PAGE 1
Institutional Productivity The Undergraduate Origins of Science and Engineering Ph.D.s Betty D. Maxfield Contractor Report Prepared for the Office of Technology Assessment July 1987
PAGE 2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author extends special thanks to Edward (Joe) Finan and Maren Herman of the National Research Council staff for their invaluable assistance. They not only supervised the keying of the baccalaureate counts but programmed and generated all tabular and graphic data presented in this report. Vance Grant, U.S. Department of Education and Lori Thurgood, National Research Council, were also of tremendous assistance in helping the author to locate essential data sources for the study.
PAGE 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............ 1 ................. 1 II. III. IV. v. VI. VII. VIII. Purpose of Report ................................. METHODOLOGY . . . . . Data Sources Evaluation Criteria Rationale for Selection of Benchmark Graduation Years Field Definition Institutional Selection . . . . . . . . . BACCALAUREATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PH.D.S . 2 .2 .6 .. . 7 . 8 .... 8 BY PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS . . . . . . ................ 11 Top 10 0 Institutions 11 Technical Institutions 12 Liberal Arts Colleges 13 Predominately Women's Colleges 13 Traditionally Black Colleges 14 PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS FROM 1950-51 TO 1975-76 ..... 28 Top 100 Institutions Technical Institutions Liberal Arts Colleges ...... ..... 28 ................. 29 ................. 29 Women's Colleges 29 Traditionally Black Colleges 30 PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS BY FIELD OF PH. D ..46 ..46 ..46 ..47 Top 100 Institutions .................................... Technical Institutions .................... Liberal Arts Colleges Women's Colleges .............. ... 4 7 Traditionally Black Colleges ........... 48 BACCALAUREATE ORIGIN OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PH.D.S WHO ENTER S/E EMPLOYMENT FIELDS AND PURSUE RESEARCH CAREERS 71 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF GRADUATES FROM THE LEADING 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF S/E PH.D.S Gender and Field of Ph.D Race-Ethnic and Field of Ph.D. SUMMARY Possible Future Studies ...................... ........... 79 ..79 ... 83 ............. 87 .................. 89
PAGE 4
Appendices Appendix A: B.A. to Ph.D. Output Rankings by Baccalaureate Institutions ..... 91 Appendix 8: B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios by Baccalaureate Institutions .............. 114 Appendix C: States by Region ................................................ 137 Appendix D: Institutional Categories Derived from the 1976 Carnegie Classification System .............. 139 Appendix E: Sampling and Weighting Procedures for the 1985 Survey of Doctorate Recipients .............. 141
PAGE 5
Table IA Table 18 Table lC Table 1D Table IE Table 2A Table 2B Table 2C Table 2D Table 2E Table 3A Table 3B Table 3C Table 3D Table 3E Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Li:rt of Tables Productivity Ratios of the Leading 10 0 Undergraduate Sources of Science/Engineering Ph.D.s ........................... 16 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Technical Institutions .. _. .. 21 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Liberal Arts Colleges ..... 22 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Predominately Women's Colleges ................................................. 25 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Traditionally Black Colleges ........................... 27 Productivity Ratios for the Leading 100 Undergraduate Sources of Science/Engineering Ph.D.s by 6 Selected Years ......... 31 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Technical Institutions ........... 37 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Liberal Arts Colleges .... 38 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Predominately Women's Colleges ............... 41 B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios for Traditionally Black Colleges ........... 43 Field of Ph.D.s for Baccalaureate Graduates of the Leading 100 Undergraduate Sources of Science/Engineering Ph.D.s ... 49 Field of Ph.D.s for Baccalaureate Graduates of Technical Institutions ...................................................... 54 Field of Ph.D.s for Baccalaureate Graduates of Liberal Arts Colleges ..... 55 Field of Ph.D.s for Baccalaureate Graduates of Predominately Women's Colleges .... 58 Fields of Ph.D.s for Baccalaureate Graduates of Traditionally Black C alleges .................. 60 Top 50 Undergraduat~e Sources of EMP Ph.D.s ....... 61 Top 50 Undergraduate Sources of Life Sciences Ph. D.s ...... 64 Top 50 Undergraduate Sources of Social Sciences Ph.D.s ....... 67 Percentages of S/E Ph. D.s Who Earned Baccalaureate Degrees from Selected Types of B.A. Institutions and Were Employed in S/E or in Research in 1985 .. 73 ,~
PAGE 6
Tabl9 SA Table 88 Table SC Table SD Table SE Table 9 Table 10 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Ph.D. Institutions Most Frequently Selected by B.A. Graduates from the Top 100 Undergraduate Sources of S/E Ph.D.s .. 74 Ph.D. Institutions Most Frequently Selected by B.A. Graduates from Technical Colleges ....... 75 Ph.D. Institutions Most Frequently Selected by B.A. Graduates from Liberal Arts Colleges ....... 76 Ph.D. Institutions Most Frequently Selected by B.A. Graduates from Predominately Women's Colleges .... 77 Ph.D. Institutions Most Frequently Selected by B.A. Graduates from Traditionally Black Colleges 78 Field of Ph.D. and Gender of Baccalaureates from the Top 50 Undergraduate Sources of Science/Engineering Ph.D.s 80 Field of Ph.D. and Race/Ethnic Classification of Baccalaureates from the Top 50 Undergraduate Sources of Science/Engineering Ph.D.s ... 84 Lin of Figura Productivity Trends of Top 100 Baccalaureate Institutions 36 Productivity Trends by Type of Baccalaureate Institution 44 Productivity Trends by Selected Baccalaureate Institutions 45 Ph.D.s by Field of Doctorate Types of B.A. Institution 70 V
PAGE 7
I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of Report Previous studies dealing with the baccalaureate origins of Ph.D. recipients have provided evidence indicating that there are, indeed, relationships between undergraduate institutions and 8.A. to Ph.D. productivity. The purpose of this study is to address the question of whether certain types of educational institutions are more effective tnan others in producing baccalaureates who continue on to earn a science/engineering (S/E) Ph.D., and subsequently enter the S/E work force as well as pursue research careers. The B.A. to Ph.D. pipeline is analyzed for several points in time, beginning with baccalaureate counts from 1950-51 and ending with the 1975-76 academic year. The corresponding doctoral data include counts from the mid-to-late fifties up to 1986. The baccalaureate to Ph.D. pipeline is further explored by relating institutional productivity ratio to types of undergraduate institutions (technical institutions, researchoriented liberal arts colleges, predominately women's colleges, and traditionally black institutions); public/private schools; primary field of discipline for doctoral studies (empirical sciences, life sciences, and social sciences); demographic characteristics of the baccalaureate graduates (gender and race/ethnic classification); and Carnegie classification of the graduate schools these baccalaureates select for doctoral studies. 1
PAGE 8
.J D. METHODOLOGY Data Sources Although the National Center for Statistics (previously referred to as NCES, the National Center for Educational Statistics) of the U.S. Department of Education has gathered information on the number of baccalaureates (combined with first professional degree until 1961) awarded by U.S. institutions of higher education since 1947 to 1948, none of the baccalaureate degree by institution data are available on tape prior to 196869. Because of the need to have counts of the baccalaureates awarded by institutions to calculate institutional productivity of the baccalaureate to Ph.D. pipeline, controlling for size of institution, it was necessary to extract from published NCES documents B.A. counts for all U.S. baccalaureate-granting institutions for each academic year during the 1950s and l 960s. Baccalaureate production counts were then reviewed for 1950-51 through 1967-68 (the period of time when taped data were not available) to determine which benchmark years would be most representative of the four to five years surrounding it. Starting with 1950-51, the counts for baccalaureates awarded by the 1,282 U.S. institutions of higher education declined steadily from 384,352 to a low of 287,401 for academic year 1954-55. Academic year 1955-56, however, marked the beginning of a steady increase in baccalaureate production (311,298) until 1960-61 when the number of B.A.s awarded (365,337) showed a decline of approximately 30,000 from the previous academic year. The number of B.A.s awarded increased steadily from 1960-61 to 1975-76. Based on these trend data, combined with the magnitude of the task of extracting from published reports data for over 1,200 institutions per year, a decision was made to select data at 5year intervals, beginning with academic year 1950-51. 2
PAGE 9
Baccalaureate degree data for academic years 1950-51, 1955-56, 1960-61, and 1965-66 (hereafter referred to in tabular data as 1950, 1955, 1960, 1965) were extracted from the NCES's annual publications, Earned Degrees Conferred. 1 Data were reported by gender; therefore, the number of baccalaureate counts for institutions (which increased from the 1,282 schools that reported counts in 1950-51 to over 1,500 schools in 1965-66) for the four selected benchmark years exceeded 10,000 pieces of data that had to be extracted and transferred to coding sheets. As data from the NCES reports, which were listed by State, were transferred to coding forms, it was necessary to acknowledge schools that had changed names, "closed their doors," or merged with other institutions. This task was further complicated by the inconsistent manner in which schools reported data to NCES. Frequently various campuses or branches of a State university system reported data separately, yet in subsequent years they reported one count for all campuses combined. An example of this was the University of California system where data for the fifties were reported for all campuses combined, but by individual campuses in the sixties. In this situation, the data were reviewed to determine the best way to analyze it. Because individual campus data were available for the University of California system for the 1960s and 1970s, a decision was made to calculate productivity ratios for these individual campuses. Therefore, no productivity calculations are reported for the various campuses of the University of California for the 1950s when individual campus counts were not available. Where there were great variations in how data were reported from one benchmark year to the next, the data were generally merged with the main campus data and reported as one count. For example, data from the various campuses of Rutgers University, Indiana University, Columbia University, Loyola University (IL), University of Minnesota, University of Missouri, University of Maryland, Long Island University, 1. National Center for Education Statistics, Department of Health, Education, Welfare, Earned Degrees Conferred (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950-51, 1955-56, 1960-61, and 1965-66). 3
PAGE 10
Fairleigh Dickinson (NJ), University of Illinois, Southern Illinois University, University of Michigan, University of Tennessee, University of Arkansas, University of Texas, University of Alabama, and University of Colorado were merged and are reported for the main campuses only. The task of transferring NCES published counts on baccalaureates awarded to a coding form was greatly facilitated by use of the National Research Council's (NRC) Institutional Code Book. 2 This code book was divided into two major sections. One section included an alphabetic listing of all institutions of higher education, with an assigned NRC institutional code. The second section consisted of a numeric listing of each institution in ascending order within State. All universities/colleges that had merged with another institution, had changed its names, or had ceased to exist were noted in the code book and were crossed-referenced with their former institutions. Without the use of this reference document, the NCES to NRC conversion would have resulted in a number of omissions from the institutional data file. As data from the NCES reports were transferred to coding forms, it was necessary to match each institution to the National Research Council's institutional code. The NRC code is a 5-digit numerical code, with the first two positions identifying the State in which the institution is located, and the third through fifth digits identifying the specific institution (originally assigned by NRC so that the institutions were in alphabetical order within State). Where there were branches or campuses within a university system, the sixth position, an alpha character, identified the branch or campus. As indicated earlier, data for the 1969 to 1985 baccalaureates by institution were available on tape. However, in keeping with the research design of this study, only data for academic years 1970-71 and 1975-76 were extracted from the tape. These 2. National Research Council, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, Codes for Educational Institutions and United States Possession (Washington, DC: NRC, September 1986). 4
PAGE 11
institutions were converted from the HEGIS coding system to NRC's institutional coding scheme, so that the baccalaureate data could be matched with NRC's doctoral data. The baccalaureate data for 1950-51, 1955-56, 1960-61, and 1965-66 were keypunched and transferred to tape, and merged with the 1970-71 and 1975-76 dnta. A computer printout of the manually produced data and the existing taped data was examined for discrepancies from one benchmark year to the next. Special attention was given to the comparison between 1965-66 data and the 1970-71 data to assure that the manual extractions conformed to the same conditions (mergers, name changes) as the taped data. Where there were serious reservations about the completeness of the data that were reported, the data were not entered on the final edited tape. For example, an institution that reported well over 300 baccalaureates granted in 1950-51, 1955-56, and 1965-66, reported less than 25 baccalaureates granted in 1960-61. A check on the counts for the degrees conferred by this institution during 1964 and 1967. indicated that the institution was still granting over 300 baccalaureates per year. A decision was made to omit the 1960-61 entries as being unreliable data with the hypothesis that only one department reported B.A. degree data to NCES for academic year 1960-61. Only when data were clearly suspect were these deletions made. In addition to the NCES data on baccalaureate origins, two other data sources were used in this study: The National Research Council's Doctorate Record File and the Survey of Doctorate Recipients file. The Doctorate Records File (DRF) is based on the annual Surveys of Earned Doctorate (SED). The SED, which was first conducted in 1953, is done in cooperation with the graduate departments of Ph.D.-granting institutions. New Ph.D. recipients complete questionnaires that are designed to provide information on the new doctorate's demographic characteristics, as well as his/her employment plans. Although the first SEO was conducted in 1953, the ORF contains data on virtually all 1920 to 1986 U.S. Ph.D.s. For pre-survey doctorates, basic information on sex, Ph.D. 5
PAGE 12
field of study, baccalaJJreate institution, and doctoral institution was compiled by N RC staff through the use of institutions' commencement announcements. The Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR), the other NRC data source for this study, is a biennial survey of an approximately 14 percent sample of Ph.D.s in the sciences, engineering, and humanities. The survey sample is a longitudinal sample, and include information on doctorates from 1930 to 1986. The SDR was designed to provide employment information about Ph.D.s and to follow their employment patterns over time. Although the SOR dates back to I 973, the active survey sample only includes doctorates for the most recent 42-year ti me span. For example, the first SOR included a sample of doctorates from 1930 to 1972. The 1985 survey, however, includes doctorates from 1942 to 1984. The SDR questionnaire consists of questions on the Ph.D.'s field of employment, type of employment, primary work activity, and salary. Evaluation Criteria The institutional output rank, given in the following tabular data, is based on the absolute number of baccalaureates from a specified institution that go on to earn Ph.D.s in science/engineering. Obviously, the large degree granting institutions have the highest output rank because of the larger number of graduates that have the potential to earn the doctorates. 3 Therefore, the productivity ratio was introduced as a means of measuring the contributions of baccalaureate-granting institutions to Ph.D. production, while controlling for size of the institution. The productivity ratio for each institution was calculated by dividing the number of baccalaureates from institution "A" that went on to earn a science/engineering Ph.D. from either institution "A" or another doctoral 3. See Appendix A for a listing of United States undergraduate institutions by B.A. to Ph.D. output rankings. 6
PAGE 13
granting institution for a specific referenced B.A. year (or for the total of the six referenced B.A. years) by the total number of baccalaureates awarded by institution "A" for the same referenced year(s). 4 The baccalaureate year was used as a reference point, rather than the Ph.D. year. For example, the number of baccalaureates who graduated from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1955-56 and continued graduate studies to earn a S/E Ph.D. (irrespective of where and when said Ph.D. was earned) was divided by the total number of baccalaureate degrees awarded by MIT in 1955-56. The productivity ratio controls for the size of the undergraduate institutions, therefore, it differs considerable f""om the output ratio. For instance, Harvey Mudd College, a small liberal arts college in California, ranked 207 when the number of its graduates who went on to earn S/E Ph.D.s were compared to other baccalaureate granting institutions, yet its productivity ratio, which was based on the percentage of its graduates who obtained S/E Ph.D.s, placed it second overall in rank. Rationale for Selection of Benchmark Graduation Years In view of the fact that earned degree information by institution was not published by NCES until 1947-48 and was not available on tape until 1969, a decision was made to extract data for 5-year intervals, beginning with baccalaureate production during the academic year 1950-51. The 1975-76 academic year was the last year selected for baccalaureate data because of the assumption that it takes anywhere from 5 to 10 years to obtain a science/engineering Ph.D. after the baccalaureate has been earned. Those individuals who earned a baccalaureate degree in 1975-76 and then went on to pursue a doctoral 4. See Appendix B for a listing of United States undergraduate institutions by B.A. to Ph.D. productivity ratios. 7
PAGE 14
degree in S/E were likely to have earned their Ph.D. prior to 1986, the last year in which doctoral data were available from NRC's Doctoral Records File. Baccalaureate reference points beyond 1975 would have been unreliable because a high percentage of graduates who pursued doctoral studies would still be in the Ph.D. pipeline. Field Definition The Ph.D. field groupings (Empirical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Social Sciences) used in the following tables are those that are typically used by the National Academy of Sciences' staff in presenting doctoral data. Empirical Science (EMP) includes engineering, mathematics and computer sciences, and physical sciences (such as astronomy, atmospheric and meterological sciences, chemistry, geological sciences, and physics). Life Sciences include agricultural sciences, biological sciences, and heal th science. Social Sciences include psychology, economics and econometrics, anthropology and sociology, political sciences and international relations, and other social sciences. Institutional Selection To address the question of whether certain types of educational institutions are more effective than others in producing baccalaureates who continue on to earn S/E Ph.D.s, the following groups of institutions were earmarked for special analysis: Technical Institutions The 15 leading technical institutions identified by Fuller in her 1985 study5 (in 5. C.H. Fuller, "An Analysis of Leading Undergraduate Sources of Ph. D.s, Adjusted for Institutional Size" (Ann Arbor, Ml: Great Lakes College Associate, June 1985). 8
PAGE 15
which she calculated institutional productivity on the basis of the average number of baccalaureates awarded during 1946 to 1976 and the average number of Ph.D.s earned during 1951 to 1980 for all accredited institutions) were earmarked for special analysis. The curriculum of these institutions, which were mostly male in student body make-up, focused heavily on the empirical sciences. The question of whether the productivity of these technically-oriented schools is greater than other less science-focused schools is addressed in the report as is the question of the likelihood that graduates from these institutions are more likely than graduates from other types of baccalaureate institutions to remain in S/E and enter the S/E research work force after they have earned their Ph. D.s. Liberal Arts Colleges The 50 colleges that participated in the Second National Conference on "The Future of Science at Liberal Arts Colleges" at Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio in June 1986 were identified as the special group that make up the liberal arts colleges for this report. However, because Columbia University failed to report separate baccalaureate counts for Bernard College (a part of the Columbia University system) to NCES, it was not possible to calculate productivity ratios for Bernard College, one of the liberal arts colleges represented at the Oberlin conference. Thus, the "Oberlin 50" became the "Oberlin 49" for this report. These liberal arts colleges were of special interest because an earlier study by Knapp and Goodrich pointed out that among the 50 most productive institutions of higher education, "the vast majority were small liberal arts colleges.116 This finding was later confirmed by Tidball and Kistiakowsky who noted that "small, private liberal arts colleges were especially productive, in percentage terms, of men who later earned doctors tes." 7 8. R.H. Knapp and H.B. Goodrich, "The Origin of American Scientists," Science vol. 133, May 1951, pp. 543-545. (continued) 9
PAGE 16
Traditionally Women's Colleges Using the data from the NCES reports, those institutions that had zero counts for baccalaureates awarded to men in the 1950s and 1960s were labeled "women's colleges." Over 120 colleges were so labeled, however, because the number of women who earned baccalaureates from the majority of these colleges and then proceeded on to earn a S/E Ph.D. was small, the productivity ratios were too small to report. Only 58 women's colleges were analyzed by computer, and of these only 34 had productivity ratios of I percent or greater. It should be noted that many institutions that were single sex colleges in the early 1950s and 1960s have either merged with other colleges/universities or have started admitting sizeable numbers of students of the opposite sex in the 1970s. Given the frequently held view that women tend to gravitate to the humanities or social sciences rather than the "hard" sciences, special analysis of the women's colleges was done to determine their productivity ratios, and compare them to technical institutions which are predominately male and science-focused in their curriculum. Traditionally Black Institutions As part of a report by Hill, 8 traditionally black colleges were listed, along with the number of baccalaureate degrees awarded by each college in 1982. Institutions with greater than 100 baccalaureates awarder "4od over 70 percent black enrollment were isolated for special analysis. Fifty three black institutions were identified; however, only 20 institutions are reported because of the low productivity ratios for the remaining institutions. 7. M.E. Tidball and V. Kistiakowsky, "Baccalaureate Origins of American Scientists and Scholars," Science vol 193, August 1976, pp. 646-652. 8. Susan Hill, "The Traditionally Black Institutions of Higher Education," 1860-1982, 84-308X (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education). 10
PAGE 17
ID. BACCALAUREATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PH.D.S BY PRODUCTMTY RATIOS Top 100 Institutions Table IA lists the leading 100 undergraduate sources of science/engineering Ph.D.s for the six selected benchmark years for all science/engineering fields combined. As the reader might suspect, the undergraduate institutions with the highest output ranks (based on absolute numbers of B.A. to Ph.D. production) are not, for the most part, the institutions with the highest productivity ratios (B.A. to Ph.D. production, adjusted for size of institution). Of the leading 100 baccalaureate institutions, 81 were private schools and only 19 were public. Only three women's colleges (Radcliffe (MA), Bryn Mawr (PA), Wellesley (MA)), and none of the traditionally black colleges were in the top 100. Fourteen of the 15 technical institutions that had been earmarked for special analysis were in the top 100, and 31 of the 49 private liberal arts research colleges had productivity ratios large enough to place them in the highly productive top 100 institutions. By geographic location, 9 the Middle Atlantic region (New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) accounted for one-third of the top 100 institutions, followed by the Pacific region (Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and Hawaii), New England region (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut), and East North Central region (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin) where 16, per region, of the leading institutions were located. The remaining 5 geographic regions of the United States accounted for less than 20 percent of these highly productive undergraduate institutions. 9. See Appendix C for a listing of States in each of the nine regions. 11
PAGE 18
Technical Institutions Of the 15 technical institutions that were identified for special analysis, 14 had productivity ratios that placed them in the top 100 undergraduate institutions in the United States. However, two institutions stood out as being particularly productive: California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Table 1B). Of the 875, mostly male, baccalaureates that graduated from the California Institute of Technology during the six benchmark years, 388 (or 44 percent) continued on to earn Ph.D.s in science/engineering prior to 1986. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which ranked number 2 in absolute B.A. to Ph.D. output during the 1950 to 1986 time period, also ranked number 2 among the technical institutions in productivity with 1,114 of its 5,234 baccalaureate graduates (or approximately one out of every five) earning S/E Ph.D.s. With the exception of Case Western Reserve (OH) (a consolidation of Western Reserve University and Case Institute of Technology) and Carnegie-Mellon University (PA), these top ranked technical institutions were primarily private male colleges. There were, however, tremendous variations in the size of these technical schools. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and California Institute of Technology were both relatively large producers of baccalaureates that went on to earn Ph.D.s, ranking in the top 50 of U.S. colleges. However, Webb Institute of Naval Architecture (NY), which had a productivity ratio high enough to place it in number 7 ranking among the technical institutions, was one of the smallest B.A. to Ph.D. producers (in absolute numbers) ranking number 782 in output. 12
PAGE 19
Liberal Arts Colleges Although there were similarities in size and nature of undergraduate programs for the liberal arts colleges listed in table lC, there were large variations in the degree to which these schools produced baccalaureates that went on to earn S/E Ph.D.s .. The B.A. to Ph.D. output rankings ranged from a 50 for Oberlin College (OH) to 548 for Hampton College (VA). The productivity ratio, on the other hand, ranged from 30.6 percent for Harvey Mudd College (CA) to one percent for Hampton College (VA). Thirty one of the 49 colleges were listed in the top 100 baccalaureate sources of S/E Ph.D.s. As many as 37 of these colleges were located in the New England, Middle Atlantic, and East North Central regions. Three of the liberal arts colleges, namely Harvey Mudd, Reed, and Swarthmore, had significantly high productivity ratios. Approximately one out of every three baccalaureat~s awarded by Harvey Mudd College continued on to earn a S/E Ph.D. For Reed College (OR), the ratio was one out of every five graduate earned S/E Ph.D. degree and for Swarthmore, the ratio was one out of every six graduates. Predominately Women's Colleges Although 127 baccalaureate producing women's colleges were rostered for special analysis, only 34 are reported in table lD. The reason for this truncated list is the small productivity ratio that were calculated for women's colleges. Only the colleges that had productivity ratios of one percent or greater are reported. Only the top three women's colleges (namely Radcliffe, Bryn Mawr, and Wellesley) were in the top 100 leading baccalaureate sources or science/engineering Ph.D.s. Radcliffe and Bryn Mawr, in particular, had significantly higher production ratios than the other women's colleges in the group. 13
