91-/3
GULF COAST RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER
IFAS, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
5007 60th STREET EAST
BRADENTON, FL 34203
Bradenton GCREC Research Report BRA1991-13 July 1991
TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS FOR SPR I ic.
T. K. Howe, J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters'
Twenty fresh market tomato varieties or breeding lines were evaluated in a
replicated yield trial in the spring of 1991 at the Gulf Coast Research and
Education Center in Bradenton, FL. In addition, seventy-two breeding lines and
varieties were evaluated visually (no harvest) in non-replicated observational
plots.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Bed Preparation: Soil in the trial area was sampled before field preparation and
analyzed by the IFAS Soil Testing Lab: ph=6.5, Melich I extractable (double
acid), elements P=16, K=20, Mg=109, Ca=778, Zn=2.4, Cu=1.2, Mn=0.7, and Fe=6.7
ppm. Raised beds of EauGallie fine sand were formed on January 24, 1991. The
32-inch wide, 8-inch high beds were spaced on 5-ft centers with 6 beds between
seepage irrigation ditches. Fertilizer included 15-0-30-2 (N-P20s-KO2-MgO) at
1917 Ib/A (Acre = 8712 linear feet of bed) distributed into 2 narrow bands in
shallow grooves on the bed surface 10 inches to each side of the bed center. In
addition, a banded false bed application of superphosphate (0-20-0 with 80 Ibs
per ton minor elements as F503) at 523 Ib/A was made. This fertilizer regime
provided a 1:2 ratio of N:K20 with approximately 288 lb N/A. Beds were fumigated
with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (67%:33%) at 189 Ib/mulched A (mulched A =
23,522 sq ft) and mulched with black polyethylene film.
Transplant Production: Seeds were sown on January 4, 1991 into wooden flats
containing an inert processed product of spent coal, and lightly covered with
coarse vermiculite. Seedlings were transferred 12 days later into planter flats
(1.5 x 1.5 x 2.5-inch cells) containing vermiculite and Canadian peat (1:1, v:v)
amended with superphosphate, dolomite and hydrated lime (11.3 lb, 5.6 lb and 2.8
Ib/cu yd, respectively).
Crop Production: Transplants were set in the field February 20, 1991, spaced
28.5 inches apart in single rows in the center of each bed, and drenched with 20-
20-20 liquid fertilizer at 3.0 lb/100 gal water. Four replications of 10 plants
per entry were arranged in a randomized complete block design for the harvested
trial, and single 8-plant plots were used for the observational trial. Plants
were staked and tied without pruning.
'Research Program Coordinator, Professor, and Center Director, respectively.
2
Plots were scouted for insect control throughout the season. Sweetpotato
whitefly, thrips, leafminer and lepidopterous larvae, in descending order, were
the primary insects found. Permethrin, endosulfan, oxamyl, esfenvalerate,
avermectin, methamidophos, insecticidal soap and Bacillus thuringiensis were
applied as needed following label instructions. A spray program utilizing
mancozeb, tribasic copper and chlorothalonil was followed for bacterial spot,
target spot, and as general controls for other fungal diseases. Paraquat was
applied to row middles for weed control.
Fruit of the replicated trial entries (Table 2) were harvested at the mature-
green stage (or beyond) on May 13 and 22, 1991. These dates approximated an
early-mid and mid-late season harvests. Tomatoes were graded as cull or
marketable by U.S. standards for grades (1) and marketable fruits were sized by
machine as: 6x7 (medium), 6x6 (large) and 5x6 (extra large) according to
commercial standards (see footnotes in Tables 2-4 for specifications). Both cull
and marketable fruit were counted and weighed.
Subjective ratings for various categories defining plant and fruit
characteristics were given to all tomato entries in the replicated and
observational trials at the end of the season when red ripe fruit were on the
vine (Table 5). Since replicated entries were harvested, additional non-
harvested plots of replicated entries were planted specifically for the late
season appraisal.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Weather information for the season compared to the 35-year averages (12) is in
Table 1. Temperatures were above normal for the entire production period.
Rainfall greatly exceeded the 35-year averages for April and May. There was an
increased incidence of bacterial leaf spot and target spot diseases as the season
progressed, first apparent in late April. These diseases have not been
conspicuous during the spring trial period in the last nine years (2-10). The
Florida Tomato Geminivirus was also obvious in the production area from the
beginning of the season, although symptoms were generally not extreme and was
distributed through the field randomly.
Seasonal: Total marketable yields for the season (Table 2) ranged from 1251
cartons/A for IFAS 7384 to 2195 cartons/A for XPH 5796. These yields are much
lower (30-40% less) than those achieved at this location in recent spring seasons
(9,10). The bacterial spot infection and presence of the Florida Tomato
Geminivirus were the main reasons for the low yields. Ten entries were not
significantly different than XPH 5796 in yield, they were: IFAS 7385, 'Solar
Set', IFAS 7308, IFAS 7307, 'Agriset 761', IFAS 7264, ~SR 864189, 'Sunny',
'Cobia' and PSR 853689.
