan's Multiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 5. Percentage of seasonal marketable yield by harvest, spring, 1988. May 23 June 2 Entry -------------------%-------------------- NVH 4459 61.6 38.4 Regency 26.3 73.7 Bingo 56.3 43.7 Bonita 49.6 50.4 FTE 12 45.5 54.5 Duke 53.3 46.7 Floratom II 41.9 58.1 PSR 76184 40.0 60.0 Pacific 47.4 52.5 Sun 984 55.4 44.6 XPH 5129 48.4 51.7 IFAS 7182 52.7 47.3 IFAS 7211 42.6 57.4 IFAS 7193 46.4 53.6 Sunny 47.4 52.7 FMX 86 44.2 55.8 Horizon 49.0 51.0 Solar Set 46.1 54.0 Summer Flavor 4200 45.3 54.7 Summer Flavor 6000 54.5 45.5 Table 6. Yields and fruit size of tomato entries for the second harvest, - June 2, 1988. Marketable Yields (Carton/1000 LFB)z Average Plant Total Extra Large+ Large Medium Culls Fruit Stand Entry Second Pick (5 X 6)+ (6 X 6) (6 X 7) (%) Wt (oz) (%) Regency 180.8 aY 51.3 ab 81.2 a 48.3 ab 27.1 ab 5.1 a-d 90.0 a PSR 76184 129.7 b 61.8 a 45.0 b 22.9 c-e 21.1 ab 5.4 ab 100.0 a Floratom II 127.0 b 29.2 b-f 51.3 b 46.5 ab 28.7 a 4.6 b-d 95.0 a FTE 12 122.0 b 20.8 d-f 47.8 b 53.4 a 25.6 ab 4.7 b-d 97.5 a Bonita 113.5 b 23.5 c-f 52.8 b 37.2 a-d 28.7 a 5.1 a-d 100.0 a IFAS 7211 111.9 b 22.6 c-f 46.8 b 42.5 a-c 28.9 a 4.8 b-d 100.0 a Pacific 106.9 b 25.9 b-f 49.7 b 31.3 b-e 19.3 ab 4.7 b-d 97.5 a NVH 4459 106.6 b 36.5 a-e 36.2 b 33.8 a-e 27.0 ab 4.4 d 100.0 a Bingo 105.6 b 39.3 a-d 47.0 b 19.2 de 25.5 ab 5.4 a-c 100.0 a XPH 5129 102.9 b 25.4 b-f 46.5 b 30.9 b-e 26.1 ab 4.9 b-d 90.0 a Duke 102.3 b 25.6 b-f 41.8 b 34.9 a-e 27.8 ab 5.0 b-d 90.0 a IFAS 7193 98.5 b 50.0 a-c 33.5 b 15.0 e 9.6 c 5.9 a 97.5 a FMX 86 96.9 b 15.0 d-f 37.1 b 44.8 ab 29.5 a 4.4 d 100.0 a Sunny 95.3 b 20.7 d-f 43.6 b 31.0 b-e 24.6 ab 5.0 b-d 100.0 a IFAS 7182 93.2 b 20.1 d-f 37.9 b 35.3 a-d 19.6 ab 4.7 b-d 92.5 a Solar Set 91.0 b 29.4 b-f 41.3 b 20.3 de 18.6 b 5.2 a-d 97.5 a Summer Flavor 4200 89.6 b 8.4 ef 38.3 b 42.9 a-c 29.4 a 4.7 b-d 92.5 a Sun 984 88.9 b 30.7 b-f 37.2 b 21.0 de 26.5 ab 5.2 a-d 100.0 a Horizon 88.1 b 13.9 d-f 36.1 b 38.2 a-d 28.8 a 4.6 b-d 75.0 b Summer Flavor 6000 74.5 b 7.6 f 32.0 b 35.0 a-e 26.1 ab 4.6 cd 90.0 a ZCarton = 25 lbs. LFB = linear feet of bed. Acre = 9680 LFB. All yields adjusted to 100% plant stand. Grading belt hole sizes: extra large (5x6) = (no belt) greater than 2 26/32 inches diameter; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 inches diameter; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches diameter, cull = less than 2 10/32 inches diameter. YMiean separation within columns by Duncan's Hultiple Range Test, 5% level. Table 