PAGE 20
However, the reader should note that the 13 percent productivity ratio for Radcliffe was based on baccalaureate data for 1950-51, 1955-56, and 1960-61, but on Ph.D. dnta reported for all six referenced years. This resulted from the fact that Radcliffe merged with Harvard and its counts on baccalaureates awarded during academic years 1965-66, 1970-71, and 1975-76 were no longer reported to NCES as Radcliffe counts, but rather as Harvard counts. The difficulty in the productivity calculations stemmed from the fact that women who earned their baccalaureate degrees from the Radcliffe branch of Harvard continued to report on the ORF survey form that they had earned their baccalaureates from Radcliffe, rather than Harvard. If the data were to be adjusted to only reflect the three referenced years, Radcliffe's productivity ratio would decrease to approximately 6 percent which would drop it from number 1 rank on the list of women's colleges to number 2, and from rank number 8 on the top 100 institutions to number 51. Thirty of the top B.A. to Ph.D. producing women's colleges were located on the east coast with 11 in the New England region, 13 in the Middle Atlantic region, and 6 in the South Atlantic region. With the one exception of Mary Washington College (VA), the top producing women's colleges were priva~e schools, and for the majority (28) of these colleges, the number of baccalaureates that went on to earn S/E Ph.D.s was less than 30 for all six referenced years combined. Traditionally Black Colleges From the 53 traditionally black colleges that were selected for analysis, only 20 colleges are presented in table IE, because of the low productivity ratios calculated for the balance of these schools. Black colleges, in generalt had very small numbers of their graduates who went on 14
PAGE 21
to pursue S/E Ph.D.s. The total number of S/E Ph.D.s traced to th~se baccalaureate institutions for the combined six referenced years was well below 30 Ph.D.s with the exception of Howard University (DC) (79 Ph.D.s) and Tuskegee University (AL) (43 Ph.D.s). None of the black colleges were in the top 100 undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s. Only 2 percent each of the baccalaureates from the top ranked black college (Morehouse (GA), Lincoln University (PA), Fisk University (TN), and Tuskegee) went on to earn S/E Ph.D.s. All but two of these black colleges were located in the South (11 in the South Atlantic region; 4 in the East South Central region; and 3 in the West South Central region). 15
PAGE 22
TABLE lA PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS (ADJUSTED FOR INSTITUTION SIZE) BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 1 32 CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 388 44.3 2 207 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 68 30.6 3 2 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 1114 21. 3 4 104 REED COLLEGE/OR 172 20.7 5 78 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 228 17.1 6 146 COOPER UNION/NY 126 13.7 7 23 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 497 13.5 8 154 RADCLIFFE C/MA 97 13.4 9 51 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 288 12.0 10 179 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 86 11. 7 11 453 NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U 30 11. 6 12 111 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 161 11.0 13 108 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 161 10.2 14 159 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 119 9.9 15 so OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 292 9.7 16 112 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 127 9.4 16 131 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 156 9.4 18 5 CORNELL UNIV/NY 981 9.3 19 389 N MEX I MINING&TECH 33 9.2 20 28 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 410 9.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 16 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE
PAGE 23
TABLE lA PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS (ADJUSTED FOR INSTITUTION SIZE) BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 21 140 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 133 8.9 21 222 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 73 8.9 23 127 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 143 8.6 24 208 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 72 8.5 25 578 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 20 8.4 26 1 CALIF, U-BERKELEY 1472 8.3 27 27 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 368 8.2 28 92 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 210 8.1 29 212 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 75 7.9 29 89 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 189 7.9 29 56 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 276 7.9 29 106 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 148 7.9 33 10 HARVARD UNIV/MA 730 7.5 34 628 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 18 7.2 34 138 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 134 7.2 36 148 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 119 7.0 36 202 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 65 7.0 38 24 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 470 6.9 39 49 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 277 6.8 40 158 CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ 110 6.7 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 17 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC
PAGE 24
TABLE lA PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS (ADJUSTED FOR INSTITUTION SIZE) BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 41 144 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 113 6.5 41 38 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 321 6.5 41 43 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 320 6.5 44 782 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6 6.4 44 293 PHilA C PHARM&SCI/PA 52 6.4 46 75 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 191 6.3 46 19 STANFORD UNIV/CA 560 6.3 46 185 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 93 6.3 49 33 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 399 6.2 49 205 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 77 6.2 51 218 KNOX COLLEGE/IL 75 6.0 52 200 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 80 5.8 52 220 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 74 5.8 54 8 CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 848 5.7 54 130 UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 144 5.7 54 431 ECKERD COLLEGE/FL 24 5.7 54 35 CALIF, U-DAVIS 337 5.7 58 7 CUNY-CITY COLLEGE 915 5.6 58 532 BLACKBURN COLLEGE/IL 21 5.6 60 245 LAWRENCE UNIV/WI 69 5.5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 18 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 25
TABLE lA PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS (ADJUSTED FOR INSTITUTION SIZE) BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 61 67 DARTMOUTH COLLEGE/NH 235 5.4 61 261 BATES COLLEGE/ME 62 5.4 61 14 COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 646 5.4 61 438 DELAWARE VALLEY C/PA 34 5.4 65 178 CLARK UNIVERSITY/MA 92 5.3 65 216 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 72 5.3 65 375 ILL BENEDICTINE COLL 25 5.3 68 156 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 106 5.2 68 621 KING COLLEGE/TN 15 5.2 68 275 JUNIATA COLLEGE/PA 54 5.2 68 129 SUNY AT BINGHAMTON 131 5.2 72 164 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 117 5.1 72 95 ILLINOIS INST TECH 187 5.1 72 244 MUHLENBERG COLL/PA 77 5.1 75 282 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 52 5.0 76 150 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 118 4.9 76 147 CALIF,U-IRVINE 102 4.9 78 82 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 190 4.8 78 190 US MILITARY ACADEMY 99 4.8 78 271 SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY 52 4.8 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 19 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC
PAGE 26
TABLE lA PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS (ADJUSTED FOR INSTITUTION SIZE) BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 81 310 RHODES COLLEGE/TN 41 4.7 81 677 US MERCHANT MAR ACAD 18 4.7 83 281 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 40 4.6 83 497 BARD COLLEGE/NY 20 4.6 83 252 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 60 4.6 83 473 CENTRE COLL KENTUCKY 29 4.6 83 57 DUKE UNIVERSITY/NC 282 4.6 88 333 LEBANON VALLEY C/PA 45 4.5 88 240 COLORADO SCH MINES 55 4.5 88 206 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 74 4.5 91 280 DREW UNIVERSITY/NJ 51 4.4 92 266 BEREA COLLEGE/KY 61 4.3 92 483 CHARLESTON, C OF/SC 26 4.3 92 711 PITZER COLLEGE/CA 12 4.3 92 300 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 45 4.3 92 191 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 92 4.3 92 21 IOWA STATE UNIV 520 4.3 98 204 YESHIVA UNIV/NY 65 4.2 98 136 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 130 4.2 98 229 MACALESTER COLL/MN 72 4.2 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 20 TYPE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 27
TABLE lB BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR TECHNICAL INSTITUTIONS BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 1 32 CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 388 44.3 2 2 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 1114 21. 3 3 389 N MEX I MINING&TECH 33 9.2 4 27 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 368 8.2 5 92 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 210 8.1 6 49 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 277 6.8 7 782 WEBB I ~L~VAL ARCH/NY 6 6.4 8 185 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 93 6.3 9 33 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 399 6.2 10 200 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 80 5.8 11 95 ILLINOIS INST TECH 187 5.1 12 82 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 190 4.8 13 240 COLORADO SCH MINES 55 4.5 14 300 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 45 4.3 15 369 ROSE-HULMAN TECH/IN 27 3.5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-Sl,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 21 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC PRIVATE
PAGE 28
TABLE lC BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 1 207 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 68 30.6 2 104 REED COLLEGE/OR 172 20.7 3 78 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 228 17.1 4 179 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 86 11. 7 5 111 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 161 11.0 6 108 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 161 10.2 7 159 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 119 9.9 8 so OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 292 9.7 9 131 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 156 9.4 10 140 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 133 8.9 10 222 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 73 8.9 12 127 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 143 8.6 13 208 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 72 8.5 14 212 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 75 7.9 15 138 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 134 7.2 16 148 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 119 7.0 16 202 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 65 7.0 18 144 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 113 6.5 19 205 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 77 6.2 20 220 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 74 5.8 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 22 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 29
TABLE lC BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 21 130 UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 144 5.7 22 261 BATES COLLEGE/ME 62 5.4 23 216 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 72 5.3 24 156 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 106 5.2 25 164 IAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 117 5.1 26 282 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 52 5.0 27 150 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 118 4.9 28 281 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 40 4.6 28 252 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 60 4.6 30 206 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 74 4.5 31 191 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 92 4.3 32 136 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 130 4.2 32 229 MACALESTER COLL/MN 72 4.2 34 195 COLGATE U/NY 87 4.1 35 227 TRINITY COLLEGE/CT 62 4.0 35 162 DEPAUW UNIVERSITY/IN 103 4.0 37 224 MIDDLEBURY COLL/VT 75 3.9 37 118 MANHATTAN COLLEGE/NY 160 3.9 37 183 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 82 3.9 40 238 COLORADO COLLEGE 61 3.8 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 23 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 30
TABLE lC BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 40 170 ST OLAF COLLEGE/MN 94 3.8 42 192 WHEATON COLLEGE/IL 94 3.7 43 215 DENISON UNIV/OH 70 3.6 44 284 ALBION COLLEGE/MI 53 3.1 44 168 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 94 3.1 46 201 OHIO WESLEYAN UNIV 86 3.0 47 198 HOLY CROSS, C OF/MA 74 2.7 48 450 ALMA COLLEGE/MI 22 2.2 49 548 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 20 1.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 24 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 31
TABLE lD BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR PREDOMINATLEY WOMEN'S COLLEGES BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 1 154 RADCLIFFE C/MA 97 13.4 2 212 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 75 7.9 3 150 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 118 4.9 4 183 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 82 3.9 5 466 SARAH LAWRENCE C/NY 26 3.5 6 168 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 94 3.1 7 381 GOUCHER COLLEGE/MD 28 2.6 8 770 NOTRE DAME COLL/OH 11 2.4 8 600 MILLS COLLEGE/CA 20 2.4 10 384 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 33 2.2 10 725 WELLS COLLEGE/NY 12 2.2 12 624 CHATHAM COLLEGE/PA 13 2.1 13 683 WILSON COLLEGE/PA 11 1.8 13 581 WHEATON COLLEGE/MA 20 1. 8 13 729 ALBERTUS MAGNUS C/CT 8 1.8 13 552 TRINITY COLLEGE/DC 16 1.8 13 769 ST JOSEPHS COLL/NY 13 1.8 18 756 ROSEMONT COLLEGE/PA 11 1. 7 19 675 BENNINGTON COLL/VT 7 1. 6 19 597 AGNES SCOTT COLL/GA 12 1. 6 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-Sl,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 25 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE
PAGE 32
TABLE 1D BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR PREDOMINATLEY WOMEN'S COLLEGES BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 21 480 SKIDMORE COLLEGE/NY 25 1.5 21 704 SETON HILL COLL/PA 12 1.5 21 403 SIMMONS COLLEGE/MA 29 1.5 24 775 HOOD COLLEGE/MD 10 1.4 24 530 EMMANUEL COLLEGE/MA 21 1.4 24 582 MANHATTANVILLE C/NY 15 1.4 27 643 MT ST VINCENT,COL/NY 14 1. 3 27 567 RANDOLPH-MACN WOM/VA 11 1. 3 29 819 OUR I.ADY I.AKE UN/TX 11 1. 2 29 676 REGIS COLLEGE/MA 13 1.2 29 730 ELMIRA COLLEGE/NY 13 1.2 32 678 CHESTNUT HILL C/PA 11 1.1 33 573 MARY WASHINGTON C/VA 16 1.0 33 778 INCARNATE WORD C/TX 11 1.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 26 TYPE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE
PAGE 33
TABLE lE BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR TRADITIONALLY BLACK COLLEGES BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY OUTPUT TOTAL# PRODUCTIVITY RANK RANK INSTITUTION S/E PHDS* RATIO* 1 434 MOREHOUSE COLL/GA 18 2.2 2 658 LINCOLN UNIV/PA 15 2.1 3 534 FISK UNIVERSITY/TN 20 2.0 3 398 TUSKEGEE UNIV/AL 43 2.0 5 693 TOUGALOO COLLEGE/MS 12 1.8 6 194 HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC 79 1. 7 7 810 DILLARD UNIV/LA 10 1.1 8 585 NC CENTRAL UNIV 22 1.0 8 548 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 20 1.0 8 463 MORGAN STATE UNIV/MD 23 1.0 8 836 TALLADEGA COLLEGE/AL 4 1.0 12 808 SPELMAN COLLEGE/GA 7 .9 12 760 C~ COLLEGE/GA 7 .9 12 504 NC AG & TECH STU 22 .9 15 449 SOUTHERN UNIV/LA 27 .8 16 674 VIRGINIA STATE UNIV 15 7 17 688 CENTRAL STATE U/OH 9 .6 17 843 VIRGINIA UNION UNIV 6 .6 17 726 XAVIER UNIV/LA 7 .6 20 818 FT VALLEY ST COLL/GA 7 .5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-Sl,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 27 TYPE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PUBLIC
PAGE 34
IV. PRODUCTMTY RATIOS FOR BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS FROM 1950-51 TO 1975-76 The productivity ratio for each institution is a measure of the school.'s success in producing baccalaureates who go on to successfully earn S/E doctorates. Obviously, the productivity ratio is influenced by a number of external variables, as well as changes in the institution itself. Top 100 Institutions Table 2A provide information on the productivity ratios of the top 100 undergraduate sources of science/engineering Ph.D.s over time. Although there are variations from one institution to the next, there are overall trends, as shown in figure 1, that indicate the health of the B.A. to Ph.D. pipeline from 1950 to 1975. From 1950 to 1955, approximately 75 percent of the institutions either increased in their productivity or remained fairly stable. A more definitive trend was noted for the 1955 to 1960 and 1960 to 1965 time periods when as many as 89 percent and 79 percent of these institutions increased or remained stable in their productivity ratios, with the latter time frame consisting of far greater numbers of institutions that merely stabilized in their productivity. The most noteworthy change occurred from 1965 to 1970 when 89 percent of the top 100 institutions had a decrease in their productivity ratios. Although the situation improved for the 1970 to 1975 time frame, 72 percent of the institutions continued to show a decrease in productivity. The 1955-56 academic year proved to be banner years for New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and Kalamazoo College (Ml). New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology had a productivity ratio of three percent in 1950 but increased to 20 percent 28
PAGE 35
in 1955. Kalamazoo College increased from 5 percent in 1950 to 17 percent in 1955. The academic year, 1960-61, proved to be very productive for Webb Institute of Naval Architecture (NY), however, the reader is cautioned here because of the small numbers on which this productivity ratio is calculated. Technical Institutions The time series data for technical colleges (table 2B) show that productivity ratios, in general, increased between 1950 and 1965, but decreased sharply and steadily from 1965 to 1975. The most drastic decline occurred for California Institute of Technology which decreased from a productivity ratio of 61 percent in 1965 to 43 percent in 1970 and 1975. Liberal Arts Colleges The early 1960s also appeared to be peak years for the liberal arts colleges with a rather drastic decline occurring from 1965 to 1975, especially for the high productive colleges such as Reed College, Swarthmore College, and Antioch College (OH) (table 2C). Women's Colleges For the most part, the productivity ratios of predominately women's undergraduate schools was less than three percent for the six benchmark years (table 2D). Higher productivity ratios were noted, however, for Bryn Mawr, Radcliffe, Wellesley, Mt. Holyoke, Sarah Lawrence College, and Smith College. Productivity in women's colleges increased during the 1950 to 1965 period, but decreased between 1965 and 1975 specially for Bryn Mawr College (PA), Notre Dame 29
PAGE 36
College (OH), and Trinity College (DC). Traditionally Black Colleges The time-series data for the traditionally black institutions indicated that the productivity ratios for these undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s were on the increase between 1955 and 1960, but declined steadily from 1960 to the 1975-76 academic year. (See table 2E). Figure 2 provides a graphic illustration of the trends that occurred in productivity from 1950 to 1975 for the various types of baccalaureate institutions discussed in the preceding text, and figure 3 shows the productivity ratios over time for selected baccalaureate institutions. 30
PAGE 37
TABLE 2A PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS BY 6 SELECTED YEARS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 29.6 35.2 57.4 60.7 42.6 43.2 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 37.0 47.5 26.0 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 13.9 15.7 32.3 32.6 19.1 16.8 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 16.4 16.9 36.4 32.~ 14.9 14.4 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 18.3 14.0 26.2 22.9 15.1 9.5 COOPER UNION/NY 13.7 14.5 13.8 37.6 15.5 6.1 8.7 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 13.5 20.1 6.6 9.6 21. 5 13.7 13.2 RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 4.8 4.2 8.9 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 12.0 8.7 6.2 15.5 18.3 16.3 7.1 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 8.9 10.5 9.5 17.8 12.4 11. 8 NEW COLL-SOUTH FI.AU 11. 6 5.3 14.2 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 7.8 5.7 15.4 14.1 10.3 10.1 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 7.4 6.8 14.2 11. 9 11.5 8.8 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 6.8 8.8 8.6 15.3 14.8 6.2 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 8.7 11.1 10.4 14. 3 11.5 4.2 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 9.4 14.9 7.5 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 10.3 17.6 10.6 18.9 7.0 3.9 CORNELL UNIV/NY 9.3 6.8 6.3 9.8 12.9 7.7 12.7 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 3.4 20.0 10.8 17.9 7.9 7.6 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 9.0 6.7 8.6 9.5 14.1 6.4 8.8 31
PAGE 38
TABLE 2A PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS BY 6 SELECTED YEARS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 11.0 8.9 15.9 8.4 7.9 5.7 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 13.4 10.2 11.5 11. 8 5.1 4.4 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 5.3 7.7 10.8 13.9 8.8 5.7 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 5.9 4.5 7.7 11. 8 4.0 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 8.4 8.4 CALIF, U-BERKELEY 8.3 8.0 8.5 5.6 3.6 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 3.7 6.7 12.0 14.9 7.4 8.2 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 3.9 6.2 9.5 17.3 7.9 6.2 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 13.6 5.4 7.1 9.6 9.2 5.0 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 7.9 17.6 11.2 7.5 4.9 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 7.9 5.3 6.2 10.7 10.8 8.5 6.1 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 7.9 4.1 8.4 11. 2 9.2 6.0 HARVARD UNIV/MA 7.5 6.8 2.6 12.8 12.6 8.0 7.3 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 7.2 15.6 10.0 6.5 10.6 6.1 1.4 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 5.7 6.4 11.2 10.6 6.8 4.3 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 6.7 4.1 10.3 10.9 7.5 3.8 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 5.3 16.7 10.3 5.9 5.0 7.1 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 6.9 6.0 4.3 9.4 8.3 7.7 7.2 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 4.0 3.8 10.0 11. 3 6.9 5.4 CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ 6.7 7.5 6.3 32
PAGE 39
TABLE 2A PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS BY 6 SELECTED YEARS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 5.1 5.1 6.7 9.0 7.5 5.5 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 6.5 3.9 2.8 6.5 8.8 9.8 6.5 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 6.5 5.0 7.2 5.3 9.4 6.2 6.1 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 5.3 10.0 40.0 PHIIA C PHARM&SCI/PA 6.4 4.1 3.4 70.6 11. 6 5.3 1. 9 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 6.3 10.7 7.2 5.1 STANFORD UNIV/CA 6.3 4.9 3.4 6.8 9.7 6.8 6.3 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 5.2 2.4 6.1 13.1 5.6 4.4 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 3.3 3.0 9.6 12.1 8.5 4.8 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 2.9 6.2 12.1 7.9 7.1 3.4 KNOX COLLEGE/IL 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.4 12.1 4.9 2.2 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 5.8 1.0 5.0 6.5 8.3 8.7 6.3 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 5.8 2.2 2.9 9.1 8.7 6.4 4.2 CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 5.7 5.6 5.5 4.1 2.9 UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 5.7 6.5 4.3 5.1 9.6 4.3 5.0 ECKERD COLLEGE/FL 5.7 3.8 6.0 6.6 CALIF, U-DAVIS 5.7 11.4 7.1 5.9 3.7 CUNY-CITY COLLEGE 5.6 5.7 5.9 8.4 6.8 4.5 1. 9 BIACKBURN COLLEGE/IL 5.6 15.8 7.4 12.0 7.2 2.6 2.2 LAWRENCE UNIV/WI 5.5 3.9 3.6 5.6 8.5 8.0 2.4 33
PAGE 40
TABLE 2A PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS BY 6 SELECTED YEARS INSTITUTION DARTMOUTH COLLEGE/NH BATES COLLEGE/ME COLUMBIA UNIV/NY DEIAWARE VALLEY C/PA CLARK UNIVERSITY/MA BELOIT COLLEGE/WI ILL BENEDICTINE COLL OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA KING COLLEGE/TN JUNIATA COLLEGE/PA SUNY AT BINGHAMTON IAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA ILLINOIS INST TECH MUHLENBERG COLL/PA WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA CALIF,U-IRVINE LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA US MILITARY ACADEMY SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 5.4 4.6 2.8 9.2 7.2 6.0 3.2 5.4 2.4 6.8 6.4 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.3 3.2 7.6 8.8 6.1 4.0 5.4 2.1 10.7 9.8 3.6 4.7 5.3 3.7 4.3 8.5 8.0 5.1 4.0 5.3 4.7 4.4 6.0 10.4 4.3 3.1 5.3 9.1 10.7 8.8 4.9 3.2 5.2 4.2 3.6 6.1 7.6 6.6 2.8 5.2 8.1 4.9 18.2 _9 2.0 5.2 6.2 3.4 8.9 7.6 3.7 3.7 5.2 1.5 11. 9 11.5 4.5 3.3 5.1 5.3 4.0 6.3 7.8 4.0 3.4 5.1 3.1 4.1 7.3 8.4 6.0 3.8 5.1 3.9 6.3 4.2 8.5 3.7 4.8 5.0 4.0 1. 9 4.5 12.0 3.5 2.8 4.9 1.4 3.3 3.6 7.5 6.6 6.7 4.9 6.7 4.2 4.8 4.2 4.2 7.3 7.5 3.8 2.8 4.8 4.0 1. 7 7 4.8 3.3 2.1 11.5 4.2 5.5 4.6 34
PAGE 41
TABLE 2A PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS BY 6 SELECTED YEARS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % RHODES COLLEGE/TN 4.7 3.7 5.4 9.7 6.2 4.1 1.5 US MERCHANT MAR ACAD 4.7 1. 6 1.0 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 4.6 2.2 6.9 6.7 8.8 3.8 2.7 BARD COLLEGE/NY 4.6 7.3 10.4 7.0 5.6 2.0 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 4.6 2.0 4.6 5.6 9.4 7.7 2.6 CENTRE COLL KENTUCKY 4.6 2.8 6.2 1.4 6.1 3.9 6.1 DUKE UNIVERSITY/NC 4.6 2.2 2.3 3.9 7.1 7.0 4.8 LEBANON VALLEY C/PA 4.5 3.8 4.8 2.7 8.5 4.4 3.3 COLORADO SCH MINES 4.5 2.6 3.4 7.2 7.0 4.9 2.7 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 4.5 7.2 3.1 8.1 7 .4 2.0 2.2 DREW UNIVERSITY/NJ 4.4 4.0 5.5 3.6 7.2 3.7 3.4 BEREA COLLEGE/KY 4.3 4.2 6.7 6.1 6.8 1. 9 8 CHARLESTON, C OF/SC 4.3 5.8 9.8 9.1 3.6 2.7 PITZER COLLEGE/CA 4.3 5.9 3.1 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 4.3 4.9 5.5 5.6 5.9 3.3 2.6 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 4.3 3.0 1.8 3.6 3.8 7.1 5.3 IOWA STATE UNIV 4.3 5.2 3.9 7.8 7.1 3.0 2.0 YESHIVA UNIV/NY 4.2 10.2 5.8 4.7 4.7 2.5 2.0 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 4.2 1. 9 1.5 3.2 7.7 4.7 5.0 MACALESTER COLL/MN 4.2 2.2 2.1 2.2 6.3 7.6 3.7 35
PAGE 42
FIGURE 1 PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS OF TOP 100 BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS 15 0 I-cc a: > I-> 10 ICJ ::, C 0 a: 11. 5 -ElTOP 1-20 -+ TOP 21-40 ... TOP 41-60 TOP 61-80 .... TOP 81-100 0 _________ ............. __ &--...... _..,_.....,___..,_,...___. 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 YEAR 36
PAGE 43
TABLE 2B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR TECHNICAL INSTITUTIONS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 29.6 35.2 57.4 60.7 42.6 43.2 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 13.9 15.7 32.3 32.6 19.1 16.8 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 3.4 20.0 10.8 17.9 7.9 7.6 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 3.7 6.7 12.0 14.9 7.4 8.2 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 3.9 6.2 9.5 17.3 7.9 6.2 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 4.0 3.8 10.0 11. 3 6.9 5.4 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 5.3 10.0 40.0 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 5.2 2.4 6.1 13.1 5.6 4.4 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 3.3 3.0 9.6 12.1 8.5 4.8 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 5.8 1.0 5.0 6.5 8.3 8.7 6.3 ILLINOIS INST TECH 5.1 3.1 4.1 7.3 8.4 6.0 3.8 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 4.8 4.2 4.2 7.3 7.5 3.8 2.8 COLORADO SCH MINES 4.5 2.6 3.4 7.2 7.0 4.9 2.7 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 4.3 4.9 5.5 5.6 5.9 3.3 2.6 ROSE-HUI.MAN TECH/IN 3.5 6.3 4.1 6.6 3.1 3.6 1. 7 37
PAGE 44
TABLE 2C BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 37.0 47.5 26.0 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 16.4 16.9 36.4 32.9 14.9 14.4 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 18.3 14.0 26.2 22.9 15.1 9.5 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 8.9 10.5 9.5 17.8 12.4 11. 8 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 7.8 5.7 15.4 14.1 10.3 10.1 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 7.4 6.8 14.2 11. 9 11. 5 8.8 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 6.8 8.8 8.6 15.3 14.8 6.2 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 8.7 11.1 10.4 14.3 11. 5 4.2 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 10.3 17.6 10.6 18.9 7.0 3.9 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 11.0 8.9 15.9 8.4 7.9 5.7 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 13.4 10.2 11. 5 11.8 5.1 4.4 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 5.3 7.7 10.8 13.9 8.8 5.7 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 5.9 4.5 7.7 11. 8 4.0 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 13.6 5.4 7.1 9.6 9.2 5.0 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 5.7 6.4 11. 2 10.6 6.8 4.3 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 6.7 4.1 10.3 10.9 7.5 3.8 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 5.3 16.7 10.3 5.9 5.0 7.1 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 5.1 5.1 6.7 9.0 7.5 5.5 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 2.9 6.2 12.1 7.9 7.1 3.4 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 5.8 2.2 2.9 9.1 8.7 6.4 4.2 38