Extra-large fruit yield ranged from a low of 644 cartons/A for 'Regency' to 1239
cartons/A for 'Solar Set'. Eight other entries were similar to 'Solar Set' in
extra-large fruit yield, they were: 'Merced', IFAS 7385, PSR 864189, IFAS 7264,
'Agriset 761', 'Sunbeam', 'Cobia' and IFAS 7306. Large fruit ranged from 340
cartons/A for IFAS 7384 to 863 cartons/A for IFAS 7308. Only three other entries
were not significantly different than IFAS 7308 in large fruit yield, they were:
XPH 5796, IFAS 7307 and IFAS 7385.
Average fruit weight of 6 oz or greater was produced by 'Merced' (6.5 oz), IFAS
7306 (6.2), IFAS 7384 (6.1), 'Cobia' (6.0), PSR 853689 (6.0) and 'Sunbeam' (6.0).
The proportion of total fruit harvested which were culls ranged from 17% for IFAS
7307 to 44% for 'Regency'. Seven entries were below 25% in cull fruit.
First Harvest (May 13, 1991): The first harvest was timed such that red ripe
fruit were present for all entries and represented an early-midseason harvest for
most. Total marketable yields at the first pick averaged from 673 cartons/A for
'IFAS 7384' to 1228 cartons/A for 'Cobia' (Table 3). However, fourteen entries
were not significantly different than 'Cobia' in yield. Extra-large fruit yield
ranged from 364 cartons/A for 'Sunny' to 831 cartons/A for 'Merced'. Eight other
entries (PSR 864189, 'Solar Set', 'Summer Flavor 5000', 'Cobia', IFAS 7264,
'Agriset 761', 'Sunbeam' and IFAS 7307) were similar to 'Merced' in extra-large
fruit yield. Greatest large fruit yields were similar for eleven entries, all
exceeding 314 cartons/A.
Average marketable fruit weight ranged from 5.7 to 7.0 oz and nine entries
equalled or exceeded 6.3 oz. The proportion of total fruit harvested which were
culls ranged from 13% for IFAS 7307 to 40% for IFAS 7384. Main fruit defects at
this time included open or rough blossom ends, radial cracks, zipper scars and
rough shoulders. Two entries, IFAS 7384 and IFAS 7306 were among top yielding
entries in fall 1990 (12) but yields were drastically reduced in this trial due
to zippering of the fruit.
Second Harvest (May 22, 1991): Total marketable yields nine days later ranged
from 573 cartons/A for 'Summer Flavor 5000' to 1247 cartons/A for IFAS 7385
(Table 4). Only XPH 5796, 'Sunny', 'Agriset 761', IFAS 7308 and IFAS 7307 were
not significantly different than IFAS 7385 in total yield. Extra-large fruit
yield exceeded 350 cartons/A for seven entries, IFAS 7385 (529 cartons/A), 'Solar
Set (487), PSR 853689 (394), 'Sunny' (383), IFAS 7306 (378), 'Agriset 761 (357),
and 'Sunbeam' (354), and ranged from 163 to 529 cartons/A among all trial
entries. Large fruit yield ranged from 174 cartons/A for 'Merced' to 507
cartons/A for XPH 5796. Only three other entries, 'Sunny', IFAS 7385 and IFAS
7308 were similar to XPH 5796 in large fruit yield. Average fruit weight was
below 6.0 oz for all entries in trial and ranged from 4.7 oz for 'Summer Flavor
6000' to 5.9 oz for IFAS 7306. The proportion of total harvested fruit which
were culls ranged from a low of 19% for XPH 5796 to 57% for 'Regency'. The
primary defect at this harvest was radial cracking, and was a particular problem
for 'Cobia', 'Merced', 'Summer Flavor 6000', 'Summer Flavor 5000', and 'Regency'.
Horticultural Evaluation: All of the replicated and observational entries were
given ratings for numerous horticultural characteristics at the end of the season
(Table 5). Ratings of replicated entries were given to plots not'harvested for
yield data. These ratings provided general indications of crop performance and
tendencies for defects for this particular location and time. Highest quality
entries were: 'Sunbeam', IFAS 7248B, IFAS 7249B, IFAS 7375, IFAS 7408, 'Mountain
Spring', 'FTE 24', and PSR 853689.
Summary: Based on yield of extra-large and large sized fruit the first half of
the season, 'Cobia', PSR 864189, 'Solar Set', 'Summer Flavor 5000' and IFAS 7307
were good performers. However, of these, only 'Solar Set' still produced good
yields in the extra-large fruit category during the second half of the season.