7. Fruit and plant characteristics for entries in replicated and observational trials, spring 1988. Plant FruitY Fruitw Fruitv Fruitt Leafs Blossomw Fruitw Internal" Source/Entry Habit Shoulder Stemx Set Size Maturityu Shape Shape End Firmness Quality Abbott & Cobb ACX 871304 t gb 2.0 jo 3 3.5 2.5 3 c 2 4.5 4 ACX 871305 t gb 3.0 jo 3 3 3 3.5 s 3 3.5 2.5 ACX 87SU69 t gb 3.5 jo 2.5 3 4 3 s 4 3.5 3 ACX 87SU70 m-t gb 3.0 jo 3 5 2 3 s 4.5 1.5 3 ACX 87SU71 s ug 2.0 jo 3 2.5 2 4 c 3.5 3 2.5 Hybrid 661 m-t gb 2.0 jo 3.5 3 3 3.5 s 4.5 3 3.5 Hybrid 662 s-m ug 2.5 jo 4 4 1.5 4 s 5 2 3 Summer Flavor 2000 s-m gb 3.5 j2 4 3.5 2.5 3.5 s 2 3.5 3 Summer Flavor 3000 m-t gb 2 jo 2.5 3 3.5 3 s 2 3.5 3 Summer Flavor 4000 m gb 4.5 j2 3.0 3 2.5 3 s 3 4 4 Summer Flavor 4200 t ug 4.0 j2 3 3 3 3.5 s 3 2 2 Summer Flavor 5000 t gb 3.0 jo 3.5 3 2.5 4 s 3 3 2.5 Summer Flavor 6000 t ug 4.0 j2 3.5 3.5 3 3 s 4 2 3 Asgrow Gator m-t gb 3.5 j2 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 s 4.5 3 2.5 Pacific t gb 3.0 jo 4 4 2.5 4 s 4.5 3 2 Sunny m gb 4.0 jo 3 4 3 4 s 3 2 2 XPH 5129 m-t Itgb 4.0 j2 4.5 4 2 4 s 4 2 2.5 Ball Champion t gb 1.5 jo 3 3 2 2 s 4 2 2.5 Early Girl t gb 2.5 jo 3.5 1.5 2 3 s 3 2 2.5 Heartland t gb 2.0 jo 2.5 2.5 3.5 3.5 s 3 3 2 Super Fantastic t gb 2.5 jo 2.5 3 2.5 2 s 3.5 1.5 3 Ferry-Morse Bingo t ug 3.0 jo 2.5 4 3 3 s 5 3 3 FtX 86 t gb 3.0 j2 3 3 4 3 s 3 3 3.5 FMX 157 m ug 3.0 jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 3 3 5 Table 7 (continued). Plant Fruity Fruitw Fruitv Fruitt Leafs Blossomw Fruitw Internal* Source/Entry Habit Shoulder Stemx Set Size Maturityu Shape Shape End Firmness Quality Harris Moran Chello (cherry) t gb 4.5 jo 4.5 3 1.5 4 s 5 2.5 4 HMX 2807 t ug 3.0 jo 3 3.5 3.5 3 s 2 4 2.5 HMX 4817 (cherry) t gb 5.0 jo 4 2.5 3 4 s 5 2 4.5 HMX 6796 t ug 2.0 jo 3.5 3.5 3 3.5 s 4 2 4 Ole m gb 2.5 jo 3.5 4 3 4 s 2 2.5 3.5 Regency m-t Itgb 3.0 j2 4.5 4 2 3.5 s 2.5 3 4 IFAS-University of Florida Flora-Dade t gb 3.0 j2 3.5 3 3 3 c 4 4 3 Hayslip t gb 3.0 j2 4 2.5 3 3 s 2 4.5 3 Horizon m Itgb 4.0 j2 4 4 2 4 s 2 2 3 Solar Set (7164) m gb 3.0 jo 3.5 3 3 4 s 3.5 2 3 Suncoast m Itgb 3.0 jo 4 4.5 3 3 s 3 4 5 7182 m-t ltgb 4.0 j2 3.5 4 2 4.5 s 3.5 3 4.5 7193 t Itgb 4.0 jo 4 4.5 3 3.5 s 3 3.5 3.5 7206 m gb 3.0 jo 4 4 2 4 s 2 3.5 3.5 7208 s gb 3.0 jo 4.5 3.5 2 3 s 2 1.5 3 7209 m Itgb 3.0 jo 4 3.5 3 3 s 3 3 3.5 7210 t gb 2.5 jo 3 3 3 4 s 4 3.5 3.5 7211 m-t Itgb 3.0 jo 4 2.5 2.5 4 s 4 2 2.5 7212 s-m Itgb 2.5 jo 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.5 s 2.5 2.5 3.0 Neuman NS 265 t gb 3.5 jo 2 