PAGE 45
TABLE 2C BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 5.7 6.5 4.3 5.1 9.6 4.3 5.0 BATES COLLEGE/ME 5.4 2.4 6.8 6.4 5.8 5.4 5.4 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 5.3 4.7 4.4 6.0 10.4 4.3 3.1 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 5.2 4.2 3.6 6.1 7.6 6.6 2.8 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 5.1 5.3 4.0 6.3 7.8 4.0 3.4 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 5.0 4.0 1. 9 4.5 12.0 3.5 2.8 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 1.4 3.3 3.6 7.5 6.6 6.7 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 4.6 2.2 6.9 6.7 8.8 3.8 2.7 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 4.6 2.0 4.6 5.6 9.4 7.7 2.6 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 4.5 7.2 3.1 8.1 7.4 2.0 2.2 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 4.3 3.0 1. 8 3.6 3.8 7.1 5.3 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 4.2 1. 9 1.5 3.2 7.7 4.7 5.0 MACALESTER COLL/MN 4.2 2.2 .1 2.2 6.3 7.6 3.7 COLGATE U/NY 4.1 1. 7 3.7 3.6 5.0 6.0 3.9 TRINITY COLLEGE/CT 4.0 2.8 1. 6 4.6 6.8 4.9 3.1 DEPAUW UNIVERSITY/IN 4.0 2.9 3.9 5.3 6.3 3.5 1. 7 MIDDLEBURY COLL/VT 3.9 3.1 3.2 5.0 4.8 3.6 3.8 MANHATTAN COLLEGE/NY 3.9 1.1 3.4 3.3 7.6 5.3 2.5 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 3.9 2.4 2.3 2.7 5.4 6.1 3.2 COLORADO COLLEGE 3.8 1. 7 2.2 2.5 5.2 4.7 4.8 39
PAGE 46
TABLE 2C BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % ST OLAF COLLEGE/MN 3.8 3.5 3.9 5.4 4.5 3.7 2.3 WHEATON COLLEGE/IL 3.7 2.1 2.6 5.3 5.7 3.5 3.0 DENISON UNIV/OH 3.6 3.1 2.5 3.7 4.7 3.9 3.1 ALBION COLLEGE/MI 3.1 1. 8 2.9 5.6 3.0 3.5 2.3 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 3.1 1.5 .6 3.6 5.9 3.0 4.0 OHIO WESLEYAN UNIV 3.0 2.4 2.3 6.0 4.1 2.5 1. 6 HOLY CROSS, C OF/MA 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.5 5.4 2.5 1. 7 ALMA COLLEGE/MI 2.2 9 3.8 1. 8 4.9 1. 7 1.1 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 1.0 8 1.4 1.0 1.1 2.0 40
PAGE 47
TABLE 2D BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR PREDOMINATELY WOMEN'S COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 4.8 4.2 8.9 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 13.6 5.4 7.1 9.6 9.2 5.0 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 1.4 3.3 3.6 7.5 6.6 6.7 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 3.9 2.4 2.3 2.7 5.4 6.1 3.2 SARAH lAWRENCE C/NY 3.5 1. 3 7.3 4.6 1.5 3.4 3.6 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 3.1 1.5 .6 3.6 5.9 3.0 4.0 GOUCHER COLLEGE/MD 2.6 1. 2 .8 3.8 1.0 4.6 3.3 NOTRE DAME COLL/OH 2.4 2.0 7.8 2.1 1.1 MILLS COLLEGE/CA 2.4 1. 9 .9 2.2 3.7 4.0 1.4 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2.2 1. 3 2.7 2.2 4.0 WELLS COLLEGE/NY 2.2 1. 7 1.0 6.3 .9 CHATHAM COLLEGE/PA 2.1 1. 3 1. 3 4.0 1. 7 4.6 WILSON COLLEGE/PA 1.8 2.1 1. 8 1. 9 3.5 1. 3 WHEATON COLLEGE/MA 1.8 1. 2 1.0 .7 1. 7 2.1 2.7 ALBERTUS MAGNUS C/CT 1.8 4.0 1. 7 1. 3 1.4 2.3 TRINITY COLLEGE/DC 1.8 .9 1.0 1.1 4.9 1.4 ST JOSEPHS COLL/NY 1.8 1. 2 1.4 1.1 1. 8 3.7 .7 ROSEMONT COLLEGE/PA 1. 7 1.5 3.7 2.4 1.5 .7 BENNINGTON COLL/VT 1. 6 1. 9 2.5 1.4 2.8 AGNES SCOTT COLL/GA 1. 6 1.0 2.2 3.3 1. 3 1.4 .8 41
PAGE 48
TABLE 2D BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR PREDOMINATELY WOMEN'S COLLEGES INSTITUTION SKIDMORE COLLEGE/NY SETON HILL COLL/PA SIMMONS COLLEGE/MA HOOD COLLEGE/MD EMMANUEL COLLEGE/MA MANHATTANVILLE C/NY MT ST VINCENT,COL/NY RANDOLPH-MACN WOM/VA OUR I.ADY I.AKE UN/TX REGIS COLL~GE/MA ELMIRA COLLEGE/NY CHESTNUT HILL C/PA MARY WASHINGTON C/VA INCARNATE WORD C/TX TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 1.5 1.0 1. 7 1.8 2.8 9 1.5 2.0 1. 2 9 2.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 .7 3.7 1.6 2.7 9 1.4 1.4 2.9 2.3 1.8 1.4 7 1.5 1. 9 2.7 5 1.4 1.1 2.0 1.8 2.1 .7 1. 3 7 .7 .5 2.4 1.1 2.0 1. 3 2.7 1. 6 2.6 1.2 2.3 2.0 .9 1.4 5 1.1 1.2 3.7 1.4 1..5 1.2 1.0 1.4 2.0 .8 1.1 9 6 1. 2 2.1 1. 2 1.0 5 6 1. 7 1. 3 1.0 .9 1. 6 2.2 9 .6 42
PAGE 49
TABLE 2E BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS FOR TRADITIONALLY BLACK COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % MOREHOUSE COLL/GA 2.2 1.5 4.7 1. 9 5.7 1. 2 .9 LINCOLN UNIV/PA 2.1 4.5 1.8 1. 2 2.0 1. 9 FISK UNIVERSITY/TN 2.0 1.1 2.9 1. 7 2.0 1.8 2.6 TUSKEGEE UNIV/AL 2.0 .9 .6 3.1 3.7 2.2 1.5 TOUGALOO COLLEGE/MS 1.8 2.4 5.9 1. 6 3 .1 1.4 HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC 1. 7 1. 2 .4 1. 7 3.7 2.0 1. 3 DILLARD UNIV/LA 1.1 8 3.2 2.3 NC CENTRAL UNIV 1.0 1.4 .4 .4 1.5 1.1 .9 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 1.0 .8 1.4 1.0 1. i 2.0 MORGAN STATE UNIV/MD 1.0 .4 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.0 .6 TALLADEGA COLLEGE/AL 1.0 1.4 3.6 1.5 SPELMAN COLLEGE/GA .9 1. 3 1.0 2.1 .4 CLARK COLLEGE/GA .9 2.2 3.4 2.0 NC AG & TECH STU .9 .6 .7 1. 9 1.0 .9 .6 SOUTHERN UNIV/LA .8 .4 .3 1.4 .8 .2 VIRGINIA STATE UNIV .7 3 .8 2.1 .4 .5 .6 CENTRAL STATE U/OH .6 1.5 .6 1.5 .3 2 .3 VIRGINIA UNION UNIV .6 .5 1.4 1.4 .4 XAVIER UNIV/LA .6 .5 2.8 .9 5 FT VALLEY ST COLL/GA .5 .6 1.4 .3 43
PAGE 50
FIGURE2 PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS BY TYPE OF BACCA LAU REA TE INSTITUTION -mTOP 100 -+ TECHNICAL LIBERAL ARTS ... 'Ml\18'J -11BLACK 0 -+--...-............ __.,_.......... ____ ~....,__.,..---1 ---------1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 YEAR 44
PAGE 51
FIGURE3 PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS BY SELECTED BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS 40 ...... ----.---....------.------..----. 30 0 r:c > I-20 > I-(.) ::, Q 0 a: Q. 10 -& MIT ... FIE) ... CORNaL BRYN MAWR 0 ... CUNY(NY) 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 YEAR 45
PAGE 52
V. PRODUCTMTY RATIOS FOR BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTIONS BY FIELD OF PH.D. Tables 3A through 3E provide information on how baccalaureate graduates from the various types of undergraduate institutions distribute themselves with reference to selected Ph.D. fields of study. The percentages in the tables are a ratio of the total number of Ph.D.s (for the six referenced years) in either EMP, life sciences, or social sciences divided by the total number of Ph.D.s who received their baccalaureate degrees from the specified institutions listed in the tables. Also provided in this section are the top 50 undergraduate sources of EMP Ph.D.s (table 4), life sciences Ph.D.s (table 5), and social sciences Ph.D.s (table 6). Top 100 Institutions Although the leading 100 undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s produced baccalaureates that tended to gravitate to the EMP doctoral programs, there was great diversity in terms of selected doctoral fields across institutions (table 3A). Forty percent or more of the baccalaureate graduates from 60 of the top 100 undergraduate institutions selected EMP fields for doctoral studies; whereas, only 11 institutions produced similar percentage of graduates who selected the life sciences fields and 29 institutions had 40 percent or more of its graduates going on for Ph.D.s in the social sciences. Technical Institutions Technical schools, as one would readily surmise, produced graduates who pursued Ph.D.s in the same areas as their undergraduate training, namely the EMP fields (table 3B). 46
PAGE 53
Case Western Reserve (OH) and Lehigh University (PA), although similar to the other technical institutions in terms of the skewed distribution of its graduates who specialized in the EMP doctoral fields, produced high percentages (in relationship to other technical schools) of Ph.D. students who specialized in the life sciences and social sciences. Liberal Arts Colleges With the exception of Bates College (ME) and Whitman College (WA), the baccalaureate graduates from the liberal arts colleges listed in table 3C tended to focus their doctoral studies in the EMP fields and the social sciences fields. Noteworthy is the finding that four out of every five baccalaureate graduates from Harvey Mudd who decides to pursue doctoral studies, selected EMP fields as their Ph.D. specialty. Women's Colleges Table 3D presents Ph.D. field preference for the leading women's undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s. This table clearly demonstrates a point that was made earlier in the report, and that is women who go on for Ph.D.s tend to concentrate their studies primarily in the social sciences, and secondly in the life sciences. Female B.A. graduates from Notre Dame College (OH), Our Lady of the Lake University (TX), and Manhattanville College (NY) were exceptions to this field preference. Between 40 and 45 percent of the fem ale graduates who went on to earn Ph.D.s from these schools earned their doctoral degrees in tbe EMP fields. Over half of the female B.A. graduates from Mt. St. Vincent College (NY), Mary Washington College (VA), Incarnate Word College (TX), and St. Joseph College (NY), 47
PAGE 54
concentrated their Ph.D. studies in the life sciences. However, those women's colleges with the highest productivity ratios (3 percent greater) produced baccalaureates who were heavily concentrated in the social sciences Ph.D. fields. Traditionally Black Colleges Baccalaureates from predominately black institutions were varied in terms of their selected field of Ph.D. study (table 3E). There was no clear cut pattern for these graduates. Over 71 percent of the graduates from Spelman College (GA) selected social sciences as their field of graduate study, whereas, Tuskegee University graduates overwhelmingly selected the life sciences (67 percent), and one~half of the baccalaureates from Talladega College (AL) pursued doctoral studies in the EMP fields. Figure 4 provides a graphic illustra~ion of the P~.D. field of study selected by baccalaureates from the various types of undergraduate institutions. 48
PAGE 55
TABLE 3A FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 84.0 10.1 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 88.2 7.4 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 86.1 8.3 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 40.1 19.8 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 33.3 24.1 COOPER UNION/NY 13.7 92.9 6.3 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 13.5 37.2 23.7 RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 17.5 25.8 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 12.0 75.0 13.5 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 34.9 31.4 NEW COLL-SOUTH FIA U 11. 6 30.0 16.7 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 41. 6 27.3 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 40.4 29.8 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 26.1 28.6 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 32.9 19.5 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 9.4 42.5 41. 7 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 29.5 17.9 CORNELL UNIV/NY 9.3 42.1 37.9 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 78.8 18.2 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 9.0 59.0 13.7 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 49 % 5.9 4.4 5.7 40.1 42.5 8 39.0 56.7 11. 5 33.7 53.3 31.1 29.8 45.4 47.6 15.7 52.6 20.0 3.0 27.3
PAGE 56
TABLE 3A FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 33.1 17.3 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 43.8 34.2 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 38.5 19.6 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 41. 7 37.5 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 8.4 15.0 35.0 CALIF, UBERKELEY 8.3 44.2 26.2 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 82.9 11.1 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 95.2 2.9 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 22.7 21. 3 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 7.9 38.1 29.6 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 7.9 48.9 28.6 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 7.9 21. 6 25.7 HARVARD UNIV/MA 7.5 40.3 19.3 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 7.2 11.1 22.2 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 47.0 21. 6 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 46.2 21.0 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 43.1 32.3 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 6.9 46.6 16.6 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 84.5 6.9 CALIF,USANTA CRUZ 6.7 28.2 30.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. so % 49.6 21. 9 42.0 20.8 50.0 29.6 6.0 1. 9 56.0 32.3 22.5 52.7 40.4 66.7 31.3 32.8 24.6 36.8 8.7 41.8
PAGE 57
TABLE 3A FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 39.8 20.4 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 6.5 48.0 19.6 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 6.5 44.7 21. 9 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 100.0 PHII.A C PHARM&SCI/PA 6.4 21. 2 78.8 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 6.3 38.2 24.6 STANFORD UNIV/CA 6.3 42.7 22.5 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 92.5 7.5 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 66.2 16.3 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 49.4 24.7 KNOX COLLEGE/IL 6.0 41. 3 24.0 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 5.8 90.0 5.0 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 5.8 51.4 14.9 CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 5.7 37.1 24.2 UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 5.7 54.2 21. 5 ECKERp COLLEGE/FL 5.7 25.0 29.2 CALIF, U-DAVIS 5.7 16.9 64.4 CUNY-CITY COLLEGE 5.6 47.2 15.1 BI.ACKBURN COLLEGE/IL 5.6 28.6 33.3 I.AWRENCE UNIV/WI 5.5 31. 9 27.5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-Sl,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 51 % 39.8 32.4 33.4 37.2 34.8 17.5 26.0 34.7 5.0 33.8 38.7 24.3 45.8 18.7 37.7 38.1 40.6
PAGE 58
TABLE 3A FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCAIAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % DARTMOUTH COLLEGE/NH 5.4 46.0 18.7 BATES COLLEGE/ME 5.4 24.2 43.5 COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 5.4 37.5 20.7 DELAWARE VALLEY C/PA 5.4 5.9 94.1 ClARK UNIVERSITY/MA 5.3 20.7 23.9 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 5.3 43.1 23.6 ILL BENEDICTINE COLL 5.3 52.0 36.0 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 5.2 40.6 18.9 KING COLLEGE/TN 5.2 73.3 20.0 JUNIATA COLLEGE/PA 5.2 51. 9 24.1 SUNY AT BINGHAMTON 5.2 30.5 27.5 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 5.1 57.3 20.5 ILLINOIS INST TECH 5.1 87.2 4.3 MUHLENBERG COLL/PA 5.1 39.0 50.6 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 5.0 30.8 40.4 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 7.6 32.2 CALIF, U -IRVINE 4.9 28.4 51.0 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 4.8 75.8 12.1 US MILITARY ACADEMY 4.8 63.6 1.0 SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY 4. 8 26.9 63.5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 52 % 35.3 32.3 41. 8 55.4 33.3 12.0 40.6 6.7 24.1 42.0 22.2 8.6 10.4 28.8 60.2 20.6 12.1 35.4 9.6
PAGE 59
TABLE 3A FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF THE LEADING 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % RHODES COLLEGE/TN 4.7 48.8 14.6 US MERCHANT MAR ACAD 4.7 77.8 11.1 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 4.6 42.5 17.5 BARD COLLEGE/NY 4.6 10.0 45.0 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 4.6 33.3 26.7 CENTRE COLL KENTUCKY 4.6 48.3 27.6 DUKE UNIVERSITY/NC 4.6 40.8 29.1 LEBANON VALLEY C/PA 4.5 51.1 24.4 COLORADO SCH MINES 4.5 98.2 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 4.5 50.0 31.1 DREW UNIVERSITY/NJ 4.4 33.3 31.4 BEREA COLLEGE/KY 4.3 34.4 39.3 CHARLESTON, C OF/SC 4.3 42.3 38.5 PITZER COLLEGE/CA 4.3 50.0 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 4.3 91.1 8.9 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 4.3 19.6 29.3 IOWA STATE UNIV 4.3 47.1 38.8 YESHIVA UNIV/NY 4.2 40.0 15.4 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 4.2 40.0 22.3 MACALESTER COLL/MN 4.2 22.2 27.8 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 53 % 36.6 11.1 40.0 45.0 40.0 24.1 30.1 24.4 1.8 18.9 35.3 26.2 19.2 50.0 51.1 14.0 44.6 37.7 50.0
PAGE 60
TABLE 3B FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCAIAUREATE GRADUATES OF TECHNICAL INSTITUTIONS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 84.0 10.1 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 86.1 8.3 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 78.8 18.2 RENSSEIAER POLY I/NY 8.2 82.9 11.1 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 95.2 2.9 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 84.5 6.9 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 100.0 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 92.5 7.5 I CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 66.2 16.3 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 5.8 90.0 5.0 ILLINOIS INST TECH 5.1 87.2 4.3 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 4.8 75.8 12.1 COLORADO SCH MINES 4.5 98.2 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 4.3 91.1 8.9 ROSE-HULMAN TECH/IN 3.5 88.9 3.7 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 54 % 5.9 5.7 3.0 6.0 1. 9 8.7 17.5 5.0 8.6 12.1 1.8 7.4
PAGE 61
TABLE 3C FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 88.2 7.4 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 40.1 19.8 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 33.3 24.1 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 34.9 31.4 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 41. 6 27.3 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 40.4 29.8 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 26.1 28.6 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 32.9 19.5 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 29.5 17.9 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 33.1 17.3 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 43.8 34.2 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 38.5 19.6 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 41. 7 37.5 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 22.7 21. 3 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 47.0 21. 6 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 46.2 21.0 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 43.1 32.3 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 39.8 20.4 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 49.4 24.7 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 5.8 51.4 14.9 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 55 % 4.4 40.1 42.5 33.7 31.1 29.8 45.4 47.6 52.6 49.6 21. 9 42.0 20.8 56.0 31. 3 32.8 24.6 39.8 26.0 33.8
PAGE 62
TABLE 3C FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 5.7 54.2 21. 5 BATES COLLEGE/ME 5.4 24.2 43.5 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 5.3 43.1 23.6 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 5.2 40.6 18.9 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 5.1 57.3 20.5 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 5.0 30.8 40.4 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 7.6 32.2 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 4.6 42.5 17.5 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 4.6 33.3 26.7 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 4.5 50.0 31.1 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 4.3 19.6 29.3 BUCKNELL UNIV/PA 4.2 40.0 22.3 MACALESTER COLL/MN 4,2 22.2 27.8 COLGATE U/NY 4.1 33.3 26.4 TRINITY COLLEGE/CT 4.0 41. 9 27.4 DEPAUW UNIVERSITY/IN 4.0 32.0 21.4 MIDDLEBURY COLL/VT 3.9 41. 3 26.7 MANHATTAN COLLEGE/NY 3.9 64.4 18.8 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 3.9 22.0 32.9 COLORADO COLLEGE 3.8 39.3 21. 3 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 56 % 24.3 32.3 33.3 40.6 22.2 28.8 60.2 40.0 40.0 18.9 51. l 37.7 50.0 40.2 30.6 46.6 32.0 16.9 45.1 39.3
PAGE 63
TABLE 3C FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % ST OLAF COLLEGE/MN 3.8 47.9 27.7 WHEATON COLLEGE/IL 3.7 34.0 21. 3 DENISON UNIV/OH 3.6 17.1 30.0 ALBION COLLEGE/MI 3.1 32.1 37.7 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 3.1 10.6 36.2 OHIO WESLEYAN UNIV 3.0 32.6 30.2 HOLY CROSS, C OF/MA 2.7 41. 9 21. 6 ALMA COLLEGE/MI 2.2 36.4 27.3 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 1.0 30.0 35.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-Sl,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 57 % 24.5 44.7 52.9 30.2 53.2 37.2 36.5 36.4 35.0
PAGE 64
TABLE 3D FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF PREDOMINATELY WOMEN'S COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 17.5 25.8 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 22.7 21. 3 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 7.6 32.2 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 3.9 22.0 32.9 SARAH LAWRENCE C/NY 3.5 11.5 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 3.1 10.6 36.2 GOUCHER COLLEGE/MD 2.6 17.9 32.1 NOTRE DAME COLL/OH 2.4 45.5 36.4 MILLS COLLEGE/CA 2.4 10.0 25.0 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2.2 9.1 30.3 WELLS COLLEGE/NY 2.2 16.7 50.0 CHATHAM COLLEGE/PA 2.1 23.1 30.8 WILSON COLLEGE/PA 1.8 36.4 36.4 WHEATON COLLEGE/MA 1.8 25.0 40.0 ALBERTUS MAGNUS C/CT 1. 8 25.0 50.0 TRINITY COLLEGE/DC 1.8 12.5 37.5 ST JOSEPHS COLL/NY 1. 8 23.1 53.8 ROSEMONT COLLEGE/PA 1. 7 36.4 27.3 BENNINGTON COLL/VT 1. 6 14.3 14.3 AGNES SCOTT COLL/GA 1. 6 16.7 25.0 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 58 % 56.7 56.0 60.2 45.1 88.5 53.2 50.0 18.2 65.0 60.6 33.3 46.2 27.3 35.0 25.0 50.0 23.1 36.4 71.4 58.3
PAGE 65
TABLE 3D FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF PREDOMINATELY WOMEN'S COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % SKIDMORE COLLEGE/NY 1.5 12.0 40.0 SETON HILL COLL/PA 1.5 8.3 58.3 SIMMONS COLLEGE/MA 1.5 6.9 48.3 HOOD COLLEGE/MD 1.4 50.0 EMMANUEL COLLEGE/MA 1.4 14.3 38.1 MANHATTANVILLE C/NY 1.4 40.0 26.7 MT ST VINCENT,COL/NY 1. 3 21.4 57.1 RANDOLPH-MACN WOM/VA 1. 3 27.3 63.6 OUR LADY LAKE UN/TX 1. 2 45.5 27.3 REGIS COLLEGE/MA 1. 2 30.8 38.5 ELMIRA COLLEGE/NY 1. 2 23.1 46.2 CHESTNUT HILL C/PA 1.1 18.2 45.5 MARY WASHINGTON C/VA 1.0 12.5 56.3 INCARNATE WORD C/TX 1.0 9.1 54.5 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 59 % 48.0 33.3 44.8 50.0 47.6 33.3 21.4 9.1 27.3 30.8 30.8 36.4 31. 3 36.4
PAGE 66
TABLE 3E FIELD OF PHDS FOR BACCALAUREATE GRADUATES OF TRADITIONALLY BI.ACK COLLEGES TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* % % MOREHOUSE COLL/GA 2.2 38.9 22.2 LINCOLN UNIV/PA 2.1 26.7 20.0 FISK UNIVERSITY/TN 2.0 25.0 15.0 TUSKEGEE UNIV/AL 2.0 11. 6 67.4 TOUGALOO COLLEGE/MS 1. 8 25.0 41. 7 HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC 1. 7 36.7 31. 6 DILLARD UNIV/I.A 1.1 30.0 50.0 NC CENTRAL UNIV 1.0 22.7 40.9 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 1.0 30.0 35.0 MORGAN STATE UNIV/MD 1.0 39.1 13.0 TALLADEGA COLLEGE/AL 1.0 50.0 25.0 SPELMAN COLLEGE/GA 9 28.6 CLARK COLLEGE/GA 9 14.3 57.1 NC AG & TECH STU .9 22.7 31. 8 SOUTHERN UNIV/I.A .8 29.6 48.1 VIRGINIA STATE UNIV 7 40.0 33.3 CENTRAL STATE U/OH 6 33.3 VIRGINIA UNION UNIV .6 33.3 50.0 XAVIER UNIV/LA .6 42. 9 57.1 FT VALLEY ST COLL/GA 5 71.4 *NOTE: TOTAL NUMBERS OF S/E PHDS AND PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS ARE BASED ON DATA FROM 1950-51,1955-56,1960-61,1965-66,1970-71, AND 1975-76. 60 % 38.9 53.3 60.0 20.9 33.3 31. 6 20.0 36.4 35.0 47.8 25.0 71.4 28.6 45.5 22.2 26.7 66.7 16.7 28.6
PAGE 67
RANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TABLE 4 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF EMP PHDS (RANKED BY# EMP PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION CAL INST TECHNOLOGY HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA MASS INST TECHNOLOGY COOPER UNION/NY RICE UNIVERSITY/TX REED COLLEGE/OR POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY N MEX I MINING&TECH RENSSELAER POLY I/NY WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA WORCESTER POLY I/MA SWARTHMORE COLL/PA PRINCETON UNIV/NJ STEVENS INST TECH/NJ CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL CARLETON COLLEGE/MN ILLINOIS INST TECH COLORADO SCH MINES HAVERFORD COLL/PA 61 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 44.3 30.6 21. 3 13.7 12.0 20.7 8.1 9.2 8.2 6.4 6.8 6.3 17.1 9.0 5.8 13.5 11.0 5.1 4.5 11. 7 EMP % 37.3 27.0 18.3 12.7 9.0 8.3 7.7 7.2 6.8 6.4 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.0 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.1
PAGE 68
RANK 20 20 23 23 25 25 25 25 29 30 31 31 31 34 35 35 37 37 39 39 TABLE 4 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF EMP PHDS (RANKED BY# EMP PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION POMONA COLLEGE/CA CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO PARKS,ST LOUIS U/IL S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD WABASH COLLEGE/IN CORNELL UNIV/NY KING COLLEGE/TN CALIF~ U-BERKELEY US MERCHANT MAR ACAD LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA EARlliAM COLLEGE/IN NEW COLL-SOUTH FI.AU FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA MONT C MINRL SC&TECH AMHERST COLLEGE/MA US NAVAL ACADEMY/MD OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 62 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 10.2 6.2 9.4 4.0 4.3 7.9 8.9 9.3 5.2 8.3 4.7 4.8 8.5 11. 6 7.2 3.4 8.6 3.8 9.7 7.0 EMP % 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2
PAGE 69
RANK 39 42 42 42 42 46 46 46 46 46 TABLE 4 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF EMP PHDS (RANKED BY# EMP PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION YALE UNIVERSITY/CT UNION UNIVERSITY/NY BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME ROSE-HULMAN TECH/IN BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI CLARKSON UNIV/NY DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE US MILITARY ACADEMY KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 63 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 6.9 5.7 6.2 3.5 6.5 3.2 5.8 7.9 4.8 7.0 EMP % 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
PAGE 70
RANK 1 1 3 4 4 6 7 7 9 9 11 11 13 14 14 14 17 18 19 20 TABLE 5 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF LIFE SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# LIFE SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION PHILA C PHARM&SCI/PA DEI.AWARE VALLEY C/PA CAL INST TECHNOLOGY SWARTHMORE COLL/PA REED COLLEGE/OR CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO CALIF, U-DAVIS HAVERFORD COLL/PA RADCLIFFE C/MA CORNELL UNIV/NY CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL EARIBAM COLLEGE/IN SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY WABASH COLLEGE/IN CARLETON COLLEGE/MN POMONA COLLEGE/CA HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA MUHLENBERG COLL/PA CALIF,U-IRVINE 64 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 6.4 5.4 44.3 17.1 20.7 9.4 5.7 11. 7 13.4 9.3 13. 5 8.5 4.8 8.9 11.0 10.2 8.4 9.9 5.1 4.9 LIFE SCIENCES % 5.1 5.1 4.5 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5
PAGE 71
RANK 21 21 21 21 21 21 27 28 28 30 30 30 30 34 34 34 34 34 34 40 TABLE 5 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF LIFE SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# LIFE SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION BATES COLLEGE/ME MASS COLL PHARMACY KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE CALIF, U-BERKELEY BARD COLLEGE/NY PITZER COLLEGE/CA BRANDEIS UNIV/MA CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ ST THOMAS, U OF/TX WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA ILL BENEDICTINE COLL NEW COLL-SOUTH FI.A U BLACKBURN COLLEGE/IL OBERLIN ~OLLEGE/OH UTAH STATE UNIV COLORADO STATE UNIV NEW MEXICO STATE U 65 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 5.4 3.5 7.0 30.6 7.9 7.9 8.3 4.6 4.3 7.9 6.7 4.0 5.0 5.3 11. 6 5.6 9.7 3.2 2.9 4.0 LIFE SCIENCES % 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2 .1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1. 9 1. 9 1. 9 1. 9 1. 9 1. 9 1.8
PAGE 72
RANK 40 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 TABLE 5 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF LIFE SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# LIFE SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION MASS INST TECHNOLOGY BRYN MAWR COLL/PA BEREA COLLEGE/KY CORNELL COLLEGE/IA N ME:{ I MINING&TECH ECKERD COLLEGE/FL WASH&JEFFERSON C/PA IOWA STATE UNIV AMHERST COLLEGE/MA ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 66 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 21. 3 7.9 4.3 4.2 9.2 5.7 3.9 4.3 8.6 9.4 LIFE SCIENCES % 1.8 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 1. 7 '1. 7
PAGE 73
RANK 1 2 3 4 c; 6 7 8 9 10 10 12 12 14 14 16 17 18 19 19 TABLE 6 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION REED COLLEGE/OR RADCLIFFE C/MA SWARTHMORE COLL/PA NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL ANTiuC~ COLLEGE/OH ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA BRYN MAWR COLL/PA WESLEYAN UNIV/CT BRANDEIS UNIV/MA HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA HAVERFORD COLL/PA NEW SCH SOC RSCH/NY AMHERST COLLEGE/MA CARLETON COLLEGE/MN SARAH LAWRENCE C/NY POMONA COLLEGE/CA HARVARD UNIV/MA 67 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 20.7 13.4 17.1 11.6 13.5 9.4 7.2 9.7 9.9 7.9 8.9 7.9 8.4 11. 7 4.0 8.6 11.0 3.5 10.2 7.5 SOCIAL SCIENCES % 8.3 7.6 7.3 6.2 5.3 4.9 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.0
PAGE 74