Good second half of the season performers included IFAS 7385 and 'Sunny', if only
the extra-large and large fruit sizes are considered.
Note: The information contained in this report is a summary of experimental
results, and should not be used as recommendations for crop production. No
discrimination is intended nor endorsement implied where trade names are used.
Acknowledgement: The authors thank the following firms which contributed funds
toward cultivar research within the last 12 months (alphabetically): Abbott &
Cobb, Agrisales, American Takii, Asgrow, Petoseed, Neuman, Nunhems, Rogers/NK,
and Sakata America.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Anonymous. 1976. U.S. standards for grades of fresh tomatoes. USDA
Agric. Mktg. Serv. Washington, D.C.
2. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1982. Hand harvest tomato
variety trial results for spring 1982. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. GC1982-
15.
3. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1983. Fresh market tomato
variety trial results for spring 1983. Bradenton AREC Res. Rept. BRA1983-
10.
4. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1984. Fresh market tomato
variety trial results for spring 1984. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept.
BRA1984-10.
5. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1985. Fresh market tomato
variety trial results for spring 1985 at Bradenton, FL. Bradenton GCREC
Res. Rept. BRA1985-21.
6. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1986. Tomato variety trial
results for spring 1986. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1986-16.
7. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1987. Tomato variety trial
results for spring 1987. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1987-20.
8. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1988. Tomato variety trial
results for spring 1988. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1988-20.
9. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1989. Tomato variety trial
results for spring 1989. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1989-17.
10. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1990. Tomato cultivar trial
results for spring 1990. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1990-18.
11. Howe, T. K., J. W. Scott and W. E. Waters. 1991. Tomato cultivar trial
results for fall 1990. Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1991-4.
12. Stanley, C. D. 1990. Temperature and rainfall report for 1989.
Bradenton GCREC Res. Rept. BRA1990-05.
5
Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at the GCREC during the spring of 19912 and
the 35-year averages (12).
Average Daily Temperature (OF)
1991 35-yr avg. Rainfall (in.)
Month Max Min Max Min 1991 35-yr avq.
Febz 78z 56z 73 51 0.55z 3.13
Mar 79 57 77 55 3.96 3.43
Apr 85 62 82 60 4.57 1.56
May 90 69 87 64 9.39 3.10
zTransplanted Feb 20, 1991 and 1991 statistics reflect interval from Feb 20 -
28.
Table 2. Seasonal yields, seed sources, average fruit size and cull percentages of tomato entries in trial
spring 1991 (Harvested May 13 and 22, 1991).
Market Yield (cartons/A)Y
Extra Avg
Seed Large Large Medium Fruit Wt. Cullsx
Entry Sourcez Total (5x6) (6x6) (6x7) (oz.) (%)
XPH 5796 AS 2195 aW 823 c-f 842 a 530 a 5.4 e-g 20 gh
IFAS 7385 GCREC 2127 ab 1017 a-c 725 ab 385 bc 5.6 d-g 20 gh
Solar Set AS 2122 ab 1239 a 607 b-d 276 cd 5.9 b-d 21 gh
IFAS 7308 GCREC 2099 a-c 707 d-f 863 a 529 a 5.4 e-g 21 gh
IFAS 7307 GCREC 2083 a-d 934 b-e 748 ab 402 a-c 5.5 d-g 17 h
Agriset 761 AG 2076 a-d 986 a-d 668 bc 422 a-c 5.6 d-g 24 fg
IFAS 7264 GCREC 2010 a-d 1014 a-c 633 b-d 363 bc 5.5 d-g 24 fg
PSR 864189 PS 1948 a-e 1015 a-c 630 b-d 303 cd 6.0 b-d 31 d-f
Sunny AS 1898 a-e 747 c-f 686 bc 465 ab 5.3 fg 27 ef
Cobia RNK 1897 a-e 955 a-e 669 bc 273 cd 6.0 b-d 30 d-f
PSR 853689 PS 1816 a-f 906 b-f 596 b-d 314 c 5.7 c-g 29 d-f
Summer Flavor 5000 AC 1754 b-f 943 b-e 505 d-g 306 cd 5.8 b-e 39 a-c
Spitfire FM 1726 c-f 794 c-f 553 c-e 378 bc 5.7 c-f 35 b-d
Merced RNK 1711 d-f 1161 ab 380 gh 169 de 6.5 a 40 ab
Summer Flavor 6000 AC 1705 d-f 668 ef 673 bc 364 bc 5.2 g 32 de
Regency HM 1618 ef 644 f 593 b-d 381 bc 5.4 e-g 44 a
FTE 24 PS 1587 e-g 648 f 530 c-f 409 a-c 5.4 e-g 35 b-d
Sunbeam AS 1579 e-g 981 a-d 428 e-h 170 de 6.0 a-d 28 ef
IFAS 7306 GCREC 1471 fg 951 a-e 391 f-h 129 e 6.2 ab 33 c-e
IFAS 7384 GCREC 1251 g 783 c-f 340 h 130 e 6.1 a-c 39 a-c
zAC = Abbott & Cobb, AG = Agrisales, AS = Asgrow, FM = Ferry Morse, GCREC = Gulf Coast Research & Education
Center, HM = Harris Moran, PS = Petoseed, RNK = Rogers/NK.