3 3 3.5 s 3 3.5 3.5 NS 266 t gb 2.5 jo 3 3.5 3 3 s 3 2 2.5 NS 267 t ug 4.0 jo 2 2.5 3.5 4.5 s 5 2.5 3.5 NS 268 t gb 3.5 j2 2.5 2.3 3 3 s 2 4.5 3.5 Taurus m-t gb 4.0 j2 3 2.5 3 3 s 2 3.5 3 Table 7 (continued). Plant FruitY Fruitw Fruitv Fruitt Leafs Blossomw Fruitw Internalw Source/Entry Habit Shoulder Stemx Set Size Maturityu Shape Shape End Firmness Quality North Carolina State NC 8642N (cherry) NC 86171 NC 86255 NC 87127 NC 87175 NC 87185 NC 87188 NC 87194 NC 87236 NC 87237 NC 87294 NC 87345 NC 87380 NC 87408 Piedmont Summit Northrup King Bonita NVH 4459 Park Sweet million (cherry) Petoseed AllStar Duke Floratom II FTE 12 University t ug t ug t ug m-t ug t ug t ug t ug m ug t ug t ug t ug s ug m ug t gb t ug m-t gb t ug m gb t gb 5.0 gb 3.0 ug 3.0 gb 3.0 ltgb 3.5 5.0 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 2.5 3 3 3 3 3.5 4.5 3.5 2 3.5 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 3 3.5 3.5 4 4 3 3.5 3 4 3.5 3.5 2.5 1 3 3 3.5 3 2.5 2 1 4 3 3 3.5 4 3 3 3 35 3 4 4 4 3.5 3 3.5 3.5 3 4 3.5 3 3 3.5 3 5 3 3 3.5 3 4 4 4.5 4.5 4 4 4.5 3 3 3 4 4.5 2 s 5 3.5 2 3 2 4 4.5 5 5 5 3.5 3.5 5 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 3 3.5 3 3 3 3.5 4 3 2.5 4 3.5 4 4 4 4 4 2.5 3 4 3.5 2 2 2 3 4 4 3 3 3.5 3 1.5 3 3.5 3 jo 5 2.5 4 3.5 4 Table 7 (continued). Plant FruitY Fruitw Fruitv Fruitt Leafs BlossomW Fruitw Internalw Source/Entry Habit Shoulder Stemx Set Size Maturityu Shape Shape End Firmness Quality FTE 23 m gb 3.0 jo 4 4 3 c 2 4 3 PSR 34283 t gb 3.0 j2 3 2.5 4.5 s 2.5 3 3 PSR 76184 t gb 3.0 jo 2.5 3 4 s 3 2.5 3 PSR 77484 m gb 2.5 jo 3 4 3 .5 s 2.5 3.5 3 PSX 34183 t gb 3.0 j2 3.5 3 3.5 s 3 3.5 4 PSX 77684 t gb 2.5 jo 2.5 4 4 .5 s 2.5 4 4 Sakata SA87-733 m gb 2.0 j2 2.5 3.5 3 s 4.5 4 3.5 SA87-743 t gb 3.5 j2 3 3 3.5 4 s 4 4 3.5 SA87-752 s-m gb 3.0 j2 2.5 3 3 3 s 4 4 3.5 SA87-754 m-t gb 3.5 j2 2.5 3 3 3 s 3.5 4 3 SA87-770 t ug 3.0 jo 2.5 3.5 3.5 4 s 3.5 4 3.5 SA87-771 t ug 3.0 jo 2.5 2.5 3 3.5 c 4.5 4 3.5 SA87-777 m gb 3.5 j2 3 3 4 4.5 s 4 3.5 3 SA87-817 m-t gb 3.0 j2 2.5 3.5 2.5 1 s 3 2 3 Sunseeds Sun 7E-660 m-t ug 3.0 j2 3.5 3.5 2 e s 4 4 4.5 Sun 54-1031 t gb 3.0 jo 3.5 4 3 3 s 3 2 1 Sun 54-1033 t gb 3.0 jo 3.5 3.5 3 4 s 4 2 3.5 Sun 54-1103 t gb 3.5 j2 3.5 4 3 3 s 3 3 3 Sun 54-1117 m-t gb 3.0 jo 3 3.5 2 3.5 s 4 3 2.5 Sun 54-1133 m-t gb 3.0 jo 4 3.5 2.5 c 3.5 3 3.5 Sun 984 m-t gb 3.0 jo 3.5 3 4 4 c 4.5 2 1 Sunre 6563 t gb 3.0 jo 3.0 2.5 3 3 s 3 2 3 Zs = short; m = medium, t = tall. Yl = rough; 5 = smooth; ug = uniform green; gb = green base; Itgb = light green base. Xjo = jointed; j2 = jointless. W1 = poor; 5 = excellent. V1 = small; 5 = extra large. Ul = early; 5 = late. tl = inconsistent; 3 = average amount of variability; 5 = shape very consistent. Ss = smooth; s/c = slightly curled leaves; c = curled. Table 8. Fruit defects for entries in replicated and observational trials, spring 1988. Black Persistentz GrayZ Radialz Conc.z Shoulder Green Source/Entry Blotchyz Wall Zipperz Crack Crack (checking) Shoulder CommentsY Abbott & Cobb ACX 871304 ACX 871305 ACX 87SU69 ACX 87SU70 ACX 87SU71 Hybrid 661 Hybrid 662 Summer Flavor 2000 Summer Flavor 3000 Summer Flavor 4000 Summer Flavor 4200 Summer Flavor 5000 Summer Flavor 6000 Asgrow Gator Pacific Sunny XPH 5129 Ball Champion Early Girl Heartland Super Fantastic 5 5 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5 5 4 5 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.7 5 4.7 4.8 4 5 4.7 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 3 4.5 5 4.7 4 4.5 4.5 4.9 4.5 4 4 3 4 4.5 3 5 4 4 4.7 3 4 5 4.9 5 4.9 5 5 5 5 5 4.9 5 4.9 5 5 4.5 5 5 4 4.7 4.7 4.7 5 4 4.7 4 4.5 4.5 4 4 4.5 3.5 5 5 4.5 b.e.r. b.e.r. sl b.e.r., splits sl pointed b.e. b.e. rough sv b.e.r.,squat fruit b.e.r. b.e.r., splits splits pointed b.e. deep fruit, b.e.r. pointed b.e., sl b.e.r. sv. splitting v. tall, pointed b.e., sv b.e.r. pointed b.e., cat- facing, b.e.r., splitting Table 8 (continued). Black Persistentz Grayz Radialz Conc.z Shoulder Green Source/Entry Blotchyz Wall Zipperz Crack Crack (checking) Shoulder CommentsY Ferry Morse Bingo 5 FMX 86 4.5 FiMX 157 4.5 Harris Noran Chello (cherry) 5 HMX 2807 4.5 HMX 4817 (cherry) 5 HMX 6796 5 Ole 5 Regency 4.5 IFAS-University of Florida Flora-Dade 5 Hayslip 5 Horizon 2 Solar Set (7164) 5 Suncoast 5 7182 5 7193 5 7206 5 7208 5 4 4 5 5 4.7 5 3 5 5 4.7 4.5 5 4.5 4.7 5 5 4.9 3.5 5 4.7 4.5 5 7209 7210 7211 7212 4.5 5 4.5 5 4.5 5 3.5 4.5 4.8 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.8 4.5 5 5 4.5 4.5 5 4.7 5 5 4.9 5 5 5 5 5 4.7 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 5 5 4.5 5 5 5 5 4.5 3.5 5 4 4.7 5 5 5 4.7 5 4.5 5 5 pointed b.e. gold fruit sl transluscent healthy vine4, spider tracks b.e.r. spider tracks 1g, open b.e. b.e.r. sl indented b.e. catfacing, folds, open b.e., b.e.r. one plant b.e.r. Table 8 (continued). Black Persistentz Grayz Radialz Conc.z Shoulder Green Source/Entry Blotchyz Wall Zipperz Crack Crack (checking) Shoulder CommentsY Neuman NS 265 NS 266 NS 267 NS 268 Taurus North Carolina State NC 8642B (cherry) NC 86171 NC 86255 NC 87127 NC 87175 NC 87185 NC 87188 NC 87194 NC 87236 NC 