RANK 19 22 23 24 25 25 25 28 28 28 28 32 32 32 32 32 37 37 37 37 TABLE 6 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCAIAUREATES) INSTITUTION WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA CLARK UNIVERSITY/MA CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ CATHED C IM CONCP/NY CAL INST TECHNOLOGY ECKERD COLLEGE/FL WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE CALIF, U-BERKELEY PRINCETON UNIV/NJ YALE UNIVERSITY/CT SUNY AT STONY BROOK COLUMBIA UNIV/NY FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA WESTMONT COLLEGE/CA WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH IAWRENCE UNIV/WI BIACKBURN COLLEGE/IL STANFORD UNIV/CA CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 68 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 4.9 5.3 6.7 2.7 44.3 5.7 6.5 7.9 8.3 9.0 6.9 6.3 5.4 7.2 3.1 7.0 5.5 5.6 6.3 5.7 SOCIAL SCIENCES % 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
PAGE 75
RANK 37 37 37 37 45 45 45 45 45 45 TABLE 6 TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS (RANKED BY# SOCIAL SCIENCES PHDS/TOTAL BACCALAUREATES) INSTITUTION SUNY AT BINGHAMTON ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY ASSUMPTION COLL/MA VASSAR COLLEGE/NY KNOX COLLEGE/IL CUNY-CITY COLLEGE PITZER COLLEGE/CA OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA MACALESTER COLL/MN BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 69 TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 5.2 6.5 2.6 4.3 6.0 5.6 4.3 5.2 4.2 6.5 SOCIAL SCI,ENCES % 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
PAGE 76
C -I w u:: > m u, C ::c CL 100 80 60 40 20 0 FIGURE4 PHDS BY FIELD OF DOCTORATE AND TYPE OF BA INSTITUTION , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' TOP 100 TECHNICAL , , ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ' ' , , ,,,,,,,, , , ' ' , , ' ' , , '''''''' , , ,,,,,,,, , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' ,,,,,,,, ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ,,,,,,,, LIBERAL ARTS , , ,,,,,,,, , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ,,,,,,,, , , ' ' , , ' ... , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' 'Ml\1EN BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION m D EJ 70 , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' ,,,,,,,, ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' , , ' ' BLACK Bv1P LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES
PAGE 77
VI. BACCALAUREATE ORIGIN OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PH.D.S WHO ENTER S/E EMPLOYMENT FIELDS AND PURSUE RESEARCH CAREERS One of the original intents of the analysis of baccalaureate origins was to trace those individuals who had earned S/E doctorates to determine what percentage were employed in science/engineering fields as of 1985, and what percentage were actually engaged in basis or applied research. The Ph.D. recipients that were the focus of this study were tagged to the information they had supplied in response to NRC's Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) questionnaires. However, when the matching was completed and the sample weights from the SOR were a~signed to the few individuals who also were included in the SOR sample, the estimates of the percentages of Ph.D.s who indicated they were employed in S/E in 1985 often exceeded the number of Ph.D.s in the select group for a specified B.A. institution. The reason for this was the SOR, unlike the DRF, consists of a "sample" of U.S. doctorates, and as such each SOR respondent has been assigned a sampling weight. The weights were designed to inflate the sample to the SOR population, rather than the ORF population. For example, in tracing the employment status of five Ph.D.s who earned their B.A. from university "X", it is highly probable that only one would be in the SOR sample. This one individual could conceivably carry a sampling weight greater than five. If this one individual was working in S/E in 1985, the analysis would indicate that more than 5 (or more than 100 percent) of the B.A. graduates from university "X" were wcrking in S/E, which is not possible. (See appendix E for more information on the 1985 SD R survey procedurP,s and weighting scheme). Therefore, to minimize error associated with sampling and still answer the question of field of employment and primary work activity of these B.A. to Ph.D. recipients, the analysis was done by grouping Ph.D. recipients by type of B.A. institution (i.e., top 100 71
PAGE 78
baccalaureate sources of S/E Ph.D.s, technical institutions, liberal arts colleges, predominately women's colleges, and traditionally black colleges). As shown in table 7, B.A. recipients from women's colleges were more likely to leave the S/E fields for employment in nonscience/nonengineering fields after receipt of their Ph.D.s than were graduates from other types of undergraduate institutions. In fact, Ph.D. recipients from other types of B.A. institutions had an estimated 90 percent retention rate in science and engineering employment fields. Not surprisingly, baccalaureate graduates from technical institutions were more likely than graduates from other types of undergraduate institutions to pursue research careers after completing their Ph.D. degrees. Very few Ph.D.s from women's and black undergraduate institutions selected research careers. Obviously the colleges that were selected by baccalaureates for their Ph.D. study had considerable influence on the graduates' decisions to remain in S/E and/or pursue research careers. Tables SA to SE present information on the most frequently selected Ph.D. institutions for baccalaureate graduates who went on for Ph.D.s in science/engineering fields. These tables, which are presented separately for various types of undergraduate institutions, include a Carnegie classification code assigned to the Ph.D. institution and an indication of whether the school was public or private. With only one exception, the Ph.D. institutions that were selected by these graduates were Type I (Research) institutions. 72
PAGE 79
TABLE 7 PERCENTAGES* OF S/E PHDS WHO EARNED BACCALAUREATE DEGREES FROM SELECTED TYPES OF BA INSTITUTIONS AND WERE EMPLOYED IN S/E OR IN RESEARCH IN 1985 TYPE OF BA INSTITUTION TOP 100 INSTITUTIONS TECRi.ICAL COLLEGES LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES WOMEN'S COLLEGES BLACK COLLEGES EMPLOYED IN S/E % 89.7 89.3 89.5 81. 5 88.5 EMPLOYED IN RESEARCH % 31. 9 32.8 30.3 17.1 13.9 *NOTE: PERCENTAGES ARE BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX SELECTED BENCHMARK YEARS. 73
PAGE 80
TABLE BA PHD INSTITUTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED BY BA GRADUATES FROM THE TOP 100 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF S/E PHDS BA TO PHD CARNEGIE INSTITUTION NUMBERS* CODE TYPE CALIF, U-BERKELEY 1197 I PUBLIC MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 883 I PRIVATE HARVARD UNIV/MA 859 I PRIVATE STANFORD UNIV/CA 700 I PRIVATE CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 698 I PUBLIC COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 617 I PRIVA'i'E CORNELL UNIV/NY 593 I PRIVATE CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 560 I PRIVATE YALE :JNIVERSITY/CT 484 I PRIVATE WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 458 I PUBLIC ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 430 I PUBLIC MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 423 I PUBLIC PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 363 I PRIVATE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 354 I PRIVATE PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 299 I PRIVATE JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 285 I PRIVATE CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 284 I PRIVATE IOWA STATE UNIV 282 I PUBLIC WASHINGTON, U OF 274 I PUBLIC CALIF, U-DAVIS 270 I PUBLIC *NOTE: COUNTS ARE BASED ON BA TO PHO NUMBERS FROM THE 6 REFERENCED BENCHMARK YEARS 74
PAGE 81
TABLE SB PHD INSTITUTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED BY BA GRADUATES FROM TECHNICAL COLLEGES BA TO PHD CARNEGIE INSTITUTION NUMBERS* CODE TYPE MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 471 I PRIVATE CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 162 I PRIVATE STANFORD UNIV/CA 136 I PRIVATE CARNEGIE-HELLON U/PA 133 I PRIVATE CALIF, U-BERKELEY 131 I PUBLIC HARVARD UNIV/MA 114 I PRIVATE CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 112 I PRIVATE RENSSEI.AER POLY I/NY 107 I PRIVATE ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 94 I PUBLIC POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 82 I PRIVATE PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 82 I PRIVATE CORNELL UNIV/NY 79 I PRIVATE CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 72 I PUBLIC ILLINOIS INST TECH 64 I PRIVATE COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 61 I PRIVATE MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 59 I PUBLIC WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 59 I PUBLIC OHIO STATE UNIV 58 I PUBLIC PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 54 I PRIVATE MARYLAND, UNIV OF 48 I PUBLIC *NOTE: COUNTS ARE BASED ON BA TO PHD NUMBERS FROM THE 6 REFERENCED BENCHMARK YEARS 75
PAGE 82
TABLE SC PHD INSTITUTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED BY BA GRADUATES FROM LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES BA TO PHD CARNEGIE INSTITUTION NUMBERS* CODE TYPE HARVARD UNIV/MA 208 I PRIVATE MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 189 I PUBLIC WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 156 I PUBLIC YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 142 I PRIVATE CORNELL UNIV/NY 142 I PRIVATE ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 138 I PUBLIC CALIF, U-BERKELEY 130 I PUBLIC CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 125 I PRIVATE STANFORD UNIV/CA 125 I PRIVATE COLUMBIA ~IV/NY 120 I PRIVATE MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 116 I PRIVATE WASHINGTON, U OF 108 I PUBLIC PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 96 I PRIVATE MINNESOTA,U-MINNEAPL 96 I PUBLIC OHIO STATE UNIV 87 I PUBLIC PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 83 I PRIVATE PURDUE UNIVERSITY/IN 81 I PUBLIC NC, U OF-CHAPEL HILL 81 I PUBLIC NORTHWESTERN UNIV/IL 79 I PRIVATE ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 77 I PRIVATE *NOTE: COUNTS ARE BASED ON BA TO PHD NUMBERS FROM THE 6 REFERENCED BENCHMARK YEARS 76
PAGE 83
TABLE 8D PHD INSTITUTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED BY BA GRADUATES FROM PREDOMINATELY WOMEN'S COLLEGES BA TO PHD CARNEGIE INSTITUTION NUMBERS* CODE TYPE HARVARD UNIV/MA 67 I PRIVATE COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 54 I PRIVATE YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 35 I PRIVATE BOSTON UNIVERSITY/MA 34 I PRIVATE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 32 I PRIVATE MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 30 I PUBLIC PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 29 I PRIVATE CORNELL UNIV/NY 25 I PRIVATE WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 24 I PUBLIC NC, U OF-CHAPEL HILL 24 I PUBLIC CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 23 I PRIVATE MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 22 I PRIVATE RUTGERS UNIV/NJ 22 I PUBLIC JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 22 I PRIVATE MARYLAND, UNIV OF 22 I PUBLIC ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 21 I PRIVATE CALIF, U-BERKELEY 21 I PUBLIC PITTSBURGH, UNIV OF 20 I PUBLIC CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 20 I PRIVATE TEXAS, U-AUSTIN 20 I PUBLIC *NOTE: COUNTS ARE BASED ON BA TO PHO NUMBERS FROM THE 6 REFERENCED BENCHMARK YEARS 77
PAGE 84
TABLE BE PHD INSTITUTIONS MOST FREQUENTLY SELECTED BY BA GRADUATES FROM TRADITIONALLY BLACK COLLEGES BA TO PHD CARNEGIE INSTITUTION NUMBERS* CODE TYPE HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC 57 I PRIVATE ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 20 I PUBLIC OHIO STATE UNIV 19 I PUBLIC MICHIGAN STATE UNIV 16 I PUBLIC PITTSBURGH, UNIV OF 13 I PUBLIC PURDUE UNIVERSITY/IN 13 I PUBLIC MARYLAND, UNIV OF 13 I PUBLIC ATIANTA UNIV/GA 13 III PRIVATE MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 11 I PUBLIC IOWA STATE UNIV 11 I PUBLIC RUTGERS UNIV/NJ 10 I PUBLIC NC, U OF-CHAPEL HILL 9 I PUBLIC CORNELL UNIV/NY 8 I PRIVATE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 8 I PRIVATE WAYNE STATE UNIV/MI 8 I PUBLIC NC STATE U-RALEIGH 8 I PUBLIC TENN, U-KNOXVILLE 8 I PUBLIC CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 8 I PUBLIC PENN STATE UNIV 7 I PUBLIC CATHOLIC U AMER/DC 7 I PRIVATE *NOTE: COUNTS ARE BASED ON BA TO PHO NUMBERS FROM THE 6 REFERENCED BENCHMARK YEARS 78
PAGE 85
vn. DEMOGRAPmc CHARACTERISTICS OF GRADUATES FROM THE LEADING 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF S/E PH.D.S Gender and Field of Ph.D. Table 9 provides data on the field and gender distribution of those Ph.D.s who earned baccalaureate degrees from the leading undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s. The percentages were calculated on the basis of all baccalaureates who graduated from the specified undergraduate institution and then went on to earn a Ph.D. degree in S/E. Therefore, the percentages for men may be compared across fields, but should not be compared to the percentages for women since the B.A. to Ph.D. counts for men far exceeds the counts for women for all institutions except the women's colleges. As one might have hypothesized, the majority of the male Ph.D.s were in the EMP fields. Between 92 and 100 percent of the male baccalaureate graduates from the technical institutions such as Webb Institute of Naval Architecture (NY), Polytechnic University (NY), and Worchester Polytechnical Institute (MA), selected the EMP fields for their Ph.D. specialities. There were, however, a few undergraduate institutions where men were not drawn to the EMP fields. For example, approximately 77 percent of the men graduating from the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Sciences (PA) earned their Ph.D.s in the life sciences. Approximately 56 percent and 47 percent respectively, of the men graduating from St. John College (MD) and Wesleyan University (CT) focused their Ph.D. studies in the social sciences. In general, women were more likely to select the social sciences fields for Ph.D. study than either the EMP fields or the life sciences. This is especially striking for those undergraduate institutions that were totally female, such as Radcliffe and Bryn Mawr colleges, where more than half of the baccalaureate graduates who went on for S/E Ph.D.s selected the social sciencec, for their Ph.D. field of study. 79
PAGE 86
TABLE 9 FIELD OF PHD AND GENDER OF BACCALAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* %M %W %M %W %M %W CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 83.2 .8 8.5 1.5 5.9 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 83.8 4.4 5.9 1.5 4.4 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 84.4 1. 7 7.0 1. 3 5.6 .1 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 36.6 3.5 16.9 2.9 26.2 14. 0 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17 .1 30.7 2.6 17.1 7.0 23.2 19. 3 COOPER UNION/NY 13. 7 89.7 3.2 6.3 .8 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 13.5 33.4 3.8 17.7 6.0 29.0 10 .1 RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 17.5 25.8 56. 7 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 12 .0 70.8 4.2 10.1 3.5 7.6 3.8 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 34.9 31.4 33.7 NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U 11. 6 23.3 6.7 10.0 6.7 26.7 26. 7 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 32.3 9.3 19.3 8.1 19.3 11. 8 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10. 2 39.1 1. 2 21. 7 8.1 21. 7 8.1 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9,9 25.2 .8 18.5 10.1 35.3 10. 1 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 29.8 3.1 14.7 4.8 32.5 15. 1 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 9.4 39.4 3.1 34.6 7.1 7.9 7.9 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 27.6 1. 9 11. 5 6.4 35.3 17.3 CORNELL UNIV/NY 9.3 40.2 1. 9 28.7 9.2 11. 7 8.3 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 75.8 3.0 6.1 12.1 3.0 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 9.0 58.3 .7 12.7 1.0 23.7 3. 7 *NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 80
PAGE 87
TABLE 9 FIELD OF PHD AND GENDER OF BACCALAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL INSTITUTION RATIO* %M %W %M %W %M WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 31. 6 1.5 16.5 .8 46.6 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 43.8 34.2 21. 9 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 38.5 19.6 42.0 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 38.9 2.8 29.2 8.3 16.7 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 8.4 15.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 CALIF, U-BERKELEY 8.3 42.1 2.2 21. 7 4.5 20.7 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 81. 8 1.1 10.3 .8 6.0 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 93.8 1.4 2.4 .5 1. 9 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 22.7 21. 3 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 7. 9. 36.5 1. 6 22.2 7.4 24.3 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 7.9 48.2 .7 25.7 2.9 21.4 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 7.9 20.3 1.4 19.6 6.1 33.1 HARVARD UNIV/MA 7.5 39.7 .5 19.0 .3 38.6 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 7.2 5.6 5.6 16.7 5.6 55.6 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 46.3 .7 20.1 1.5 30.6 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 42.0 4.2 16.0 5.0 24.4 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 41. 5 1.5 26.2 6.2 18.5 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 6.9 45.7 .9 14.7 1. 9 33.8 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 81. 6 2.9 5.1 1.8 5.8 CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ 6.7 23.6 4.5 20.9 9.1 28.2 *NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 81 SCIENCES %W 0 4.2 25. 0 8.9 56. 0 7.9 1.1 19.6 1.8 11.1 .7 8.4 6.2 3. 0 2.9 13. 6
PAGE 88
TABLE 9 FIELD OF PHD AND GENDER OF BACCAIAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO* %M %W %M %W %M %W WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 38.9 .9 19.5 9 36.3 3.5 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 6.5 46.1 1. 9 12.8 6.9 20.6 11. 8 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 6.5 42.2 2.5 13.8 8.1 21. 3 12.2 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 100.0 PHIL.A C PHARM&SCI/PA 6.4 21. 2 76.9 1. 9 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 6.3 34.0 4.2 18.3 6.3 24.6 12.6 STANFORD UNIV/CA 6.3 39.8 2.9 15.7 6.8 22.7 12.1 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 92. 5 7.5 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 64.2 2.0 11. 8 4.5 13.3 4.3 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 48.1 1. 3 24.7 26.0 *NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 82
PAGE 89
Race-Ethnic and Field of Ph.D. Data on race-ethnic was not available for many of the Ph.D.s who had graduated from the leading 50 undergraduate institutions because of one of two reasons: 1) the race-ethnic question did not appear on the ORF questionnaire until 1973, or 2) the Ph.D. recipient selected not to answer the question. However, race data on some of these Ph.D.s were secured from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients files through its longitudinal sample surveys. With this cautionary statement in mind, the reader will note that Asians were more highly represented in the EMP doctoral fields, and least likely represented in the social sciences. Blacks and other minorities were more highly represented in the social sciences Ph.D. fields (table 10). There did not appear to be a relationship between the type of undergraduate institution from which the baccalaureate graduated and the distribution of minorities in the doctoral programs. However, the geographic location of the undergraduate institution (i.e., West coast, East coast) did appear to be related to the number of Asians coming out of the baccalaureate programs and continuing on for doctoral studies. 83
PAGE 90
TABLE 10 FIELD OF PHD AND RACE/ETHNIC CLASSIFICATION* OF BACCALAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PROD EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO** %W %A %0 %W %A %0 %W %A %0 CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 29.4 2.3 .8 5.7 .3 2.8 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 55.9 2.9 4.4 4.4 4.4 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 22.8 2.5 .9 4.3 .4 .2 3.1 .1 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 12.8 .6 8.1 18.6 .6 1. 7 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 7.5 .4 .4 7.9 .9 .4 21. 9 .4 COOPER UNION/NY 13.7 23.0 1. 6 2.4 .8 .8 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 13. 5 10.9 .4 .2 8.2 .2 .2 12.7 .2 .2 RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 5.2 12.4 1.0 29.9 2.1 2.1 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 12.0 31. 3 .3 5.9 .3 .7 6.3 .3 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 11. 6 17.4 12.8 1. 2 NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U 11. 6 26.7 3.3 10.0 50.0 3.3 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 18.6 .6 13.7 .6 16.8 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 14.3 .6 14.3 1. 2 .6 16.8 1. 2 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 6.7 .8 12.6 18.5 .8 1. 7 OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 8.6 .3 7.2 24.3 .7 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 9.4 37.0 .8 .8 36.2 3.1 1. 6 14.2 .8 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 12.2 8.3 .6 18.6 1. 3 .6 CORNELL UNIV/NY 9.3 15.0 1.1 .3 17.2 .3 .6 9.9 .1 .6 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 33.3 6.1 3.0 3.0 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 9.0 18.8 .5 4.9 .5 13.4 .7 1.0 W=WHITE A=ASIAN 0-BI.ACK,OTHER ** NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 84
PAGE 91
TABLE 10 FIELD OF PHD AND RACE/ETHNIC CLASSIFICATION* OF BACCALAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE SOURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PROD EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO** %W %A %0 %W %A %0 %W %A %0 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 7.5 8 9.8 .8 18.8 1.5 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 13. 7 1.4 11.0 1.4 8.2 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 14. 7 7.0 1.4 16.8 7 EARUIAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 16. 7 20.8 6.9 1.4 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 8.4 15.0 35.0 50.0 CALIF, U-BERKELEY 8.3 11. 5 3.1 .3 10.6 1.8 .4 14.3 .9 1.5 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 29.3 1.4 .3 7.6 3.0 .3 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 23.3 2.4 1.0 1. 9 1.4 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 10.7 1. 3 5.3 2.7 26.7 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 7.9 17.5 19.6 .5 .5 20.1 1. 6 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 7.9 14.1 .4 12.0 1.1 12.3 .7 .7 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 7.9 8.8 .7 18.2 .7 33.8 1.4 HARVARD UNIV/MA 7.5 11. 9 .4 7.8 .1 .1 16.2 .5 .7 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 7.2 5.6 11.1 22.2 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 18.7 9.7 15.7 .7 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 16.8 .8 8.4 15.1 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 15.4 1.5 16.9 15.4 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 6.9 11. 9 1. 3 .4 8.3 .9 15.7 .4 1.1 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 23.8 1.1 4.3 .7 5.1 .4 CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ 6.7 28.2 26.4 .9 38.2 .9 1.8 W-WHITE A-ASIAN 0-BI.ACK,OTHER ** NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 85
PAGE 92
TABLE 10 FIELD OF PHO AND RACE/ETHNIC CLASSIFICATION* OF BACCALAUREATES FROM THE TOP 50 UNDERGRADUATE ?OURCES OF SCIENCE/ENGINEERING PHDS TOTAL PROD EMP LIFE SCIENCES SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTITUTION RATIO** %W %A %0 %W %A %0 %W %A %0 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 11. 5 11. 5 .9 22.1 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 6.5 23.1 .3 .6 10.9 .3 20.2 .9 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 6.5 14.4 .9 .3 13. 8 .3 18.4 .3 .9 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 33.3 PHILA C PHARM&SCI/PA 6.4 5.8 21. 2 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 6.3 26.2 2.1 20.9 1.0 1.0 32.5 .5 STANFORD UNIV/CA 6.3 12.9 .7 5 11. 3 2.0 .2 19.1 .4 .7 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 43 .0 2.2 1.1 3.2 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 21. 6 .3 7.0 .5 9.5 .3 .3 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 18.2 13.0 9.1 1. 3 W-WHITE A-ASIAN 0-BI..ACK,OTHER ** NOTE: DATA IS BASED ON COUNTS FROM THE SIX BENCHMARK YEARS. 86
PAGE 93
VDL SUMMARY Obviously, the impact that an undergraduate institution has on the academic and career decisions of its graduates may be measured in a variety of ways, with the B.A. to Ph.D. institutional productivity being only one such measure. However, given the fact that institutional productivity was the focus of this study, there are a number of conclusions one may draw from the analyses presented in the preceding text. Approximately four out of every five of the leading 100 baccalaureate sources of S/E Ph.D.s were private colleges/universities. Technical institutions and liberal arts colleges were most successful in producing large percentages of their graduates that went on to obtain science/engineering Ph.D.s, and subsequently pursued research careers. Traditionally black colleges and predominately women's colleges, however, were far less likely to produce graduates who pursued science/engineering doctoral degrees. No black colleges and only three women's colleges (Bryn Mawr, Radcliffe, and Wellesley) were in the leading 100 B.A. to Ph.D. undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s. Although it is difficult to give definitive reasons for why some types of undergraduate institutions have higher productivity ratios than others, one may conclude that students enrolling in technical institutions and liberal arts research colleges do so because of their pre-college interests in the sciences. Therefore, the heavy emphasis that is placed on the sciences in the undergraduate curriculum, combined with the students' pre-college interests in science/engineering, most assuredly plays a large role in the decisions made by these students when leaving their undergraduate institutions. The decision to pursue doctoral training is not only related to the student's interest, but also to the student's financial situation and the number of academic and employment opportunities that are available to the student when such P decision is made. The influences of these external factors are alluded to in the time-series data presented in this report. 87
PAGE 94
Following World War II, heavy emphasis was placed on the value of education, both by the business world and parents who wanted to assure that their children had opportunities that were denied them during a time when the economy of the country was not as heal thy. During the early l 950s, a great deal of emphasis was placed on the need for the United States to close the technical gap that existed between the United States and the Soviet Union. This emphasis on the sciences was followed by increased attention to the space program. The productivity trends from 1955 to 1965 clearly demonstrate the impact of these science-focused programs. The productivity ratios of virtually all types of baccalaureate institutions increased between 1955 to 1965, and most drastically for the technical schools and the liberal arts colleges. With the increased involvement of the country in the Vietnam conflict in the mid-to-late l 960s and a decrease in emphasis on the sciences, the productivity ratios of the technical schools and the liberal arts colleges declined sharply and steadily from 1965 to 1975. Just as the decisions made by high school students to enter one type of college as opposed to another is determined by a number of f Rctors, the decisions to major in specific doctoral fields are also influenced by the student's pre-college interests, baccalaureate experiences, perceptions of employment opportunities, etc. For the top 100 undergraduate sources of science/engineering Ph. D.s, large percentages of the students selected the EMP fields for doctoral study. This was especially true for the graduates of technical institutions and the liberal arts research colleges, where the EMP fields were emphasized. Graduates from women's colleges, on the other hand, were more likely to focus their doctoral studies in the social sciences and the life sciences. This finding supports the hypothesis that women are less likely than men to major in "hard" sciences. Analyses of the top 50 undergraduate sources of S/E Ph.D.s indicate that minorities, other than Asians, were more likely to select the social sciences for Ph.D. study; whereas, Asians tended to gravitate more frequently to the EMP fields. 88
PAGE 95
The post-doctoral career decisions made by Ph.D. graduates are probably more influenced by their experiences at their Ph.D. institutions than by their undergraduate institutions. However, this study did note that those female students that earned their B.A. from women's colleges were less likely than graduates of other types of undergraduate institutions to remain in S/E employment fields following receipt of a S/E Ph.D. degree. Furthermore, these women, as well as graduates from traditionally black colleges, were less likely than 8.A. graduates from technical colleges and liberal arts research colleges to pursue research careers. Again, this finding supports the view that the emphasis placed on EMP fields and research by technical institutions and liberal arts research colleges has far reaching and on-&oing implications for the academic and career decisions made by its graduates. Possible Future Studies As is true with most analytical studies, this study addressed a number of questions, but also raises a number of questions that could be addressed in future studies. Given the fact that the productivity ratios of undergraduate institutions over time have already been identified, it would be useful to select institutions with changing productivity ratios to try to relate the changes to a number of external variables such as federal funding, emphasis of the job market, the economy of the country, the curriculum of the undergraduate institutions, etc. This follow-on study could be done on a year by year basis for those institutions where changes in productivity were rather drastic. The institutions could be surveyed to determine whether any changes occurred within the institution itself that may have contributed to the increase or decrease in productivity of the 8.A. to Ph.D. P.ipeline. The relationship between the high production institutions and those institutions that have traditionally been recipients of NSF and NIH fellowships and associateships could also be reviewed as part of this analysis. 89