Carton 25 Ibs. Acre = 8712 linear ft of bed, beds on 5 ft centers. Grading belt hole sizes: extra-large
(5x6) no belt, greater than 2 26/32 inches; large (6x6) 2 26/32 inches; medium (6x7) 2 18/32 inches;
cull = 2 8/32 inches.
xBy weight.
wMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level.
Table 3. Yields, average fruit size, cull percentages and plant stand of tomato entries for the first
harvest, (May 13, 1991).
Marketable Yield (cartons/A)z
Extra Avg. Plant
Large Large Medium Fruit Wt. Cullsy Stand
Entry Total (5x6) (6x6) (6x7) (oz.) (%) (%)
Cobia 1228 ax 726 a-e 374 a-c 128 a-d 6.5 a-e 18 ef 100 a
PSR 864189 1214 a 767 ab 336 a-e 112 b-e 6.4 a-e 23 de 100 a
Solar Set 1193 a 753 a-c 319 a-e 122 a-d 6.4 a-f 19 e 100 a
Summer Flavor 5000 1180 ab 732 a-d 323 a-e 125 a-d 6.4 a-e 30 bc 100 a
IFAS 7307 1109 ab 587 a-h 390 ab 132 a-d 6.0 c-f 13 f 100 a
Merced 1104 ab 831 a 206 e-g 66 c-f 7.0 a 35 a-c 100 a
IFAS 7264 1097 a-c 670 a-f 290 b-f 138 a-c 6.2 b-f 20 e 100 a
IFAS 7308 1096 a-c 459 f-h 437 a 200 a 5.8 ef 17 ef 100 a
Agriset 761 1068 a-d 629 a-g 322 a-e 117 b-e 6.3 a-f 17 ef 100 a
Regency 1028 a-e 482 d-h 358 a-d 188 ab 5.7 f 32 bc 100 a
Spitfire 977 a-e 477 e-h 314 a-e 186 ab 5.9 c-f 33 a-c 100 a
XPH 5796 955 a-e 474 e-h 335 a-e 147 a-c 6.1 b-f 23 de 100 a
PSR 853689 884 a-e 512 c-h 267 b-g 105 b-f 6.2 b-f 28 cd 100 a
IFAS 7385 879 a-e 488 d-h 290 b-f 102 c-f 6.0 c-f 17 ef 100 a
Summer Flavor 6000 869 a-e 430 f-h 322 a-e 118 b-e 5.8 c-f 17 ef 100 a
Sunbeam 829 b-e 627 a-g 163 fg 39 ef 6.6 a-c 21 e 100 a
IFAS 7306 823 b-e 574 b-h 197 e-g 53 d-f 6.5 a-d 36 ab 100 a
FTE 24 744 c-e 409 gh 221 d-g 113 b-e 6.0 c-f 23 ed 100 a
Sunny 712 de 364 h 243 c-g 105 b-f 5.8 d-f 23 ed 100 a
IFAS 7384 673 e 513 c-h 130 g 30 f 6.8 ab 40 a 100 a
zCarton = 25 Ibs. Acre = 8712 linear ft of bed,
(5x6) = no belt, greater than 2 26/32 inches;
cull = 2 8/32 inches.
YBy weight
beds on 5 ft centers.
large (6x6) = 2 26/32
Grading belt hole sizes: extra-large
inches; medium (6x7) = 2 18/32 inches;
xMean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level.
Table 4. Yields, average fruit size, cull percentages and plant stand of tomato entries for the second
harvest, (May 22, 1991).