87237 NC 87294 NC 87345 NC 87380 NC 87408 Piedmont Summit Northrup King Bonita NVH 4459 5 5 4.5 University 5 4 5 5 5 4 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 4.7 5 5 4.5 3 4 3.5 5 5 5 5 5 4.9 4.9 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 4.9 4 4.7 5 4.7 4.7 4.5 4 3 4 3.5 5 4.7 5 4.7 4.9 4 4.5 5 4 4 4.5 3.5 5 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.9 5 5 5 5 s1 b.e.r. catfacing splits b.e.r., catfacing catfacing, puffy, splits spider tracks, in- dented & lg b.e., b.e.r. v. tall yellow-orange pointed b.e. spider tracks pointed b.e. sl b.e.r. folds in fruit pointed b.e., splits b.e.r. spider tracks cracks lg & deep Table 8 (continued). Black Persistentz Grayz Radialz Conc.z Shoulder Green Source/Entry Blotchyz Wall Zipperz Crack Crack (checking) Shoulder CommentsY Park Sweet Million (cherry) Petoseed All Star Duke Floratom II FTE 12 FTE 23 PSR 34283 PSR 76184 PSR 77484 PSX 34183 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4.5 4.5 PSX 77684 Sakata SA87-733 4.5 5 4 5 5 4.7 4.5 4.7 5 5 5 5 4.5 SA87-743 SA87-752 SA87-754 SA87-770 SA87-771 SA87-777 SA87-817 5 4.5 5 4.9 4.5 4.5 5 4.5 4.8 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 5 5 4.8 4.5 4 4.7 4.5 4.8 4.5 5 3.5 5 5 5 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 4.8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 .4.9 5 5 5 4.9 5 4.7 4.7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.8 5 5 5 4 4 4.5 4.8 4.5 5 4.7 4.7 4.7 5 5 5 4.5 4 5 5 5 4.8 transluscent holes in fruit sides pointed b.e., b.e.r. spider tracks, open folds in fruit b.e.r. sl b.e.r., splits, spider tracks pointed b.e., sv b.e.r., puffy, fruit flat sided spider tracks b.e.r., spider tracks spider tracks, yellow shoulders, b.e.r. b.e.r. on one plant open holes in sides of fruit, b.e.r., sl spider tracks spider tracks, pointed b.e., b.e.r., catfacing Table 8 (continued). Black Persistentz Grayz Radialz Conc.z Shoulder Green Source/Entry Blotchyz Wall Zipperz Crack Crack (checking) Shoulder CommentsY Sunseeds Sun 7E-660 5 5 4.8 4 5 4.9 5 spider tracks, sv. b.e.r., pointed b.e. Sun 54-1031 4 5 4 4.5 5 4.5 sl pointed b.e. Sun 54-1033 3 2 5 4 5 5 4.5 pointed b.e. Sun 54-1103 4.7 5 5 4 5 5 4 catfacing & folds Sun 54-1117 4.8 4.8 4.5 4 5 5 4.5 b.e.r. Sun 54-1133 4 5 4.5 4.5 5 5 5 catfacing, b.e.r., indented & pointed b.e. Sun 984 2 1 5 5 5 5 4.5 pointed b.e. Sunre 6563 3 2 5 4.5 5 5 5 indented b.e. zl = severe; 5 = absence of defect. Yb.e.r. = blossom end rot; sl = slightlyy); b.e. = blossom end; sv = severe; 1g = large; v = very. |