PAGE 96
Secondly, in view of the fact that the employment patterns of the B.A. to Ph.D. recipients from various undergraduate institutions were not fully explored in the study, a follow-on study to analyze this topic is suggested. Using the SOR, rather than the DRF, as the data base, an employment study of B.A. graduates from highly productive technical schools, liberal arts colleges, and women's colleges would be extremely interesting in shedding light on career paths taken by these graduates. Starting with the SOR as the data base would avoid the weighting problems encountered in the analysis of the data in this report. The proposed study would relate the findings of this report to the primary work activities, salaries, fields of employment, type of employers, field switchings, publication records, etc. of the Ph.D. graduates from various types of undergraduate institutions, and would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the undergraduate institution on the productivity of its graduates. 90
PAGE 97
APPENDIX A B.A. to Ph.D. Output Rankings by Baccalaureate Institutions (Not Adjusted for Institution Size) Note: Undergraduate institutions graduating 30 or less baccalaureates who went on to earn a science/engineering Ph.D. during 1950 to 1979 were not included in Appendix A. 91
PAGE 98
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK CALIF, U-BERKELEY 6852 1 926 1 847 1 1307 2 1732 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 5702 2 617 4 811 2 1342 1 1180 ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 5599 3 719 3 i)l 3 1061 4 1247 MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 4885 4 556 7 636 6 1060 5 1127 CORNELL UNIV/NY 4748 5 561 6 649 5 858 6 1071 WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 4256 6 569 5 555 8 838 7 945 CUNY-CITY COLLEGE 4119 7 741 2 773 4 1129 3 898 CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 4025 8 442 14 534 9 776 10 1014 TEXAS, U-AUSTIN 3784 9 289 21 436 15 813 9 962 HARVARD UNIV/MA 3602 10 489 8 517 11 817 8 757 MINNESOTA,U-MINNEAPL 3590 11 482 9 564 7 767 11 752 PENN STATE UNIV 3581 12 417 15 483 14 757 13 756 PURDUE UNIVERSITY/IN 3308 13 409 16 504 13 676 14 650 COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 3262 14 447 13 510 12 764 12 739 RUTGERS UNIV/NJ 3041 15 381 17 318 22 502 20 743 MICHIGAN STATE UNIV 3038 16 298 20 331 21 480 23 741 OHIO STATE UNIV 2976 17 368 18 397 16 598 16 698 CUNY-BROOKLYN COLL 2797 18 480 10 523 10 616 15 639 STANFORD UNIV/CA 2737 19 282 22 348 19 564 18 656 WASHINGTON, U OF 2575 20 281 23 315 23 496 21 622 IOWA STATE UNIV 2435 21 324 19 359 17 590 17 531 MI.SSOURI,U-COLUMBIA 2341 22 260 25 356 18 493 22 510 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 2137 23 478 11 301 25 385 30 418 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 2136 24 279 24 308 24 460 25 379 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 2106 25 466 12 332 20 399 28 415 MARYLAND, UNIV OF 2101 26 196 35 220 41 355 35 464 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 2017 27 204 33 287 27 502 19 445 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 1992 28 217 30 279 28 387 29 418 PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 1937 29 218 29 237 33 342 39 403 FLORIDA, UNIV OF 1934 30 170 46 224 38 453 26 452 COLORADO,U-BOULDER 1917 31 200 34 232 34 382 32 444 CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 1888 32 210 32 267 30 434 ';>7 355 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 1805 33 212 31 230 36 462 24 402 UTAH, UNIV OF 1764 34 253 26 288 26 383 31 423 CALIF, U-DAVIS 1732 35 68 126 96 114 195 87 425 BRIGHAM YOUNG U/UT 1713 36 164 49 231 35 334 41 400 NORTHWESTERN UNIV/IL 1689 37 245 28 220 40 352 36 356 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 1661 38 163 so 144 70 289 48 355 KANSAS, UNIV OF 1633 39 188 37 211 44 370 33 366 INDIANA U BLOOMNGTON 1621 40 132 66 155 60 260 57 404 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 92 1 1288 1 752 1 3 1008 3 744 2 2 1124 2 657 4 4 929 4 577 5 5 924 5 685 3 8 886 6 463 10 9 460 22 118 89 6 758 9 501 6 7 827 7 457 11 10 549 16 473 8 12 599 14 426 12 11 674 10 494 7 18 663 11 406 14 15 526 20 276 29 13 626 12 471 9 14 782 8 406 15 16 605 13 310 23 19 408 26 131 78 17 543 18 344 17 20 551 15 310 24 21 376 34 255 35 22 458 23 264 30 31 341 40 214 47 39 388 30 322 20 32 366 36 128 80 24 543 17 323 18 26 339 41 240 39 30 346 39 345 16 34 436 24 301 27 25 374 35 261 32 27 406 27 253 36 45 337 43 285 28 35 360 37 139 74 29 273 60 144 70 28 522 21 426 13 36 322 45 262 31 43 316 46 200 51 44 398 29 312 21 42 314 47 184 53 33 428 25 242 37
PAGE 99
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 1586 41 179 41 240 32 316 42 332 so 294 51 225 43 CUNY -QUEENS COLL 1585 42 146 55 199 46 297 46 507 23 301 so 135 76 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 1580 43 146 56 144 71 278 51 372 40 380 32 260 34 LA ST UNIV & A&M C 1567 44 142 60 144 73 312 43 397 37 347 38 225 42 NOTRE DAME, U OF/IN 1523 45 133 64 219 42 343 38 371 41 289 53 168 58 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV 1487 46 193 36 272 29 350 37 321 54 226 74 125 81 MASS U OF-AMHERST 1482 47 171 45 128 80 223 72 325 51 331 44 304 26 SUNY AT BUFFALO 1465 48 115 77 105 98 200 85 354 46 379 33 312 22 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 1445 49 173 43 220 39 361 34 348 47 219 77 124 82 OBERLIN COLLEGEjOH 1424 so 184 39 206 45 300 44 324 52 255 64 155 63 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 1376 51 106 83 165 55 289 49 347 48 290 52 179 56 CONNECTICUT, UNIV OF 1369 52 183 40 192 47 225 71 266 75 278 57 225 41 NC STATE U-RALEIGH 1360 53 78 113 182 49 338 40 290 63 289 54 183 54 PITTSBURGH, UNIV OF 1342 54 143 59 147 67 263 55 322 53 303 48 164 59 COLORADO STATE UNIV 1334 55 145 58 166 53 254 60 321 55 267 61 181 55 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 1328 56 124 72 163 56 271 54 311 59 266 62 193 52 DUKE UNIVERSITY/NC 1325 57 110 82 157 59 216 79 279 67 339 42 224 44 NEBRASKA, U-LINCOLN 1307 58 178 42 226 37 252 61 301 60 226 73 124 84 NC, U OF-CHAPEL HILL 1290 59 130 67 114 87 221 73 316 56 302 49 207 49 WAYNE STATE UNIV/MI 1284 60 185 38 170 51 299 45 335 49 191 87 104 101 CALIF,U-SANTA BARB 1262 61 39 193 54 181 123 141 386 38 399 28 261 33 IOWA, UNIVERSITY OF 1254 62 162 52 165 54 249 64 281 66 256 63 141 73 OKLAHOMA, U OF 1247 63 166 48 255 31 297 47 250 82 179 92 100 105 TENN I U-KNOXVILLE 1222 64 105 86 145 69 254 59 312 58 251 68 155 64 OREGON STATE UNIV 1218 65 162 53 189 48 273 53 267 74 188 89 139 75 VA POLY INST&STATE U 1203 66 124 73 148 66 220 74 226 90 273 59 212 48 DARTMOUTH COLLEGE/NH 1201 67 118 76 150 63 284 so 294 61 211 81 144 69 KANSAS STATE UNIV 1201 68 167 47 214 43 259 58 259 79 187 90 115 91 SYRACUSE UNIV/NY 1189 69 248 27 145 68 245 65 234 88 217 80 100 104 ARIZONA, UNIV OF 1176 70 104 89 127 82 236 67 284 64 255 65 170 57 WASHINGTON UNIV/MO 1175 71 163 51 144 72 244 66 236 86 235 70 153 66 GEORGIA INST TECH 1165 72 105 85 182 so 274 52 316 57 176 97 112 93 CINCINNATI, U OF/OH 1150 73 112 81 138 74 235 68 260 78 252 67 153 65 BOSTON UNIVERSITY/MA 1101 74 132 65 113 89 190 88 238 85 287 55 141 71 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 1092 75 55 262 192 109 540 19 305 25 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY/PA 1067 76 155 54 128 81 186 92 272 70 232 71 94 110 GEORGIA, UNIV OF 1058 77 115 78 114 88 214 81 266 76 192 86 157 62 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 1050 78 146 57 153 62 250 62 224 91 153 119 124 83 WASHINGTON STATE U 1033 79 63 160 57 210 83 235 87 178 94 112 95 SAN DIEGO STATE U/CA 1010 80 85 107 98 112 226 70 279 68 201 83 121 85 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 93
PAGE 100
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME FLORIDA STATE UNIV LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA MIAMI UNIVERSITY/OH DELAWARE, UNIV OF UTAH STATE UNIV SOUTHERN ILL UNIV VIRGINIA, UNIV OF TEXAS TECH UNIV CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE CUNY-HUNTER COLLEGE TUFTS UNIVERSITY/MA POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY WEST VIRGINIA UNIV FORDHAM UNIV/NY ILLINOIS INST TECH AUBURN UNIVERSITY/AL SAN JOSE STATE U/CA KENTUCKY, UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF, U OF ARKANSAS,U-FAYETTVLE DREXEL UNIVERSITY/PA BOSTON COLLEGE/MA ALABAMA, UNIVER OF REED COLLEGE/OR OREGON, UNIV OF BRANDEIS UNIV/MA NEW MEXICO, UNIV OF POMONA COLLEGE/CA MIAMI, UNIV OF/FL GEO WASHINGTON U/DC CARLETON COLLEGE/MN CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO VANDERBILT UNIV/TN MISSISSIPPI STATE U OHIO UNIVERSITY LOYOLA U CHICAGO/IL ARIZONA STATE UNIV MANHATTAN COLLEGE/NY NORTHEASTERN U/MA TULANE U OF LA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 1006 81 49 159 77 131 217 77 294 62 218 79 151 68 993 82 114 79 150 64 249 63 223 92 172 99 85 127 981 83 97 92 107 96 167 105 258 80 220 76 132 77 976 84 58 141 71 138 148 119 214 99 253 66 232 40 966 85 173 44 154 61 229 69 207 103 129 141 74 143 964 86 56 145 99 108 217 76 262 77 219 78 111 96 963 87 87 100 66 149 142 122 198 107 229 72 241 38 958 88 86 104 131 77 215 80 271 72 161 107 94 111 946 89 60 163 174 100 272 71 280 56 160 60 934 90 119 74 113 90 216 78 267 73 165 105 54 183 933 91 88 99 110 93 188 91 253 81 175 98 119 87 931 92 128 68 168 52 260 56 215 98 112 155 48 209 912 93 113 80 121 84 218 75 220 94 160 108 80 134 899 94 119 75 137 75 179 96 219 96 176 95 69 149 891 95 141 61 158 58 212 82 180 117 134 137 66 157 875 96 125 71 124 83 189 90 204 104 144 127 89 120 868 97 84 108 99 110 199 86 284 65 137 136 65 164 860 98 140 62 134 76 175 98 177 122 145 125 89 119 849 99 126 70 103 104 165 107 179 120 155 117 121 86 842 100 105 87 150 65 179 97 176 123 133 138 99 107 841 101 34 209 104 100 208 84 242 84 166 103 87 123 835 102 85 106 86 118 174 99 246 83 153 118 91 115 833 103 78 114 104 102 183 93 199 106 157 115 112 94 821 104 105 88 131 78 180 95 163 132 153 120 89 121 814 105 71 121 81 125 161 108 213 100 188 88 100 106 811 106 19 303 70 140 154 116 219 95 208 82 141 72 805 107 83 109 97 113 138 127 209 102 169 101 109 98 805 108 93 95 113 91 161 109 178 121 155 116 105 100 801 109 90 97 104 101 155 115 197 108 165 106 90 116 786 110 128 69 110 94 160 112 182 115 148 122 58 172 782 111 51 153 65 152 180 94 209 101 159 110 118 90 778 112 1 1167 71 256 383 31 323 19 755 113 72 118 89 117 151 118 173 125 178 93 92 114 749 114 99 91 95 115 168 103 180 118 120 146 87 124 748 115 69 123 83 119 173 101 188 111 159 109 76 140 748 116 72 117 82 123 167 106 186 112 166 104 75 141 740 117 29 233 75 134 123 140 202 105 180 91 131 79 733 118 59 137 114 86 190 89 189 110 129 140 52 189 716 119 81 110 61 156 167 104 164 130 157 113 86 125 715 120 79 112 83 120 159 113 184 114 139 131 71 147 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 94
PAGE 101
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ST LOUIS UNIV/MO RHODE ISi.AND, U OF MARQUETTE UNIV/WI HOUSTON, U OF/TX WILLIAM & MARY, C/VA MAINE, U-ORONO AMHERST COLLEGE/MA CAL STU, LONG BEACH SUNY AT BINGHAMTON UNION UNIVERSITY/NY ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH NEW HAMPSHIRE, U OF SUNY AT ALBANY HAWAII, UNIV OF MONTANA STATE UNIV BUCKNELL UNIV/PA KENT STATE UNIV/OH FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA SAN FRANCISC STU/CA WESLEYAN UNIV/CT EMORY UNIV/GA VERMONT, U OF IDAHO, UNIV OF WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA CLEMSON UNIV/SC COOPER UNION/NY CALIF,U-IRVINE WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH CAL ST U,LOS ANGELES WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA STHRN METHODIST U/TX WYOMING, UNIV OF VILLANOVA UNIV/PA RADCLIFFE C/MA GEORGETOWN UNIV/DC OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA DAYTON, U OF/OH CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA CAL STU, FRESNO TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 706 121 80 111 103 103 173 102 185 113 122 142 43 231 703 122 71 120 78 129 133 132 165 128 146 124 110 97 703 123 56 146 115 85 160 111 173 124 144 126 55 182 703 124 41 175 59 167 87 194 229 89 197 85 90 117 692 125 54 147 58 170 108 154 145 148 176 96 151 67 683 126 91 96 104 99 131 134 164 129 113 154 80 132 682 127 75 115 130 79 139 126 171 126 105 165 62 167 682 128 9 492 38 231 137 129 273 69 153 121 72 145 673 129 9 468 19 352 107 155 180 116 200 84 158 61 669 130 105 84 98 111 119 144 v.~1 145 108 161 92 112 668 131 100 90 100 106 156 114 162 135 105 168 45 223 663 132 85 105 99 107 131 135 119 165 147 123 82 129 663 133 31 224 44 201 51 276 102 186 220 75 215 46 653 134 69 124 56 177 99 172 170 127 158 112 101 103 643 135 93 94 99 109 147 120 141 150 106 164 57 176 642 136 so 157 46 195 108 153 162 134 168 102 108 99 630 137 67 127 77 130 115 147 138 151 157 114 76 139 621 138 59 138 82 122 136 130 163 131 99 176 82 131 617 139 32 223 62 155 143 121 222 93 107 163 51 194 605 140 65 129 68 142 129 137 111 176 114 152 118 88 589 141 57 144 73 136 103 163 151 140 116 149 89 118 581 142 71 119 70 139 95 177 113 172 119 147 113 92 567 143 89 98 111 92 137 128 126 159 58 267 46 222 563 144 62 131 78 128 125 139 113 173 105 166 80 133 557 145 45 166 79 127 116 146 138 152 91 182 88 122 555 146 so 155 100 105 160 110 122 160 75 218 48 208 554 147 78 239 274 58 202 so 552 148 57 143 67 148 140 123 149 142 89 186 so 195 549 149 27 247 42 211 88 190 218 97 139 132 35 277 545 150 45 164 67 146 103 162 132 153 119 148 79 135 544 151 60 136 83 121 140 125 110 177 101 174 so 198 544 152 63 130 76 133 122 142 120 164 102 172 61 170 538 153 35 202 48 192 129 138 127 156 132 139 67 156 536 154 40 177 59 165 154 117 150 141 92 178 41 240 535 155 32 221 59 166 106 158 145 147 122 143 71 146 533 156 49 160 60 164 119 145 147 146 109 160 49 207 532 157 33 215 60 161 101 166 151 139 140 130 47 216 527 158 64 278 244 69 219 45 524 159 40 185 58 169 133 133 148 144 89 187 56 179 520 160 39 192 64 153 101 169 149 143 115 151 52 190 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 95
PAGE 102
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME NORTHERN ILL UNIV DEPAUW UNIVERSITY/IN LIU-BROOKLYN CMPS/NY LAFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA WESTERN MICHIGAN U BAYLOR UNIV/TX NEW MEXICO STATE U SMITH COLLEGE/MA MICHIGAN TECH UNIV ST OLAF COLLEGE/MN HOFSTRA UNIV/NY ST JOHNS U-QUEENS/NY N TEXAS STATE UNIV CAL STU, NORTHRIDGE NORTH DAKOTA ST UNIV DETROIT, U OF/MI CATHOLIC U AMER/DC CIARK UNIVERSITY/MA HAVERFORD COLL/PA PUERTO RICO, UNIV OF BOWLING GREENS U/OH WISCONSIN,U-MILWAUKE MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA SOUTH CAROLINA, U OF WORCESTER POLY I/MA SOUTH FLORIDA, U OF MONTANA, UNIV OF DENVER, UNIV OF/CO CAL POLS U-SL OBISP US MILITARY ACADEMY VASSAR COLLEGE/NY WHEATON COLLEGE/IL CALVIN COLLEGE/MI HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC COLGATE U/NY CLARKSON UNIV/NY SOUTH DAKOTA STATE U HOLY CROSS, C OF/MA US NAVAL ACADEMY/MD STEVENS INST TECH/NJ TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 516 161 25 254 28 269 75 215 154 138 142 128 92 113 515 162 70 122 94 116 131 136 95 198 78 206 47 217 512 163 58 140 31 257 94 179 162 133 111 156 56 178 509 164 66 128 68 143 121 143 117 169 89 185 48 211 508 165 28 240 43 208 100 170 142 149 138 133 57 175 504 166 62 134 68 144 113 150 127 157 91 183 43 233 487 167 37 199 51 187 101 168 118 168 115 150 65 163 485 168 28 235 34 244 87 191 130 154 120 145 86 126 481 169 43 171 76 132 140 124 72 252 88 188 62 168 481 170 51 154 70 141 101 167 92 205 104 169 63 166 480 171 40 179 43 206 104 161 126 158 102 171 65 161 477 172 68 125 63 154 106 156 127 155 79 203 34 278 475 173 60 135 73 137 112 152 116 170 76 215 38 262 475 174 1 1040 45 316 179 119 172 100 78 136 473 175 62 133 82 124 106 157 100 190 78 209 45 224 470 176 51 152 65 151 135 131 122 162 70 232 27 322 470 177 75 116 54 179 113 149 114 171 83 194 31 294 467 178 33 213 36 237 71 224 108 180 137 134 82 130 467 179 62 132 67 147 92 182 87 218 75 220 84 128 467 180 38 197 61 159 87 195 107 183 108 162 66 159 464 181 45 165 40 219 73 219 101 188 137 135 68 153 464 182 1 907 11 486 42 326 156 137 158 111 96 108 458 183 37 198 45 199 86 196 112 174 110 158 68 151 456 184 30 229 56 175 85 200 95 199 122 144 68 155 453 185 39 188 51 185 101 165 119 166 75 216 68 152 441 186 38 343 158 136 141 129 104 102 439 187 58 142 68 145 88 189 98 194 86 192 41 246 434 188 87 101 54 180 89 188 98 195 77 212 29 312 426 189 40 186 48 193 90 186 107 182 79 205 62 169 425 190 86 102 109 95 86 197 79 233 56 269 9 583 425 191 43 169 38 225 79 208 86 220 105 167 74 142 424 192 53 148 61 157 112 151 93 203 56 270 49 202 424 193 38 196 79 126 92 183 73 245 74 222 68 154 423 194 44 168 32 252 77 213 108 181 114 153 48 212 421 195 40 178 37 233 67 230 98 193 102 170 77 138 409 196 34 207 35 240 87 192 120 163 70 229 63 165 409 197 59 139 74 135 98 173 94 201 49 295 35 275 404 198 42 172 51 184 71 225 118 167 80 199 42 234 404 199 97 93 107 97 98 174 66 273 29 414 7 675 396 200 24 262 58 168 94 180 90 211 89 184 41 241 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 96
PAGE 103
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCAI.AUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK OHIO WESLEYAN UNIV 395 201 52 149 65 150 113 148 73 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 394 202 40 184 35 242 82 202 83 WAKE FOREST UNIV/NC 390 203 28 241 32 253 65 236 104 YESHIVA UNIV/NY 388 204 so 156 60 160 97 175 81 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 376 205 33 212 47 194 104 160 63 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 375 206 40 183 39 222 89 187 90 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 369 207 1 1044 62 245 100 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 368 208 40 182 31 259 95 178 104 CAL STU, SACRAMENTO 368 209 9 493 28 277 81 205 109 WICHITA ST UNIV/KS 367 210 39 190 57 172 82 203 89 VALPARAISO UNIV/IN 366 211 38 195 38 229 105 159 100 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 365 212 40 181 40 218 72 220 91 NORTH DAKOTA, U OF 365 213 32 220 61 158 99 171 86 FAIRLEIGH DICKN U/NJ 364 214 4 646 20 335 87 193 122 DENISON UNIV/OH 359 215 35 203 38 227 59 251 82 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 357 216 32 219 so 188 62 243 99 ST. JOSEPHS UNIV/PA 356 217 30 226 46 196 79 209 78 KNOX COLLEGE/IL 354 218 24 264 44 203 94 181 85 LOUISVILLE, U OF/KY 352 219 52 151 56 176 81 204 79 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 351 220 30 228 41 215 72 223 81 PROVIDENCE COLL/RI 346 221 29 230 45 200 82 201 96 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 345 222 34 210 53 182 102 164 79 AKRON, U OF/OH 342 223 46 162 41 213 65 234 51 MIDDLEBURY COLL/VT 341 224 39 187 54 178 73 217 63 ALLEGHENY COLLEGE/PA 340 225 36 201 39 221 80 206 78 AMERICAN UNIV/DC 340 226 35 205 20 342 65 235 91 TRINITY COLLEGE/CT 339 227 34 206 43 205 69 227 72 GETTYSBURG COLL/PA 336 228 28 237 24 295 77 212 88 MACALESTER COLL/MN 336 229 24 265 28 273 55 263 96 ADELPHI UNIV/NY 335 230 36 200 27 278 64 238 93 TOLEDO, UNIV OF/OH 334 231 26 249 41 214 61 246 91 IA SALLE UNIV/PA 331 232 20 296 41 212 51 277 101 SOWESTERN I.A, U OF 330 233 27 245 51 186 90 185 73 HUMBOLDT STATE U/CA 330 234 4 694 18 374 51 285 92 ALFRED UNIVERSITY/NY 329 235 38 194 48 191 77 211 62 BRADLEY UNIV/IL 325 236 46 163 43 207 66 233 66 ROOSEVELT UNIV/IL 325 237 86 103 56 174 72 222 77 COLORADO COLLEGE 319 238 27 246 37 236 55 265 83 TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIV 318 239 32 222 so 190 97 176 67 COLORADO SCH MINES 313 240 41 176 60 162 65 237 52 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 97 244 66 241 26 335 225 81 196 73 144 185 92 180 69 150 229 72 223 28 313 279 64 244 65 160 213 62 250 55 181 191 110 159 96 109 184 58 265 40 248 179 101 175 40 251 215 60 256 40 250 189 51 288 34 280 207 80 200 42 236 221 58 266 29 309 161 92 179 39 253 227 101 173 44 227 192 78 208 36 267 237 69 235 54 184 222 78 207 29 306 235 54 276 30 302 230 77 211 so 197 196 52 283 42 235 234 45 306 32 285 331 86 191 53 188 280 69 234 43 229 236 60 255 47 215 209 97 177 32 287 249 68 237 53 187 216 71 228 48 210 197 91 181 42 238 202 75 217 40 247 208 74 221 41 243 187 76 213 42 237 246 66 242 23 365 206 87 190 78 137 284 60 253 44 225 271 76 214 28 314 240 27 433 7 667 226 66 243 51 193 268 45 311 27 328 329 63 249 32 288
PAGE 104
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME MISSISSIPPI, UNIV OF PORTLAND STATE U/OR LOUISIANA TECH UNIV MUHLENBERG COLL/PA I.AWRENCE UNIV/WI MISSOURI,U-KANS CITY NEVADA, UNIV OF SANTA CLARA UNIV/CA MEMPHIS STATE U/TN DUQUESNE UNIV/PA ILLINOIS STU-NORMAL HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY ST I.AWRENCE UNIV/NY LAMAR UNIVERSITY/TX DEPAUL UNIVERSITY/IL CAL STU, FULLERTON CANISIUS COLLEGE/NY XAVIER UNIV/OH AUGUSTANA COLL/IL SETON HALL UNIV/NJ BATES COLLEGE/ME JOHN CARROLL UNIV/OH LOWELL, UNIV OF/MA WESTERN WASHINGTON U USAF ACADEMY/CO BEREA COLLEGE/KY NEW JERSEY INST TECH WESTERN ILLINOIS U SAN FRANCSCO,U OF/CA CAL STU, CHICO SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY EASTERN ILL UNIV REDLANDS, U OF/CA SCRANTON, U OF/PA JUNIATA COLLEGE/PA DICKINSON COLL/PA RICHMOND, U OF/VA TULSA, UNIV OF/OK CAL ST POLY-POMONA DREW UNIVERSITY/NJ TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 312 241 33 217 42 210 80 207 91 210 41 330 25 346 312 242 1 967 13 455 86 199 110 178 70 233 32 289 311 243 25 260 52 183 86 198 84 224 42 324 22 372 307 244 33 214 35 241 so 287 66 270 58 263 65 162 307 245 34 211 28 271 51 280 84 223 80 201 30 299 306 246 25 255 25 293 61 248 78 238 81 198 36 268 306 247 39 191 32 255 58 256 56 311 72 225 49 206 306 248 15 355 27 281 59 252 87 219 64 247 54 186 305 249 23 273 37 235 64 239 82 228 68 238 31 296 304 250 49 158 31 258 70 226 90 212 53 279 11 530 302 251 22 279 22 316 51 279 69 263 72 224 66 158 298 252 2:1 242 40 217 66 232 57 301 70 230 38 256 293 253 40 180 30 261 42 324 69 260 75 219 37 264 292 254 8 523 38 230 91 184 81 231 51 290 23 366 291 255 41 174 42 209 72 221 67 267 41 328 28 315 291 256 14 612 95 200 111 157 71 148 290 257 21 281 32 251 73 218 69 259 60 254 35 272 289 258 28 238 46 197 76 214 69 262 45 305 25 342 289 259 35 204 56 173 51 278 61 292 48 300 38 261 279 260 43 170 23 304 47 301 92 204 48 299 26 332 278 261 23 269 37 232 49 291 59 297 59 258 51 191 276 262 14 361 38 228 69 228 72 250 52 285 31 292 275 263 7 52.8 19 351 45 310 68 265 79 202 57 174 275 264 12 413 17 390 39 339 90 214 79 204 38 263 267 265 8 585 69 229 112 175 69 236 9 614 266 266 52 150 58 171 54 268 56 310 27 440 19 405 265 267 29 232 44 202 78 210 69 261 34 375 11 529 265 268 11 421 16 394 47 302 72 251 82 195 37 265 264 269 14 371 21 332 48 299 80 232 86 193 15 468 262 270 15 354 32 256 51 284 73 248 55 274 36 271 261 271 32 218 28 267 45 312 45 360 53 278 58 171 260 272 15 349 36 238 43 322 62 286 64 245 40 249 258 273 45 167 40 220 52 275 72 253 39 344 10 576 257 274 39 189 20 337 48 295 75 242 39 338 36 266 255 275 22 278 23 306 62 '24.2 71 254 44 313 33 282 254 276 24 263 23 305 34 360 74 243 58 262 41 242 254 277 30 227 36 239 52 272 77 241 33 388 26 338 251 278 24 268 46 198 46 309 so 339 42 325 43 232 251 279 4 763 30 396 88 217 72 226 57 177 250 280 29 231 37 234 so 286 48 346 51 286 35 274 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 98
PAGE 105
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME KENYON COLLEGE/OH WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA WITTENBERG UNIV/OH ALBION COLLEGE/MI WISCONSIN,U-STEVN PT ST THOMAS, C OF/MN ST JOHNS UNIV/MN INDIANA UNIV OF PA FAIRFIELD UNIV/CT CLEVELAND ST UNIV/OH ST PETERS COLL/NJ COLBY COLLEGE/ME PHILA C PHARM&SCI/PA SOUTHERN MISS, U OF CONCORDIA-MORHEAD/MN YOUNGSTOWN STU/OH LOYOLA COLLEGE/MD WESTERN KENTUCKY U TENNESSEE TECH U ,S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH DRAKE UNIV/IA GEORGIA STATE UNIV CENTRAL MICHIGAN U SOUTH DAKOTA, U OF EMPORIA ST UNIV/KS GONZAGA UNIV/WA OAKLAND UNIV/MI FURMAN UNIV/SC BALL STATE UNIV/IN RHODES COLLEGE/TN LOYOLA MARYMONT U/CA WISCONSIN,U-E CLAIRE MILLSAPS COLLEGE/MS TRINITY UNIV/TX MARIETTA COLLEGE/OH CREIGHTON UNIV/NE ABILENE CHRIST U/TX IDAHO STATE UNIV HOBART&WM SMITH C/NY WISCONSIN,U-RIVR FLS TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 248 281 21 287 33 247 44 317 62 285 39 340 49 201 248 282 23 275 23 314 57 259 73 247 so 292 22 374 247 283 12 397 25 291 56 261 57 302 58 264 39 254 245 284 21 288 28 270 57 257 57 304 55 273 27 321 245 285 7 537 24 297 38 341 60 295 67 239 49 203 245 286 47 161 35 243 51 282 60 296 34 377 18 416 244 287 26 250 30 262 62 244 45 363 51 289 30 300 242 288 12 395 14 420 40 329 66 269 55 272 55 180 241 289 8 496 21 321 47 300 61 289 57 268 47 214 241 290 7 531 19 355 39 335 52 326 70 231 54 185 240 291 34 208 28 268 63 240 63 281 38 347 14 472 235 292 19 302 13 431 39 333 69 258 46 302 49 199 235 293 42 173 38 226 63 241 51 330 26 445 15 458 235 294 21 293 29 264 58 255 57 305 35 369 35 276 234 295 33 216 39 223 74 216 39 399 26 451 23 362 229 296 19 304 16 392 53 270 54 316 49 293 38 260 227 297 25 257 24 300 47 304 65 275 37 354 29 310 226 298 20 301 20 343 52 273 64 277 43 319 27 327 225 299 21 291 26 289 55 264 62 288 38 351 23 364 222 300 27 244 so 189 58 254 39 401 33 386 15 460 216 301 19 307 27 279 61 247 41 389 44 315 24 353 216 302 7 613 25 434 68 266 88 189 28 317 215 303 13 379 15 406 47 303 63 282 45 307 32 286 214 304 23 272 27 280 46 307 53 324 43 317 22 369 213 305 25 256 26 287 67 231 48 350 33 387 14 480 213 306 16 341 41 216 45 315 71 255 25 466 15 465 211 307 19 519 70 257 81 197 41 244 211 308 19 309 21 328 24 444 49 341 49 296 49 204 210 309 20 297 15 405 45 313 55 313 49 294 26 336 210 310 19 310 22 318 49 294 62 287 36 362 22 371 210 311 16 343 21 331 so 290 61 294 37 356 25 349 209 312 5 607 14 425 28 403 59 298 53 281 so 196 209 313 26 251 33 249 40 332 49 342 43 320 18 419 207 314 17 329 25 294 27 414 49 343 59 261 30 303 205 315 25 253 23 307 53 269 47 354 37 352 20 388 205 316 20 300 21 326 49 293 so 336 38 350 27 324 205 317 19 311 34 246 44 319 52 328 35 370 21 379 205 318 23 274 29 265 38 345 69 264 30 407 16 443 204 319 13 373 20 333 29 398 61 290 54 275 27 318 203 320 16 335 28 272 51 281 47 355 32 393 29 308 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 99
PAGE 106
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARHED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME NEBRASKA,U-OMAHA VIRGINIA MILITARY I MURRAY STATE UNIV/KY PITTSBURG STATE U/KS NORTHERN IOWA, U OF MARSHALL UNIV/WV LEMOYNE COLLEGE/NY URSINUS COLLEGE/PA SW MISSOURI ST UNIV WILLAMETTE UNIV/OR WASHINGTON&LEE U/VA INDIANA STATE UNIV LEBANON VALLEY C/PA WASH&JEFFERSON C/PA ST MARYS COLLEGE/MN EAST CAROLINA U/NC EASTERN MICHIGAN U LUTHER COLLEGE/IA FORT HAYS STATE U/KS SF AUSTIN STU/TX HIRAM COLLEGE/OH BUTLER UNIV/IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY/LA IONA COLLEGE/NY SPRING HILL COLL/AL LORAS COLLEGE/IA GUSTAV ADOLPHUS C/MN SUNY COLL OSWEGO WILKES COLLEGE/PA MANKATO STATE U/MN ALBRIGHT COLLEGE/PA ST VINCENT COLL/PA SOUTHEASTERN LAU GOSHEN COLLEGE/IN NORTHERN COLORADO,U LEWIS & CLARK C/OR HAMLINE UNIV/MN CORNELL COLLEGE/IA OLD DOMINION UNIV/VA VA COMMONWEALTH UNIV TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 203 321 21 289 26 286 so 289 51 333 36 361 19 403 203 322 31 225 34 245 54 267 56 308 24 474 4 832 203 323 14 367 21 329 57 258 54 320 40 335 17 430 201 324 19 308 24 299 61 250 66 272 23 484 8 636 200 325 24 267 19 358 so 288 44 369 37 353 26 337 200 326 25 258 26 288 46 308 50 337 27 439 26 339 199 327 8 497 26 282 52 271 61 291 34 372 18 410 199 328 25 252 21 323 36 350 47 353 36 358 34 279 198 329 17 325 28 275 38 342 53 323 34 378 28 316 198 330 23 276 44 204 57 260 42 385 16 584 16 444 197 331 17 327 24 301 44 318 48 351 39 342 25 343 195 332 15 348 19 356 43 321 54 317 53 280 11 532 194 333 21 284 21 322 30 385 56 306 41 327 25 341 193 334 21 285 19 354 54 266 41 387 39 339 19 398 193 335 19 306 28 274 58 253 65 274 18 551 5 762 193 336 9 486 23 312 32 373 so 338 60 257 19 404 191 337 13 380 15 407 46 306 44 367 44 314 29 307 191 338 17 323 25 292 42 327 48 349 35 368 24 354 186 339 14 364 19 359 61 249 54 319 24 473 14 479 186 340 11 432 19 364 31 382 59 299 41 331 25 347 185 341 21 286 11 479 39 336 56 307 40 334 18 413 185 342 23 271 33 248 31 377 43 374 26 449 29 305 185 343 25 261 33 250 48 297 40 392 20 532 19 407 184 344 16 331 20 334 46 305 64 276 26 443 12 515 183 345 25 259 39 224 52 274 47 356 12 671 8 647 182 346 16 336 26 285 51 283 48 348 31 401 10 562 179 347 19 305 24 298 36 352 42 380 27 435 31 293 177 348 3 709 5 676 15 580 42 379 66 240 46 219 176 349 14 359 12 465 33 364 55 312 31 400 31 291 176 350 17 322 18 367 39 337 54 318 34 376 14 477 174 351 16 332 22 315 31 376 45 361 33 384 27 320 172 352 15 346 20 336 49 292 58 300 23 480 7 665 172 353 14 368 28 276 36 353 55 315 24 476 15 464 171 354 10 438 14 422 48 296 57 303 28 423 14 475 171 355 13 388 18 371 43 323 31 453 45 312 21 380 170 356 18 314 18 373 31 383 45 365 34 382 24 359 169 357 17 321 23 309 33 367 48 347 36 360 12 521 169 358 24 266 20 339 33 368 53 322 24 472 15 459 167 359 1 1004 24 443 52 327 63 248 27 325 167 360 4 669 15 412 19 526 26 494 59 260 44 228 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 100
PAGE 107