Marketable Yield (cartons/A)z
Extra Avg. Plant
Large Large Medium Fruit Wt. Cullsy Stand
Entry Total (5x6) (6x6) (6x7) (oz.) (%) (%)
IFAS 7385 1247 a" 529 a 435 a-c 283 a-f 5.3 b-f 22 i-k 100 a
XPH 5796 1239 a 349 bc 507 a 383 a 5.0 d-f 19 k 100 a
Sunny 1186 ab 383 a-c 443 ab 360 ab 5.0 d-f 30 f-i 100 a
Agriset 761 1008 a-c 357 a-c 347 b-f 305 a-d 5.0 c-f 31 e-h 100 a
IFAS 7308 1003 a-c 248 cd 426 a-c 329 a-c 5.0 d-f 25 g-k 100 a
IFAS 7307 974 a-c 347 bc 358 b-d 270 b-f 5.2 b-f 21 jk 100 a
PSR 853689 931 b-d 394 a-c 329 c-f 209 d-i 5.4 a-e 31 e-h 98 b
Solar Set 929 b-d 487 ab 288 d-h 154 g-j 5.4 a-d 23 h-k 100 a
IFAS 7264 912 b-d 344 b-d 342 b-f 225 c-h 4.9 d-f 29 f-j 100 a
FTE 24 843 c-e 239 cd 309 d-g 295 a-e 5.0 d-f 45 b-d 100 a
Summer Flavor 6000 835 c-e 238 cd 351 b-e 246 c-g 4.7 f 43 b-d 100 a
Sunbeam 750 c-e 354 a-c 265 d-i 131 h-j 5.6 ab 34 e-g 100 a
Spitfire 749 c-e 317 b-d 239 e-i 193 e-i 5.6 a-c 36 d-f 100 a
PSR 864189 734 c-e 249 cd 294 d-h 191 e-i 5.5 a-d 41 c-e 100 a
Cobia 669 de 229 cd 295 d-h 145 g-j 5.3 b-f 43 b-d 100 a
IFAS 7306 648 de 378 a-c 194 hi 76 j 5.9 a 30 f-i 100 a
Merced 607 e 330 b-d 174 i 103 ij 5.7 ab 50 a-c 100 a
Regency 591 e 163 d 235 f-i 193 e-i 4.8 ef 57 a 100 a
IFAS 7384 579 e 270 cd 209 g-i 100 ij 5.5 a-d 39 c-e 100 a
Summer Flavor 5000 573 e 211 cd 181 hi 181 f-j 4.9 d-f 52 ab 100 a
'Carton = 25 Ibs. Acre = 8712 linear ft of bed,
beds on 5 ft centers.
Gra
(5x6) = no belt, greater than 2 26/32 inches; large (6x6) = 2 26/32 inch(
cull = 2 8/32 inches.
YBy weight
"Mean separation within columns by Duncan's multiple range test, 5% level.
ding belt hole sizes: extra-large
es; medium (6x7) 2 18/32 inches;
Table 5. Late season ratings of fruit and plant characteristics for tomato entries in trial, spring 1991.
.1 0) <0 0.
41 41 42, a,
N -o -' -: 4) -C
0) C C 3 0
-0 0 +-' N W 5- 'U O" CO
'4n S_ 11 0- > C / ^ a U
r (/3 (/3 '/ 4-' 2: e a 'U>-, >M 'c U) M- a- ( 4-'Uomn
^0 C+-' LC 3 .- 'U U)
4-' 4-t 4 -*) 4-.' 5- 4-> U)l 4-'- l--- 0 0) '0 Ua .e : -*.-C
C- C U) ** )- 4-' >, 0. *r- 0 0 U) Q)
^ ~ in e ? a e u uu vl ^ ^ -
S r :E r) 3 3 :3 0 I a o 0 'U 0 i.0)i_
Source/Entry b- 4- L. L U 5- LL I- 'U 0- Gil rr C ~ C
Abbott & Cobb
Summer Flavor 5000
Summer Flavor 6000
Agrisales
Agriset 761
Agriset 1000
Agristar
Asgrow
Pacific
Solar Set
Sunbeam (XPH 5628)
Sunny
XPH 5796
Ferry-Morse
Bingo
FMX 173 (cherry)
FMX 174
Spitfire (FMX 157)
Whirlaway
Harris Moran
HMX 8813
Regency
IFAS-Univ. Florida
Flora-Dade
Hayslip
Horizon
IFAS 7248B (Heat tol.)
m-t 2.0 gb jo 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 3.5 5.0 4.5 3.5 sv rad crk & persis gr shld
m-t 3.0 Itgb j2 3.5 3.5 2.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.5 5.0 4.0 4.5 sv rad crk
t 2.5 gb jo 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.0 folds in sides of frt
m 2.5 gb j2 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 5.0 4.7 4.5 sl indented be, spider
tracks on frt
m-t 2.5 gb jo 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.7 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.9 4.5 pointed be, spider tracks
on frt
3.0 gb
3.0 Itgb
3.5 ug
3.0 gb
3.5 gb
2.5 Itgb
4.5 Itgb
3.0 Itgb
3.0 Itgb
3.0 Itgb
Ig frt size high on vine
folds in sides of frt
spider tracks on frt
sl ber, sl catfacing
crimson gene, puffy
m-t 2.5 Itgb j2 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 2.5 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 2.0 5.0 4.7 5.0 deep crks, spider tracks
on frt
m-t 3.5 Itgb j2 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.5 5.0 4.0 4.5 frt size variable, spider
tracks on frt
t 3.0 gb j2 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.5 pointed be, spider
tracks on frt
m-t 4.0 gb j2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.9 spider tracks on frt
3.0 ug
3.0 gb
3.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.5
4.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5
3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
3.5 5.0 5.0 5.0
3.0 5.0
4.7 5.0
4.0 5.0
4.7 5.0
dk red internal,
indented be
Table 5. (continued 2).
N 4- 3 Cv -: V mn 'r
4-o ) > CW_ U
3 3 0. C E *^ 'U 0 O C 4-'-
-O 0 4+ N 3 ,U Uj C L 'U 0- C
'U X: 0) ..- >, -r *.- ,-3 ,n ) S Ce wt^
3 (I) V 4-' o A E I E> 'U ) C) C/ U +) -/
r0 C4- C 3: M 4) Lf
4-' X ) 4- 4- l- 4-' 41 U LN 0) 'U= aC
C r E *- 4-1 > C 0 U0 tin W
2 3 'U + C C cl -1 C .- M 0 2 41 Co2n -ents r
Source/Entry -/ a- t u c CD ix Ur, C 0 CDComments _____
IFAS 72498 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7262 (Heat tol.) m-
IFAS 7264 m
IFAS 7267 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7296 (Heat tol.) m-
IFAS 7303 (Fusarium
race 3 res.) m
IFAS 7304 (Fusarium
race 3 res.) m-
IFAS 7306 m
IFAS 7307 m
IFAS 7308 s
IFAS 7362 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7368 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7374 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7375 (Heat tol.) m.
IFAS 7376 (Heat tol.) m
IFAS 7384 m-
IFAS 7385 t
IFAS 7389 m
IFAS 7392 m
IFAS 7406 m
IFAS 7407 m
IFAS 7408 s
Suncoast m
Neuman
NS 207 (plum)
NS 262R
NS 269 (cherry)
NS 273 (indeter)
3.0 gb jo 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.5
3.0 ug
3.5 ug
3.0 gb
3.0 ug
2.5 4.0 3.0
3.5 3.0 3.0
3.0 4.0 2.5
3.0 4.0 3.0
3.0 ug jo 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.0
2.5 Itgb jo
4.5 ug jo
4.5 Itgb jo
4.0 ug j2
3.0 Itgb jo
3.0 ug jo
4.0 Itgb jo
3.0 ug jo
3.5 Itgb jo
3.0 ug jo
3.0 gb jo
2.0 gb jo
2.0 Itgb jo
3.5 ug jo
2.5 ug jo
2.5 Itgb jo
3.5 ug jo
3.0 3.0 2.5
4.5 3.0 4.0
4.0 2.5 4.0
4.0 2.0 3.5
3.0 4.0 3.0
3.5 4.0 3.0
3.0 4.0 3.5
4.0 4.0 4.0
3.5 4.0 3.0
3.5 2.5 3.5
3.5 3.5 3.0
2.5 4.0 2.0
4.0 3.0 4.0
3.0 3.5 3.0
3.0 3.5 3.0
3.5 3.5 3.0
3.5 4.0 4.0
s 4.5 ug jo 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
m-t 3.5 gb jo 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0
t-vt 4.5 gb Jo 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5
vt 5.0 gb Jo 3.5 3.5 4.5 4.5
3.5 3.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 4.7
3.5 4.5
3.5 3.5
3.0 3.0
3.5 3.0
3.0 4.5 5.0 4.5
2.5 5.0 5.0 4.7
2.5 5.0 5.0 4.7
2.5 5.0 5.0 4.7
2.5 3.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 4.0
3.0 3.5
4.0 4.0
4.5 3.0
4.0 3.5
4.0 3.0
3.0 3.5
3.0 4.0
4.0 3.5
3.5 3.5
3.0 3.0
3.5 3.0
3.0 4.0
2.5 4.0
3.5 4.0
3.5 3.5
3.5 3.0
2.0 4.0
4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
2.5 5.0 5.0 2.0
2.5 5.0 5.0 4.5
2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0
2.5 4.5 5.0 4.7
3.0 4.5 5.0 4.7
2.5 5.0 5.0 3.5
3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
3.5 5.0 5.0 4.5
3.5 4.5 5.0 3.0
2.5 5.0 5.0 4.7
3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
2.5 4.0 5.0 4.9
3.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
4.0 4.5 5.0 4.5
2.5 4.5 5.0 5.0
3.5 5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
4.0 3.0 3.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
5.0 2.5 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
5.0 2.5 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
4.5 5.0 5.0 4.7 sl indented be, yellow
halo around calyx
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0
5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 sl catfacing
4.0 5.0 4.5 5.0
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 frt size variable
4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 zippers w/holes
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 sl catfacing
4.7 5.0 4.5 4.5 sl catfacing
4.7 4.0 4.5 5.0 sl pointed be, sl catfacing
4.7 5.0 4.5 4.7
4.5 4.5 4.7 5.0
4.7 4.5 4.5 5.0
4.7 5.0 4.9 5.0 1g frt high on vine, set
variable
4.5 4.7 4.7 5.0 sl indented be
4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5
4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0
3.5 5.0 4.5 5.0
5.0 4.7 4.5 5.0 indented be, frt set
variable, sl catfacing
4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 yellow halo around calyx
5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7
4.5 5.0 4.7 5.0
5.0 5.0 4.7 5.0 smooth be, frt shape
variable
2.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 rad crks deep, frt sl deep
& pointed
4.7 4.9 4.7 5.0
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 v bushy vine
Table 5. (continued 3).