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME PACIFIC, U OF/CA MONTCLAIR ST COLL/NJ WISCONSIN,U-OSHKOSH NORTHERN ARIZONA U PUGET SOUND, U OF/WA KINGS COLLEGE/PA LAKE FOREST COLL/IL ST MARYS UNIV/TX ROSE-HULMAN TECH/IN FLORIDA ATLANTIC U SEATTLE UNIV/WA CAL STU, HAYWARD WHITTIER COLLEGE/CA BALDWIN-WALLACE C/OH ILL BENEDICTINE COLL THOMAS MORE COLL/KY SW TEXAS STATE UNIV PACIFIC LTHRN U/WA BRIDGEPORT, U OF/CT ST BONAVENTURE U/NY GOUCHER COLLEGE/MD AUSTIN COLLEGE/TX TEXAS A&I UNIVERSITY CONNECTICUT COLLEGE WESTERN MARYLAND COL EAST TEXAS STATE U MASS, U-BOSTON SOUTH, UNIV OF/TN N MEX I MINING&TECH MANCHESTER COLL/IN STETSON UNIV/FL SUNY COLL CORTLAND SE MISSOURI ST UNIV NEBRASKA WESLEYAN U CUNY-HRBERT LEHMAN C EAST TENN STATE UNIV BIRMNGHAM-STHRN C/AL TUSKEGEE UNIV/AL ROCHESTER I TECH/NY WISCONSIN,U-PLATTVIL TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 167 361 16 344 20 350 35 358 43 377 32 397 21 381 166 362 9 469 13 435 23 448 43 373 35 365 43 230 166 363 8 503 12 468 26 420 51 332 45 308 24 352 166 364 6 595 8 586 17 556 40 393 53 282 42 239 166 365 15 353 16 401 35 357 37 417 33 389 30 304 165 366 21 283 19 353 38 340 32 439 31 399 24 350 165 367 11 420 8 559 33 365 55 314 38 349 20 389 164 368 12 411 32 254 36 354 54 321 21 522 9 609 163 369 12 398 14 423 35 356 45 362 39 341 18 414 163 370 56 309 61 252 46 221 162 371 13 389 20 348 30 394 51 335 33 390 15 466 162 372 8 751 63 283 64 246 27 329 162 373 29 234 15 416 41 328 40 395 30 408 7 695 159 374 23 270 13 437 29 399 33 433 42 323 19 399 159 375 11 418 11 483 40 330 49 340 27 432 21 377 159 376 8 514 16 399 27 409 44 370 44 316 20 393 159 377 12 412 17 385 38 344 47 357 34 381 11 549 159 378 14 370 18 372 25 438 42 384 36 363 24 358 158 379 10 434 13 432 22 462 48 345 45 304 20 382 158 380 21 282 25 290 45 311 30 454 25 458 12 516 158 381 9 482 15 411 26 423 43 375 47 301 18 417 158 382 5 629 19 363 31 381 53 325 26 454 24 357 157 383 10 462 19 365 48 298 37 416 30 405 13 512 156 384 8 495 7 592 20 492 42 378 46 303 33 281 155 385 18 313 17 382 26 424 39 402 32 394 23 363 155 386 21 294 16 400 28 406 45 364 34 380 11 548 154 387 1 852 35 420 71 227 47 213 153 388 12 408 24 303 33 369 46 359 24 475 14 484 152 389 5 633 17 388 27 416 35 426 43 321 25 348 151 390 20 298 26 283 42 325 23 523 21 515 19 400 151 391 9 488 19 360 34 363 51 334 23 487 15 463 150 392 2 780 7 595 14 597 37 413 52 284 38 257 150 393 22 280 23 310 32 372 39 400 22 500 12 522 148 394 18 312 15 409 31 379 28 475 34 379 22 370 144 395 1 936 5 822 22 534 77 210 39 252 144 396 10 457 17 384 27 410 44 371 32 395 14 483 143 397 21 292 21 330 30 388 40 391 22 506 9 604 143 398 10 458 12 472 27 411 41 390 28 429 25 345 142 399 14 417 30 384 37 411 34 373 27 319 142 400 5 608 16 395 28 404 44 368 36 359 13 500 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 101
PAGE 108
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ROCKHURST COLLEGE/MO MERRIMACK COLLEGE/MA SIMMONS COLLEGE/MA SUNY COLL FREDONIA WAGNER COLLEGE/NY SUNY COLL NEW PALTZ AUGUSTANA COLL/SD MONMOUTH COLLEGE/IL SE MASS U-N DARTMOTH MISSOURI,U-ST LOUIS ARKANSAS STATE UNIV MUSKINGUM COLLEGE/OH SIENA COLLEGE/NY MIDDLE TENN STATE U GROVE CITY COLL/PA RIPON COLLEGE/WI SUNY COLL BROCKPORT CITADEL, THE/SC CAPITAL UNIV/OH CENTRAL STATE U/OK SAM HOUSTON STU/TX ST JOHN FISHER C/NY WEBER STATE COLL/UT NORTH CENTRAL C/IL CARROLL COLLEGE/WI UPSALA COLLEGE/NJ GANNON UNIV/PA SUNY COLL ONEONTA CTRL MISSOURI STU TOWSON STATE U/MD ECKERD COLLEGE/FL WEST TEXAS STATE U CENTRAL UNIV OF IOWA MOREHOUSE COLL/GA EASTERN WASH UNIV/WA HENDRIX COLLEGE/AR NORWESTRN ST UNIV LA DELAWARE VALLEY C/PA COE COLLEGE/IA EASTERN KENTUCKY U TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 142 401 13 381 20 341 45 314 38 406 17 565 9 595 141 402 6 554 10 500 31 375 19 396 38 345 17 423 141 403 9 465 11 476 29 397 '\7 410 40 333 15 449 141 404 4 718 10 680 34 428 55 271 38 258 141 405 27 243 17 375 36 349 35 422 17 560 9 584 139 406 2 781 5 674 12 640 41 386 53 277 26 330 139 407 12 405 18 369 34 362 27 482 28 427 20 390 138 408 17 320 17 378 36 351 39 398 21 516 8 627 137 409 9 466 12 457 14 593 25 499 28 419 49 200 137 410 30 459 61 251 46 220 137 411 6 588 20 345 27 412 42 382 25 464 17 431 136 412 12 396 13 438 35 355 38 404 26 448 12 519 135 413 17 317 14 418 39 334 31 445 14 607 20 385 135 414 6 584 20 344 25 437 34 430 25 463 25 344 134 415 22 277 8 553 26 418 29 462 28 422 21 376 134 416 11 423 24 296 33 366 32 442 24 471 10 560 133 417 3 708 3 777 7 756 15 639 59 259 46 218 133 418 16 338 31 260 39 338 32 444 13 641 2 1004 132 419 17 318 21 324 32 370 38 403 12 658 12 518 132 420 9 489 14 430 26 426 37 415 32 396 14 488 132 421 10 461 18 370 44 320 28 479 23 491 9 610 131 422 1 863 15 403 25 430 37 412 34 374 19 396 131 423 6 814 61 293 41 332 23 367 130 424 28 239 26 284 31 378 25 503 12 659 8 628 130 425 10 440 23 308 32 371 19 567 28 424 18 415 129 426 28 236 10 502 20 495 30 455 28 420 13 495 129 427 9 471 6 626 27 407 46 358 25 460 16 438 128 428 1 865 5 675 9 699 31 446 38 346 44 226 128 429 12 403 18 368 34 361 26 492 27 437 11 537 128 430 1 923 1 1001 9 712 35 424 43 318 39 255 128 431 5 849 48 352 45 309 30 301 128 432 6 593 17 386 27 415 42 383 30 406 6 730 127 433 10 443 20 338 23 454 33 435 28 426 13 502 127 434 21 290 22 317 28 405 31 450 17 567 8 643 127 435 10 463 9 547 30 393 49 344 15 602 14 492 126 436 8 521 11 493 26 425 38 407 23 488 20 394 126 437 8 522 20 346 30 390 25 508 29 417 14 487 125 438 3 715 13 436 20 496 44 366 19 537 26 333 125 439 20 299 19 357 23 455 28 474 27 436 8 634 125 440 14 366 12 471 21 486 24 515 30 404 24 356 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 102
PAGE 109
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME NORTHERN MICHIGAN U SOWESTERN OKLA STU SUNY COLL PLATTSBURG BELLARMINE COLL/KY NE LOUISIANA UNIV SUNY COLL GENESEO HANOVER COLLEGE/IN MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE SOUTHERN UNIV/LA ALMA COLLEGE/MI WISCONSIN,U-L CROSSE WILLIAM JEWELL C/MO NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U HEIDELBERG COLL/OH GMI ENGR&MNGMNT I/MI BENEDICTINE COLL/KS ST. CLOUD STATE U/MN NIAGARA UNIV/NY WESTMINSTER COLL/PA NC, U OF-GREENSBORO CENTRAL CONN ST UNIV EVANSVILLE, U OF/IN MORGAN STATE UNIV/MD SONOMA STATE UNIV/CA ST MICHAELS COLL/VT SARAH LAWRENCE C/NY IDAHO, COLLEGE OF SEATTLE PACIFIC U/WA CLRMONT MCKENNA C/CA AMER INTERNATL C/MA HARTWICK COLLEGE/NY ST FRANCIS COLL/NY CENTRE COLL KENTUCKY WEST CHESTER U OF PA WEST VA WESLEYAN C MILLERSVILLE U OF PA APPALACHIAN STU/NC WOFFORD COLLEGE/SC ST ANSELM COLL/NH SKIDMORE COLLEGE/NY TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 124 441 6 566 8 561 22 467 26 491 35 367 27 323 124 442 5 628 6 661 24 446 44 372 25 465 20 395 123 443 1 866 2 849 9 700 28 469 48 298 35 273 123 444 2 822 13 451 40 331 42 381 18 553 8 645 123 445 3 761 6 660 21 488 37 414 39 343 17 432 122 446 1 864 2 848 17 547 23 519 41 326 38 259 122 447 15 347 11 481 28 402 41 388 23 481 4 811 122 448 8 518 30 263 32 374 34 431 11 689 7 687 120 449 4 685 20 347 27 413 38 408 23 490 8 650 119 450 10 439 11 484 25 431 29 465 25 461 19 401 119 451 4 658 14 426 20 499 30 458 28 425 23 361 119 452 15 350 23 311 37 347 25 505 9 736 10 565 119 453 18 591 so 291 51 192 118 454 14 360 14 421 22 463 29 463 19 540 20 387 118 455 6 565 15 408 37 346 32 441 19 541 9 593 118 456 17 326 9 529 30 387 27 483 20 531 15 461 117 457 7 538 11 487 26 421 33 434 29 413 11 535 116 458 10 435 13 433 25 429 34 427 19 536 15 452 116 459 13 376 15 404 20 497 28 472 22 497 18 412 116 460 6 579 9 535 10 690 34 429 26 453 31 295 115 461 17 316 12 458 19 515 28 468 21 511 18 409 115 462 17 319 11 480 23 451 29 464 22 499 13 497 115 463 10 449 21 327 22 469 29 466 19 543 14 481 115 464 33 436 49 297 33 283 114 465 12 391 16 391 21 473 36 418 14 605 15 448 113 466 12 394 12 463 17 545 22 536 30 403 20 384 113 467 13 387 17 387 30 391 26 495 13 651 14 490 113 468 17 330 22 320 26 427 26 496 17 571 5 789 113 469 4 695 11 499 13 637 38 409 31 402 16 445 112 470 15 345 9 521 34 359 32 437 17 558 5 737 112 471 12 392 12 460 19 516 25 501 29 409 15 451 111 472 20 295 13 434 20 493 23 517 25 459 10 556 111 473 8 513 15 413 25 435 21 551 22 504 20 392 110 474 7 530 10 504 21 475 19 563 29 412 24 351 110 475 17 328 11 489 31 380 27 485 17 566 7 678 109 476 4 649 6 630 12 642 23 521 38 348 26 334 109 477 3 747 13 446 25 433 27 486 21 520 20 391 109 478 10 454 24 302 27 408 21 550 19 545 8 642 108 479 17 315 11 475. 26 417 21 543 22 495 11 526 108 480 4 645 4 716 17 546 32 438 36 357 15 453 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 103
PAGE 110
I APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCAI.AUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ELMHURST COLLEGE/IL WISCONSIN,U-WHITWATR CHARLESTON, C OF/SC MIDWESTERN STU/TX DAVID LIPSCOMB C/TN ALASKA, UNIV OF MASS COLL PHARMACY HOUGHTON COLL/NY THIEL COLLEGE/PA HARDING UNIVERSTY/AR ANDREWS UNIV/MI CENTRAL WASH UNIV ITHACA COLLEGE/NY AUGSBURG COLLEGE/MN MARIST COLLEGE/NY PRATT INSTITUTE/NY BARD COLLEGE/NY OTTERBEIN COLLEGE/OH MERCER UNIVERSITY/GA EASTERN NEW MEXICO U PORTLAND, UNIV OF/OR ST MARYS COLL CALIF OHIO NORTHERN UNIV NC AG & TECH STU ROLLINS COLLEGE/FL ST FRANCIS COLL/PA ILLINOIS WESLEYAN U HASTINGS COLLEGE/NE WASHBURN U TOPEKA/KS LYCOMING COLLEGE/PA WRIGHT STATE UNIV/OH TENN, U-CHATTANOOGA WALLA WALLA COLL/WA CARSON-NEWMAN C/TN TEXAS WOMANS UNIV RANDOLPH-MACON C/VA MT UNION COLLEGE/OH WARTBURG COLL/IA CNTRL FLORIDA, U/FL PHILLIPS UNIV/OK TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 108 481 16 333 12 466 21 478 16 623 35 366 8 626 108 482 3 736 2 870 11 661 35 423 41 329 16 441 108 483 15 351 4 747 16 571 22 541 15 598 36 270 108 484 6 589 10 516 20 510 43 376 16 582 13 511 107 485 11 428 9 539 25 436 31 451 22 505 9 603 107 486 14 372 13 456 18 543 21 554 26 456 15 469 106 487 26 248 28 266 19 514 24 511 5 862 4 797 106 488 11 416 12 461 19 517 25 502 23 478 16 436 106 489 5 602 5 679 26 419 30 456 26 447 14 474 106 490 3 758 11 492 30 389 28 477 22 507 12 524 105 491 11 422 17 379 25 432 25 504 15 588 12 520 104 492 5 634 7 622 18 541 40 394 23 492 11 551 103 493 1 858 3 773 6 792 22 535 39 337 32 284 103 494 6 567 4 732 20 500 38 405 27 434 8 632 102 495 6 556 7 593 14 595 35 421 31 398 9 582 102 496 12 393 8 550 36 348 26 490 18 549 2 949 101 497 5 597 10 501 25 428 26 489 21 512 14 470 101 498 14 362 13 439 21 476 31 448 13 636 9 589 101 499 8 512 8 573 15 589 27 487 28 428 15 462 101 500 6 594 10 518 30 392 35 425 16 583 4 855 101 501 13 390 20 349 30 395 19 581 13 653 6 734 101 502 7 553 15 415 25 439 26 498 23 493 5 794 100 503 4 654 21 325 22 465 23 522 13 635 17 426 100 504 10 452 13 447 23 457 18 589 23 485 13 507 100 sos 13 383 8 574 24 445 20 561 22 503 13 509 99 506 7 529 9 526 24 441 32 440 21 514 6 705 99 507 11 419 5 682 16 564 28 473 26 450 13 498 99 508 11 425 17 381 24 442 23 525 14 617 10 566 99 509 9 481 13 445 23 456 36 419 14 618 4 825 98 510 11 417 6 629 23 450 31 447 20 529 7 664 98 511 17 602 51 287 30 298 98 512 13 385 11 490 20 508 20 562 21 521 13 510 98 513 16 342 17 389 20 512 26 497 11 691 8 653 97 514 10 456 19 361 19 527 25 507 13 645 11 542 96 515 8 525 6 663 24 447 28 480 21 524 9 611 95 516 9 484 17 383 20 505 30 460 12 664 7 676 94 517 13 377 10 506 22 464 18 585 22 498 9 588 94 518 12 401 13 443 21 482 16 626 21 517 11 536 94 519 310 49 205 94 520 14 369 19 362 23 460 17 612 12 672 9 608 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 104
PAGE 111
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME PR, U-MAYAGUEZ DRURY COLLEGE/MO LINFIELD COLLEGE/OR EDINBORO U OF PENN MOORHEAD STATE U/MN MACMURRAY COLLEGE/IL PARK COLLEGE/MO BETHANY COLLEGE/WV OKI.AHOMA CITY UNIV EMMANUEL COLLEGE/MA GENEVA COLLEGE/PA BLACKBURN COLLEGE/IL ST NORBERT COLL/YI FISK UNIVERSITY/TN HARTFORD, UNIV OF/CT CENTENARY COLL/LA BLOOMSBURG U OF PA SHIPPENSBURG U OF PA OKI.AHOMA BAPT UNIV SUNY COLL BUFFALO ST JOSEPHS COLL/IN MILLIKIN UNIV/IL ROANOKE COLLEGE/VA CENTRAL ARKANSAS, U CALIF UNIV OF PENN NE MISSOURI STATE U KEARNEY ST COLL/NE HAMPTON UNIV/VA BETHEL COLL/KS AUSTIN PEAY STU/TN SAMFORD UNIV/AL TRINITY COLLEGE/DC MORAVIAN COLLEGE/PA HAMPDEN-SYDNEY C/VA GUILFORD COLL/NC CLARION U OF PA NW MISSOURI STATE U FLORIDA SOUTHERN C MARYVILLE COLLEGE/TN WHITWORTH COLL/WA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 94 521 1 978 3 835 4 917 11 741 43 322 32 290 93 522 11 424 16 397 19 521 19 569 17 564 11 538 93 523 12 414 16 402 23 461 23 531 11 692 8 654 92 524 3 716 6 625 16 560 14 660 28 421 25 340 92 525 5 610 8 563 16 566 31 449 15 590 17 427 91 526 1 897 4 729 22 466 39 397 20 530 5 755 91 527 17 324 17 380 29 401 17 607 9 734 2 973 91 528 10 451 10 511 21 484 22 540 21 519 7 677 91 529 3 763 8 581 21 489 34 432 18 557 7 689 90 530 5 596 4 708 19 513 28 467 25 457 9 578 90 531 13 375 14 419 24 440 22 537 8 757 9 585 90 532 13 378 18 366 21 477 19 564 8 761 11 534 90 533 10 441 8 562 18 533 30 457 17 562 7 669 90 534 11 429 23 313 16 573 11 732 18 554 11 543 89 535 1 931 15 579 17 598 39 336 17 424 89 536 11 430 15 414 16 576 17 611 22 508 8 649 88 537 9 470 8 552 21 474 17 599 13 631 20 386 88 538 3 718 11 478 16 561 16 62I 19 539 23 360 88 539 10 460 22 319 19 528 18 594 16 581 3 931 87 540 5 600 4 717 8 723 23 518 32 391 15 454 87 541 12 399 16 393 23 452 21 545 8 760 7 666 87 542 16 334 14 424 19 518 15 645 14 615 9 591 87 543 11 427 8 571 13 627 23 527 19 544 13 506 87 544 13 386 12 473 12 652 18 592 18 556 14 485 86 545 3 711 4 720 23 449 28 470 20 528 8 622 86 546 5 612 6 639 20 502 26 493 19 542 10 564 86 547 10 447 10 509 18 536 19 570 16 578 13 503 86 548 8 509 7 607 19 524 25 506 22 501 5 768 85 549 11 426 16 398 26 422 14 666 13 639 5 767 85 550 6 583 6 656 20 507 30 461 13 644 10 571 85 551 16 340 9 541 18 539 19 577 18 555 5 782 84 552 7 542 9 532 20 504 32 443 15 594 1 1156 83 553 10 436 8 555 12 643 27 481 13 633 13 496 83 554 10 450 6 647 10 687 27 484 18 552 12 523 83 555 14 365 6 650 16 569 23 528 14 619 10 568 82 556 3 714 9 525 13 616 20 557 22 496 15 457 82 557 4 659 20 340 16 567 21 547 15 591 6 716 82 558 12 407 13 448 17 552 16 629 13 643 11 540 82 559 16 339 13 452 14 606 19 575 12 670 8 646 82 560 9 491 10 519 21 491 15 656 13 652 14 493 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 105
PAGE 112
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ELIZABETHTOWN C/PA WASHINGTON COLL/MD SOUTHWESTERN U/TX SPRINGFIELD COLL/MA SOUTHRN CONN ST UNIV SUNY COLL POTSDAM RANDOLPH-MACN WOM/VA MARYLAND,U-BALT CNTY BRIDGEWATER COLL/VA MCNEESE STATE U/1.A TRENTON ST COLL/NJ SLIPPERY ROCK U/PA MARY WASHINGTON C/VA KUTZTOWN UNIV/PA ST AMBROSE COLL/IA CENTRAL METH COLL/MO US INTERNATL U/CA HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA STONEHILL COLLEGE/MA WESTMONT COLLEGE/CA WHEATON COLLEGE/MA MANHATTANVILLE C/NY SUSQUEHANNA UNIV/PA CARTHAGE COLL/WI NC CENTRAL UNIV GEORGIA SOUTHERN C OUACHITA BAPT U/AR PACIFIC UNION C/CA MT ST MARYS COLL/MD WHEELING COLLEGE/WV STHRN NAZARENE U/OK NOWESTERN OKLA STU ESTRN NAZARENE C/MA BEMIDJI STATE U/MN POINT LOMA NAZA C/CA LYNCHBURG COLLEGE/VA AGNES SCOTT COLL/GA NOEASTERN OKLA STU DALLAS, UNIV OF/TX MILLS COLLEGE/CA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 81 561 6 559 10 503 13 618 28 471 19 538 5 745 81 562 5 615 9 531 15 587 22 539 13 640 17 428 81 563 6 590 9 544 20 511 18 595 14 625 14 489 80 564 14 356 7 590 18 532 24 512 10 697 7 658 80 565 1 857 1 934 10 678 24 513 24 469 20 383 80 566 1 867 4 719 4 868 12 694 33 383 26 331 80 567 5 620 7 608 10 688 23 526 22 502 13 505 79 568 1 1207 37 355 41 245 79 569 5 616 14 427 17 550 21 548 16 579 6 719 79 570 1 951 14 429 20 509 16 633 23 489 5 786 78 571 1 873 3 779 16 559 13 679 24 470 21 375 78 572 3 719 2 856 11 660 18 584 26 446 18 411 78 573 5 619 5 690 7 772 19 572 29 415 13 504 77 574 8 499 8 554 12 641 17 600 23 479 9 586 77 575 12 400 11 488 20 501 18 586 10 706 6 714 77 576 12 402 16 396 29 400 10 757 7 789 3 898 77 577 4 764 11 676 23 533 23 494 16 446 76 578 19 535 57 173 76 579 3 701 3 770 14 594 23 516 15 585 18 408 76 580 4 698 4 765 18 542 16 636 27 442 7 694 75 581 4 639 4 710 13 613 21 544 21 510 12 514 75 582 4 642 6 624 16 557 15 638 26 444 8 617 75 583 6 561 7 597 14 599 16 622 18 550 14 473 75 584 5 606 12 467 16 565 14 664 15 589 13 499 75 585 9 487 10 512 13 630 21 549 14 620 8 641 75 586 6 582 4 752 17 551 19 574 15 600 14 482 75 587 7 548 7 617 10 693 27 488 13 648 11 544 75 588 11 433 5 706 19 531 22 542 8 779 10 574 74 589 8 508 6 646 19 523 11 726 26 452 4 827 74 590 2 884 20 506 28 476 15 596 9 598 73 591 11 431 8 579 18 540 18 593 14 623 4 848 73 592 4 687 11 495 23 459 16 634 8 771 11 546 72 593 8 494 9 522 17 544 17 597 10 694 11 527 72 594 5 609 3 797 18 534 19 568 13 637 14 476 72 .595 5 636 10 520 12 655 13 692 22 509 10 575 71 596 5 618 9 533 19 525 18 588 11 683 9 597 71 597 6 581 7 612 22 470 17 609 10 712 9 602 71 598 3 762 8 580 17 554 31 452 7 804 5 787 71 599 8 748 23 530 29 418 11 547 71 600 3 768 2 911 19 530 14 676 25 468 8 655 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 106
PAGE 113
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME PEPPERDINE UNIV/CA WAYNESBURG COLL/PA UNIV NORTH ALABAMA NEW ROCHELLE, COLL LEWIS UNIVERSITY/IL AQUINAS COLLEGE/MI ST THOMAS, U OF/TX INDIANA INST OF TECH WISCONSIN,U-SUPERIOR GEORGE MASON U/VA FLORIDA AG & MECH U DELTA STATE UNIV/MS CARROLL COLLEGE/MT CUNY-BERNRD BARUCH C RIDER COLLEGE/NJ MUNDELEIN COLLEGE/IL WESTMINSTER COLL/MO ASBURY COLLEGE/KY TEXAS LUTHERAN COLL SOUTHERN COLO, UNIV KING COLLEGE/TN TENNESSEE STATE UNIV REGIS COLLEGE/CO CHATHAM COLLEGE/PA ROCKFORD COLLEGE/IL BETHEL COLLEGE/MN SIMPSON COLLEGE/IA ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD MCMURRAY COLLEGE/TX MONMOUTH COLLEGE/NJ OTTAWA UNIVERSITY/KS WEST LIBERTY ST C/WV NEW SCH SOC RSCH/NY TAYLOR UNIVERSITY/IN QUINCY COLLEGE/IL WSTRN CAROLINA U/NC E STROUDSBURG U/PA SOUTHWESTERN COLL/KS COLUMBIA UNION C/MD ESTRN MENNONITE C/VA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 71 601 10 464 9 548 15 592 23 532 6 860 8 656 70 602 9 472 17 376 15 582 11 719 14 612 4 807 70 603 7 547 10 513 16 574 17 610 11 687 9 605 69 604 6 557 12 462 14 596 20 556 13 629 4 801 69 605 2 862 12 647 23 524 23 482 9 590 69 606 7 535 11 485 21 480 20 559 5 878 5 758 69 607 1 957 5 704 15 590 28 478 13 649 7 691 68 608 6 564 13 440 15 584 17 603 11 676 6 708 68 609 10 442 13 442 13 623 17 606 10 705 5 761 68 610 5 930 27 438 36 269 68 611 7 544 13 449 18 538 12 705 16 580 2 1013 68 612 3 756 7 615 14 607 21 553 17 569 6 727 68 613 979 11 497 21 490 11 739 13 650 3 933 67 614 2 776 9 697 25 500 23 477 8 616 67 615 2 852 5 829 16 620 32 392 12 517 67 616 8 502 6 633 23 453 21 546 6 828 3 891 67 617 4 660 8 565 18 535 18 587 12 662 7 672 67 618 5 624 13 450 23 458 12 706 8 767 6 726 67 619 8 524 8 582 8 749 11 738 21 523 11 550 67 620 25 510 28 430 14 491 66 621 13 384 6 657 21 487 15 655 6 855 5 778 66 622 7 546 13 453 12 650 12 707 15 601 7 685 66 623 15 352 6 665 14 610 18 596 9 749 4 854 65 624 3 713 3 781 15 581 23 520 16 574 5 743 65 625 2 792 7 600 20 498 19 566 12 660 5 756 65 626 4 733 13 624 22 538 13 638 13 501 65 627 10 445 8 564 21 481 16 625 4 935 6 715 64 628 9 483 5 688 10 686 19 571 15 593 6 718 64 629 2 837 9 543 13 634 25 509 9 748 6 729 63 630 1 945 20 494 15 640 14 609 13 494 63 631 5 614 15 410 14 603 15 649 12 663 2 985 63 632 6 576 7 610 21 485 19 573 5 886 5 770 62 633 13 374 8 549 13 615 11 714 13 630 4 802 62 634 3 725 3 791 30 386 12 699 10 703 4 812 62 635 4 655 7 599 9 706 17 605 17 561 8 629 62 636 1 932 9 536 15 588 16 628 12 665 9 599 61 637 4 648 4 721 13 617 10 750 14 610 16 437 61 638 9 480 8 568 20 503 10 760 6 839 8 637 61 639 4 665 10 510 19 522 16 627 9 738 3 905 61 640 5 617 8 570 18 537 14 668 7 791 9 596 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 107
PAGE 114
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME BOB JONES UNIV/SC BRIDGEWATER ST C/MA MT ST VINCENT,COL/NY WM PATERSON C OF NJ WIDENER UNIV/PA GRAND VALLEY ST C/MI BERRY COLLEGE/GA MOREHEAD STATE U/KY BAKER UNIV/KS JAMES MADISON U/VA JACKSONVILLE UNIV/FL SOUTH ALABAMA, U HARDIN-SIMMONS U/TX STHRN ORE ST COLL CAL ST U,S BERNRDINO SUFFOLK UNIV/MA PACE UNIVERSITY/NY LINCOI.N UNIV/PA ST MARYS COLLEGE/IN PRINCIPIA COLLEGE/IL JAMESTOWN COLLEGE/ND CONCORD COLLEGE/WV WEST FLORIDA, U OF GEORGETOWN COLL/KY WESTERN ST COLL COLO ASSUMPTION COLL/MA SYRACUSE U-UTICA/NY HOLLINS COLLEGE/VA NC, U OF-CHARLOTTE NORTH GEORGIA COLL ST. EDWARD'S U/TX WINONA STATE UNIV/MN WESTMAR COLLEGE/IA VIRGINIA STATE UNIV BENNINGTON COLL/VT REGIS COLLEGE/MA US MERCHANT MAR ACAD CHESTNUT HILL C/PA CONCORDIA COLLEGE/IL EMORY & HENRY C/VA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 61 641 10 453 8 572 13 631 8 821 11 685 11 539 60 642 4 638 3 767 9 695 20 555 13 628 11 528 60 643 5 598 4 712 11 657 18 583 14 606 8 618 60 644 8 726 8 807 29 411 15 456 60 645 2 788 1 960 12 644 20 558 14 613 11 531 60 646 11 722 33 385 16 440 60 647 13 382 9 537 9 715 18 590 4 948 7 681 60 648 4 676 6 655 10 692 23 529 12 669 5 775 59 649 9 478 13 444 11 665 15 648 6 838 5 765 59 650 4 668 6 648 4 890 6 880 15 595 24 355 59 651 14 605 16 630 23 486 6 725 59 652 13 688 27 441 19 406 59 653 12 410 11 496 22 471 8 828 6 858 59 654 1 968 3 831 6 816 17 614 21 525 11 552 59 655 6 898 35 371 18 421 58 656 6 555 7 591 9 696 16 618 10 698 10 554 58 657 3 706 1 940 5 825 10 745 29 410 10 555 58 658 14 358 6 628 9 701 11 718 13 632 5 746 58 659 3 724 4 728 12 646 15 643 614 10 557 58 660 9 474 13 441 13 622 12 700 5 877 6 710 58 661 12 404 6 642 11 663 13 684 11 681 5 764 58 662 9 485 5 691 14 604 17 608 10 709 3 910 58 663 11 730 29 416 18 418 58 664 7 545 14 428 17 553 7 849 9 743 4 843 58 665 7 551 '6 666 19 529 12 710 8 775 6 732 57 666 2 772 4 707 11 656 13 677 18 548 9 577 57 667 1 868 2 850 5 826 24 514 17 559 8 620 57 668 2 808 5 689 8 736 11 727 21 518 10 567 57 669 1 1122 10 766 25 462 21 378 57 670 10 455 4 753 8 739 20 560 9 742 6 723 57 671 5 631 10 517 13 635 17 613 8 772 4 851 56 672 3 739 4 734 14 602 12 703 9 733 14 478 56 673 6 568 7 603 21 483 13 682 7 788 2 972 56 674 8 510 12 470 13 628 8 818 10 708 5 169 55 675 7 588 12 638 16 616 14 604 6 698 55 676 5 670 15 578 16 617 16 572 3 863 55 677 14 357 9 524 14 598 10 748 5 867 3 875 55 678 5 601 5 678 10 682 14 659 16 575 5 744 55 679 8 501 11 482 14 600 17 604 4 923 1 1112 55 680 4 667 7 606 16 568 15 650 7 792 6 720 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 108
PAGE 115
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCAIAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCAIAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ARKANSAS TECH UNIV MARYMOUNT COLLEGE/NY WILSON COLLEGE/PA ANDERSON COLLEGE/IN N PARK C&THEOL S/IL EAST CENTRAL UNIV/OK SOUTHESTRN OKIA STU CENTRAL STATE U/OH TRI-STATE UNIV/IN CHARLESTON, U OF/WV JACKSONVILLE STU/AL MISS UNIV WOMEN TOUGALOO COLLEGE/MS ADAMS STATE COLL/CO NORWICH UNIV/VT GREENVILLE COLL/IL FERRIS ST COLL/MI IOWA WESLEYAN COLL TRANSYLVANIA U/KY TROY STATE UNIV/AL NICHOLLS STATE U/lA CAL STU STANISLAUS LOCK HAVEN UNIV/PA SETON HILL COLL/PA FROSTBURG ST COLL/MD CATAWBA COLLEGE/NC WILMINGTON COLL/OH ILLINOIS COLLEGE NW NAZARENE COLL/ID CAL ST UNIV-CARSON PITZER COLLEGE/CA GORDON COLLEGE/MA MANSFIELD UNIV/PA MCPHERSON COLLEGE/KS PFEIFFER COLLEGE/NC FLORIDA INST TECH MONTEVALLO, U OF/AL FT LEWIS COLLEGE/CO CUNY-STATEN ISIAND,C LENOIR-RHYNE COLL/NC TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 55 681 2 830 5 701 13 632 16 631 14 622 5 784 54 682 2 778 9 523 13 614 10 744 15 586 5 741 54 683 10 437 6 631 9 703 12 696 13 634 4 808 54 684 3 722 10 507 8 728 15 642 10 702 8 625 54 685 21 479 19 565 10 704 4 814 54 686 4 686 12 474 13 633 13 690 9 745 3 930 54 687 7 549 7 620 14 609 10 770 10 719 6 728 53 688 4 652 10 sos 13 620 14 663 10 701 2 955 53 689 3 726 17 377 16 563 8 810 6 826 3 890 53 690 16 337 6 649 10 689 14 670 6 847 1 1161 53 691 6 587 7 614 9 716 11 733 13 646 7 686 53 692 3 757 3 823 9 718 19 579 10 717 9 606 53 693 8 519 9 542 8 745 14 673 10 718 4 847 53 694 3 828 22 472 19 580 3 1035 6 731 52 695 7 526 2 838 15 577 18 582 6 812 4 796 52 696 5 605 8 557 15 585 15 644 4 925 5 753 52 697 3 731 7 601 14 601 15 647 4 929 9 592 52 698 10 444 1 988 19 520 16 624 2 1079 4 817 52 699 3 755 8 576 11 670 11 731 14 621 5 776 52 700 8 517 5 700 12 651 9 798 13 647 5 783 52 701 1 1027 6 812 11 735 20 533 14 486 52 702 6 899 28 431 18 422 51 703 2 784 2 855 9 702 14 661 15 587 9 587 51 704 4 650 12 464 11 659 12 695 7 784 5 750 51 705 2 806 4 889 14 667 15 592 16 442 51 706 6 577 4 744 13 629 14 671 11 684 3 913 so 707 8 500 4 725 16 562 15 641 4 920 3 886 50 708 9 473 8 558 8 731 9 784 11 677 5 754 so 709 1 961 8 584 12 654 12 709 8 774 9 612 so 710 7 856 26 455 17 433 so 711 8 829 25 467 "' .Lr 434 49 712 7 527 5 669 10 677 14 657 6 813 ., 657 49 713 6 560 3 782 7 759 14 662 14 611 5 747 49 714 9 479 8 567 15 586 11 725 4 943 ., 983 L 49 715 4 745 11 668 15 652 10 711 9 600 49 716 5 939 17 568 27 326 49 717 2 897 16 575 19 576 10 716 2 1024 49 718 9 722 14 674 17 570 9 613 48 719 6 859 35 364 7 660 48 720 6 578 7 611 16 570 7 844 5 889 7 679 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 109
PAGE 116
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCAI.AUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCAI.AUREATE INSTITUTION NAME CHRISTN BROTHRS C/TN UNION UNIVERSITY/TN HUNTINGDON COLL/AL TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIV WELLS COLLEGE/NY XAVIER UNIV/I.A CHAPMAN COLLEGE/CA RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE ALBERTUS MAGNUS C/CT ELMIRA COLLEGE/NY DOANE COLLEGE/NE WAYNE ST COLL/NE TABOR COLLEGE/KS ST CATHERINE,C OF/MN GEO PEABODY COL/TN UNION COLLEGE/NE ARKANSAS,U-MONTICELO US COAST GUARD ACAD ASHLAND COLLEGE/OH CONCORDIA THEO SM/IN MORNINGSIDE COLL/IA ST MARYS SEM & U/MD AUGUSTA COLLEGE/GA HENDERSON STU/ARK PRAIRIE VIEW A&M/TX N MEXICO HIGHLANDS U KEAN COLL NEW JERSEY INDIANA CENTRAL UNIV OLIVET NAZARENE C/IL WISC, U-GREEN BAY ALCORN STATE U/MS JACKSON STATE U/MS SUL ROSS STATE U/TX METROPOLITAN ST C/CO I AMER U-SAN GERM/PR ROSEMONT COLLEGE/PA ADRIAN COLLEGE/MI KANSAS WESLEYAN FAIRMONT STATE C/WV CLARK COLLEGE/GA TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 48 721 2 894 16 572 21 552 7 799 2 1018 48 722 8 515 8 577 8 743 12 708 7 801 5 780 48 723 6 586 10 514 11 671 13 .687 3 1023 5 781 48 724 6 591 8 583 11 673 10 771 5 907 8 652 47 725 2 783 7 596 5 827 6 860 20 527 7 663 47 726 10 459 11 494 11 672 5 945 7 803 3 929 47 727 1 972 1 1043 6 818 10 774 20 534 9 615 46 728 3 702 3 771 4 865 12 693 8 752 16 435 46 729 4 640 5 672 6 790 16 619 11 674 4 799 46 730 1 937 7 755 14 658 21 513 3 868 46 731 12 406 9 528 7 769 10 759 4 940 4 821 46 732 6 571 7 605 22 468 6 879 3 1000 2 982 46 733 8 507 9 530 13 626 8 816 6 840 2 987 45 734 8 504 9 527 12 648 5 918 3 992 8 633 45 735 12 409 11 491 5 853 9 796 5 901 3 924 44 736 10 448 12 469 7 770 9 789 4 942 2 981 44 737 8 520 6 659 14 608 5 944 3 1027 8 648 43 738 9 467 12 459 12 639 9 776 1 1146 43 739 3 720 3 784 12 645 8 809 11 675 6 706 43 740 1 890 8 556 15 583 10 753 8 759 1 1105 43 741 8 505 4 736 6 800 10 756 8 763 7 670 43 742 6 574 3 810 17 549 10 763 6 843 1 1154 43 743 14 672 19 546 10 570 43 744 3 759 7 616 8 746 9 799 9 744 7 688 43 745 7 550 9 545 15 591 9 802 3 1033 43 746 3 765 9 546 14 611 11 740 4 959 2 1038 42 747 1 946 1 1063 10 749 16 573 14 471 42 748 6 563 4 726 13 621 9 782 7 787 3 888 42 749 3 728 7 598 7 761 11 721 4 927 10 558 42 750 23 483 19 402 42 751 4 682 2 898 7 783 19 578 8 769 2 1025 42 752 4 683 2 900 4 903 11 734 11 688 10 572 42 753 4 690 7 621 13 636 7 853 10 720 1 1208 42 754 1 1239 19 547 22 373 42 755 5 637 6 668 6 819 16 637 7 811 2 1049 41 756 2 786 1 958 13 619 13 680 7 783 5 749 41 757 4 656 2 864 3 932 13 681 14 616 5 757 41 758 4 664 4 740 11 666 7 843 8 765 7 674 41 759 2 811 5 692 7 774 14 669 10 710 3 911 41 760 3 752 9 538 7 778 10 767 12 667 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 110
PAGE 117
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME LOUISIANA COLLEGE NAZARETH C ROCHTR/NY FLORIDA INTERNAT'L U ST XAVIER COLLEGE/IL GEORGIA COLLEGE TAMPA, UNIV OF/FL OKLAHOMA PANHND STU HOWARD PAYNE UNIV ST JOSEPHS COLL/NY NOTRE DAME COLL/OH FRANKLIN C INDIANA NORTHEASTERN ILL U GRACELAND COLL/IA STERLING COLLEGE/KS HOOD COLLEGE/MD WINTHROP COLLEGE/SC ARKANSAS, U-PINE BLU INCARNATE WORD C/TX EVERGREEN ST COLL/WA LOMA LINDA UNIV/CA MARYMNT MNH~TN C/NY WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY EASTERN COLLEGE/PA BUJFFTON COLLEGE/OH MILWAUKEE SCH ENGR DUBUQUE, UNIV OF/IA WEST VA INST OF TECH WEST VIRGINIA ST C VALDOSTA STATE C/GA AIABAMA AG&MECH U SAN DIEGO,UNIV OF/CA MARYWOOD COLLEGE/PA STEUBENVILLE,U OF/OH CHADRON ST COLL/NE DANA COLLEGE/NE PRESBYTERIAN COLL/SC OGLETHORPE UNIV/GA SOUTHERN COL/TN MONT C MINRL SC&TECH BOISE STATE UNIV/ID TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 41 761 5 626 10 515 12 653 6 894 5 903 3 928 40 762 1 861 7 594 10 679 13 678 6 816 3 870 40 763 11 686 29 311 39 764 2 794 5 683 7 763 15 646 8 762 2 963 39 765 5 623 6 653 2 1022 3 1038 10 714 13 508 39 766 3 753 8 575 8 741 6 890 7 798 7 684 39 767 4 688 13 454 9 721 9 800 4 956 39 768 4 689 1 1029 17 555 4 995 5 906 8 651 38 769 4 644 4 713 9 698 5 907 10 699 6 702 38 770 2 790 5 680 5 832 17 601 7 785 2 956 38 771 6 562 3 789 8 729 10 754 6 825 5 752 38 772 1 976 2 991 3 1018 16 577 16 439 38 773 2 873 4 879 5 920 17 563 10 561 38 774 6 573 8 569 9 711 10 761 4 944 1 1152 38 775 2 807 1 996 8 735 10 762 9 739 8 638 38 776 3 751 4 750 10 691 8 822 12 666 1 1177 38 777 5 625 5 702 9 720 16 632 3 1028 38 778 2 835 4 761 7 786 11 737 9 747 5 788 38 779 7 808 31 297 38 780 4 697 2 910 8 752 5 950 8 778 11 553 37 781 5 673 6 793 11 713 12 657 3 869 37 782 2 782 8 551 16 558 8 806 2 1060 1 1081 37 783 2 854 8 727 11 717 8 756 8 623 37 784 4 651 6 632 10 683 6 868 5 874 6 707 37 785 7 536 7 602 9 707 12 702 2 1076 37 786 9 477 4 735 13 625 5 919 4 933 2 970 37 787 2 813 2 883 9 714 11 729 9 740 4 833 37 788 5 622 4 743 11 667 9 791 6 848 2 995 37 789 2 821 2 893 4 898 9 794 12 668 8 644 37 790 1 949 3 822 8 744 13 686 8 768 4 845 37 791 2 914 5 859 9 805 15 603 6 736 36 792 2 785 3 783 4 870 10 751 16 576 1 1093 36 793 3 721 3 787 9 704 12 697 7 786 2 958 36 794 4 662 7 604 7 768 7 840 9 737 2 980 36 795 7 540 3 806 9 710 7 842 3 999 7 673 36 796 2 818 4 749 7 777 15 654 7 796 1 1174 36 797 4 673 6 654 11 669 8 824 5 894 2 1011 36 798 4 680 6 658 8 742 8 825 5 899 5 779 36 799 5 632 11 498 8 750 7 855 2 1111 3 934 36 800 4 997 14 626 18 420 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 111