E U =3 r-4
Ci uS> VS a) 0)
0) DO +C Cia>- .n .-oS -o
AJ a_ > (U "U C0 01 <
) C E C 0 C 0
-> 0 4-t- N 3 ) W~ L- i- S.. C) 0.-' C O
C) -^ C) .- >, -C *.- *-3 US C) 1 -C-^ 0.C
2r tfl C/S C/S C1/) in U C)0>C >. C) US
W0 CI_- wC 3 _I: I S- C
+ X 4* +> L- -C-' .fl +-C SC..- Si C) CU J^ *- C
C T- in *- *- *- VI *"- C).- 4-*- >, 0. ** U 0i- U
S() -' 0 ->' 0 C CU -. -)
4 X _=Source/Entry &. _C = C C 5 C C 0 5 Conentsr
:f E :3 41 U ~eo h e u a
Source/Entry L LI LL 2 L L Cr CrO CDc a D omet
m 2.5 gb j2 3.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.5
North Carolina State Univ.
Mountain Belle (cherry) m-t
Mountain Gold t
Mountain Spring
(NC 87127) t
NC 8911
NC 9022
NC 87175
NC 87294
NC 88112
NC 88289
Piedmont
Summit
Northrup King
Bonita
Cobia
Merced (NVH 4461)
Santiago (NVH 4465)
Tango (NVH 4467)
8-12958
Nunhems/Canner's
NUN 8066
870.189
Park
Better Bush VFN
Park's Whopper VFNT
4.5 Itgb j2
3.0 ug jo
4.5 3.5 4.5 4.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 5.0 4.9 5.0
3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 2.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 zippers w/holes
2.0 ug jo 3.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 5.0 4.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 5.0 4.7 5.0 Ig frt high on vine, persis
pointed be
m 2.5 Itgb jo
m-t 2.5 ug jo
m 3.0 vb jo
t 3.0 ug jo
m-t 3.5 ug jo
t 2.5 Itgb jo
m-t 3.0 Itgb jo
t 2.5 gb j2
3.5 Itgb j2
3.5 gb jo
2.5 gb jo
3.0 gb jo
3.0 Itgb jo
3.5 gb jo
t 3.0 gb jo
m 2.5 gb jo
3.5 4.5
3.0 3.5
3.5 3.5
3.0 4.0
3.5 5.0
3.5 4.5
4.0 3.0
4.0 4.5
3.0 3.0
3.0 2.5
4.0 3.0
3.5 4.0
4.0 3.0
4.0 4.0
3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5
3.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
m 3.0 gb jo 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 3.5
vt 3.5 gb jo 3.0 3.0 4.5 2.5 2.5 1.5
4.0 5.0
3.0 5.0
3.5 4.7
4.0 3.0
3.0 5.0
3.5 5.0
4.0 5.0
4.0 4.5
3.0 5.0
2.5 4.5
2.5 5.0
3.0 5.0
3.5 5.0
3.5 5.0
5.0 4.7
5.0 4.0
5.0 4.5
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 4.5
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
5.0 5.0
4.7 5.0
4.0 5.0
4.5 5.0
4.5 5.0 pointed be, spider tracks
on frt
4.5 5.0 pointed be
4.7 4.7
4.7 5.0
4.5 4.5 spider tracks on frt
5.0 4.7
5.0 4.5 puffy
4.5 4.5 pointed be, sl catfacing
4.5 4.7 pointed be
4.0 5.0 cracks deep
5.0 4.5 sl irreg crk, indented be
3.0 4.0 5.0 5:0 3.5 4.5 4.5 5.0
2.5 4.5 5.0 4.7 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 pointed be, catfacing
2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 4.7 4.5 coarse If texture, upright
compact vine
3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.7 5.0 5.0 rough shld, squat frt;
radial & irreg splits
Rosario
Table 5. (continued 4).