PAGE 118
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME GODDARD COLLEGE/VT OHIO DOMINICAN COLL PARKS,ST LOUIS U/IL ST LOUIS C PHARM/MO TARKIO COLLEGE/MO SWEET BRIAR COLL/VA DAVIS & ELKINS C/WV SPELMAN COLLEGE/GA SOUTHERN ARKANSAS U DILLARD UNIV/IA LA VERNE, UNIV OF/CA SALEM STATE COLL/MA DYOUVILLE COLLEGE/NY MARYGROVE COLLEGE/MI FRIENDS UNIV/KS SHEPHERD COLLEGE/WV SO CAROLINA STATE C FT VALLEY ST COLL/GA OUR I.ADY I.AKE UN/TX MT ST MARYS COLL/CA CATHED C IM CONCP/NY RUSSELL SAGE COLL/NY CULVER-STOCKTON C/MO WEBSTER UNIV/MO NORTHERN ST COLL/SD CONCORDIA TCHRS C/NE WEST GEORGIA COLLEGE PAN AMERICAN UNIV/TX ST MARTINS COLL/WA NORTHROP UNIV/CA STHRN ME U/PORTLAND ATIANTIC UNION C/MA PHIL C TEXTIL&SCI/PA MIDLAND LTHRN C/NE BETHANY COLL/KS TALI.ADEGA COLLEGE/AL DAEMEN COLLEGE/NY GLASSBORO ST COLL/NJ IMMACULATA COLL/PA MT ST JOS ON OHIO, C TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 35 801 2 770 2 837 2 970 10 742 13 627 6 699 35 802 7 532 3 786 4 873 11 720 8 758 2 957 35 803 3 729 8 560 17 548 5 916 2 1071 35 804 6 570 6 640 10 685 9 786 1 1204 3 901 35 805 5 613 2 877 9 709 11 724 2 1083 6 717 35 806 1 926 4 741 6 804 13 685 5 884 6 721 35 807 6 575 9 534 7 773 6 883 5 885 2 994 35 808 2 820 1 1015 8 740 7 848 10 715 7 683 35 809 2 832 7 618 4 905 13 689 7 802 2 1028 35 810 2 833 7 619 8 747 7 851 8 770 3 927 35 811 2 839 2 909 11 675 7 857 7 809 6 735 34 812 1 849 1 927 -1 1052 10 743 12 655 9 579 34 813 4 641 4 711 6 791 11 712 6 814 3 867 34 814 9 475 6 634 6 798 8 811 3 988 2 964 34 815 7 541 8 566 5 846 5 927 5 881 4 824 34 816 2 812 7 609 8 737 9 790 7 794 1 1162 34 817 6 580 5 695 5 848 7 846 7 797 4 839 34 818 4 672 4 751 4 895 7 847 10 713 5 774 34 819 3 764 5 703 6 813 9 801 7 806 4 850 34 820 7 552 8 587 8 753 7 858 4 962 33 821 2 775 11 477 5 821 9 777 5 864 1 1070 33 822 2 779 2 846 6 794 10 746 6 817 7 662 33 823 2 798 5 686 11 662 13 683 1 1200 1 1140 33 824 3 743 6 641 5 842 8 814 9 735 2 975 33 825 3 746 6 644 6 801 10 758 7 790 1 1147 33 826 2 803 4 739 11 664 7 841 6 837 3 904 33 827 2 1026 12 704 13 642 6 724 33 828 1 955 1 1030 7 787 3 1052 14 624 7 690 33 829 4 693 4 762 6 815 10 772 8 776 1 1220 33 830 1 975 10 694 13 691 7 810 2 1043 32 831 1 842 2 967 3 1004 11 673 15 447 32 832 1 845 7 589 6 788 7 831 9 723 2 944 32 833 1 881 4 722 3 928 6 867 10 700 8 624 32 834 2 804 3 807 6 802 9 788 8 764 4 822 32 835 6 572 6 645 7 771 5 926 3 1001 5 766 32 836 8 516 8 578 9 717 3 1044 4 953 31 837 2 851 8 724 9 779 9 727 3 876 31 838 1 871 2 982 6 861 7 782 15 455 31 839 3 717 6 627 7 758 9 780 3 975 3 879 31 840 4 653 3 785 6 797 9 781 6 823 3 884 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 112
PAGE 119
APPENDIX A NUMBER OF BACCALAUREATES WHO EARNED S/E PHDS BY BA INSTITUTION & YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE INSTITUTION NAME ST TERESA, C OF/MN BUENA VISTA COLL/IA VIRGINIA UNION UNIV ALDERSN BROADUS C/W NC, U OF-WILMINGTON ERSKINE COLLEGE/SC TOTAL 1950-54 1955-59 1960-64 1965-69 1970-74 1975-79 N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK N RANK 31 841 2 796 5 685 6 799 11 723 4 932 3 896 31 842 1 912 3 799 7 765 14 665 3 994 3 897 31 843 8 511 4 742 9 713 8 819 2 993 31 844 4 670 3 813 4 891 10 765 7 793 3 909 31 845 6 887 8 766 17 429 31 846 5 694 7 776 9 793 6 851 4 837 SOURCE: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL'S SURVEY OF EARNED DOCTORATES 113
PAGE 120
APPENDIX B B.A. to Ph.D. Productivity Ratios by Baccalaureate Institutions (Adjusted for Institution Size) Note: Baccalaureate institutions with productivity ratios less than 0.1 percent were not reported in Appendix B. 114
PAGE 121
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 32 CAL INST TECHNOLOGY 44.3 29.6 35.2 57.4 60.7 42.6 43.2 207 HARVEY MUDD COLL/CA 30.6 37.0 47.5 26.0 2 MASS INST TECHNOLOGY 21. 3 13.9 15.7 32.3 32.6 19.1 16.8 104 REED COLLEGE/OR 20.7 16.4 16.9 36.4 32.9 14.9 14.4 78 SWARTHMORE COLL/PA 17.1 18.3 14.0 26.2 22.9 15.1 9.5 146 COOPER UNION/NY 13.7 14.5 13.8 37.6 15.5 6.1 8.7 23 CHICAGO, UNIV OF/IL 13.5 20.1 6.6 9.6 21. 5 13.7 13.2 154 RADCLIFFE C/MA 13.4 4.8 4.2 8.9 51 RICE UNIVERSITY/TX 12.0 8.7 6.2 15.5 18.3 16.3 7.1 179 HAVERFORD COLL/PA 11. 7 8.9 10.5 9.5 17.8 12.4 11. 8 453 NEW COLL-SOUTH FLA U 11. 6 5.3 14.2 111 CARLETON COLLEGE/MN 11.0 7.8 5.7 15.4 14.1 10.3 10.1 108 POMONA COLLEGE/CA 10.2 7.4 6.8 14.2 11. 9 11. 5 8.8 159 GRINNELL COLLEGE/IA 9.9 6.8 8.8 8.6 15.3 14.8 6.2 so OBERLIN COLLEGE/OH 9.7 8.7 11.1 10.4 14.3 11. 5 4.2 112 CALIF, U-SAN DIEGO 9.4 14.9 7.5 131 ANTIOCH COLLEGE/OH 9.4 10.3 17.6 10.6 18.9 7.0 3.9 5 CORNELL UNIV/NY 9.3 6.8 6.3 9.8 12.9 7.7 12.7 389 N MEX I MINING&TECH 9.2 3.4 20.0 10.8 17.9 7.9 7.6 28 PRINCETON UNIV/NJ 9.0 6.7 8.6 9.5 14.1 6.4 8.8 140 WESLEYAN UNIV/CT 8.9 11.0 8.9 15.9 8.4 7.9 5.7 WABASH COLLEGE/IN 8.9 13.4 10.2 11. 5 11.8 5.1 4.4 127 AMHERST COLLEGE/MA 8.6 5.3 7.7 10.8 13.9 8.8 5.7 208 EARLHAM COLLEGE/IN 8.5 5.9 4.5 7.7 11. 8 4.0 578 HAMPSHIRE COLL/MA 8.4 8.4 1 CALIF, U-BERKELEY 8.3 8.0 8.5 5.6 3.6 27 RENSSELAER POLY I/NY 8.2 3.7 6.7 12.0 14.9 7.4 8.2 92 POLYTECHNIC UNIV/NY 8.1 3.9 6.2 9.5 17.3 7.9 6.2 212 BRYN MAWR COLL/PA 7.9 13.6 5.4 7.1 9.6 9.2 5.0 89 CALIF,U-RIVERSIDE 7.9 17.6 11. 2 7.5 4.9 56 JOHNS HOPKINS U/MD 7.9 5.3 6.2 10.7 10.8 8.5 6.1 106 BRANDEIS UNIV/MA 7.9 4.1 8.4 11. 2 9.2 6.0 10 HARVARD UNIV/MA 7.5 6.8 2.6 12.8 12.6 8.0 7.3 628 ST JOHNS COLLEGE/MD 7.2 15.6 10.0 6.5 10.6 6.1 1.4 138 FRNKLN&MARSHAL C/PA 7.2 5.7 6.4 11. 2 10.6 6.8 4.3 148 WOOSTER, COLL OF/OH 7.0 6.7 4.1 10.3 10.9 7.5 3.8 202 KALAMAZOO COLLEGE/MI 7.0 5.3 16.7 10.3 5.9 5.0 7.1 24 YALE UNIVERSITY/CT 6.9 6.0 4.3 9.4 8.3 7.7 7.2 49 CARNEGIE-MELLON U/PA 6.8 4.0 3.8 10.0 11. 3 6.9 5.4 158 CALIF,U-SANTA CRUZ 6.7 7.5 6.3 115
PAGE 122
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 144 WILLIAMS COLLEGE/MA 6.5 5.1 5.1 6.7 9.0 7.5 5.5 38 BROWN UNIVERSITY/RI 6.5 3.9 2.8 6.5 8.8 9.8 6.5 43 ROCHESTER,UNIV OF/NY 6.5 5.0 7.2 5.3 9.4 6.2 6.1 782 WEBB I NAVAL ARCH/NY 6.4 5.3 10.0 40.0 293 PHIIA C PHARM&SCI/PA 6.4 4.1 3.4 70.6 11. 6 5.3 1. 9 75 SUNY AT STONY BROOK 6.3 10.7 7.2 5.1 19 STANFORD UNIV/CA 6.3 4.9 3.4 6.8 9.7 6.8 6.3 185 WORCESTER POLY I/MA 6.3 5.2 2.4 6.1 13.1 5.6 4.4 33 CASE WESTRN RSRVE/OH 6.2 3.3 3.0 9.6 12.1 8.5 4.8 205 BOWDOIN COLLEGE/ME 6.2 2.9 6.2 12.1 7.9 7.1 3.4 218 KNOX COLLEGE/IL 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.4 12.1 4.9 2.2 200 STEVENS INST TECH/NJ 5.8 1.0 5.0 6.5 8.3 8.7 6.3 220 DAVIDSON COLLEGE/NC 5.8 2.2 2.9 9.1 8.7 6.4 4.2 8 CALIF,U-LOS ANGELES 5.7 5.6 5.5 4.1 2.9 130 UNION UNIVERSITY/NY 5.7 6.5 4.3 5.1 9.6 4.3 5.0 431 ECKERD COLLEGE/FL 5.7 3.8 6.0 6.6 35 CALIF, U-DAVIS 5.7 11.4 7.1 5.9 3.7 7 CUNY-CITY COLLEGE 5.6 5.7 5.9 8.4 6.8 4.5 1. 9 532 BLACKBURN COLLEGE/IL 5.6 15.8 7.4 12.0 7.2 2.6 2.2 245 LAWRENCE UNIV/WI 5.5 3.9 3.6 5.6 8.5 8.0 2.4 67 DARTMOUTH COLLEGE/NH 5.4 4.6 2.8 9.2 7.2 6.0 3.2 261 BATES COLLEGE/ME 5.4 2.4 6.8 6.4 5.8 5.4 5.4 14 COLUMBIA UNIV/NY 5.4 4.3 3.2 7.6 8.8 6.1 4.0 438 DELAWARE VALLEY C/PA 5.4 2.1 10.7 9.8 3.6 4.7 178 CI.ARK UNIVERSITY/MA 5.3 3.7 4.3 8.5 8.0 5.1 4.0 216 BELOIT COLLEGE/WI 5.3 4.7 4.4 6.0 10.4 4.3 3.1 375 ILL BENEDICTINE COLL 5.3 9.1 10.7 8.8 4.9 3.2 156 OCCIDENTAL COLL/CA 5.2 4.2 3.6 6.1 7.6 6.6 2.8 621 KING COLLEGE/TN 5.2 8.1 4.9 18.2 5.9 2.0 275 JUNIATA COLLEGE/PA 5.2 6.2 3.4 8.9 7.6 3.7 3.7 129 SUNY AT BINGHAMTON 5.2 1.5 11. 9 11. 5 4.5 3.3 164 !AFAYETTE COLLEGE/PA 5.1 5.3 4.0 6.3 7.8 4.0 3.4 95 ILLINOIS INST TECH 5.1 3.1 4.1 7.3 8.4 6.0 3.8 244 MUHLENBERG COLL/PA 5.1 3.9 6.3 4.2 8.5 3.7 4.8 282 WHITMAN COLLEGE/WA 5.0 4.0 1. 9 4.5 12.0 3.5 2.8 150 WELLESLEY COLLEGE/MA 4.9 1.4 3.3 3.6 7.5 6.6 6.7 147 CALIF,U-IRVINE 4.9 6.7 4.2 82 LEHIGH UNIVERSITY/PA 4.8 4.2 4.2 7.3 7.5 3.8 2.8 190 US MILITARY ACADEMY 4.8 4.0 1. 7 .7 271 SUNY ENVR SCI FRSTRY 4.8 3.3 2.1 11. 5 4.2 5.5 4.6 116
PAGE 123
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 310 RHODES COLLEGE/TN 4.7 3.7 5.4 9.7 6.2 4.1 1.5 677 US MERCHANT MAR ACAD 4.7 1. 6 1.0 281 KENYON COLLEGE/OH 4.6 2.2 6.9 6.7 8.8 3.8 2.7 497 BARD COLLEGE/NY 4.6 7.3 10.4 7.0 5.6 2.0 252 HAMILTON COLLEGE/NY 4.6 2.0 4.6 5.6 9.4 7.7 2.6 473 CENTRE COLL KENTUCKY 4.6 2.8 6.2 1.4 6.1 3.9 6.1 57 DUKE UNIVERSITY/NC 4.6 2.2 2.3 3.9 7.1 7.0 4.8 333 LEBANON VALLEY C/PA 4.5 3.8 4.8 2.7 8.5 4.4 3.3 240 COLORADO SCH MINES 4.5 2.6 3.4 7.2 7.0 4.9 2.7 206 HOPE COLLEGE/MI 4.5 7.2 3.1 8.1 7.4 2.0 2.2 280 DREW UNIVERSITY/NJ 4.4 4.0 5.5 3.6 7.2 3.7 3.4 266 BEREA COLLEGE/KY 4.3 4.2 6.7 6.1 6.8 1. 9 8 483 CHARLESTON, C OF/SC 4.3 5.8 9.8 9.1 3.6 2.7 711 PITZER COLLEGE/CA 4.3 5.9 3.1 300 S DAKOTAS MINE&TECH 4.3 4.9 5.5 5.6 5.9 3.3 2.6 191 VASSAR COLLEGE/NY 4.3 3.0 1.8 3.6 3.8 7.1 5.3 21 IOWA STATE UNIV 4.3 5.2 3.9 7.8 7.1 3.0 2.0 204 YESHIVA UNIV/NY 4.2 10.2 5.8 4.7 4.7 2.5 2.0 136 'BUCKNELL UNIV /PA 4.2 1. 9 1.5 3.2 7.7 4.7 5.0 229 MACALESTER COLL/MN 4.2 2.2 2.1 2.2 6.3 7.6 3.7 358 CORNELL COLLEGE/IA 4.2 2.4 4.0 7.7 8.1 2.2 2.1 45 NOTRE DAME, U OF/IN 4.1 2.4 2.4 5.1 6.7 4.5 3.3 195 COLGATE U/NY 4.1 1. 7 3.7 3.6 5.0 6.0 3.9 91 TUFTS UNIVERSITY/MA 4.1 2.2 2.1 4.0 8.9 4.5 3.7 276 DICKINSON COLL/PA 4.1 3.2 1. 9 3.4 7.4 5.7 2.4 18 CUNY-BROOKLYN COLL 4.0 5.5 5.9 4.8 5.3 3.9 1.0 633 NEW SCH SOC RSCH/NY 4.0 4.8 26.3 2.0 3.6 125 WILLIAM & MARY, C/VA 4.0 4.4 1. 9 5.8 3.8 4.2 4.2 227 TRINITY COLLEGE/CT 4.0 2.8 1. 6 4.6 6.8 4.9 3.1 731 DOANE COLLEGE/NE 4.0 11. 7 3.2 6.7 8.8 .9 607 ST THOMAS, U OF/TX 4.0 3.3 4.3 8 444 BELLARMINE COLL/KY 4.0 2.1 3.4 4.4 1. 9 6 WISCONSIN,U-MADISON 4.0 3.8 3.2 5.0 6.0 3.8 2.8 162 DEPAUW UNIVERSITY/IN 4.0 2.9 3.9 5.3 6.3 3.5 1. 7 167 NEW MEXICO STATE U 4.0 3.4 4.2 3.1 6.1 9 4 MICHIGAN, UNIV OF 4.0 3.7 2.9 5.3 5.8 4.0 3.0 803 PARKS,ST LOUIS U/IL 4.0 1.4 265 USAF ACADEMY/CO 4.0 3.5 .1 334 WASH&JEFFERSON C/PA 3.9 3.1 2.0 4.6 6.3 4.5 2.8 224 MIDDLEBURY COLL/VT 3.9 3.1 3.2 5.0 4.8 3.6 3.8 117
PAGE 124
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 225 ALLEGHENY COLLEGE/PA 3.9 3.7 2.9 5.9 4.9 3.2 2.9 118 MANHATTAN COLLEGE/NY 3.9 1.1 3.4 3.3 7.6 5.3 2.5 183 MT HOLYOKE COLL/MA 3.9 2.4 2.3 2.7 5.4 6.1 3.2 287 ST JOHNS UNIV/MN 3.9 6 1. 9 7.8 6.4 5.1 1.5 29 PENNSYLVANIA, U OF 3.8 1. 7 2.7 4.6 6.0 4.7 3.9 113 VANDERBILT UNIV/TN 3.8 1.8 2.3 5.6 6.7 4.9 2.6 238 COLORADO COLLEGE 3.8 1. 7 2.2 2.5 5.2 4.7 4.8 170 ST OLAF COLLEGE/MN 3.8 3.5 3.9 5.4 4.5 3.7 2.3 61 CALIF,U-SANTA BARB 3.8 2.0 6.6 3.0 3.0 199 US NAVAL ACADEMY/MD 3.8 3.2 1. 3 .4 141 EMORY UNIV/GA 3.8 2.8 2.0 4.7 6.4 4.6 2.8 3 ILL, U, URBANA-CHAMP 3.7 3.4 3.5 5.9 7.1 3.3 2.0 192 WHEATON COLLEGE/IL 3.7 2.1 2.6 5.3 5.7 3.5 3.0 71 WASHINGTON UNIV/MO 3.7 3.3 2.3 4.5 3.6 4.9 3.5 15 RUTGERS UNIV/NJ 3.7 5.0 3.3 4.9 5.1 3.9 2.1 345 SPRING HILL COLL/AL 3.7 2.2 2.8 5.4 6.2 2.5 .8 313 MILLSAPS COLLEGE/MS 3.7 1.1 1.4 1.8 10.8 5.3 2.6 13 PURDUE UNIVERSITY/IN 3.7 2.9 4.1 5.1 5.4 3.5 2.3 322 VIRGINIA MIL!" ~y I 3.7 2.3 6.1 3.7 4.2 4.3 1. 7 215 DENISON UNIV/OH 3.6 3.1 2.5 3.7 4.7 3.9 3.1 433 CENTRAL UNIV OF IOWA 3.6 3.5 5.1 2.9 9.9 2.6 2.1 52 CONNECTICUT, UNIV OF 3.6 4.2 3.0 3.3 3.7 2.0 289 FAIRFIELD UNIV/CT 3.6 3.7 1.8 3.9 4.7 3.4 554 HAMPDEN-SYDNEY C/VA 3.6 2.4 4.0 8.7 1.5 4.2 107 NEW MEXICO, UNIV OF 3.6 2.1 3.7 4.4 4.2 1.8 34 UTAH, UNIV OF 3.6 5.0 4.3 5.3 5.3 2.8 1. 3 53 NC STATE U-RALEIGH 3.6 1.4 3.8 6.1 5.6 4.0 1. 6 487 MASS COLL PHARMACY 3.5 3.8 7.7 4.0 5.7 1. 9 369 ROSE-HULMAN TECH/IN 3.5 6.3 4.1 6.6 3.1 3.6 1. 7 259 AUGUSTANA COLL/IL 3.5 3.0 4.7 3.9 6.7 2.2 2.1 376 THOMAS MORE COLL/KY 3.5 1.5 2.3 5.2 6.0 2.8 2.8 466 SARAH I.AWRENCE C/NY 3.5 1. 3 7.3 4.6 1.5 3.4 3.6 177 CATHOLIC U AMER/DC 3.4 3.6 1.1 2.7 5.4 5.0 2.3 193 CALVIN COLLEGE/MI 3.4 4.8 4.4 5.0 3.7 2.1 2.8 799 MONT C MINRL SC&TECH 3.4 3.6 3.3 10.0 3.2 2.0 2.6 31 COLORADO,U-BOULDER 3.4 2.3 3.2 3.9 4.4 1. 6 84 DELAWARE, UNIV OF 3.4 2.7 3.3 4.8 6.5 3.1 2.6 335 ST MARYS COLLEGE/MN 3.4 2.3 1.0 5.8 7.1 2.9 8 48 SONY AT BUFFALO 3.4 2.1 2.6 4.8 4.2 3.3 3.4 228 GETTYSBURG COLL/PA 3.4 1. 7 1. 9 5.1 4.8 3.1 2.9 118
PAGE 125
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 352 ST VINCENT COLL/PA 3.4 3.0 2.7 3.0 7.3 4.8 5 72 GEORGIA INST TECH 3.4 1. 9 3.4 3.9 6.5 2.8 2.7 367 LAKE FOREST COLL/IL 3.3 5 .9 1. 3 7.5 5.4 2.4 37 NORTHWESTERN UNIV/IL 3.3 2.5 1. 9 3.6 4.8 4.1 3.9 257 CANISIUS COLLEGE/NY 3.3 1. 7 4.3 7.8 4.4 3.0 2.0 382 AUSTIN COLLEGE/TX 3.3 1.0 4.8 1.0 6.3 3.8 2.5 196 CLARKSON UNIV/NY 3.2 1.1 4.1 3.9 6.6 2.0 3.2 85 UTAH STATE UNIV 3.2 5.2 3.9 3.4 4.4 1. 8 1.8 508 HASTINGS COLLEGE/NE 3.2 1.4 1.1 6.7 4.6 2.7 3.2 562 WASHINGTON COLL/MD 3.2 1.1 2.4 3.9 5.2 4.0 2.7 101 DREXEL UNIVERSITY/PA 3.2 1. 2 2.4 3.8 5.9 3.3 2.2 439 COE COLLEGE/IA 3.1 5.5 3.5 4.4 4.6 2.9 397 BIRMNGHAM-STHRN C/AL 3.1 3.4 1.5 2.0 6.4 1. 7 3.3 284 ALBION COLLEGE/MI 3.1 1.8 2.9 5.6 3.0 3.5 2.3 87 VIRGINIA, UNIV OF 3.1 2.6 1. 6 5.4 3.5 4.3 2.6 12 PENN STATE UNIV 3.1 3.7 3.3 4.3 5.2 2.3 1. 9 422 ST JOHN FISHER C/NY 3.1 5.8 4.0 4.9 2.8 1. 7 346 LORAS COLLEGE/IA 3.1 1.0 3.5 4.1 4.1 3.9 1.4 41 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 3.1 2.3 3.2 4.9 5.0 3.2 1. 9 292 COLBY COLLEGE/ME 3.1 .4 1.4 4.2 5.8 3.4 3.1 416 RIPON COLLEGE/WI 3.1 4.5 8.2 5.7 3.1 1.6 .6 168 SMITH COLLEGE/MA 3.1 1.5 .6 3.6 5.9 3.0 4.0 580 WESTMONT COLLEGE/CA 3.1 6.9 4.0 6.4 341 HIRAM COLLEGE/OH 3.1 3.1 1.1 2.4 5.4 5.1 .7 17 OHIO STATE UNIV 3.0 2.2 2.1 4.2 4.2 1.2 351 ALBRIGHT COLLEGE/PA 3.0 1.8 1. 7 4.8 4.8 2.4 2.6 436 HENDRIX COLLEGE/AR 3.0 1. 7 1. 3 3.3 6.6 3.5 1. 7 201 OHIO WESLEYAN UNIV 3.0 2.4 2.3 6.0 4.1 2.5 1.6 297 LOYOLA COLLEGE/MD 3.0 6.7 .9 2.7 5.9 2.8 1.0 388 SOUTH, UNIV OF/TN 3.0 4.4 4.2 2.4 6.6 1. 2 262 JOHN CARROLL UNIV/OH 2.9 1. 3 2.6 2.9 5.5 2.2 2.4 42 CUNY-QUEENS COLL 2.9 6.0 4.1 4.3 5.0 2.8 1.1 169 MICHIGAN TECH UNIV 2.9 2.6 2.8 5.9 3.8 2.1 1. 3 83 MIAMI UNIVERSITY/OH 2.9 2.1 2.6 2.6 3.7 1.2 55 COLORADO STATE UNIV 2.9 5.2 4.0 3.8 4.9 2.3 1. 7 330 WILlAMETTE UNIV/OR 2.9 1. 9 3.5 3.6 4.7 1.5 1. 9 39 KANSAS, UNIV OF 2.9 2.9 2.6 4.2 4.2 2.7 1.6 120 TULANE U OF I.A 2.9 1. 7 1.0 4.5 5.4 3.4 2.2 110 GEO WASHINGTON U/DC 2.9 2.7 2.5 5.2 4.1 2.6 1. 2 47 MASS, U OF-AMHERST 2.9 7.6 4.2 3.3 4.4 2.3 1. 7 119
PAGE 126
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCAIAUREATE BA TO PHD OUTPUT RANK INSTITUTION 452 WILLIAM JEWELL C/MO 122 RHODE ISLAND, U OF 132 NEW HAMPSHIRE, U OF 401 ROCIOruRST COLLEGE/MO 273 REDLANDS, U OF/CA 347 GUSTAV ADOLPHUS C/MN 412 MUSKINGUM COLLEGE/OH 354 GOSHEN COLLEGE/IN 385 WESTERN MARYLAND COL 716 FLORIDA INST TECH 286 ST THOMAS, C OF/MN 528 BETHANY COLLEGE/WV 467 IDAHO, COLLEGE OF 331 WASHINGTON&LEE U/VA 590 WHEELING COLLEGE/WV 66 VA POLY INST&STATE U 274 SCRANTON, U OF/PA 22 MISSOURI,U-COLUMBIA 198 HOLY CROSS, C OF/MA 495 MARIST COLLEGE/NY 328 URSINUS COLLEGE/PA 733 TABOR COLLEGE/KS 821 CATHED C IM CONCP/NY 203 WAKE FOREST UNIV/NC 258 XAVIER UNIV/OH 9 TEXAS, U-AUSTIN 20 WASHINGTON, U OF 617 WESTMINSTER COLL/MO 666 ASSUMPTION COLL/MA 116 LOYOLA U CHICAGO/IL 408 MONMOUTH COLLEGE/IL 381 GOUCHER COLLEGE/MD 356 LEWIS & CLARK C/OR 327 LEMOYNE COLLEGE/NY 25 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 76 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY/PA 559 MARYVILLE COLLEGE/TN 661 JAMESTOWN COLLEGE/ND 248 SANTA CLARA UNIV/CA 599 DALI.AS, UNIV OF/TX TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 2.9 1. 6 2.2 7.1 5.9 .9 1.5 2.9 3.2 3.8 4.3 5.2 2.2 1. 7 2.8 3.0 4.2 5.0 5.2 2.5 1.0 2.8 2.0 3.8 5.3 5.4 3.1 .3 2.8 4.7 1. 6 2.9 5.2 2.1 1.2 2.8 1. 6 3.4 2.8 5.0 1. 8 2.7 2.8 .9 2.9 4.3 3.2 3.3 1.5 2.8 1. 3 1. 2 5.2 5.5 1. 9 1. 6 2.8 1.6 3.1 1. 9 4.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 4.1 2.8 2.4 2.4 5.7 4.3 2.8 1.0 2.8 3.5 1.5 4.5 7.3 1.5 .5 2.8 2.0 1. 2 2.6 4.5 1. 6 3.6 2.8 1.2 4.0 3.6 2.9 3.3 2.4 2.7 4.1 4.3 1.6 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.9 3.3 4.5 3.0 1.6 2.7 2.9 2.6 7 5.2 3.9 .9 2.7 1. 9 2.7 3.5 4.5 2.8 1. 7 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.5 5.4 2.5 1. 7 2.7 27.3 9.1 2.0 3.4 .9 2.7 2.1 2.7 4.5 2.5 3.3 2.7 5.4 9.1 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.7 8.9 2.3 2.9 1.6 2.7 1. 2 5 4.3 3.5 4.1 2.5 2.6 1.4 3.8 3.1 4.3 2.6 1.0 2.6 1. 8 2.8 4.3 5.5 2.9 1.3 2.6 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 2.5 1.5 2.6 2.0 7.3 5.9 1.1 2.7 1.4 2.6 4.5 4.3 8.2 1.8 1.4 2.6 1.8 2.2 3.4 4.2 2.9 1.5 2.6 1. 9 1. 8 3.6 4.4 2.6 1.6 2.6 1. 2 8 3.8 1.0 4.6 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.5 2.0 6.5 2.4 l. 2.6 2.5 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.8 2.6 2.4 1. 7 2.7 3.6 3.5 2.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.7 2.9 1.0 2.5 1. 2 3.1 1. 9 4.9 1.5 2.8 2,, 6.5 1. 7 2.2 1. 3 2.6 1.8 2. r.: .9 2.0 4. 3 3.9 2.5 1.8 2.5 2.6 4.1 2.0 2.0 120
PAGE 127
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 221 PROVIDENCE COLL/RI 2.5 2.5 1. 2 3.2 3.8 2.6 1.4 143 IDAHO, UNIV OF 2.5 2.9 3.6 4.0 4.0 8 1. 2 424 NORTH CENTRAL C/IL 2.5 5.1 .8 3.4 4.9 5 .9 58 NEBRASKA, U-LINCOLN 2.5 2.7 2.2 3.7 3.9 2.0 1.4 133 SUNY AT ALBANY 2.5 2.1 1.0 2.2 2.9 2.3 2.9 454 HEIDELBERG COLL/OH 2.5 3.2 2.7 4.3 1.5 2.3 2.2 142 VERMONT, U OF 2.5 3.1 2.1 2.3 3.3 2.6 2.0 465 ST MICHAELS COLL/VT 2.5 1. 8 2.9 1.6 6.8 1. 6 1.1 314 TRINITY UNIV/TX 2.5 1. 7 2.7 2.3 3.8 3.9 1.1 447 HANOVER COLLEGE/IN 2.5 2.1 2.2 1. 3 3.6 4.2 1.1 46 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV 2.5 2.2 3.2 3.6 3.6 2.1 1. 3 11 MINNESOTA,U-MINNEAPL 2.5 2.0 2.8 4.2 3.9 1. 9 1. 7 481 ELMHURST COLLEGE/IL 2.5 8.8 .9 2.5 2.4 2.7 1.2 36 BRIGHAM YOUNG U/UT 2.5 4.2 3.4 4.8 2.7 1.8 1.5 315 MARIETTA COLLEGE/OH 2.4 3.5 1. 3 3.3 3.0 1. 9 1.8 135 MONTANA STATE UNIV 2.4 5.1 3.2 2.7 3.4 1.8 .9 804 ST LOUIS C PHARM/MO 2.4 5.4 4.5 5.5 1.5 588 PACIFIC UNION C/CA 2.4 2.0 1.1 5.7 3.6 7 2.0 44 I.A ST UNIV & A&M C 2.4 2.2 1. 9 3.1 4.5 2.2 1.6 479 ST ANSELM COLL/NH 2.4 4.3 1. 3 3.4 1.8 3.5 7 100 ARKANSAS,U-FAYETTVLE 2.4 2.5 2 .. 0 2.9 3.5 2.0 1. 6 291 ST PETERS COLL/NJ 2.4 3.6 1. 8 4.0 4.1 2.0 1.0 770 NOTRE DAME COLL/OH 2.4 2.0 7.8 2.1 1.1 600 MILLS COLLEGE/CA 2.4 1. 9 .9 2.2 3.7 4.0 1.4 90 CUNY-HUNTER COLLEGE 2.4 2.4 1. 9 2.2 3.6 3.2 1.1 65 OREGON STATE UNIV 2.4 2.8 3.0 4.1 3.5 1. 7 1.1 30 FLORIDA, UNIV OF 2.4 1. 8 2.3 5.6 4.5 2.0 1.3 563 SOUTHWESTERN U/TX 2.4 3.5 1. 9 2.9 1.5 3.2 319 HOBART&WM SMITH C/NY 2.4 1. 3 2.4 4.3 1.3 2.0 68 KANSAS STATE UNIV 2.4 2.5 3.4 3.3 3.5 2.3 1.0 79 WASHINGTON STATE U 2.4 2.9 2.5 4.6 4.0 1. 7 1.0 516 RANDOLPH-MACON C/VA 2.4 1.0 2.5 1.1 5.4 3.0 1.4 469 CLRMONT MCKENNA C/CA 2.4 3.4 1. 3 2.7 4.1 2.2 211 VALPARAISO UNIV/IN 2.3 1.5 1. 7 4.0 3.7 1. 7 1.5 283 WITTENBERG UNIV/OH 2.3 .9 2.8 3.0 2.3 2.7 2.4 549 BETHEL COLL/KS 2.3 1.1 1. 3 3.4 3.7 4.2 253 ST IAWRENCE UNIV/NY 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.1 4.2 1. 7 308 FURMAN UNIV/SC 2.3 1. 3 1.1 1. 9 4.8 2.4 2.3 115 OHIO UNIVERSITY 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.3 7 54 PITTSBURGH, UNIV OF 2.3 1. 8 1. 7 2.8 6.0 2.8 1. 2 121
PAGE 128
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCAIAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 349 WILKES COLLEGE/PA 2.3 3.5 2.8 6 2.6 1. 8 2.7 59 NC, U OF-CHAPEL HILL 2.3 2.3 1.1 3.0 3.8 2.3 1. 7 520 PHILLIPS UNIV/OK 2.3 3.0 6 4.3 3.2 1. 7 1.5 478 WOFFORD COLLEGE/SC 2.3 2.5 1. 6 2.6 3.1 3.4 .8 394 NEBRASKA WESLEYAN U 2.3 2.5 1.8 1. 3 2.6 3.2 1. 9 63 OKIAHOMA, U OF 2.3 1. 9 2.4 4.3 3.0 2.0 1. 2 434 MOREHOUSE COLL/GA 2.2 1.5 4.7 1. 9 5.7 1. 2 .9 62 IOWA, UNIVERSITY OF 2.2 2.9 1. 6 3.1 3.1 1.8 1.5 338 LUTHER COLLEGE/IA 2.2 2.4 9 2.6 4.3 1.4 2.0 486 ALASKA, UNIV OF 2.2 2.9 10.3 4.4 2.6 2.0 1.1 121 ST LOUIS UNIV/MO 2.2 2.0 1.0 3.9 3.0 2.6 1. 3 384 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2.2 1. 3 2.7 2.2 4.0 70 ARIZONA, UNIV OF 2.2 2.8 2.3 3.4 2.4 1. 9 1.6 217 ST. JOSEPHS UNIV/PA 2.2 1.1 3.9 2.2 4.2 1.8 1. 6 295 CONCORDIA-MORHEAD/MN 2.2 2.1 2.6 4.3 2.6 1.5 1.0 488 HOUGHTON COLL/NY 2.2 3.7 3.1 2.8 3.0 .4 1. 8 725 WELLS COLLEGE/NY 2.2 1. 7 1.0 6.3 .9 145 CLEMSON UNIV/SC 2.2 1.4 1. 9 2.7 5.7 1. 7 1. 3 16 MICHIGAN STATE UNIV 2.2 2.4 1.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 1.5 543 ROANOKE COLLEGE/VA 2.2 1.4 2.0 4.3 1. 9 2.2 450 ALMA COLLEGE/MI 2.2 .9 3.8 1.8 4.9 1. 7 1.1 533 ST NORBERT COLL/WI 2.2 2.1 1.5 4.0 4.9 1.4 .4 357 HAMLINE UNIV/MN 2.1 1.4 5 3.9 4.9 2.4 1.0 94 FORDHAM UNIV/NY 2.1 1.5 1.8 1. 9 3.8 3.5 1.1 613 CARROLL COLLEGE/MT 2.1 4.8 2.4 2.7 3.3 1. 7 .6 102 BOSTON COLLEGE/MA 2.1 1.6 1.2 2.6 3.1 2.9 1. 3 306 GONZAGA UNIV/WA 2.1 1. 9 3.7 3.1 2.2 9 311 LOYOIA MARYMONT U/CA 2.1 .6 1.4 3.9 5.1 2.2 1.2 783 EASTERN COLLEGE/PA 2.1 4.2 1. 9 3.4 .9 1.8 523 LINFIELD COLLEGE/OR 2.1 4.1 2.9 1.5 4.4 1.0 .8 624 CHATHAM COLLEGE/PA 2.1 1. 3 1. 3 4.0 1. 7 4.6 187 MONTANA, UNIV OF 2.1 2.3 1. 3 3.3 4.0 2.1 7 569 BRIDGEWATER COLL/VA 2.1 1.0 4.3 4.4 3.2 1. 7 5 576 CENTRAL METH COLL/MO 2.1 1.4 2.4 5.7 2.2 1.6 526 MACMURRAY COLLEGE/IL 2.1 8 4.5 4.7 6 489 THIEL COLLEGE/PA 2.1 1.0 3.5 2.0 1.8 2.9 73 CINCINNATI, U OF/OH 2.1 1.6 2.5 3.1 3.8 1.8 1. 3 234 HUMBOLDT STATE U/CA 2.1 .9 1.5 2.7 3.1 2.7 1.4 589 MT ST MARYS COLL/MD 2.1 2.3 1.1 3.9 2.0 3.9 374 BALDWIN-WALLACE C/OH 2.1 2.2 1.1 2.5 3.3 2.6 1.1 122
PAGE 129
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 502 ST MARYS COLL CALIF 2.1 1.4 1. 6 2.7 3.0 3.5 .5 658 LINCOLN UNIV/PA 2.1 4.5 1.8 1.2 2.0 1. 9 175 NORTH DAKOTA ST UNIV 2.1 2.0 3.3 3.2 3.2 1. 7 9 197 SOUTH DAKOTA STATE U 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.5 4.6 8 1. 3 152 WYOMING, UNIV OF 2.1 3.1 1.8 3.2 3.6 1. 3 1.1 235 ALFRED UNIVERSITY/NY 2.1 6.5 2.3 7.4 8.5 3.3 5 738 US COAST GUARD ACAD 2.1 3.2 7 157 DAYTON, U OF/OH 2.0 1.5 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.0 7 534 FISK UNIVERSITY/TN 2.0 1.1 2.9 1. 7 2.0 1.8 2.6 595 POINT LOMA NAZA C/CA 2.0 1.8 4.8 .7 1.4 2.3 1. 3 390 MANCHESTER COLL/IN 2.0 2.7 2.1 2.2 2.5 1.0 1. 7 471 HARTWICK COLLEGE/NY 2.0 3.0 3.9 3.3 1. 9 1.1 1. 6 398 TUSKEGEE .uNIV/AL 2.0 9 6 3.1 3.7 2.2 1.5 627 SIMPSON COLLEGE/IA 2.0 2.2 1. 2 2.1 5.1 5 1.1 93 WEST VIRGINIA UNIV 2.0 2.1 2.9 4.1 3.4 1.4 8 527 PARK COLLEGE/MO 2.0 8.8 7.4 6.8 6.3 1.0 805 TARKIO COLLEGE/MO 2.0 4.5 2.1 2.1 7 3.5 26 MARYi.AND, UNIV OF 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.6 3.2 1. 9 1. 3 494 AUGSBURG COLLEGE/MN 2.0 1. 3 1.1 3.9 2.7 2.3 7 402 MERRIMACK COLLEGE/MA 2.0 1. 2 4.1 2.1 2.3 1. 7 307 OAKI.AND UNIV/MI 2.0 1. 9 1.0 69 SYRACUSE UNIV/NY 2.0 2.1 1.5 3.2 2.1 2.6 1. 2 155 GEORGETOWN UNIV/DC 2.0 .5 5 3.9 4.3 3.2 1. 3 263 LOWELL, UNIV OF/MA 1. 9 1.0 1. 2 2.6 4.0 3.2 7 513 WALLA WALi.A COLL/WA 1. 9 2.6 6 1. 3 4.3 1. 9 1.0 625 ROCKFORD COLLEGE/IL 1. 9 6.2 4.7 1. 3 .6 114 MISSISSIPPI STATE U 1. 9 1. 9 2.2 2.4 3.3 1. 6 1. 2 320 WISCONSIN,U-RIVR FLS 1. 9 2.3 2.7 3.6 2.0 1. 6 1.1 267 NEW JERSEY INST TECH 1. 9 3.0 1. 2 3.0 3.8 1. 3 .1 126 MAINE, U-ORONO 1. 9 2.1 2.6 1.5 3.0 1.0 1. 9 685 N PARK C&THEOL S/IL 1. 9 4.5 3.6 1. 3 425 CARROLL COLLEGE/WI 1. 9 1.1 1. 8 1. 9 2.6 2.5 1.5 123 MARQUETTE UNIV/WI 1. 9 .7 1. 3 2.4 3.3 2.5 1.1 366 KINGS COLLEGE/PA 1.8 3.0 4.3 1.8 2.6 1. 2 .9 683 WILSON COLLEGE/PA 1.8 2.1 1.8 1. 9 3.5 1. 3 269 SAN FRANCSCO,U OF/CA 1.8 .4 7 2.4 1.8 3.9 7 60 WAYNE STATE UNIV/MI 1.8 1.5 2.0 3.0 3.7 1.0 .8 490 HARDING UNIVERSTY/AR 1.8 1.8 2.0 5.7 2.2 1. 3 7 581 WHEATON COLLEGE/MA 1. 8 1. 2 1.0 .7 1. 7 2.1 2.7 729 ALBERTUS MAGNUS C/CT 1. 8 4.0 1. 7 1. 3 1.4 2.3 123
PAGE 130
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 693 TOUGALOO COLLEGE/MS 1.8 2.4 5.9 1. 6 3.1 1.4 629 MCMURRAY COLLEGE/TX 1.8 1.1 2.3 4.8 .8 1.1 568 MARYLAND,U-BALT CNTY 1.8 2.9 1.4 593 ESTRN NAZARENE C/MA 1.8 1.4 1. 3 2.9 2.7 1. 3 491 ANDREWS UNIV/MI 1. 8 2.6 2.4 2.9 2.5 1. 6 .4 475 WEST VA WESLEYAN C 1. 8 2.3 1. 9 5.8 2.1 .8 3 88 TEXAS TECH UNIV 1. 8 1. 8 1. 7 3.3 3.3 1.6 .8 182 WISCONSIN,U-MILWAUKE 1.8 3 3.8 1. 9 1. 3 105 OREGON, UNIV OF 1.8 1.0 1. 9 3.3 2.8 1.8 1.0 153 VILLANOVA UNIV/PA 1.8 1. 9 .6 2.2 2.1 2.4 1.6 552 TRINITY COLLEGE/DC 1. 8 .9 1.0 1.1 4.9 1.4 277 RICHMOND, U OF/VA 1.8 1. 3 1. 9 2.9 2.8 .9 1.2 98 KENTUCKY, UNIV OF 1.8 1. 8 2.9 2.7 2.9 1. 2 1.1 769 ST JOSEPHS COLL/NY 1.8 1. 2 1.4 1.1 1.8 3.7 7 714 MCPHERSON COLLEGE/KS 1.8 5.0 1.4 2.6 1. 7 1. 3 829 ST MARTINS COLL/WA 1.8 5.8 3.2 3.6 1. 9 .4 736 UNION COLLEGE/NE 1. 7 2.8 2.5 2.8 1. 3 507 ILLINOIS WESLEYAN U 1. 7 1. 6 .8 1.6 .8 3.2 1. 3 626 BETHEL COLLEGE/MN 1. 7 2.5 2.5 1. 7 1. 9 647 BERRY COLLEGE/GA 1. 7 3.5 3.0 3.4 3.0 3 5 844 ALDERSN BROADUS C/W 1. 7 2.3 3.9 2.0 9 171 HOFSTRA UNIV/NY 1. 7 2.1 1.1 2.3 2.2 1. 3 1. 6 160 CAL STU, FRESNO 1. 7 1. 6 1.5 1. 7 2.1 .6 316 CREIGHTON UNIV/NE 1. 7 .8 1.5 4.0 2.8 1. 7 8 606 AQUINAS COLLEGE/MI 1. 7 1. 8 3.0 3.2 3.2 .4 1.0 779 EVERGREEN ST COLL/WA 1. 7 1. 7 715 PFEIFFER COLLEGE/NC 1. 7 1.6 2.5 2.0 9 756 ROSEMONT COLLEGE/PA 1. 7 1.5 3.7 2.4 1.5 7 378 PACIFIC LTHRN U/WA 1. 7 1. 3 1.6 1.8 3.0 1.6 1. 2 236 BRADLEY UNIV/IL 1. 7 1.0 3.1 1. 7 2.2 1. 9 9 232 IA SALLE UNIV/PA 1. 7 5 1.8 1.2 3.9 1.0 1. 3 194 HOWARD UNIVERSITY/DC 1. 7 1. 2 .4 1. 7 3.7 2.0 1. 3 380 ST BONAVENTURE U/NY 1. 7 1. 3 1.8 3.8 2.3 1.4 9 459 WESTMINSTER COLL/PA 1. 7 .9 7 1.8 1. 9 2.4 1. 9 427 GANNON UNIV/PA 1. 7 1.5 2.0 3.1 3.5 .9 7 413 SIENA COLLEGE/NY 1. 7 7 1. 7 1. 7 4.1 .9 1. 6 675 BENNINGTON COLL/VT 1.6 1. 9 2.5 1.4 2.8 539 OKLAHOMA BAPT UNIV 1. 6 1.1 1.1 2.6 2.8 2.1 7 77 GEORGIA, UNIV OF 1. 6 1. 6 1.0 2.2 2.7 1.1 1.4 81 FLORIDA STATE UNIV 1. 6 1.1 1.1 1. 9 2.9 1.4 1.1 124
PAGE 131
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 773 GRACELAND COLL/IA 1. 6 3.1 1. 2 740 CONCORDIA THEO SM/IN 1. 6 3.4 1.6 1.1 6 109 MIAMI, UNIV OF/FL 1. 6 1.2 1. 7 1. 8 2.6 1.4 1.4 505 ROLLINS COLLEGE/FL 1. 6 3.9 2.1 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.0 597 AGNES SCOTT COLL/GA 1. 6 1.0 2.2 3.3 1. 3 1.4 8 343 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY/LA 1. 6 8 1.5 3.5 3.7 1.0 .8 40 INDIANA U BLOOMNGTON 1.6 1.4 1.1 2.1 3.0 1.6 1.1 278 TULSA, UNIV OF/OK 1. 6 1.6 2.9 1. 3 1.6 1.6 1.1 560 WHITWORTH COLL/WA 1. 6 1.8 3.0 1.5 .8 1.2 1.8 696 GREENVILLE COLL/IL 1. 6 2.6 2.8 3.9 6 619 TEXAS LUTHERAN COLL 1. 6 6.5 .9 1. 9 1. 6 166 BAYLOR UNIV/TX 1. 6 1.1 .8 2.4 2.6 1.5 1. 3 415 GROVE CITY COLL/PA 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 2.7 7 1. 6 699 TRANSYLVANIA U/KY 1. 6 1.3 1.4 2.3 2.5 1. 3 1. 2 80 SAN DIEGO STATE U/CA 1. 6 2.9 1.5 2.7 3.5 1. 3 7 522 DRURY COLLEGE/MO 1. 6 2.2 1. 6 .5 1.6 2.5 1. 2 405 WAGNER COLLEGE/NY 1. 6 3.6 .9 3.0 2.1 .5 .4 151 STHRN METHODIST U/TX 1.6 1.2 1.5 3.0 2.3 1.2 1.4 237 ROOSEVELT UNIV/IL 1.6 2.6 1. 6 2.1 2.1 1.1 .1 176 DETROIT, U OF/MI 1.6 6 .7 2.1 3.6 1.2 1.5 368 ST MARYS UNIV/TX 1.6 1.4 3.1 1. 6 3.6 5 .4 671 ST. EDWARD'S U/TX 1.6 1. 9 4.0 5.3 1.1 181 BOWLING GREENS U/OH 1. 6 7 1.1 1. 3 2.1 9 64 TENN, U-KNOXVILLE 1.6 1. 9 1. 6 3.2 3.0 1.1 .8 577 US INTERNATL U/CA 1. 6 1.1 2.9 2.0 .9 409 SE MASS U-N DARTMOTH 1.6 4.4 1. 9 3.8 1.1 1. 2 631 OTTAWA UNIVERSITY/KS 1.6 3.1 3.5 1.6 .8 623 REGIS COLLEGE/CO 1.6 3.4 3.6 3.0 .5 .5 99 SOUTHERN CALIF, U OF 1. 6 1. 2 .9 2.4 2.5 1. 9 1.5 213 NORTH DAKOTA, U OF 1.6 1.1 3.0 2.8 2.8 1.0 .6 407 AUGUSTANA COLL/SD 1. 6 2.2 .9 1.4 2.3 1.4 1.5 419 CAPITAL UNIV/OH 1.5 1.5 .8 2.0 2.7 9 1. 2 518 WARTBURG COLL/IA 1.5 5.3 1.0 2.2 1.8 1.0 7 531 GENEVA COLLEGE/PA 1.5 1. 9 5.2 2.5 3 3 223 AKRON, U OF/OH 1.5 2.4 1. 9 1. 6 1.5 1. 9 1.0 480 SKIDMORE COLLEGE/NY 1.5 1.0 1. 7 1.8 2.8 .9 517 MT UNION COLLEGE/OH 1.5 1.0 3.3 1.8 1.1 1.5 707 WILMINGTON COLL/OH 1.5 1. 7 2.1 1.4 3.7 6 246 MISSOURI,U-KANS CITY 1.5 1.5 .5 2.9 2.1 1.8 1.1 704 SETON HILL COLL/PA 1.5 2.0 1. 2 .9 2.2 1.4 1.4 125
PAGE 132
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1973 % % % % % % 250 DUQUESNE UNIV/PA 1.5 1.5 9 2.4 2.7 1.4 .4 771 FRANKLIN C INDIANA 1.5 2.6 1.1 3.3 1. 6 541 ST JOSEPHS COLL/IN 1.5 3.4 1.3 2.3 1.3 .7 1.3 795 DANA COLLEGE/NE 1.5 4.2 1.4 1.6 3.8 708 ILLINOIS COLLEGE 1.5 1.0 1. 9 2.1 2.2 .7 1. 6 74 BOSTON UNIVERSITY/MA 1.5 .9 1.2 1. 9 2.0 1. 7 1.3 403 SIMMONS COLLEGE/MA 1.5 .7 3.7 1.6 2.7 9 247 NEVADA, UNIV OF 1. 5 3.4 2.5 1.8 1.6 1. 2 1.1 660 PRINCIPIA COLLEGE/IL 1.5 1.4 2.6 2.2 1.5 .6 1.5 723 HUNTINGDON COLL/AL 1.5 2.1 1.8 3.8 .6 485 DAVID LIPSCOMB C/TN 1.5 4.0 2.1 2.9 1. 6 .9 7 391 STETSON UNIV/FL 1.5 .3 9 2.0 3.9 1.1 1. 3 230 ADELPHI UNIV/NY 1.5 2.1 .5 1.5 1.8 1. 7 1. 3 243 LOUISIANA TECH UNIV 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.6 3.3 1.1 7 456 BENEDICTINE COLL/KS 1.5 1.4 .9 1.8 2.0 1.6 9 579 STONEHILL COLLEGE/MA 1.5 2.4 1. 9 1.8 1.4 1.2 721 CHRISTN BROTHRS C/TN 1.5 5.9 1. 3. 2.7 1.4 591 STHRN NAZARENE U/OK 1.5 2.3 1.0 2.4 2.5 1.5 239 TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIV 1.5 1. 2 1.6 2.7 1. 9 .8 1. 2 299 TENNESSEE TECH U 1.5 1. 7 1.1 3.0 2.8 1.1 5 103 AIABAMA, UNIVER OF 1.5 1.1 1.5 2.4 2.3 1.4 1.0 815 FRIENDS UNIV/KS 1.4 2.0 1.4 1. 2 2.3 1.5 7 608 INDIANA INST OF TECH 1.4 .6 .5 2.4 1.1 4.4 124 HOUSTON, U OF/TX 1.4 7 .6 1.5 2.5 2.0 9 339 FORT HAYS STATE U/KS 1.4 3.5 .5 1. 9 2.6 .6 7 758 KANSAS WESLEYAN 1.4 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.0 655 CAL ST U,S BERNRDINO 1.4 1. 6 1.3 96 AUBURN UNIVERSITY/AL 1.4 1.1 1.4 2.4 2.4 .9 1.0 254 LAMAR UNIVERSITY/TX 1.4 1.6 1. 7 3.3 .8 5 119 NORTHEASTERN U/MA 1.4 1. 2 1. 3 1. 9 2.6 1.2 9 210 WICHITA ST UNIV/KS 1.4 1. 7 3.5 1. 9 2.4 .9 6 484 MIDWESTERN STU/TX 1.4 .5 3.5 2.7 3.0 .2 1.0 472 ST FRANCIS COLL/NY 1.4 2.9 2.7 6 2.4 1. 7 698 IOWA WESLEYAN COLL 1.4 1. 6 4.5 1. 9 .4 .6 587 OUACHITA BAPT U/AR 1.4 1. 8 5 3.3 2.0 .6 775 HOOD COLLEGE/MD 1.4 1.4 2.9 2.3 1. 8 536 CENTENARY COLL/I.A 1.4 .9 1. 2 6 2.5 1.0 2.4 722 UNION UNIVERSITY/TN 1.4 2.1 1.0 3.0 1. 9 757 ADRIAN COLLEGE/MI 1.4 4.4 1. 7 1.5 1.4 784 BLUFFTON COLLEGE/OH 1.4 4.3 3.3 3.1 1. 6 7 126
PAGE 133
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCAIAUREATE BA TO PHO OUTPUT RANK INSTITUTION 219 LOUISVILLE, U OF/KY 423 WEBER STATE COLL/UT 823 CULVER-STOCKTON C/MO 742 ST MARYS SEM & U/MD 117 ARIZONA STATE UNIV 640 ESTRN MENNONITE C/VA 510 LYCOMING COLLEGE/PA 530 EMMANUEL COLLEGE/MA 226 AMERICAN UNIV/DC 582 MANHATTANVILLE C/NY 506 ST FRANCIS COLL/PA 498 OTTERBEIN COLLEGE/OH 464 SONOMA STATE UNIV/CA 373 WHITTIER COLLEGE/CA 511 WRIGHT STATE UNIV/OH 231 TOLEDO, UNIV OF/OH 462 EVANSVILLE, U OF/IN 774 STERLING COLLEGE/KS 361 PACIFIC, U OF/CA 643 MT ST VINCENT,COL/NY 426 UPSALA COLLEGE/NJ 634 TAYLOR UNIVERSITY/IN 743 AUGUSTA COLLEGE/GA 649 BA.KER UNIV/KS 359 OLD DOMINION UNIV/VA 500 EASTERN NEY MEXICO U 567 RANDOLPH-MACN YOM/VA 318 IDAHO STATE UNIV 134 HAWAII, UNIV OF 718 FT LEWIS COLLEGE/CO 709 NY NAZARENE COLL/ID 163 LIU-BROOKLYN CMPS/NY 255 DEPAUL UNIVERSITY/IL 188 DENVER, UNIV OF/CO 797 OGLETHORPE UNIV/GA 317 ABILENE CHRIST U/TX 186 SOUTH FLORIDA, U OF 418 CITADEL, THE/SC 174 CAL STU, NORTHRIDGE 605 LEWIS UNIVERSITY/IL TOTAL PROJ)UCTIVITY RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 1.4 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.3 1.5 .9 1.4 3.0 1. 3 .8 1.4 1. 8 3.1 4.9 .4 1.4 .7 8 2.2 1. 2 3.3 1.4 .9 1.8 1.4 2.7 1.4 .7 1.4 1.8 1. 2 2.6 1. 6 1.0 1.4 .9 1. 2 1. 9 2.6 1. 3 6 1.4 .7 1.5 1. 9 2.7 5 1.4 2.9 1.1 1. 3 1.6 1.8 7 1.4 1.1 2.0 1.8 2.1 7 1.4 .6 1.1 .6 2.2 2.3 .3 1.4 2.2 1.8 5 2.9 7 7 1.4 3.3 1.8 1.0 1.4 1. 6 1.5 1. 7 1. 6 1.1 1.0 1.4 8 1.4 .9 1. 3 2.4 3.0 1. 3 .6 1.4 1. 7 1. 6 3.4 1.5 1. 3 .4 1.3 4.0 2.4 1.1 1.5 .8 1. 3 .8 1. 3 ~.o 2.7 1.5 .2 1. 3 .7 7 5 2.4 1.1 2.0 1. 3 7 2.1 7 2.2 1.1 1.5 1. 3 1. 3 3.4 2.0 1. 2 7 1. 3 1.8 .9 1. 3 .8 2.7 2.1 1.1 1. 3 1. 3 2.1 1. 6 7 1. 3 1. 5 6 1. 3 2.5 .2 1.3 2.7 1.6 2.6 1. 3 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.3 .7 3 1. 3 2.5 2.0 1.1 1. 7 1.4 .8 1. 3 3.5 1.6 3 1.3 2.6 1. 2 2.3 1.8 1.3 2.1 2.2 1. 7 1. 9 1.0 8 1. 3 .9 1.1 2.7 1. 9 .9 9 1.3 1.5 1.1 1. 7 2.2 .9 7 1. 3 1.0 1.5 4.0 .9 6 1. 3 2.2 8 1.4 2.2 1.1 6 1. 3 3.3 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.4 2.7 1.4 1. 3 2 1. 3 1. 6 2.2 I. 2 8 1.3 2.7 2.4 2.2 .4 127