1-
cu~v vivi0)
N 00) V C U I -a~ -
'A o U w
0o 4-' N 3 0a uj 1- W- L 0 O- CO
10 .C 0u *rC >.-c- -3 Un C) C- C- OJ^uc
-r.I <) *,A 4-' /l E Lt. o0>- >, 0o U) lC) (/)t 4-*tU)
*- 0 C4-' CE 3: 1-. 0 U)
4-' 4-' X 4-' 4-' SC 4-' lUl +-' C-.- 0 01 0 -^ iC .C
uC *- E 4- >, 0- 0 OJ
'C1 1-> L-r
w0 3 3 10 '' 0 0 C0 0 0 r
Source/Entry -1 L- L. -_ :3 2 0 S-ntsr
a Ln L Li, L ea Q CD co o M w C): o co ITM Conments
Petoseed
Cherry Grande (cherry) t
Colonial m-t
Duke m
FTE 12 m
FTE 24 m-t
Olympic
PSR 853689
PSR 855389
PSR 860889
PSR 864189
PSR 868889
PSR 869089
Sakata
STM 9102 (88-28)
STM 9202 (88-11)
STM 9203 (89-12)
87-27
88-17
Shamrock
SR 445
SR 600
Sunseeds
Mogambo
Sunre 6589
Sunre 6590
4.5 gb
3.0 gb
3.0 Itgb
3.0 gb
3.5 gb
m 3.0 gb
m 4.0 ug
3.5 Itgb
m 3.5 gb
t 3.0 Itgb
m 2.5 gb
m 2.5 gb
2.5 gb
2.5 Itgb
3.0 ug
3.0 gb
3.0 gb
m 3.0 gb Jo
m-t 3.0 gb jo
t 2.5 ug
m-t 2.5 Itgb
m 2.5 gb
4.5 3.5 5.0
2.0 3.0 3.0
3.5 3.5 3.5
4.0 3.5 3.0
4.0 4.5 4.0
3.0 3.5 3.0
4.0 3.5 4.0
3.5 3.0 3.0
3.0 3.0 3.0
3.5 3.0 4.0
3.0 3.0 3.0
3.0 3.5 3.0
2.5 3.5 3.5
3.5 3.5 3.5
4.0 2.0 4.0
3.0 3.5 3.0
2.5 3.5 3.5
3.0 3.5 3.5
3.5 3.5 3.5
2.0 3.5 3.0
3.0 3.0 3.5
3.5 3.5 4.0
5.0 3.5 4.0 5.0
4.0 3.5 3.5 5.0
3.0 3.5 4.5 5.0
3.0 3.0 3.5 5.0
2.0 3.5 3.5 5.0
4.0 4.5 3.5 5.0
2.0 4.0 3.0 4.5
2.0 3.0 3.5 5.0
3.5 3.0 2.5 4.5
2.5 3.0 3.0 4.5
2.0 2.5 2.0 5.0
2.0 3.0 2.5 5.0
3.5 2.5 3.0 4.0
4.5 3.0 3.0 4.0
4.5 3.0 4.0 3.0
3.5 2.5 3.0 4.5
1.5 3.0 3.0 4.0
3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 4.5
2.5 4.0 2.5 3.0 4.5
3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0
2.5 4.0 2.5 3.5 4.'0
3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 4.7
5.0 5.0 4.9
5.0 4.7 4.0
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 4.5
5.0 4.7 4.5
5.0 5.0 4.7
5.0 4.9 4.0
5.0 5.0 4.5
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 4.5 3.5
5.0 5.0 4.5
5.0 5.0 3.5
5.0 5.0 4.5
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 3.5
5.0 4.7 4.5
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 5.0 2.5
5.0 5.0 4.0
5.0 4.7 4.5
4.7
4.5 highly variable frt set
4.0 sl catfacing
5.0 frt set variable
4.0 frt Ig at top of plt,
open be
4.5
5.0
4.7 spider tracks & folds
on frt
4.0 sl spider tracks on frt
5.0
4.5 green stripes on frt
3.0
4.5 sl indented be
5.0
5.0
4.5 spider tracks on frt
4.7 spider tracks on frt,
sl catfacing, joints
tear
4.5 4.5 4.0 sl spider tracks on frt
4.5 4.5 5.0
5.0 4.7 5.0
5.0 4.0 5.0 spider tracks on frt
5.0 5.0 5.0 squatty frt
's short, m medium, t tall, vt very tall.
'1 rough, 5 smooth, ug uniform green, gb green base, Itgb light green base, vdkgb very dark green base, dkgb dark green base.
"jo = jointed, j2 = jointless.
I = poor, 5 = excellent.
' = small, 5 = extra large.
" = late, 5 = early.
' = inconsistent, 3 = average amount of variability, 5 = shape very consistent.
'1 = severe, 5 = absence of defect.
'be = blossom end, ber = blossom end rot, crk(s) = crack(s), dk = dark, frt = fruit, gr = green, irreg = irregular, If = leaf, lg = large, persis =
persistent, pit = plant, rad = radial, shld = shoulder, sl = slight, sv = severe, w/ = with, v = very.
C.)*
|