PAGE 134
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 344 IONA COLLEGE/NY 1. 3 3 .3 2.2 2.5 1. 3 .9 555 GUILFORD COLL/NC 1. 3 5.1 1. 2 2.4 9 1.1 342 BUTLER UNIV/IN 1. 3 8 7 1.3 2.4 .6 2.3 833 PHIL C TEXTIL&SCI/PA 1. 3 1. 9 1.4 2.4 1. 6 .9 285 WISCONSIN,U-STEVN PT 1. 2 .5 1. 3 1. 7 1.8 9 1. 2 371 SEATTLE UNIV/WA 1. 2 9 .7 1.1 2.3 1.0 .7 455 GMI ENGR&MNGMNT I/MI 1.2 .3 2.2 1.5 1.4 .9 468 SEATTLE PACIFIC U,IWA 1.2 2.3 .5 .8 1. 8 1. 2 .7 312 WISCONSIN,U-E CIAIRE 1.2 .8 1. 7 2.7 1.0 .8 379 BRIDGEPORT, U OF/CT 1. 2 7 1.5 .6 1. 3 1.5 1.2 667 SYRACUSE U-UTICA/NY 1.2 .6 .4 712 GORDON COLLEGE/MA 1. 2 1.1 .9 5.0 .6 596 LYNCHBURG COLLEGE/VA 1.2 7 2.2 2.4 5 1. 3 .8 242 PORTLAND STATE U/OR 1.2 1.6 2.5 1.1 .7 458 NIAGARA UNIV/NY 1.2 8 2.1 3.4 .2 .9 819 OUR I.ADY LAKE UN/TX 1. 2 2.3 2.0 .9 1.4 5 1.1 173 N TEXAS STATE UNIV 1.2 9 2.0 1. 9 1. 7 1.0 .4 86 SOUTHERN ILL UNIV 1.2 1.8 1. 6 2.6 2.1 9 .6 824 WEBSTER UNIV/MO 1.2 .8 1.5 2.1 .4 676 REGIS COLLEGE/MA 1.2 3.7 1.4 1.5 304 SOUTH DAKOTA, U OF 1. 2 1. 9 1. 9 1.4 1. 8 1.1 3 553 MORAVIAN COLLEGE/PA 1.2 6.7 1.0 3.7 6 3 399 ROCHESTER I TECH/NY 1.2 1.0 2.8 1. 9 .4 561 ELIZABETHTOWN C/PA 1. 2 2.2 3.0 7 1. 7 1.1 .6 448 MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE 1.2 2.2 1. 7 2.1 7 5 730 ELMIRA COLLEGE/NY 1.2 1.0 1.4 2.0 .8 746 N MEXICO HIGHLANDS U 1.2 .6 1. 9 2.7 3.4 .9 835 BETHANY COLL/KS 1.2 1. 6 1. 3 1.5 1. 7 .8 564 SPRINGFIELD COLL/MA 1. 2 .6 .6 .8 4.1 .5 .6 172 ST JOHNS U-QUEENS/NY 1. 2 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.4 7 542 MILLIKIN UNIV/IL 1.2 1.5 1. 9 2.6 .7 .9 290 CLEVELAND ST UNIV/OH 1. 2 .7 2.6 4.3 2.2 1.0 8 602 WAYNESBURG COLL/PA 1. 2 1.1 1. 2 1.1 1.0 2.0 272 EASTERN ILL UNIV 1.2 2.7 .8 2.1 2.0 9 .8 499 MERCER UNIVERSITY/GA 1.2 .7 7 1.1 1. 7 2.1 1.1 189 CAL POLS U-SL OBISP 1.1 7 2.2 1.4 1. 9 .8 8 279 CAL ST POLY-POMONA 1.1 2.4 .9 7 584 CARTHAGE COLL/WI 1.1 1. 7 1.1 5 512 TENN, U-CHATTANOOGA 1.1 2.4 2.4 9 2.3 3 .4 635 QUINCY COLLEGE/IL 1.1 1. 6 1. 3 1. 3 1. 9 3 128
PAGE 135
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 832 ATIANTIC UNION C/MA 1.1 2.6 3.0 1.1 1.0 365 PUGET SOUND, U OF /WA 1.1 .8 1. 7 2.4 1.5 .9 8 364 NORTHERN ARIZONA U 1.1 1.1 7 .8 1.6 1.5 .6 249 MEMPHIS STATE U/TN 1.1 8 5 1. 9 1. 7 1.1 .7 470 AMER INTERNATL C/MA 1.1 3 6 3.7 2.5 .6 3 575 ST AMBROSE COLL/IA 1.1 1. 3 1. 7 1. 7 1.5 .4 7 97 SAN JOSE STATE U/CA 1.1 1. 6 1.0 1. 3 1. 7 1.0 .4 678 CHESTNUT HILL C/PA 1.1 .9 .6 1. 2 2.1 1. 2 529 OKLAHOMA CITY UNIV 1.1 5 .8 1.1 1. 8 1. 9 3 302 GEORGIA STATE UNIV 1.1 1.0 2.3 1.4 6 324 PITTSBURG STATE U/KS 1.1 1.1 .2 1.0 2.7 8 3 842 BUENA VISTA COLL/IA 1.1 9 4.0 5 214 FAIRLEIGH DICKN U/NJ 1.1 .9 1.4 1. 9 1.1 .5 670 NORTH GEORGIA COLL 1.1 1.5 .8 2.2 1.6 .4 810 DILIARD UNIV/LA 1.1 8 3.2 2.3 233 SOWESTERN LA, U OF 1.1 9 1.5 1. 7 1. 6 1.1 3 395 CUNY-HRBERT LEHMAN C 1.1 1.3 .8 556 CLARION U OF PA 1.1 1. 3 .9 241 MISSISSIPPI, UNIV OF 1.1 .5 1.0 1.4 2.4 1.1 3 298 WESTERN KENTUCKY U 1.1 6 .3 1. 7 2.3 1.1 .4 288 INDIANA UNIV OF PA 1.1 3 .6 8 1.0 1.0 592 NOWESTERN OKI.A STU 1.0 .8 2.4 .4 2 2.5 161 NORTHERN ILL UNIV 1.0 1. 3 .2 8 2.0 7 9 558 FLORIDA SOUTHERN C 1.0 6 1.8 .5 1.1 1. 7 .8 585 NC CENTRAL UNIV 1.0 1.4 .4 .4 1.5 1.1 .9 149 CAL ST U,LOS ANGELES 1.0 7 .6 6 1.8 1. 3 .5 684 ANDERSON COLLEGE/IN 1.0 .9 1. 2 1. 7 1. 7 .4 260 SETON HALL UNIV/NJ 1.0 1.4 .3 .4 1. 9 1. 2 .6 445 NE LOUISIANA UNIV 1.0 1.6 1. 6 9 .8 268 WESTERN ILLINOIS U 1.0 .4 .7 .6 2.8 1.4 .5 370 FLORIDA ATLANTIC U 1.0 1.0 8 1. 2 184 SOUTH CAROLINA, U OF 1.0 7 .8 1.8 2.5 8 .5 807 DAVIS & ELKINS C/WV 1.0 1.5 1. 3 3.9 1. 6 609 WISCONSIN,U-SUPERIOR 1.0 1.1 2.3 .4 2.4 .6 .3 573 MARY WASHINGTON C/VA 1.0 5 .6 1. 7 1. 3 548 HAMPTON UNIV/VA 1.0 8 1.4 1.0 1.1 2.0 761 LOUISIANA COLLEGE 1.0 2.2 2.7 9 .6 787 WEST VA INST OF TECH 1.0 8 2.6 7 .7 503 OHIO NORTHERN UNIV 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 695 NORWICH UNIV/VT 1.0 7 .8 1.1 2.3 7 129
PAGE 136
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 404 SUNY COLL FREDONIA 1.0 .5 1.6 1.1 1. 2 786 DUBUQUE, UNIV OF/IA 1.0 7 2.6 2.2 .7 7 741 MORNINGSIDE COLL/IA 1.0 1.0 1.8 .6 1.0 3 2.0 463 MORGAN STATE UNIV/MD 1.0 .4 1. 2 1.5 1. 2 1.0 .6 323 MURRAY STATE UNIV/la 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.5 1.1 .2 329 SW MISSOURI ST UNIV 1.0 1. 9 1.1 .6 1. 6 1.0 .6 137 KENT STATE UNIV/OH 1.0 1.6 1.6 1.5 1. 3 8 .6 256 CAL STU, FULLERTON 1.0 1.5 1. 3 7 326 MARSHALL UNIV/WV 1.0 9 1. 9 1. 9 1.8 5 5 754 METROPOLITAN ST C/CO 1.0 2.4 .6 834 MIDI.AND LTHRN C/NE 1.0 9 3.4 1. 3 778 INCARNATE WORD C/TX 1.0 9 1. 6 2.2 9 .6 551 SAMFORD UNIV/AL 1.0 1.3 .8 1.0 1.4 8 .6 645 WIDENER UNIV/PA 1.0 .6 1.2 1.0 2.0 583 SUSQUEHANNA UNIV/PA 1.0 1.2 3.3 .4 1. 7 798 SOUTHERN COL/TN" 1.0 3.1 2.7 2.1 .6 836 TALLADEGA COLLEGE/AL 1.0 1.4 3.6 1.5 296 YOUNGSTOWN STU/OH .9 1.3 .8 2.0 1.1 .4 .6 808 SPELMAN COLLEGE/GA .9 1. 3 1.0 2.1 .4 659 ST MARYS COLLEGE/IN .9 1. 3 .5 .4 2.0 .8 760 CLARK COLLEGE/GA .9 2.2 3.4 2.0 846 ERSKINE COLLEGE/SC .9 3.0 8 .6 1. 2 7 618 ASBURY COLLEGE/la .9 .5 1.8 .5 1.4 1.4 669 NC, U OF-CHARLOTTE 9 2.5 1.5 .6 837 DAEMEN COLLEGE/NY .9 1.0 1.0 'i 1.4 750 WISC, U-GREEN BAY .9 ?.8 .6 451 WISCONSIN,U-L CROSSE 9 1.0 1.1 1.8 5 .8 363 WISCONSIN,U-OSHKOSH .9 3.5 1. 7 1.0 1.1 .8 .5 680 EMORY & HENRY C/VA .9 2.1 .8 2.7 .5 781 MARYMNT MNHTTN C/NY .9 2.1 1.4 .3 604 NEW ROCHELLE, COLL .9 .6 1. 5 3.3 1.0 3 362 MONTCLAIR ST COL~/NJ .9 3 .8 .7 1. 9 5 .8 504 NC AG & TECH STU 9 .6 7 1. 9 1.0 9 .6 638 SOUTHWESTERN COLL/KS .9 1.4 2.0 8 1. 2 521 PR, U-MAYAGUEZ 9 1.8 .4 383 TEXAS A&I UNIVERSITY .9 1. 6 1. 2 1. 7 1.1 5 5 791 SAN DIEGO,UNIV OF/CA 9 .7 .5 1.8 5 652 soura AIABAMA, u 9 1. 3 5 535 HARTFORD, UNIV OF/CT .9 1.0 1. 2 7 1. 2 620 SOUTHERN COLO, UNIV 9 1.5 1.0 .6 130
PAGE 137
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 387 MASS, U-BOSTON .9 1. 3 1.5 264 WESTERN WASHINGTON U 9 8 6 .5 2.0 7 .6 501 PORTLAND, UNIV OF/OR 9 .8 1.0 2.3 .6 9 612 DELTA STATE UNIV/MS 9 1.4 1.4 1.2 .4 544 CENTRAL ARKANSAS, U .9 .8 1.1 .9 1.4 .9 8 710 CAL ST UNIV-CARSON .9 2.1 5 1.39 SAN FRANCISC STU/CA 9 .3 5 1.1 1. 7 .9 .4 209 CAL STU, SACRAMENTO 9 .4 9 1.0 1.5 1. 2 5 128 CAL ST U, LONG BEACH .9 1. 2 1. 7 .9 5 372 CAL ST U, HAYWARD 9 1.1 1. 3 5 353 SOUTHEASTERN LAU .9 .4 1. 7 2.0 2.0 .6 .1 437 NORWESTRN ST UNIV IA 9 8 1.4 .6 1. 3 .6 8 570 MCNEESE STATE U/LA .9 2.1 1.5 .3 1.4 3 748 INDIANA CENTRAL UNIV 8 1.5 2.5 .. 7 .5 .9 802 OHIO DOMINICAN COLL .8 2.7 1.5 1.2 .6 514 CARSON-NEWMAN C/TN .8 9 1.2 1. 3 3 8 524 EDINBORO U OF PENN 8 7 1. 9 1.4 1.1 .6 7 270 CAL STU, CHICO .8 1.1 2.5 1.5 1. 7 .3 5 550 AUSTIN PEAY STU/TN 8 8 .6 2.4 .6 .2 749 OLIVET NAZARENE C/IL .8 2.2 1.9 .3 1.0 441 NORTHERN MICHIGAN U 8 2.0 1.4 .5 .6 .6 7 165 WESTERN MICHIGAN U .8 8 .6 1.4 1.1 .9 .4 616 MUNDELEIN COLLEGE/IL 8 1.4 1. 9 .8 830 NORTHROP UNIV/CA 8 .2 1. 7 7 1.1 681 ARKANSAS TECH UNIV .8 2.6 1.8 .6 3 443 SONY COLL PLATTSBURG 8 .5 1.0 1.8 .6 703 LOCK HAVEN UNIV/PA .8 1.0 .7 .6 9 393 SE MISSOURI ST UNIV .8 2.2 2.3 .7 7 .5 .4 796 PRESBYTERIAN COLL/SC 8 .9 4.4 .8 336 EAST CAROLINA U/NC 8 7 .4 1.0 2 701 NICHOLLS STATE U/LA .8 1. 3 .6 1.0 7 392 SONY COLL CORTLAND .8 3 .4 1.0 1.1 1.1 845 NC, U OF-WILMINGTON s. .9 .4 1.0 632 WEST LIBERTY ST C/W .8 1. 7 2.6 3.0 3 449 SOUTHERN UNIV/IA 8 .4 3 1.4 .8 2 301 DRAKE UNIV/IA 8 5 1.1 1. 6 .6 1.0 .4 519 CNTRL FLORIDA, U/FL .8 1.0 8 325 NORTHERN IOWA, U OF 8 .9 8 1.1 1.5 .4 6 493 ITHACA COLLEGE/NY 8 .5 .3 1.5 8 706 CATAWBA COLLEGE/NC 8 .8 7 2.0 .4 .4 131
PAGE 138
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 496 PRATT INSTITUTE/NY 8 .9 .4 3.0 1.5 .4 .2 305 EMPORIA ST UNIV/KS .8 1.2 1. 7 .8 1.2 .8 .2 694 ADAMS STATE COLL/CO .8 2.6 1.2 1. 3 5 3 668 HOLLINS COLLEGE/VA .8 1.4 1. 9 .8 420 CENTRAL STATE U/OK .7 .7 1. 2 1.4 8 .2 411 ARKANSAS STATE UNIV .7 1. 2 .6 1.5 .6 .3 664 GEORGETOWN COLL/KY 7 1. 3 .6 .5 5 1.2 294 SOUTHERN MISS, U OF .7 .4 .6 1. 3 1.4 3 .4 737 ARKANSAS,U-MONTICELO 7 2.0 1.5 .4 .4 687 SOUTHESTRN OKIA STU .7 .3 .8 1.1 1.0 1.0 .2 809 SOUTHERN AR.KANSAS U .7 1.0 .8 1.1 .6 .4 396 EAST TENN STATE UNIV .7 .5 1.0 1. 6 8 .5 3 651 JACKSONVILLE UNIV/FL 7 1.9 7 .6 .5 766 TAMPA, UNIV OF/FL .7 9 1. 8 7 .4 .5 476 MILLERSVILLE U OF PA 7 .5 1.1 1.1 .9 .5 793 STEUBENVILLE,U OF/OH .7 3.3 1. 3 5 386 EAST TEXAS STATE U .7 .3 .2 .2 1. 7 .7 .4 653 HARDIN-SIMMONS U/TX .7 .5 2.9 .9 251 ILLINOIS STU-NORMAL .7 .8 .5 .9 1.1 .4 .6 674 VIRGINIA STATE UNIV .7 .3 .8 2.1 .4 .5 .6 764 ST XAVIER COLLEGE/IL 7 1. 7 1. 3 .6 1.1 .6 642 BRIDGEWATER ST C/MA 7 .7 1.0 1.1 1.0 .4 538 SHIPPENSBURG U OF PA .7 1.0 7 .6 .8 446 SUNY COLL GENESEO .7 1.2 .8 .7 .7 822 RUSSELL SAGE COLL/NY .7 2.0 1. 2 .5 .5 400 WISCONSIN,U-PlATTVIL 7 .7 .8 1.5 8 654 STHRN ORE ST COLL 7 .6 .5 1.0 .9 .5 679 CONCORDIA COLLEGE/IL .7 2.1 .4 1. 3 .5 509 WASHBURN U TOPEKA/KS 7 3 1. 2 2.2 .4 .4 180 PUERTO RICO, UNIV OF .7 1.3 .3 .8 .8 .8 .4 690 CHARLESTON, U OF/WV 7 1.5 1.8 .7 5 .2 360 VA COMMONWEALTH UNIV .7 .7 .4 .8 .9 .9 806 SWEET BRIAR COLL/VA .7 3.4 7 1. 3 377 SW TEXAS STATE UNIV .7 .4 .7 1.5 1.4 .9 .2 814 MARYGROVE COLLEGE/MI .7 .5 .7 .6 1.0 .6 1.0 340 SF AUSTIN STU/TX 7 .4 .4 .8 2.0 .4 .5 753 SUL ROSS STATE U/TX 7 .4 1. 9 .4 9 .3 841 ST TERESA, C OF/MN .7 1.1 6 1.1 8 .5 840 MT ST JOS ON OHIO, C .7 7 1.4 .5 1. 3 332 INDIANA STATE UNIV 7 .6 1.1 9 3 132
PAGE 139
APPENDIX B BA TO PHO PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHO TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 432 WEST TEXAS STATE U 7 3 1.1 1.6 1.4 .5 .2 639 COLUMBIA UNION C/MD 7 1.0 1.5 2.2 646 GRAND VALLEY ST C/MI 7 1. 7 2 762 NAZARETH C ROCHTR/NY .7 1.0 1. 2 9 .6 .4 610 GEORGE MASON U/VA 7 9 .6 727 CHAPMAN COLLEGE/CA 7 1.5 2.8 .1 435 EASTERN WASH UNIV/WA 7 7 1.1 2.1 .5 3 537 BLOOMSBURG U OF PA 7 1.1 .5 1.6 1. 2 6 .3 601 PEPPERDINE UNIV/CA .6 7 1.4 .6 5 .4 .4 515 TEXAS WOMANS UNIV .6 .8 1.5 1. 2 5 3 574 KUTZTOWN UNIV/PA .6 2.0 1.0 1.2 .6 .1 460 NC, U OF-GREENSBORO 6 .2 .6 3 1.0 7 5 421 SAM HOUSTON STU/TX .6 .4 .8 1.1 1.0 5 .2 656 SUFFOLK UNIV/MA .6 .6 .6 .5 1.6 .2 .6 442 SOWESTERN OKLA STU .6 1.3 5 .6 6 688 CENTRAL STATE U/OH .6 1.5 .6 1.5 3 2 .3 586 GEORGIA SOUTHERN C .6 5 1. 3 7 .4 .8 839 IMMACULATA COLL/PA .6 2.2 1.5 .3 739 ASHLAND COLLEGE/OH .6 1.6 9 .7 477 APPAIACHIAN STU/NC .6 .7 .2 1.5 .5 .6 789 VALDOSTA STATE C/GA .6 1.4 1.6 .4 .4 641 BOB JONES UNIV/SC .6 .8 1. 2 .6 3 .4 .5 321 NEBRASKA,U-OMAHA .6 .6 7 1.4 7 3 .5 768 HOWARD PAYNE UNIV .6 1. 3 1.2 .6 .4 811 IA VERNE, UNIV OF/CA 6 1.6 .8 1. 3 .4 843 VIRGINIA UNION UNIV .6 .5 1.4 1.4 .4 355 NORTHERN COLORADO,U .6 1. 2 2 1.1 9 .4 .5 767 OKLAHOMA PANHND STU .6 1. 3 1. 9 .9 702 CAL ST U STANISLAUS 6 1.1 .4 785 MILWAUKEE SCH ENGR .6 .8 1.5 4.4 630 MONMOUTH COLLEGE/NJ .6 .9 .6 .4 .7 417 SUNY COLL BROCKPORT .6 .2 .8 .8 719 CUNY-STATEN ISLAND,C 6 1. 7 350 MANKATO STATE U/MN .6 .4 .7 .6 9 .6 3 303 CENTRAL MICHIGAN U .6 7 .2 5 1.4 .4 .4 461 CENTRAL CONN ST UNIV .6 1. 3 .4 1.0 1.5 .4 .2 410 MISSOURI,U-ST LOUIS .6 .8 .5 429 CTRL MISSOURI STU .6 8 .2 1. 2 .2 8 .5 406 SUNY COLL NEW PALTZ 6 .9 .6 .8 348 SUNY COLL OSWEGO .6 .8 .2 .5 .5 1.0 133
PAGE 140
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 525 MOORHEAD STATE U/MN .6 1.0 2.9 .7 1.1 .1 5 726 XAVIER UNIV/IA 6 5 2.8 9 5 428 SUNY COLL ONEONTA 6 .2 .5 1.0 547 KEARNEY ST COLL/NE .5 1. 7 6 .7 .4 3 .4 673 WESTMAR COLLEGE/IA 5 1. 3 1. 6 7 .4 713 MANSFIELD UNIV/PA .5 5 1. 3 1. 7 .2 .1 800 BOISE STATE UNIV/ID 5 .2 7 818 FT VALLEY ST COLL/GA .5 6 1.4 3 662 CONCORD COLLEGE/WV .5 1.1 .7 .4 .9 457 ST. CLOUD STATE U/MN .5 .2 1.0 .5 9 5 3 717 MONTEVALLO, U OF/AL 5 1. 7 1. 3 .3 .2 657 PACE UNIVERSITY/NY .5 .2 .7 .6 .8 7 557 NW MISSOURI STATE U 5 .9 9 1.4 .5 .1 828 PAN AMERICAN UNIV/TX 5 .4 .4 .6 5 672 WINONA STATE UNIV/MN .5 .7 1. 2 .5 3 5 732 WAYNE ST COLL/NE .5 .7 9 1.4 3 5 720 LENOIR-RHYNE COLL/NC 5 5 1.0 .4 9 794 CHADRON ST COLL/NE .5 1.4 1.1 .4 .5 482 WISCONSIN,U-WHITWATR .5 .8 1.0 .6 3 817 SO CAROLINA STATE C .5 .4 .4 6 7 6 492 CENTRAL WASH UNIV .5 .4 1. 2 1.4 .5 .2 792 MARYWOOD COLLEGE/PA 5 .4 3 1. 9 474 WEST CHESTER U OF PA 5 .6 7 .7 9 3 .4 337 EASTERN MICHIGAN U 5 1.1 7 .1 .4 572 SLIPPERY ROCK U/PA 5 .4 9 3 :6 440 EASTERN KENTUCKY U 5 1.2 .4 .4 7 .5 5 566 SUNY COLL POTSDAM 5 .6 .4 .2 1.0 .4 414 MIDDLE TENN STATE U 5 .6 .8 8 .5 3 752 JACKSON STATE U/MS 5 .6 5 .4 7 700 TROY STATE UNIV/AL 5 6 .9 7 735 GEO PEABODY COL/TN .5 9 .8 7 3 820 MT ST MARYS COLL/CA 5 .6 1.0 .6 603 UNIV NORTH ALABAMA .5 7 .9 .8 6 .5 2 309 BALL STATE UNIV/IN 5 7 .6 1.0 9 .4 3 790 ALABAMA AG&MECH U 5 .6 .7 1. 7 .5 689 TRI-STATE UNIV/IN 5 .2 3 .2 .3 9 692 MISS UNIV WOMEN 5 1. 3 .8 594 BEMIDJI STATE U/MN .4 1.4 .3 1.5 2 813 DYOUVILLE COLLEGE/NY .4 1. 7 .6 .6 648 MOREHEAD STATE U/KY .4 7 7 .6 3 134
PAGE 141
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCAI.AUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 744 HENDERSON STU/ARK .4 1.1 .3 .8 546 NE MISSOURI STATE U .4 .3 .4 1.1 .6 .2 2 598 NOEASTERN OKIA STU .4 .3 3 .6 1.1 .1 691 JACKSONVILLE STU/AL .4 .2 .8 .6 .8 .4 .2 665 WESTERN ST COLL COLO .4 .2 1. 7 1.0 .4 614 CUNY-BERNRD BARUCH C .4 3 .1 622 TENNESSEE STATE UNIV .4 .8 .3 .4 .4 .5 .1 777 ARKANSAS, U-PINE BLU .4 .5 .4 .7 7 .2 615 RIDER COLLEGE/NJ .4 .4 .8 .4 776 WINTHROP COLLEGE/SC .4 .7 .8 .5 .5 826 CONCORDIA TCHRS C/NE .4 1.4 'I 3 .2 3 571 TRENTON ST COLL/NJ .4 .7 .5 .5 831 STHRN ME U/PORTLAND .4 .5 7 827 WEST GEORGIA COLLEGE .4 1.0 .6 .1 780 LOMA LINDA UNIV/CA .4 9 .7 .2 .4 430 TOWSON STATE U/MD .4 7 .2 .4 .4 545 CALIF UNIV OF PENN .4 .5 .8 7 .4 .2 682 MARYMOUNT COLLEGE/NY .4 .5 1.2 .4 801 GODDARD COLLEGE/VT .4 4.5 5 751 ALCORN STATE U/MS .4 .6 1.1 .6 650 JAMES MADISON U/VA .4 .9 5 .3 .5 .4 565 SOUTHRN CONN ST UNIV .4 .4 .6 .8 .4 637 E STROUDSBURG U/PA .4 .6 .9 .5 .2 .5 724 TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIV .4 .6 .7 .5 3 .2 3 759 FAIRMONT STATE C/WV .4 7 1. 2 .6 2 788 WEST VIRGINIA ST C .4 .3 .6 .4 .9 745 PRAIRIE VIEW A&M/TX .4 .6 .4 1. 7 5 765 GEORGIA COLLEGE .4 .4 3 1.1 686 EAST CENTRAL UNIV/OK 3 3 .4 .9 .2 697 FERRIS ST COLL/MI 3 .9 .9 1.1 825 NORTHERN ST COLL/SD 3 .9 .4 .6 3 2 772 NORTHEASTERN ILL U 3 3 .5 .4 728 RHODE ISi.AND COLLEGE 3 7 7 5 3 663 WEST FLORIDA, U OF 3 .4 .2 763 FLORIDA INTERNAT'L U 3 3 611 FLORIDA AG & MECH U 3 .3 .5 1.0 636 WSTRN CAROLINA U/NC 3 .6 1. 6 .5 .1 734 ST CATHERINE,C OF/MN 3 6 3 .9 755 I AMER U-SAN GERM/PR 3 .4 644 WM PATERSON C OF NJ 2 7 .2 2 .2 135
PAGE 142
APPENDIX B BA TO PHD PRODUCTIVITY RATIOS BY BA INSTITUTION AND YEAR OF BACCALAUREATE BA TO PHD TOTAL OUTPUT PRODUCTIVITY RANK INSTITUTION RATIO 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 % % % % % % 838 GlASSBORO ST COLL/NJ .2 3 .4 540 SUNY COLL BUFFALO .2 .5 .2 .4 .3 .2 812 SALEM STATE COLL/MA .2 .2 .3 705 FROSTBURG ST COLL/MD .2 1.0 816 SHEPHERD COLLEGE/WV .2 .8 .6 747 KEAN COLL NEW JERSEY .1 .1 2 136
PAGE 143
APPENDIX C States By Region 137
PAGE 144
NEW ENGLAND Maine New Hampshire Vermont Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut MIDDLE ATLANTIC New York New Jersey Pennsylvania EAST NORTH CENTRAL Ohio Indiana Illinois Michigan Wisconsin WEST NORTH CENTRAL Minnesota Iowa Missouri North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas SOUTH ATLANTIC Delaware Maryland District of Columbia Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Georgia Florida Appendix C States by Region 138 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL Kentucky Tennessee Alabama M ississi pp i WEST SOUTH CENTRAL Arkansas Louisiana Oklahoma Texas MOUNTAIN Montana Idaho Wyoming Colorado N~w Mexico Arizona Utah Nevada PACIFIC Washington Oregon California Alaska Hawaii
PAGE 145
APPENDIX D Institutional Categories Derived from the 1976 Carnegie Classification System* Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (rev. ed.). Berkeley: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1976 139
PAGE 146
Appendix D Institutional Categories Derived from the 1976 Carnegie Classification System Research f (Type I): The 50 leading universities in terms of Federal financial support of academic science in at least two of the three academic years 1972-73, 1973-74, and 1974-75, provided they awarded at least 50 Ph.D.s in 1973-74. Other Doctorate-Granting (Type 11): A sum of the Carnegie categories of Research II, Doctorate-Granting I, and Doctorate-Granting II institutions with established doctoral programs that awarded at least 20 Ph.D.s in 1973-74, or 10 or more Ph.D.s in at least three fields. Comprehensive Universities and Colleges (Type III): Institutions that offered a liberal arts program plus at least one other professional or occupational program such as engineering, business administration, and nursing. Many offered master's degrees, but all either lacked or had an extremely limited doctoral program. Former teachers colleges that broadened their curricula in the 1960s are included in this category. Liberal Arts Colleges (Type IV): Predominately bachelor's degree granting institutions with a strong liberal arts tradition. Thus, institutions such as Oberlin College are included even though they have master's degree programs. Specialized Institutions (Type V): Those with primarily focused technical or professional programs in a range of areas such as theology, medicine, engineering, business, art, music, law, and teaching. 140
PAGE 147
APPENDIX E Sampling and Weighting Procedures for the 1985 Survey of Doctorate Recipients Source: Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council, "Methodological Report for the 1985 Survey of Doctorate Recipients," April 1987. 141
PAGE 148
Appendix E Sampling and Weighting Procedures for the 1985 Survey of Doctorate Recipients 1985 SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS The 1985 survey was the seventh in a biennial series begun in 1973. As with its predecessors, its purpose was to collect current information necessary to characterize the supply and utilization of United States doctoral personnel in the sciences, engineering, and the humanities. By 1985, the SDR population had undergone some significant changes. The coverage of foreign-earned doctorates located in the United States, who had not been fully covered to begin with, had dwindled as a result of biennial cohort adjustments applied since the inception of the survey. This group, classified as Segment 3, had not been updated since 1973 -attempts to do so proved costly and inadequate. A similar case could be made for the coverage of the Segment 2 cases (i.e., doctorates in education and the professional fields who work as scientists or engineers). These individuals, who affect only the science and engineering target population were identified primarily through the National Register. Like the foreign-earned doctorates, they suffered less than complete coverage in the original 1973 survey, and that coverage had dwindled since then. While a majority of doctorates in education and professional fields who had earned degrees from U.S. institutions could have been id~ntified through the ORF and a random sample of them could have been surveyed, an extensive address search would have been required for all but the most recent cohort. Moreover, it is likely that many, perhaps even most, of them would not have been employed in a science or engineering field. If not, they would have been excluded from the target population and, the ref ore, surveyed needlessly. Moreover, because the target universe within this segment was (and is) unknown it would have been difficult to determine what sampling rates would have minimized cost, yet provided sufficiently reliable survey estimates. The Target Population The 1985 population was adjusted to the 42-year interval and included science, engineering, and humanities doctorates who graduated between January I, 1942, and June 30, 1984. Graduates from 1940 to 1941 were deleted from the 1983 sampling frame and replaced with the 1983 to 1984 U.S. graduates identified through the ORF (Segment 1 cases). Sources for identifying the pre-1983 graduates, who had been carried in the sample since 1973, were those listed for the 1973 survey. As noted, the target population to which extrapolations are made is the population of science, engineering, and humanities doctorates residing in the United States during the survey year. Because the core of the sample is carried from one survey to the next, individuals in the core who no longer satisfy conditions for the target population must be deleted from the sampling frame and appropriate adjustments applied correspondingly to the original population. Those deleted are doctorates known to be deceased prior to the current survey and those who indicated on the previous survey that they held a doctorate from a. foreign institution and were foreign citizens living outside the United States (the latter group is ref erred to as "inactive").* The number of sample cases that were either inactive or deceased prior to the survey, together with the adjustments made to the sample and the population, is shown on the next page: 142
PAGE 149
Sample Population Original Number 74,757 551,175 Inactives 408 3,391 Presurvey Deceased 2,142 15,727 ACTIVE SURVEY 72,207 532,057 Stratification Criteria and Sampling Rates In 1985, the SOR population was stratified into 1,678 individual cells on the basis of segment, field of degree (field of employment was used when degree field was unavailable), year of degree, gender, minority status, and citizenship.** The number of strata have grown since 1979 (when the number of strata was reduced to 950) because new cohorts are more highly stratified than the older cohorts they replace. Within the individual strata, a variable rate of sampling, ranging from 2 to 100 percent, was applied to ensure adequate representation of small subpopulations while avoiding needless oversampling of large ones. F.stimation Procedure Once all responses had been coded and edited, survey data were weighted to reflect the population values to be estimated. Two weights were applied in the estimation procedure: a sample weight and a response weight. Initially, each member of the original sample was assigned a weight inversely proportionate to the sampling rate applied to the population stratum from which the member was drawn; this is called a sample weight. For example, if a sample member, known to be deceased prior to the survey, was drawn from a population stratum that was sampled at a rate of 20 percent, that member would carry a weight of 1/.20, or a weight of 5. More generally, if .sh was the sampling rate applied to stratum h, the. sample weight for each member of that stratum was equal to 1/sh. To determine the estimated number in the target population for a particular stratum, sample weights were applied to members of the sample who were known, prior to the survey, to be deceased or inactive; the sum of their weighted numbers was then subtracted from the original population number, yielding the number estimated to be in the target population. Similarly, the number in the survey sample was determined by subtracting, from the original sample, the total number of inactives and the number known to be deceased prior to the survey. Response weights were calculated by dividing the number of survey sample cases in a stratum by the number of responses in that stratum (that is, applying the inverse of the response rate) and multiplying the resulting quotient by the stratum's sample weight. Let The numbers of inactives and pre-survey deceased in the population are estimated from the sample. Estimation procedures are discussed in a later section of this appendix. ** More precisely, this number reflects the number of response strata; the formula used for estimating sampling error associated with individual survey results dictates that strata with fewer than two responses be merged with other strata. However, as so few cells are merged, the number reported above is functionally accurate. The overall sampling rate applied in 1985 was 13.8 percent. 143
PAGE 150
wrh = the response weight. If nsh = the number in the survey sample in stratum h, rly.h = the number of responses in stratum h, 1/sh = the sample weight for stratum h, then wrh = nsh 1 0rh sh For example, if a stratum sampled at a rate of 20 percent was represented by 15 respondents from a survey sample of 30, the weight for each of those respondents was computed as follows: wrh = [(30/15)(1/.20) = 10. The target population number for that stratum then was estimated at 150, i.e., the product of the response number, 15, and the response weight, 10. To estimate the number of individuals in the target population possessing a particular characteristic, response weights were summed for all who possessed that characteristic. By definition, those learned through the 1985 survey to be deceased would be excluded from such estimates. Since the weighting procedures described above would not necessarily yield a whole number, an adjustment was made so that only integer weights were used, thereby eliminating the need for rounding of final estimates. This adjustment resulted in. two possible integer weight values for a given stratum. These integer weights were randomly assigned to the relevant observations. To illustrate, let W rh = the response weight for stratum h, let rh = the number _of response in stratum n, and let Nth = the target population number for stratum h, so that Then, let x = a positive integer, where the range within which the weight will fall is provided by X < Wrh < X + 1. Finally, let y = the number of responses receiving a weight of x, and let the remaining portion of responses, formulated as (nrh y), receive a_ weight of x + 1. Then, the integer weights would be assigned as follows: [y(x)] + [(rh -y)(x + 1) = Nth When the response number, the target population number, and the actual response weight are know, one can compute the number of response receiving each of the integer weights. In the previous example, the target population was 150. If instead of 15 responses,. there were 12, the response weight would equal 12.50 In this case, x = 12 and x + 1 = 13. Therefore, [y(12)] + ((12-y)l 3] 150 or y = 6. In this example, six of the responses will receive a weight of 12, while the remaining six will receive a weight of 13. 144
PAGE 151
, ., :~ '' "' !\ BL\'i 1. i-.y .. ... l l !, ?' ..... v ....... ,_ i \ ti "< \ ; .' ', .J r ,~, ..... ,r..J~._ RELIABILITY OF THE SURVEY ESTIMATES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS Because the SOR estimates are based on a sample, they may vary from the values obtained had all units in the target population been surveyed using the same questionnaires and data collection methods. Two types of error are possible when population estimates are derived from measures of a sample: sampling error and nonsampling error. Nonsampling Error Nonsampling error may be introduced during any part of the survey operation. Inability to obtain data on all sample cases is one such type of nonsampling error. Response variability is another and may include variability in interpretation of questionnaire items, or in providing incorrect or incomplete information, whether deliberate or inadvertent. Error may also be introduced in processing responses (as in coding and editing) or in generating the final estimates. Nonsampling error that is randomly introduced will increase the variance in the data, and, hence, be reflected, in part, in the standard error estimates. Error that is biased, or constant in one direction, will contribute to bias in the estimate. This bias, however, is not reflected in the estimates of standard error. Sampling Error Sampling variability is the variation that occurs by chance because a sample, rather than the entire population, is surveyed. The particular sample used to estimate the 1985 U.S. doctoral population of scientists, engineers, and humanists was one of a large number of possible samples that could have been selected using the same sample design and size. Estimates based on each of these samples would have differed from one another. In theory, the deviation of each of the sample estimates from the average of all possible samples would provide the basis for estimating the sampling error associated with a particular estimate derived from an individual sample. However, the sampling error may be estimated by determining the standard error of the survey estimate. "The term standard error is ordinarily used only in ref erring to the standard deviation of all possible ,ample estimates [of some] summary measure estimated from [the] samples." In other words, if all possible samples had been selected from the target population using the given sample design and size and if a particular population estimate had been derived from each of these samples, the standard deviation of the distribution of sample estimates would be the standard error. Although all samples have not been measured, the standard error may be estimated from a single sample. The sample estimate then, together with its estimated standard error, may be used to construct confidence intervals bounds set around the sample estimate in which, with some prescribed probability, the average estimate from all possible samples will lie. M.H. Hansen, W.N. Hurwitz, and W.G. Madow, Sample Survey Methods and Theory, vol. 1, (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1953), p. 115. 145
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF-8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID ETJZILAUO_B6VV86 INGEST_TIME 2017-06-05T16:44:54Z PACKAGE AA00055668_00001
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES
|